Which Side Is Looking Out For You...

[PoliticalChic]

"Your subject topic was how Maher said something"

The subject was, and is, how happy Democrats are with anything that harms, hurts or damages America and Americans.

That's your spin on what a comedian said. Many Democrats disagreed with him.

Many Democrats agree, and Maher speaks for them.

This is the Democrat Party....the enemy of America and Americans.

Sadly this is what has become of the Republican Party. The Banana Republicans prize asset is the ability to generate false claims based on false narratives and have those merit less claims parroted endlessly by the flock.

Let's take a gigantic leap of faith, and try to believe that education, logic, and experience actually have some bearing on your geopolitical outlook....so far not in evidence.
But...being the eternal optimist.....I'll offer you an education.

a. the Democrats favor open borders and illegal immigration....Obama told illegals to go and vote.....is any of this a benefit to Americans?

b. Trump has reduced the burden of regulations....does this benefit Americans?

c. Trump is trying to stymie the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism from getting the nuclear weapons that the Democrats guaranteed them....does this benefit Americans?

d. Tax cuts are part of the Right's agenda.....does this benefit Americans?

e. The Democrats are running on anti-white bias.....does dividing the country based on skin color benefit Americans?



And, of course, Maher is correct...
"Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats"
Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats | RealClearPolitics



I am for benefiting Americans.

It is clear and evident that it is the Right that does so.

Thank you for that excellent example of endlessly parroting to bolster my case against the new Banana Republicans.

Most welcome....and thank you for admitting the truth of my post.

 

[Yarddog]

....or, to put it another way, which side is looking out for its own power and interests above the interests of the American people?


While the right, under this President, has benefited the people in a multitude of ways, the Democrats, the Left, wishes for the collapse of the economy so it will benefit their return to power.

Watch Bill Maher Two Years Ago Say We Want To Crash the Economy
By Mark SimoneMar 15, 2020

Is this all part of a vast left wing conspiracy to crash the economy? Bill Maher said in 2018 that he is "hoping" for the bottom to fall out of the economy and for the country to enter a recession so we can "get rid of Trump." He said one way to do that is a "crashing economy." Maher said he is "sorry" if it hurts people, but rooting for a recession is a prevention measure to losing democracy.

There's only one person looking out for me

 

[BlindBoo]

That's your spin on what a comedian said. Many Democrats disagreed with him.

Many Democrats agree, and Maher speaks for them.

This is the Democrat Party....the enemy of America and Americans.

Sadly this is what has become of the Republican Party. The Banana Republicans prize asset is the ability to generate false claims based on false narratives and have those merit less claims parroted endlessly by the flock.

Let's take a gigantic leap of faith, and try to believe that education, logic, and experience actually have some bearing on your geopolitical outlook....so far not in evidence.
But...being the eternal optimist.....I'll offer you an education.

a. the Democrats favor open borders and illegal immigration....Obama told illegals to go and vote.....is any of this a benefit to Americans?

b. Trump has reduced the burden of regulations....does this benefit Americans?

c. Trump is trying to stymie the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism from getting the nuclear weapons that the Democrats guaranteed them....does this benefit Americans?

d. Tax cuts are part of the Right's agenda.....does this benefit Americans?

e. The Democrats are running on anti-white bias.....does dividing the country based on skin color benefit Americans?



And, of course, Maher is correct...
"Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats"
Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats | RealClearPolitics



I am for benefiting Americans.

It is clear and evident that it is the Right that does so.

Thank you for that excellent example of endlessly parroting to bolster my case against the new Banana Republicans.

Most welcome....and thank you for admitting the truth of my post.

Always happy to expose false claims based on false narratives.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Many Democrats agree, and Maher speaks for them.

This is the Democrat Party....the enemy of America and Americans.

Sadly this is what has become of the Republican Party. The Banana Republicans prize asset is the ability to generate false claims based on false narratives and have those merit less claims parroted endlessly by the flock.

Let's take a gigantic leap of faith, and try to believe that education, logic, and experience actually have some bearing on your geopolitical outlook....so far not in evidence.
But...being the eternal optimist.....I'll offer you an education.

a. the Democrats favor open borders and illegal immigration....Obama told illegals to go and vote.....is any of this a benefit to Americans?

b. Trump has reduced the burden of regulations....does this benefit Americans?

c. Trump is trying to stymie the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism from getting the nuclear weapons that the Democrats guaranteed them....does this benefit Americans?

d. Tax cuts are part of the Right's agenda.....does this benefit Americans?

e. The Democrats are running on anti-white bias.....does dividing the country based on skin color benefit Americans?



And, of course, Maher is correct...
"Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats"
Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats | RealClearPolitics



I am for benefiting Americans.

It is clear and evident that it is the Right that does so.

Thank you for that excellent example of endlessly parroting to bolster my case against the new Banana Republicans.

Most welcome....and thank you for admitting the truth of my post.

Always happy to expose false claims based on false narratives.

I've exposed you as a liar in earlier threads...but, just to move our discourse to a higher plane, try this: when you attempt to claim 'false narratives,' you should provide them, and show them to be false.

We both know why you didn't: there are no 'false narratives.'

 

[PoliticalChic]

....or, to put it another way, which side is looking out for its own power and interests above the interests of the American people?


While the right, under this President, has benefited the people in a multitude of ways, the Democrats, the Left, wishes for the collapse of the economy so it will benefit their return to power.

Watch Bill Maher Two Years Ago Say We Want To Crash the Economy
By Mark SimoneMar 15, 2020

Is this all part of a vast left wing conspiracy to crash the economy? Bill Maher said in 2018 that he is "hoping" for the bottom to fall out of the economy and for the country to enter a recession so we can "get rid of Trump." He said one way to do that is a "crashing economy." Maher said he is "sorry" if it hurts people, but rooting for a recession is a prevention measure to losing democracy.

There's only one person looking out for me

Not even mommy???????

 

[BlindBoo]

Sadly this is what has become of the Republican Party. The Banana Republicans prize asset is the ability to generate false claims based on false narratives and have those merit less claims parroted endlessly by the flock.

Let's take a gigantic leap of faith, and try to believe that education, logic, and experience actually have some bearing on your geopolitical outlook....so far not in evidence.
But...being the eternal optimist.....I'll offer you an education.

a. the Democrats favor open borders and illegal immigration....Obama told illegals to go and vote.....is any of this a benefit to Americans?

b. Trump has reduced the burden of regulations....does this benefit Americans?

c. Trump is trying to stymie the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism from getting the nuclear weapons that the Democrats guaranteed them....does this benefit Americans?

d. Tax cuts are part of the Right's agenda.....does this benefit Americans?

e. The Democrats are running on anti-white bias.....does dividing the country based on skin color benefit Americans?



And, of course, Maher is correct...
"Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats"
Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats | RealClearPolitics



I am for benefiting Americans.

It is clear and evident that it is the Right that does so.

Thank you for that excellent example of endlessly parroting to bolster my case against the new Banana Republicans.

Most welcome....and thank you for admitting the truth of my post.

Always happy to expose false claims based on false narratives.

I've exposed you as a liar in earlier threads...but, just to move our discourse to a higher plane, try this: when you attempt to claim 'false narratives,' you should provide them, and show them to be false.

We both know why you didn't: there are no 'false narratives.'

Lets take A. (1) You claim Democrats are for open borders. Okay, so what? So are Republicans. To further clarify, both parties support controlled borders. Border security funding is still bipartisan and neither support (2) illegal immigration. That would mean support for No Border.

They're all false narrative. But that is your SOP.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

....or, to put it another way, which side is looking out for its own power and interests above the interests of the American people?


While the right, under this President, has benefited the people in a multitude of ways, the Democrats, the Left, wishes for the collapse of the economy so it will benefit their return to power.

Watch Bill Maher Two Years Ago Say We Want To Crash the Economy
By Mark SimoneMar 15, 2020

Is this all part of a vast left wing conspiracy to crash the economy? Bill Maher said in 2018 that he is "hoping" for the bottom to fall out of the economy and for the country to enter a recession so we can "get rid of Trump." He said one way to do that is a "crashing economy." Maher said he is "sorry" if it hurts people, but rooting for a recession is a prevention measure to losing democracy.

The "one" funded by the donor class has our backs I'm sure.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Let's take a gigantic leap of faith, and try to believe that education, logic, and experience actually have some bearing on your geopolitical outlook....so far not in evidence.
But...being the eternal optimist.....I'll offer you an education.

a. the Democrats favor open borders and illegal immigration....Obama told illegals to go and vote.....is any of this a benefit to Americans?

b. Trump has reduced the burden of regulations....does this benefit Americans?

c. Trump is trying to stymie the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism from getting the nuclear weapons that the Democrats guaranteed them....does this benefit Americans?

d. Tax cuts are part of the Right's agenda.....does this benefit Americans?

e. The Democrats are running on anti-white bias.....does dividing the country based on skin color benefit Americans?



And, of course, Maher is correct...
"Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats"
Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats | RealClearPolitics



I am for benefiting Americans.

It is clear and evident that it is the Right that does so.

Thank you for that excellent example of endlessly parroting to bolster my case against the new Banana Republicans.

Most welcome....and thank you for admitting the truth of my post.

Always happy to expose false claims based on false narratives.

I've exposed you as a liar in earlier threads...but, just to move our discourse to a higher plane, try this: when you attempt to claim 'false narratives,' you should provide them, and show them to be false.

We both know why you didn't: there are no 'false narratives.'

Lets take A. (1) You claim Democrats are for open borders. Okay, so what? So are Republicans. To further clarify, both parties support controlled borders. Border security funding is still bipartisan and neither support (2) illegal immigration. That would mean support for No Border.

They're all false narrative. But that is your SOP.

Don had 2 years with majorities in both houses. What did he do with that regarding immigration, "the border", or any of the hysterics he fomented on the 2016 campaign trail?

I'm aware of absolutely nothing, perhaps I missed the monumental legislation to save us from the dark hordes?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's take a gigantic leap of faith, and try to believe that education, logic, and experience actually have some bearing on your geopolitical outlook....so far not in evidence.
But...being the eternal optimist.....I'll offer you an education.

a. the Democrats favor open borders and illegal immigration....Obama told illegals to go and vote.....is any of this a benefit to Americans?

b. Trump has reduced the burden of regulations....does this benefit Americans?

c. Trump is trying to stymie the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism from getting the nuclear weapons that the Democrats guaranteed them....does this benefit Americans?

d. Tax cuts are part of the Right's agenda.....does this benefit Americans?

e. The Democrats are running on anti-white bias.....does dividing the country based on skin color benefit Americans?



And, of course, Maher is correct...
"Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats"
Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats | RealClearPolitics



I am for benefiting Americans.

It is clear and evident that it is the Right that does so.

Thank you for that excellent example of endlessly parroting to bolster my case against the new Banana Republicans.

Most welcome....and thank you for admitting the truth of my post.

Always happy to expose false claims based on false narratives.

I've exposed you as a liar in earlier threads...but, just to move our discourse to a higher plane, try this: when you attempt to claim 'false narratives,' you should provide them, and show them to be false.

We both know why you didn't: there are no 'false narratives.'

Lets take A. (1) You claim Democrats are for open borders. Okay, so what? So are Republicans. To further clarify, both parties support controlled borders. Border security funding is still bipartisan and neither support (2) illegal immigration. That would mean support for No Border.

They're all false narrative. But that is your SOP.

"They're all false narrative."


Let's check.

1. “The new guard of the Democratic Party absolutely supports open borders

Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., isn’t on the fringe of the Left. He is the second ranking member of the Democratic National Committee and he basically wears his immigration policy on his sleeve. More specifically, the No. 2 Democrat wore a T-Shirt that literally said “I don’t believe in borders.”

The most honest voice on the Left is also the newest. A left-wing, Bernie Sanders volunteer named Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just offed Rep. Joe Crowley, the New York Democrat who was waiting in the wings to take over for Nancy Pelosi. Young and earnest at just 28-years-old, Ocasio-Cortez ran on a simple far-left platform that included abolishing ICE.

The progressive darling made the rounds on cable Wednesday to introduce the rest of the country to the message that had just helped her win in New York the night before. Abolishing ICE wasn’t just a question of enforcement at the border. It is about enforcing a redefined idea of the border itself.

The policy of Ocasio-Cortez and the growing number who agree with her is one where enforcement of White House policy makes ICE agents not just cruel but actually inhumane. Her solution requires a completely new agency and a completely new vision of the border where border patrol become travel agents instead of law enforcement. They won’t deter anyone entering illegally. Instead they will offer “safe passage.” The new guard of the Democratic Party absolutely supports open borders

2. “Why Are the Democrats Obsessed With Open Borders?

The answer is straightforward, POWER! It’s simple really, more people necessitates a ‘need’ for more government. The current migrant caravan story is just the latest example. We’ve been in an illegal immigration crisis for decades, with tens of millions of people entering the country illegally.

So follow with me now – more people, more government. And what’s the point of an open border? To invite illegal immigration.

A brand new study shows that 63 percent of non-citizens are on some kind of welfare program. 70 percent of non-citizens who have been in the country for longer than 10 years are on a welfare program.” The Democrats Have a VERY Clear Purpose for Wanting Open Borders - And It's NOT Just Votes

3. Leaked Memo Confirms What We Already Knew About Democrats And Illegal Immigration
… a leaked document from the Center For American Progress (CAP) Action Fund shows what most of us have always known, but what Democrats like to pretend isn’t their reality.

Namely, the memo, in great detail, maps out how Democrats are relying on illegal immigration to prop up their political future.

“The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” reads Palmieri’s memo,…” Leaked Memo Confirms What We Already Knew About Democrats and Illegal Immigration


4. “Yes, Democrats Are Now The Party Of Open Borders

…recent events show that the party has, in fact, morphed into one that reflexively opposes virtually any attempt to secure the southern border.

…the House voted on a bill that simply expressed Congress' "continued support for all United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and personnel who carry out the important mission of ICE" and "the efforts of all Federal agencies, State law enforcement, and military personnel who bring law and order to our Nation's borders."

Just 18 Democrats voted for this resolution. Thirty-five voted no. And the other 133 dodged the issue altogether by voting "present."

…eight Democrats co-sponsored an actual abolish-ICE bill.

As far as we are aware, no prominent Democrat has raised their voice in protest of this dangerously naive idea. Instead, they are either overtly supporting the "abolish ICE" campaign, or mumbling about how ICE needs to be replaced with, as Sen. Elizabeth Warren put it, "something that reflects our morality and that works."Meanwhile, Senate Democrats are now pushing a bill that would effectively establish "catch and release" as federal policy.

…San Francisco started registering illegal immigrants this week, so they can vote in the November city school board election."We want to give immigrants the right to vote," Norman Yee, a county supervisor, said.

So, let's add all this up.

Democrats want to neuter the one agency responsible for enforcing border security. They want to make it easy for illegals who cross to stay in the country. And they want to give them the right to vote.

Leading Democrats also adamantly oppose building a secure border wall. They support "sanctuary cities" that actively protect illegals from deportation. And they want to grant every illegal in the country amnesty.

And we're supposed to believe that Democrats aren't for open borders…” Illegal Immigration: Yes, Democrats Are Now The Party Of Open Borders

5. “Yes, the Democrats Are for Open Borders

Long before #AbolishICE became a rallying cry for the party’s socialist wing, Democratic bigwigs have been saying that no illegal alien should ever be sent home merely because he snuck into the country or overstayed a visa. Nancy Pelosi in 2013 put it very clearly: “If somebody is here without sufficient documentation, that is not reason for deportation.” Hillary Clinton said much the same during one of the 2016 primary debates: “Of the people, the undocumented people living in our country, I do not want to see them deported.” Likewise with Bernie Sanders, at the same debate; in response to Jorge Ramos’s question, “And can you promise not to deport immigrants who don’t have a criminal record?” Sanders answered, “I can make that promise.”

If you will an end, you must will the means to that end. The Democrats have demonstrated that there are no means to achieve the goal of controlled immigration that they are willing to support — not border control to keep unauthorized people from barging in, and not deportation of those who manage to get past the notional borders. For a pedant, that may not qualify as “open borders,” in the sense that national frontiers would be completely unmonitored, merely jurisdictional markers showing who picks up the garbage on which side of the line. But it’s good enough for government work.” Democrats' Open Borders Immigration Policy | National Review




Quite a beating you're taking, huh?


Couldn't happen to a nicer......

 

[PoliticalChic]

....or, to put it another way, which side is looking out for its own power and interests above the interests of the American people?


While the right, under this President, has benefited the people in a multitude of ways, the Democrats, the Left, wishes for the collapse of the economy so it will benefit their return to power.

Watch Bill Maher Two Years Ago Say We Want To Crash the Economy
By Mark SimoneMar 15, 2020

Is this all part of a vast left wing conspiracy to crash the economy? Bill Maher said in 2018 that he is "hoping" for the bottom to fall out of the economy and for the country to enter a recession so we can "get rid of Trump." He said one way to do that is a "crashing economy." Maher said he is "sorry" if it hurts people, but rooting for a recession is a prevention measure to losing democracy.

The "one" funded by the donor class has our backs I'm sure.

The donor class is the Democrats, you dunce.

“The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin

1. In the conventional wisdom, it is Republicans and the political right, with their corporate sponsors and big-money donors who make up the “party of the rich,” while progressives speak for the poor and powerless.
   1. And conservatives are agents of an economic “ruling class” organized to defend its social privileges.
   2. And Democrats are the party of “working Americans and their families.”
   3. “They're for the powerful, we're for the people!” Al Gore, Google
2. This is standard progressive folklore. Provably false.
3. As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! [p. 8]
   1. Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).

i. Scaife Foundation has assets totaling $244 million.

ii. Bradley Foundation, $623 million.

1. Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.

i. Ford alone has 16 times what Bradley has.

ii. Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.

iii. The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.

1. With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
   1. “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions… The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/scaifemain050299.htm

Top Ten Donors, 2016 Campaign:

Fahr LLC, Renaissance Technologies, Paloma Partners, Newsweb Corp., NextGen Climate, Priorities USA, Soros …..to the Democrats: $311 million

Los Vegas Sands, Adelson Clinic, Elliott Management, Renaissance Technologies….to Republicans: $110 million

Top Organization Contributors | OpenSecrets

 

[PoliticalChic]

Thank you for that excellent example of endlessly parroting to bolster my case against the new Banana Republicans.

Most welcome....and thank you for admitting the truth of my post.

Always happy to expose false claims based on false narratives.

I've exposed you as a liar in earlier threads...but, just to move our discourse to a higher plane, try this: when you attempt to claim 'false narratives,' you should provide them, and show them to be false.

We both know why you didn't: there are no 'false narratives.'

Lets take A. (1) You claim Democrats are for open borders. Okay, so what? So are Republicans. To further clarify, both parties support controlled borders. Border security funding is still bipartisan and neither support (2) illegal immigration. That would mean support for No Border.

They're all false narrative. But that is your SOP.

Don had 2 years with majorities in both houses. What did he do with that regarding immigration, "the border", or any of the hysterics he fomented on the 2016 campaign trail?

I'm aware of absolutely nothing, perhaps I missed the monumental legislation to save us from the dark hordes?

Which party is for open borders?



"I'm aware of absolutely nothing,"

Truer words were never said.

 

[Blues Man]

you people who think the government is looking out for you are delusional

 

[PoliticalChic]

....or, to put it another way, which side is looking out for its own power and interests above the interests of the American people?


While the right, under this President, has benefited the people in a multitude of ways, the Democrats, the Left, wishes for the collapse of the economy so it will benefit their return to power.

Watch Bill Maher Two Years Ago Say We Want To Crash the Economy
By Mark SimoneMar 15, 2020

Is this all part of a vast left wing conspiracy to crash the economy? Bill Maher said in 2018 that he is "hoping" for the bottom to fall out of the economy and for the country to enter a recession so we can "get rid of Trump." He said one way to do that is a "crashing economy." Maher said he is "sorry" if it hurts people, but rooting for a recession is a prevention measure to losing democracy.

The "one" funded by the donor class has our backs I'm sure.

Here's your homework.

 

[PoliticalChic]

you people who think the government is looking out for you are delusional

You misunderstand the issue.

Your job is to decide which party is better for the American public, not whether government meets all of your desires.


This may help:



a. the Democrats favor open borders and illegal immigration....Obama told illegals to go and vote.....is any of this a benefit to Americans?

b. Trump has reduced the burden of regulations....does this benefit Americans?

c. Trump is trying to stymie the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism from getting the nuclear weapons that the Democrats guaranteed them....does this benefit Americans?

d. Tax cuts are part of the Right's agenda.....does this benefit Americans?

e. The Democrats are running on anti-white bias.....does dividing the country based on skin color benefit Americans?



And, of course, Maher is correct...
"Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats"
Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats | RealClearPolitics





There's an old saying that applies:
'Don't Let the Perfect Be the Enemy of the Good'

 

[busybee01]

My point is I don't care what Maher said. He's a comedian. If you are getting your political opinions from or getting twisted up and around in knots by comedians, then as my dad used to say, "you got issues, kid".

Let's take a gigantic leap of faith, and try to believe that education, logic, and experience actually have some bearing on your geopolitical outlook....so far not in evidence.
But...being the eternal optimist.....I'll offer you an education.

a. the Democrats favor open borders and illegal immigration....Obama told illegals to go and vote.....is any of this a benefit to Americans?

b. Trump has reduced the burden of regulations....does this benefit Americans?

c. Trump is trying to stymie the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism from getting the nuclear weapons that the Democrats guaranteed them....does this benefit Americans?

d. Tax cuts are part of the Right's agenda.....does this benefit Americans?

e. The Democrats are running on anti-white bias.....does dividing the country based on skin color benefit Americans?



And, of course, Maher is correct...
"Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats"
Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats | RealClearPolitics



I am for benefiting Americans.

It is clear and evident that it is the Right that does so.

a. Obama did not tell illegals to vote. He said that if you vote then it is because you are a citizen. This was in response to fears Republicans would try to intimidate Hispanic voters. Voters disapprove of Trump's border and immigration policies. They approve of DACA, oppose walls and support amnesty.

b. Trump made it easier for companies to pollute the air, water and destroy wildlife habitats. Made it easier for companies to cheat their customers. Allow misleading advertising.

c. The fact is that many people including military leaders disagreed with Trump's decision.

d. Tax cuts for the rich and powerful do not benefit ordinary Americans. Ordinary Americans largely opposed the tax cuts. The reason is simple. Most people do not pay enough in taxes for it to matter.

e. Republicans are dividing Americans. White supremacists run the Republican Party.

"a. Obama did not tell illegals to vote. "

Here he is doing just that.


She says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.









Transcript:



RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
[Who would come for legal citizens voting?????????]
OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.

[Just like you.....a bald-faced liar!]

And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

[Meaning: 'Go ahead and vote....no one will be the wiser!']



The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

[Meaning, I guess....if you are living with lots of other illegals...well, heck, at least some of you should go vote! After all....Trump is trying to get rid of you illegals!]

Obama encouraged Latino citizens to vote. Your spin is malarkey.

He told illegals, the folks the interviewer said she spoke for, to vote.


It's right in the vid.

Your biased interpretation is not in the video.

 

[BlindBoo]

Thank you for that excellent example of endlessly parroting to bolster my case against the new Banana Republicans.

Most welcome....and thank you for admitting the truth of my post.

Always happy to expose false claims based on false narratives.

I've exposed you as a liar in earlier threads...but, just to move our discourse to a higher plane, try this: when you attempt to claim 'false narratives,' you should provide them, and show them to be false.

We both know why you didn't: there are no 'false narratives.'

Lets take A. (1) You claim Democrats are for open borders. Okay, so what? So are Republicans. To further clarify, both parties support controlled borders. Border security funding is still bipartisan and neither support (2) illegal immigration. That would mean support for No Border.

They're all false narrative. But that is your SOP.

"They're all false narrative."


Let's check.

1. “The new guard of the Democratic Party absolutely supports open borders

Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., isn’t on the fringe of the Left. He is the second ranking member of the Democratic National Committee and he basically wears his immigration policy on his sleeve. More specifically, the No. 2 Democrat wore a T-Shirt that literally said “I don’t believe in borders.”

The most honest voice on the Left is also the newest. A left-wing, Bernie Sanders volunteer named Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just offed Rep. Joe Crowley, the New York Democrat who was waiting in the wings to take over for Nancy Pelosi. Young and earnest at just 28-years-old, Ocasio-Cortez ran on a simple far-left platform that included abolishing ICE.

The progressive darling made the rounds on cable Wednesday to introduce the rest of the country to the message that had just helped her win in New York the night before. Abolishing ICE wasn’t just a question of enforcement at the border. It is about enforcing a redefined idea of the border itself.

The policy of Ocasio-Cortez and the growing number who agree with her is one where enforcement of White House policy makes ICE agents not just cruel but actually inhumane. Her solution requires a completely new agency and a completely new vision of the border where border patrol become travel agents instead of law enforcement. They won’t deter anyone entering illegally. Instead they will offer “safe passage.” The new guard of the Democratic Party absolutely supports open borders

2. “Why Are the Democrats Obsessed With Open Borders?

The answer is straightforward, POWER! It’s simple really, more people necessitates a ‘need’ for more government. The current migrant caravan story is just the latest example. We’ve been in an illegal immigration crisis for decades, with tens of millions of people entering the country illegally.

So follow with me now – more people, more government. And what’s the point of an open border? To invite illegal immigration.

A brand new study shows that 63 percent of non-citizens are on some kind of welfare program. 70 percent of non-citizens who have been in the country for longer than 10 years are on a welfare program.” The Democrats Have a VERY Clear Purpose for Wanting Open Borders - And It's NOT Just Votes

3. Leaked Memo Confirms What We Already Knew About Democrats And Illegal Immigration
… a leaked document from the Center For American Progress (CAP) Action Fund shows what most of us have always known, but what Democrats like to pretend isn’t their reality.

Namely, the memo, in great detail, maps out how Democrats are relying on illegal immigration to prop up their political future.

“The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” reads Palmieri’s memo,…” Leaked Memo Confirms What We Already Knew About Democrats and Illegal Immigration


4. “Yes, Democrats Are Now The Party Of Open Borders

…recent events show that the party has, in fact, morphed into one that reflexively opposes virtually any attempt to secure the southern border.

…the House voted on a bill that simply expressed Congress' "continued support for all United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and personnel who carry out the important mission of ICE" and "the efforts of all Federal agencies, State law enforcement, and military personnel who bring law and order to our Nation's borders."

Just 18 Democrats voted for this resolution. Thirty-five voted no. And the other 133 dodged the issue altogether by voting "present."

…eight Democrats co-sponsored an actual abolish-ICE bill.

As far as we are aware, no prominent Democrat has raised their voice in protest of this dangerously naive idea. Instead, they are either overtly supporting the "abolish ICE" campaign, or mumbling about how ICE needs to be replaced with, as Sen. Elizabeth Warren put it, "something that reflects our morality and that works."Meanwhile, Senate Democrats are now pushing a bill that would effectively establish "catch and release" as federal policy.

…San Francisco started registering illegal immigrants this week, so they can vote in the November city school board election."We want to give immigrants the right to vote," Norman Yee, a county supervisor, said.

So, let's add all this up.

Democrats want to neuter the one agency responsible for enforcing border security. They want to make it easy for illegals who cross to stay in the country. And they want to give them the right to vote.

Leading Democrats also adamantly oppose building a secure border wall. They support "sanctuary cities" that actively protect illegals from deportation. And they want to grant every illegal in the country amnesty.

And we're supposed to believe that Democrats aren't for open borders…” Illegal Immigration: Yes, Democrats Are Now The Party Of Open Borders

5. “Yes, the Democrats Are for Open Borders

Long before #AbolishICE became a rallying cry for the party’s socialist wing, Democratic bigwigs have been saying that no illegal alien should ever be sent home merely because he snuck into the country or overstayed a visa. Nancy Pelosi in 2013 put it very clearly: “If somebody is here without sufficient documentation, that is not reason for deportation.” Hillary Clinton said much the same during one of the 2016 primary debates: “Of the people, the undocumented people living in our country, I do not want to see them deported.” Likewise with Bernie Sanders, at the same debate; in response to Jorge Ramos’s question, “And can you promise not to deport immigrants who don’t have a criminal record?” Sanders answered, “I can make that promise.”

If you will an end, you must will the means to that end. The Democrats have demonstrated that there are no means to achieve the goal of controlled immigration that they are willing to support — not border control to keep unauthorized people from barging in, and not deportation of those who manage to get past the notional borders. For a pedant, that may not qualify as “open borders,” in the sense that national frontiers would be completely unmonitored, merely jurisdictional markers showing who picks up the garbage on which side of the line. But it’s good enough for government work.” Democrats' Open Borders Immigration Policy | National Review




Quite a beating you're taking, huh?


Couldn't happen to a nicer......

More of the same highly partisan copy and paste Hyperbole. Let take a look at the first object in your counter-narrative. Keith Ellison instead of insinuating something awful because of a tee shirt slogan why not go with his answers.

When you think about illegal immigration, which of the following solutions come closest to your opinion?

• A: All illegal immigrants should be able to stay in the US legally
• B: Most illegal immigrants should be able to stay in the US, with some exceptions
• C: Most illegal immigrants should be deported, with some exceptions
• D: All illegal immigrants should be deported
• E: Unsure

 

[berg80]

A new poll shows a startling partisan divide on the dangers of the coronavirus
A new poll shows a startling partisan divide on the dangers of the coronavirus

A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll has revealed sharp partisan divides between Americans over the coronavirus pandemic.

The poll found 68 percent of Democrats are worried that someone in their family could catch the virus, while just 40 percent of Republicans and 45 percent of independents share that concern.

The gulf in perception over an outwardly nonpolitical issue underscores how signals from politicians and media outlets have played a critical role in shaping how seriously Americans are taking a viral outbreak that has overwhelmed health care systems and triggered mass quarantines in several countries around the world.

Nearly 80 percent of Democrats believe the worst is yet to come, but just 40 percent of Republicans and 57 percent of independents believe that. Overall, 53 percent of all voters are concerned that someone in their immediate family might contract the coronavirus, and 60 percent believe the worst is yet to come.
....................................................................................................................
You will rarely find a more identifiable example of Trump Denial Syndrome than this. It is a certainty that things will become worse. Yet because of the deceit of right wing media, in support of Trump's lies, nitwits don't believe it.
IOW, Repubs are sabotaging the efforts to slow the spread of COVID-19.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's take a gigantic leap of faith, and try to believe that education, logic, and experience actually have some bearing on your geopolitical outlook....so far not in evidence.
But...being the eternal optimist.....I'll offer you an education.

a. the Democrats favor open borders and illegal immigration....Obama told illegals to go and vote.....is any of this a benefit to Americans?

b. Trump has reduced the burden of regulations....does this benefit Americans?

c. Trump is trying to stymie the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism from getting the nuclear weapons that the Democrats guaranteed them....does this benefit Americans?

d. Tax cuts are part of the Right's agenda.....does this benefit Americans?

e. The Democrats are running on anti-white bias.....does dividing the country based on skin color benefit Americans?



And, of course, Maher is correct...
"Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats"
Success of the Trump Economy Is Bad News for Democrats | RealClearPolitics



I am for benefiting Americans.

It is clear and evident that it is the Right that does so.

a. Obama did not tell illegals to vote. He said that if you vote then it is because you are a citizen. This was in response to fears Republicans would try to intimidate Hispanic voters. Voters disapprove of Trump's border and immigration policies. They approve of DACA, oppose walls and support amnesty.

b. Trump made it easier for companies to pollute the air, water and destroy wildlife habitats. Made it easier for companies to cheat their customers. Allow misleading advertising.

c. The fact is that many people including military leaders disagreed with Trump's decision.

d. Tax cuts for the rich and powerful do not benefit ordinary Americans. Ordinary Americans largely opposed the tax cuts. The reason is simple. Most people do not pay enough in taxes for it to matter.

e. Republicans are dividing Americans. White supremacists run the Republican Party.

"a. Obama did not tell illegals to vote. "

Here he is doing just that.


She says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.









Transcript:



RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
[Who would come for legal citizens voting?????????]
OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.

[Just like you.....a bald-faced liar!]

And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

[Meaning: 'Go ahead and vote....no one will be the wiser!']



The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

[Meaning, I guess....if you are living with lots of other illegals...well, heck, at least some of you should go vote! After all....Trump is trying to get rid of you illegals!]

Obama encouraged Latino citizens to vote. Your spin is malarkey.

He told illegals, the folks the interviewer said she spoke for, to vote.


It's right in the vid.

Your biased interpretation is not in the video.

Word for word it is, liar.


I provided the transcript.


Now, get lost.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Most welcome....and thank you for admitting the truth of my post.

Always happy to expose false claims based on false narratives.

I've exposed you as a liar in earlier threads...but, just to move our discourse to a higher plane, try this: when you attempt to claim 'false narratives,' you should provide them, and show them to be false.

We both know why you didn't: there are no 'false narratives.'

Lets take A. (1) You claim Democrats are for open borders. Okay, so what? So are Republicans. To further clarify, both parties support controlled borders. Border security funding is still bipartisan and neither support (2) illegal immigration. That would mean support for No Border.

They're all false narrative. But that is your SOP.

"They're all false narrative."


Let's check.

1. “The new guard of the Democratic Party absolutely supports open borders

Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., isn’t on the fringe of the Left. He is the second ranking member of the Democratic National Committee and he basically wears his immigration policy on his sleeve. More specifically, the No. 2 Democrat wore a T-Shirt that literally said “I don’t believe in borders.”

The most honest voice on the Left is also the newest. A left-wing, Bernie Sanders volunteer named Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just offed Rep. Joe Crowley, the New York Democrat who was waiting in the wings to take over for Nancy Pelosi. Young and earnest at just 28-years-old, Ocasio-Cortez ran on a simple far-left platform that included abolishing ICE.

The progressive darling made the rounds on cable Wednesday to introduce the rest of the country to the message that had just helped her win in New York the night before. Abolishing ICE wasn’t just a question of enforcement at the border. It is about enforcing a redefined idea of the border itself.

The policy of Ocasio-Cortez and the growing number who agree with her is one where enforcement of White House policy makes ICE agents not just cruel but actually inhumane. Her solution requires a completely new agency and a completely new vision of the border where border patrol become travel agents instead of law enforcement. They won’t deter anyone entering illegally. Instead they will offer “safe passage.” The new guard of the Democratic Party absolutely supports open borders

2. “Why Are the Democrats Obsessed With Open Borders?

The answer is straightforward, POWER! It’s simple really, more people necessitates a ‘need’ for more government. The current migrant caravan story is just the latest example. We’ve been in an illegal immigration crisis for decades, with tens of millions of people entering the country illegally.

So follow with me now – more people, more government. And what’s the point of an open border? To invite illegal immigration.

A brand new study shows that 63 percent of non-citizens are on some kind of welfare program. 70 percent of non-citizens who have been in the country for longer than 10 years are on a welfare program.” The Democrats Have a VERY Clear Purpose for Wanting Open Borders - And It's NOT Just Votes

3. Leaked Memo Confirms What We Already Knew About Democrats And Illegal Immigration
… a leaked document from the Center For American Progress (CAP) Action Fund shows what most of us have always known, but what Democrats like to pretend isn’t their reality.

Namely, the memo, in great detail, maps out how Democrats are relying on illegal immigration to prop up their political future.

“The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” reads Palmieri’s memo,…” Leaked Memo Confirms What We Already Knew About Democrats and Illegal Immigration


4. “Yes, Democrats Are Now The Party Of Open Borders

…recent events show that the party has, in fact, morphed into one that reflexively opposes virtually any attempt to secure the southern border.

…the House voted on a bill that simply expressed Congress' "continued support for all United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and personnel who carry out the important mission of ICE" and "the efforts of all Federal agencies, State law enforcement, and military personnel who bring law and order to our Nation's borders."

Just 18 Democrats voted for this resolution. Thirty-five voted no. And the other 133 dodged the issue altogether by voting "present."

…eight Democrats co-sponsored an actual abolish-ICE bill.

As far as we are aware, no prominent Democrat has raised their voice in protest of this dangerously naive idea. Instead, they are either overtly supporting the "abolish ICE" campaign, or mumbling about how ICE needs to be replaced with, as Sen. Elizabeth Warren put it, "something that reflects our morality and that works."Meanwhile, Senate Democrats are now pushing a bill that would effectively establish "catch and release" as federal policy.

…San Francisco started registering illegal immigrants this week, so they can vote in the November city school board election."We want to give immigrants the right to vote," Norman Yee, a county supervisor, said.

So, let's add all this up.

Democrats want to neuter the one agency responsible for enforcing border security. They want to make it easy for illegals who cross to stay in the country. And they want to give them the right to vote.

Leading Democrats also adamantly oppose building a secure border wall. They support "sanctuary cities" that actively protect illegals from deportation. And they want to grant every illegal in the country amnesty.

And we're supposed to believe that Democrats aren't for open borders…” Illegal Immigration: Yes, Democrats Are Now The Party Of Open Borders

5. “Yes, the Democrats Are for Open Borders

Long before #AbolishICE became a rallying cry for the party’s socialist wing, Democratic bigwigs have been saying that no illegal alien should ever be sent home merely because he snuck into the country or overstayed a visa. Nancy Pelosi in 2013 put it very clearly: “If somebody is here without sufficient documentation, that is not reason for deportation.” Hillary Clinton said much the same during one of the 2016 primary debates: “Of the people, the undocumented people living in our country, I do not want to see them deported.” Likewise with Bernie Sanders, at the same debate; in response to Jorge Ramos’s question, “And can you promise not to deport immigrants who don’t have a criminal record?” Sanders answered, “I can make that promise.”

If you will an end, you must will the means to that end. The Democrats have demonstrated that there are no means to achieve the goal of controlled immigration that they are willing to support — not border control to keep unauthorized people from barging in, and not deportation of those who manage to get past the notional borders. For a pedant, that may not qualify as “open borders,” in the sense that national frontiers would be completely unmonitored, merely jurisdictional markers showing who picks up the garbage on which side of the line. But it’s good enough for government work.” Democrats' Open Borders Immigration Policy | National Review




Quite a beating you're taking, huh?


Couldn't happen to a nicer......

More of the same highly partisan copy and paste Hyperbole. Let take a look at the first object in your counter-narrative. Keith Ellison instead of insinuating something awful because of a tee shirt slogan why not go with his answers.

When you think about illegal immigration, which of the following solutions come closest to your opinion?

• A: All illegal immigrants should be able to stay in the US legally
• B: Most illegal immigrants should be able to stay in the US, with some exceptions
• C: Most illegal immigrants should be deported, with some exceptions
• D: All illegal immigrants should be deported
• E: Unsure

I documented, linked and sourced all of it....time for you to slither away, liar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Paul Krugman Celebrates Stock Market Rout Because He Thinks It Hurts Trump

Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning trade economist and New York Times columnist, celebrated the sharp decline of the stock market due to the coronavirus on the grounds that, in his opinion, it would hurt President Donald Trump.

“Economists, myself included, often make a point of saying that the stock market is not the economy, which it isn’t. It *is,” however, pretty much the Trump presidency,” Krugman tweeted. “Take away his magic talisman and there’s nothing left.”
Paul Krugman Celebrates Stock Market Rout: Thinks It Hurts Trump




Tell this to the Democrats, see if they care:

'We're just a mom & pop business:' Utah's small business owners try to stay afloat
We are just a mom and pop business. It's going to hurt.

Medina is the third owner of the restaurant which was started by her grandfather Rafael Torres in 1967.


Right now, she is very worried about her employees - several who are single mothers:

We have families that provide for college students, single mothers. This is their income."
'We're just a mom & pop business:' Utah's small business owners try to stay afloat