Where's my Global Warming!

[Old Rocks]

The globe stopped warming 16 years ago.

Global warming is a croc.

Your proof of which is?

 

[Old Rocks]

I'm quite sure the Australians KNOW what's normal in Australia and what is not.

We all have mirrors.

That's good, for an OZie I guess, lol.

Point is Australia affirms a claimed pattern while another set of data suggests the theory invalid. That means the theory has problems at least.

If someone comes up with a theory and three thousand experiments support it, but ten disprove it, guess what Sherlock? The theory is disproven or at the very least any anomalies would show it needs revision.


The Anthropomorphic theory of Global Warming is in need of very heavy revision at a minimum.

And your Phd is in which branch of atmospheric physics?

When you, as a layman, make a statement like that, you had better back it up with a link to a credible source. Otherwise it is regarded as mere flap-yap.

 

[tinydancer]

The globe stopped warming 16 years ago.

Global warming is a croc.

Your proof of which is?

Because your global warming scientists say that it has stalled. Met Office in Britain for example.

Global warming has STALLED since 1998: Met Office admits Earth's temperature is rising slower than first thought

Earlier forecasts predicted a much steeper rise in global temperatures
But latest figures from Met Office show slower rise than previously warned
Figures raise questions about the true danger posed by greenhouse gasses



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ns-showing-planet-NOT-rapidly-heating-up.html

 

[tinydancer]

I'm quite sure the Australians KNOW what's normal in Australia and what is not.

We all have mirrors.

That's good, for an OZie I guess, lol.

Point is Australia affirms a claimed pattern while another set of data suggests the theory invalid. That means the theory has problems at least.

If someone comes up with a theory and three thousand experiments support it, but ten disprove it, guess what Sherlock? The theory is disproven or at the very least any anomalies would show it needs revision.


The Anthropomorphic theory of Global Warming is in need of very heavy revision at a minimum.

And your Phd is in which branch of atmospheric physics?

When you, as a layman, make a statement like that, you had better back it up with a link to a credible source. Otherwise it is regarded as mere flap-yap.

Pray tell how did mankind cause the massive droughts of the past?

The longest droughts of the 20th century, what Californians think of as severe, occurred from 1987 to 1992 and from 1928 to 1934.

Both, Stine said, are minor compared to the ancient droughts of 850 to 1090 and 1140 to 1320.

Oh and in between droughts....

Stine, who has spent decades studying tree stumps in Mono Lake, Tenaya Lake, the Walker River and other parts of the Sierra Nevada, said that the past century has been among the wettest of the last 7,000 years.

Looking back, the long-term record also shows some staggeringly wet periods.

The decades between the two medieval megadroughts, for example, delivered years of above-normal rainfall — the kind that would cause devastating floods today.

Scientists: Past California droughts have lasted 200 years

 

[Abraham3]

Point is Australia affirms a claimed pattern while another set of data suggests the theory invalid. That means the theory has problems at least.

What are you talking about? What pattern? What data? What theory?

If someone comes up with a theory and three thousand experiments support it, but ten disprove it, guess what Sherlock? The theory is disproven or at the very least any anomalies would show it needs revision.

The trouble is that NO experiments have disproven AGW. If three thousand support AGW, however, and ten do not, guess what Sherlock? AGW becomes accepted science.

The Anthropomorphic theory of Global Warming is in need of very heavy revision at a minimum.

You've presented nothing so far that would justify such a revision. None of you have. And it's "anthropogenic", not "anthropomorphic". Completely different meaning.

 

[Jroc]

The Great Lakes are on the cusp of a record for ice cover.

“In the last one to two weeks, we’ve seen rapid accumulations on Lakes Superior, Huron and Michigan,” said Jeff Andresen , an associate professor in Michigan State University’s geography department who also is the state climatologist.
The ice cover on the lakes increased from 79.7% to 88.4% just in the last week, putting the region close to the record of almost 95% set in February 1979, according to data compiled by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory in Ann Arbor.
The extensive ice cover has had some interesting and positive effects, like shut- ting off lake-effect snow, making it sunnier in parts of northern and western Michigan and limiting evaporation, which could help boost lake levels.
And the ice cover, Andre-sen said, could help delay the spring warm-up — good new for farmers as it helps keep certain crops, like fruit trees, dormant longer and less susceptible to freezing early in the growing season.
Andresen said that the winter of 2013-14 also is shaping up to be one of the five coldest in Michigan in recorded history, although it’s still early to say for certain.

Deep freeze pushes Great Lakes ice cover to 88%, close to 1979 record | Detroit Free Press | freep.com

 

[Synthaholic]

The globe stopped warming 16 years ago.

Global warming is a croc.

Enjoying your record heatwave, Aussie?

 

[Synthaholic]

Where's my Global Warming!

You're another moron, like Bill O'Reilly, who thinks the United States is the entire world.

Australia is dealing with the hottest weather on record currantly - 107+ degrees, forcing them to cancel sporting events.

BBC News - Heatwave halts Australian Open tennis matches

Australia's Horrifying Heatwave | TIME.com

Australian heatwaves more frequent, hotter and longer: Climate Council report - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Australian heatwaves getting hotter and longer, says Climate Council | World news | theguardian.com


Why are you so fucking ignorant, anyway? Is it from all the FOXNEWS?

Oh, and btw - a question mark, not an exclamation point, should be at the end of your thread title. But you're ignorant. Whatcha gonna do?

So, tell me Mr. "not ignorant".......what sort of temperature do you expect in a country that is 76% near desert/desert?

Hope you were looking in the mirror when you made that incredibly stupid statement.

Maybe you should read slower, for comprehension: it's the hottest in over 100 years, since they have kept records.

When was the last time they had to cancel the Australian Open, due to heat? Never.

 

[Synthaholic]

Where's my Global Warming!

You're another moron, like Bill O'Reilly, who thinks the United States is the entire world.

Australia is dealing with the hottest weather on record currantly - 107+ degrees, forcing them to cancel sporting events.

BBC News - Heatwave halts Australian Open tennis matches

Australia's Horrifying Heatwave | TIME.com

Australian heatwaves more frequent, hotter and longer: Climate Council report - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Australian heatwaves getting hotter and longer, says Climate Council | World news | theguardian.com


Why are you so fucking ignorant, anyway? Is it from all the FOXNEWS?

Oh, and btw - a question mark, not an exclamation point, should be at the end of your thread title. But you're ignorant. Whatcha gonna do?

A bunch of idiot journalists repeating theories based on bad science does not equate to ignorance on the part of those who reject the bad science.

BTW, eat shit.

Over 95% of the world's climate scientists say there is global warming.

What are you basing this "bad science" on? FOXNEWS nitwits like O'Reilly?

 

[Synthaholic]

The globe stopped warming 16 years ago.

Global warming is a croc.

Your proof of which is?

Because your global warming scientists say that it has stalled. Met Office in Britain for example.

Global warming has STALLED since 1998: Met Office admits Earth's temperature is rising slower than first thought

Earlier forecasts predicted a much steeper rise in global temperatures
But latest figures from Met Office show slower rise than previously warned
Figures raise questions about the true danger posed by greenhouse gasses



Global warming: Met Office releases revised global temperature predictions showing planet is NOT rapidly heating up | Mail Online

Holy shit! From your own link:


However, Dr Richard Allan of the University of Reading said: ‘Global warming is not “at a standstill” but does seem to have slowed down since 2000, in comparison to the rapid warming of the world since the 1970s.

+5


‘In fact, consistent with rising greenhouse gases, heat is continuing to build up beneath the ocean surface.’


He was backed by Bob Ward of the London School of Economics, who said it would be wrong to interpret that warming had stopped.


However, he also condemned the Met Office for releasing data without an explanation of its full meaning.


‘It’s true to say this isn’t the Met Office’s finest hour,’ he said.


‘The sceptics have simply exploited that fact. I think on this particular occasion the Met Office has fallen short of the standards one would expect of them.’

 

[Synthaholic]

The Great Lakes are on the cusp of a record for ice cover.

“In the last one to two weeks, we’ve seen rapid accumulations on Lakes Superior, Huron and Michigan,” said Jeff Andresen , an associate professor in Michigan State University’s geography department who also is the state climatologist.
The ice cover on the lakes increased from 79.7% to 88.4% just in the last week, putting the region close to the record of almost 95% set in February 1979, according to data compiled by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory in Ann Arbor.
The extensive ice cover has had some interesting and positive effects, like shut- ting off lake-effect snow, making it sunnier in parts of northern and western Michigan and limiting evaporation, which could help boost lake levels.
And the ice cover, Andre-sen said, could help delay the spring warm-up — good new for farmers as it helps keep certain crops, like fruit trees, dormant longer and less susceptible to freezing early in the growing season.
Andresen said that the winter of 2013-14 also is shaping up to be one of the five coldest in Michigan in recorded history, although it’s still early to say for certain.

Deep freeze pushes Great Lakes ice cover to 88%, close to 1979 record | Detroit Free Press | freep.com

That's from global warming, dumbass.

 

[Abraham3]

It's cold air that more typically stays above the Arctic Circle. And for it to be over the American midwest means some OTHER mass of air is up north. The temperature anomaly data show precisely that.

 

[Jroc]

The Great Lakes are on the cusp of a record for ice cover.

“In the last one to two weeks, we’ve seen rapid accumulations on Lakes Superior, Huron and Michigan,” said Jeff Andresen , an associate professor in Michigan State University’s geography department who also is the state climatologist.
The ice cover on the lakes increased from 79.7% to 88.4% just in the last week, putting the region close to the record of almost 95% set in February 1979, according to data compiled by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory in Ann Arbor.
The extensive ice cover has had some interesting and positive effects, like shut- ting off lake-effect snow, making it sunnier in parts of northern and western Michigan and limiting evaporation, which could help boost lake levels.
And the ice cover, Andre-sen said, could help delay the spring warm-up — good new for farmers as it helps keep certain crops, like fruit trees, dormant longer and less susceptible to freezing early in the growing season.
Andresen said that the winter of 2013-14 also is shaping up to be one of the five coldest in Michigan in recorded history, although it’s still early to say for certain.

Deep freeze pushes Great Lakes ice cover to 88%, close to 1979 record | Detroit Free Press | freep.com

That's from global warming, dumbass.

...Oh Ok

 

[Jroc]

It's cold air that more typically stays above the Arctic Circle. And for it to be over the American midwest means some OTHER mass of air is up north. The temperature anomaly data show precisely that.

Oh really?...so how were the Great Lakes formed again?....Oh yeah, the climate has changed since then. So is climate change something New?..No it isn't. Can man control the climate? No he can't. Get over yourself, or just admit global warming is a religion, and pray with your proselytizing, bought and paid for, scientists.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The science has been good enough to convince the scientists. What makes you think you know better?

Not ALL scientists, dude.

 

[JimBowie1958]

You're another moron, like Bill O'Reilly, who thinks the United States is the entire world.

Australia is dealing with the hottest weather on record currantly - 107+ degrees, forcing them to cancel sporting events.

BBC News - Heatwave halts Australian Open tennis matches

Australia's Horrifying Heatwave | TIME.com

Australian heatwaves more frequent, hotter and longer: Climate Council report - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Australian heatwaves getting hotter and longer, says Climate Council | World news | theguardian.com


Why are you so fucking ignorant, anyway? Is it from all the FOXNEWS?

Oh, and btw - a question mark, not an exclamation point, should be at the end of your thread title. But you're ignorant. Whatcha gonna do?

A bunch of idiot journalists repeating theories based on bad science does not equate to ignorance on the part of those who reject the bad science.

BTW, eat shit.

Over 95% of the world's climate scientists say there is global warming.

What are you basing this "bad science" on? FOXNEWS nitwits like O'Reilly?

1) Science does not operate on votes, dude, nor consensus. If you understood science you would know that. Copernicus was right even though he went against the scientific consensus of his time.

2) The 'adjustments' to the temperature data are fraudulent. For example the heat island effect is being used to raise temps to urban levels instead of reducing urban temps at invalid sites to rural temps.

Fox News is like all the other networks; 95%a entertainment and 5% substance.

 

[Jroc]

Farmers’ Almanac more accurate than government climate scientists

This exceptionally cold and snowy winter has shown that government climate scientists were dead wrong when it came to predicting just how cold this winter would be, while the 197-year old Farmers’ Almanac predicted this winter would be “bitterly cold”.


CPC grades its prediction accuracy on a Heidke skill score, which ranges from 100 (perfect accuracy) to -50 (no better than playing pin the tail on the donkey while blindfolded).

CPC’s score for October’s weather predictions for November through January was -22 and the September weather prediction for October through December was at -23.

“Not one of our better forecasts,” Mike Halpert, the Climate Prediction Center’s acting director, told Bloomberg Businessweek.

Who could have predicted such a harsh winter? The Farmers Almanac did, according to a CBS News report from August 2013. The nearly 200-year old publication hit newsstands last summer and predicted that “a winter storm will hit the Northeast around the time the Super Bowl is played at MetLife Stadium in the Meadowlands in New Jersey,” and also predicted “a colder-than-normal winter for two-thirds of the country and heavy snowfall in the Midwest, Great Lakes and New England.”

“We’re using a very strong four-letter word to describe this winter, which is C-O-L-D. It’s going to be very cold,” Sandi Duncan, the almanac’s managing editor, told CBS News in August.

The Farmers’ Almanac makes predictions based on planetary positions, sunspots and lunar cycles — a prediction system that has remained largely unchanged since its first publication in 1818. While modern scientists don’t put much stock in the almanac’s way of doing things, the book says it’s accurate about 80 percent of the time.

Report: Farmers? Almanac more accurate than government climate scientists | The Daily Caller

 

[JimBowie1958]

You're another moron, like Bill O'Reilly, who thinks the United States is the entire world.

Australia is dealing with the hottest weather on record currantly - 107+ degrees, forcing them to cancel sporting events.

BBC News - Heatwave halts Australian Open tennis matches

Australia's Horrifying Heatwave | TIME.com

Australian heatwaves more frequent, hotter and longer: Climate Council report - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Australian heatwaves getting hotter and longer, says Climate Council | World news | theguardian.com


Why are you so fucking ignorant, anyway? Is it from all the FOXNEWS?

Oh, and btw - a question mark, not an exclamation point, should be at the end of your thread title. But you're ignorant. Whatcha gonna do?

A bunch of idiot journalists repeating theories based on bad science does not equate to ignorance on the part of those who reject the bad science.

BTW, eat shit.

Over 95% of the world's climate scientists say there is global warming.

What are you basing this "bad science" on? FOXNEWS nitwits like O'Reilly?

Basing it on idiots like you who do not know how science works.

You think it is something they vote on or something, but it isn't.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The globe stopped warming 16 years ago.

Global warming is a croc.

Enjoying your record heatwave, Aussie?

Weather, not climate, lol

 

[JimBowie1958]

You're another moron, like Bill O'Reilly, who thinks the United States is the entire world.

Australia is dealing with the hottest weather on record currantly - 107+ degrees, forcing them to cancel sporting events.

BBC News - Heatwave halts Australian Open tennis matches

Australia's Horrifying Heatwave | TIME.com

Australian heatwaves more frequent, hotter and longer: Climate Council report - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Australian heatwaves getting hotter and longer, says Climate Council | World news | theguardian.com


Why are you so fucking ignorant, anyway? Is it from all the FOXNEWS?

Oh, and btw - a question mark, not an exclamation point, should be at the end of your thread title. But you're ignorant. Whatcha gonna do?

So, tell me Mr. "not ignorant".......what sort of temperature do you expect in a country that is 76% near desert/desert?

Hope you were looking in the mirror when you made that incredibly stupid statement.

Maybe you should read slower, for comprehension: it's the hottest in over 100 years, since they have kept records.

Yeah, cause using 'adjusted' data proves so much, lol.