georgephillip
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #261
What's hypocritical about calling for the removal of all corporate funds from US elections?Oooh, there's that famous leftist homophobia.Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia come to my mind whenever the word "hypocrite" arises.Then the same applies to unions.
So perhaps you need to tell the unions to stop spending their members' dues on Democrat politicians and telling their members how to vote.
Because then, you know, you wouldn't be a flaming hypocrite.
Especially when it's offered by a "proud" conservative.
Are you especially proud of Clarence and Antonin attending fundraisers for the American Spectator? How about the two SCOTUS Justices mapping out strategy and fundraising for Charles and David Koch?
Think any of those lucrative sidelines might have influenced their rejection of Reinquist's and White's "corporations are creatures of law" in favor of the current majority's description of corps as "associations of citizens"?
All power corrupts and its potential for corruption is determined by the amount of dollars it has at its disposal. Since for-profit corporations like those found on Wall Street have infinitely more money than non-profit unions, your view would be less hypocritical if you called for removing all corporate financing from US elections.
Because then, you know, you wouldn't be a flaming faggot for Wall Street.
Corporate Free Speech | Corporate free-speech ruling speaks of shift in Supreme Court - Los Angeles Times
I knew you'd find some sort of justification for your own hypocrisy. But you need to realize "They do it too!" isn't really a rational defense.