Where Do All The Racism/Rape Fables Begin?

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
125,093
60,647
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
Just not believing 'em.

Progressives/Liberals have always been able to make up lies and use their control of the media and the schools to keep them circulating.

But more and more, folks are simply rolling their eyes, and identifying them as self-serving deceptions.




So says Naomi Schaefer Riley....

1. ".... recent revelations that the gang-rape story at UVa was made up, that Lena Dunham wasn’t actually sexually assaulted by a college Republican named Barry (and perhaps not at all), people may start wondering why the young and well-educated are so inclined to lie —

2. ... colleges and the culture at large are pressuring them to do so.




3. If there is an epidemic of rape on campus, why do people need to make up stories to prove it? If there is structural racism everywhere, why keep making up incidents of bigotry?

  • A black student at Sweet Briar College in Virginia this fall put “white” and “colored” signs up on campus to show others, as she explained, “We can never really shake the past.”
  • A University of Chicago student admitted last month to perpetrating a racist attack on his own Facebook page. It turned out to be part of his effort to get the administration to incorporate racial and ethnic studies into the core curriculum.
  •  Oberlin canceled classes last year in the wake of a report of a sinister figure in a KKK robe hanging around the Afrikan Heritage House. It turned out to be someone in a blanket.
....those who follow higher education learn to be skeptical from the start.





4. ....the perpetrators inevitably get their way — even when it’s a hoax, the administration engages in days of handwringing and re-education.

5. [It] isn’t simply how very few real racial incidents occur on college campuses these days, but something bigger:

College students feel pressured to find a cause from very early on in their days on campus, and if they want to lend that cause some legitimacy, they need a story of personal struggle that brought them to it.




6. You can join one of the many feminist groups on campus. But if you want people to take you seriously, you should probably have some kind of discrimination, abuse or even assault in your past.....you need to be traumatized. The personal is political, as they say.

7. But most of the students at Oberlin or UVa or the University of Chicago haven’t really been through a lot — at least in the sense they want to mean it, which is why their “narratives” are so often embellished."
Empty 8216 stories Beyonce and today 8217 s college kids New York Post



So teaching Liberals-in-Training to lie is what college has become.
 
Last edited:
There is an inclination on the Right (I am a card-carrying member of the Great Right-wing Conspiracy) to jump from...(a) this particular allegation is a hoax, to...(b) the whole problem is imaginary.

And whether the discussion is about boorish-to-criminal sexual activity by men on campus or disparate treatment by police of Blacks and "Hispanics," the reality of the problem should not be lost in the weakness of the current news stories.

As one of the slandered students at UVA said yesterday, it's almost irrelevant that her story was made up, the problem is real and should be addressed.

As for why college students might make up or embellish tales of sexual victimization, it is not difficult to understand. The whole, nauseating orientation process at many universities stresses how much the institution "cares" about people who are "different" or dis-abled, or "people of color" or victims of various species. Young women, who are simply teeming with pent-up EMPATHY, want desperately to be relevant - to be part of the discussion, and thus might be tempted to exaggerate any boorish male behavior, or any unpleasant association into a full-fledged case of "stalking" or "sexual assault."

"One in five women attending college will be sexually assaulted..."

Yawn.

Which works to the great disadvantage of any who might have actually been raped.
 
There is an inclination on the Right (I am a card-carrying member of the Great Right-wing Conspiracy) to jump from...(a) this particular allegation is a hoax, to...(b) the whole problem is imaginary.

And whether the discussion is about boorish-to-criminal sexual activity by men on campus or disparate treatment by police of Blacks and "Hispanics," the reality of the problem should not be lost in the weakness of the current news stories.

As one of the slandered students at UVA said yesterday, it's almost irrelevant that her story was made up, the problem is real and should be addressed.

As for why college students might make up or embellish tales of sexual victimization, it is not difficult to understand. The whole, nauseating orientation process at many universities stresses how much the institution "cares" about people who are "different" or dis-abled, or "people of color" or victims of various species. Young women, who are simply teeming with pent-up EMPATHY, want desperately to be relevant - to be part of the discussion, and thus might be tempted to exaggerate any boorish male behavior, or any unpleasant association into a full-fledged case of "stalking" or "sexual assault."

"One in five women attending college will be sexually assaulted..."

Yawn.

Which works to the great disadvantage of any who might have actually been raped.



"As one of the slandered students at UVA said yesterday, it's almost irrelevant that her story was made up, the problem is real and should be addressed."

Nonsense.


"A new report on sexual assault released today by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officially puts to bedthe bogus statistic that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault.In fact, non-students are 25 percent more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students, according to the data. And the real number of assault victims isseveral orders of magnitude lower than one-in-five.


The full study, which was published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a division within DOJ, found that rather than one in five female college students becoming victims of sexual assault, the actual rate is 6.1 per 1,000 students, or 0.61 percent(instead of 1-in-5, the real number is 0.03-in-5). For non-students, the rate of sexual assault is 7.6 per 1,000 people."
New DOJ Data On Sexual Assaults Students Are Less Likely To Be Raped


"...0.61 percent(instead of 1-in-5,..."
 
Conservatives are right; there is no rape or racism in the world. It's just a liberal conspiracy.



You moron....point to anyone...conservative, or moron like you, who has said rape doesn't exist.

The question is why Liberals/Progressives lie about it, by multiplying the actual numbers 40 times.

Not 20-25%....but 0.61%
 
Conservatives are right; there is no rape or racism in the world. It's just a liberal conspiracy.



You moron....point to anyone...conservative, or moron like you, who has said rape doesn't exist.

The question is why Liberals/Progressives lie about it, by multiplying the actual numbers 40 times.

Not 20-25%....but 0.61%

40 x 0 = 0. Which is how much rape and racism there is in the world. I read it on infowars.
 
Conservatives are right; there is no rape or racism in the world. It's just a liberal conspiracy.



You moron....point to anyone...conservative, or moron like you, who has said rape doesn't exist.

The question is why Liberals/Progressives lie about it, by multiplying the actual numbers 40 times.

Not 20-25%....but 0.61%

40 x 0 = 0. Which is how much rape and racism there is in the world. I read it on infowars.


Link, you lying moron.
 
Conservatives are right; there is no rape or racism in the world. It's just a liberal conspiracy.



You moron....point to anyone...conservative, or moron like you, who has said rape doesn't exist.

The question is why Liberals/Progressives lie about it, by multiplying the actual numbers 40 times.

Not 20-25%....but 0.61%

40 x 0 = 0. Which is how much rape and racism there is in the world. I read it on infowars.


Link, you lying moron.

The lying liberal media tore the link down because they want dumb ugly women to rule the world. Those slimy little weasels :mad:
 
Conservatives are right; there is no rape or racism in the world. It's just a liberal conspiracy.



You moron....point to anyone...conservative, or moron like you, who has said rape doesn't exist.

The question is why Liberals/Progressives lie about it, by multiplying the actual numbers 40 times.

Not 20-25%....but 0.61%

40 x 0 = 0. Which is how much rape and racism there is in the world. I read it on infowars.


Link, you lying moron.

The lying liberal media tore the link down because they want dumb ugly women to rule the world. Those slimy little weasels :mad:



I'll accept that feeble attempt at obfuscation as the usual Liberal white flag.

Be gone.
 
Where Do All The Racism/Rape Fables Begin?

Maybe it began right around WWII, with all those silly stories about Japanese soldiers raping thousands of Korean women.
 
8. The use of lies, especially about racism and civil liberties, has been especially successful for the Left.

Let's give credit where credit is due: when the destroyers of civilization found that they couldn't burn down the universities.....they moved into vocations where they could own them!


a. "The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.”
Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.


b. “The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.”
Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51


c. “[The radicals] did not go away or change their minds; the New Left shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.” Ibid p. 53


The Leftists, the Liberal/Progressive Democrats, patiently demolished the wall of Western Civilization....brick by brick.

And, like every other parasitic organism....it doesn't realize that it will die, as well, when the host dies.
 
More lying, lies of Liberals....

9. “In addition to lying in the history books, liberals lied on their personal resumes. Suddenly, every liberal remembered being beaten up by a 300-pound Southern sheriff during the civil rights movement.

Among the ones who have been caught falsely gassing about their civil rights heroism are Bob Beckel, Carl Bernstein and Joseph Ellis. (Some days, it seems as if there are more liberals pretending to have been Freedom Riders than pretending to be Cherokees!)… You will never see anything so brave as a liberal fighting nonexistent enemies.” Liberals Can t Break 200-Year Racism Habit - Ann Coulter - Page full




10. Not only did the media try to advance the calumny, but when it fails, they simply move on.

During the Tea Party protests over ObamaCare, the Democrats marched the very liberal black caucus through the protesters, hoping for the ‘proof’ of racism. When it didn’t happen, they simply made it up: claims of Representative Emmanuel Cleaver allegedly being spat upon, and Representative John Lewis called the n-word fifteen times, not only were never proven….

....but “Andrew Breitbart offered to make a $100,000 donation to the United Negro College Fund for any audio/video footage of the N-word being hurled at Congressman John Lewis or if Lewis could pass a lie-detector test.” Tea Baggers Only Purpose 8230 Racism. MrMilitantNegro

One would suppose that reporters have camera-phones……



What's your fav Liberal lie/fable?
Rapes?
Racism?
Global Warming?
Heterosexual AIDS?
Voter suppression?
Second Hand Smoke?
Religion of Peace?

Don't like any of those? Wait a few minutes....there'll be another one along....
 
Another gem.... heterosexual AIDS doesn't exist :rofl:


I love how stupid you allow yourself to appear.

The Liberals pretended that the fabled epidemic would sweep the nation:

"...Life magazine’s July 1985 cover declared in bold red letters, “Now No One Is Safe from AIDS.”




"In November 1987 [Fumento] published a landmark article, “AIDS: Are Heterosexuals at Risk?” [20] in Commentary that in 1990 became the basis of a controversial book, The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS: How a Tragedy Has Been Distorted by the Media and Partisan Politics[21] He wrote dozens of subsequent pieces on the subject.[22] In Commentary, he challenged the presumption that, as Life magazine’s July 1985 cover declared in bold red letters, “Now No One Is Safe from AIDS.”[23]
Michael Fumento - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


You, OldFool, are truly a great spokesperson for Liberalism!
 
Another gem.... heterosexual AIDS doesn't exist :rofl:


I love how stupid you allow yourself to appear.

The Liberals pretended that the fabled epidemic would sweep the nation:

"...Life magazine’s July 1985 cover declared in bold red letters, “Now No One Is Safe from AIDS.”




"In November 1987 [Fumento] published a landmark article, “AIDS: Are Heterosexuals at Risk?” [20] in Commentary that in 1990 became the basis of a controversial book, The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS: How a Tragedy Has Been Distorted by the Media and Partisan Politics[21] He wrote dozens of subsequent pieces on the subject.[22] In Commentary, he challenged the presumption that, as Life magazine’s July 1985 cover declared in bold red letters, “Now No One Is Safe from AIDS.”[23]
Michael Fumento - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia



You, OldFool, are truly a great spokesperson for Liberalism!

Of course. Because no heterosexual person has ever had AIDS. What kind of crazy world do you live in PC?
 
I'll show you were these myths begin:
head-up-ass.jpg
 
Another gem.... heterosexual AIDS doesn't exist :rofl:


I love how stupid you allow yourself to appear.

The Liberals pretended that the fabled epidemic would sweep the nation:

"...Life magazine’s July 1985 cover declared in bold red letters, “Now No One Is Safe from AIDS.”




"In November 1987 [Fumento] published a landmark article, “AIDS: Are Heterosexuals at Risk?” [20] in Commentary that in 1990 became the basis of a controversial book, The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS: How a Tragedy Has Been Distorted by the Media and Partisan Politics[21] He wrote dozens of subsequent pieces on the subject.[22] In Commentary, he challenged the presumption that, as Life magazine’s July 1985 cover declared in bold red letters, “Now No One Is Safe from AIDS.”[23]
Michael Fumento - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia



You, OldFool, are truly a great spokesperson for Liberalism!

Of course. Because no heterosexual person has ever had AIDS. What kind of crazy world do you live in PC?


But no one ever said that, did they, you liar.
 

Forum List

Back
Top