White House blames 'polar vortex' on global warming in blog post.

We know that no single weather episode proves or disproves climate change. Climate refers to the patterns observed in the weather over time and space – in terms of averages, variations, and probabilities. But we also know that this week’s cold spell is of a type there’s reason to believe may become more frequent in a world that’s getting warmer, on average, because of greenhouse-gas pollution.

We the Geeks: ?Polar Vortex? and Extreme Weather | The White House

It may or it may not.

You reactionaries are a hoot.

Turns out the "reactionaries" are you "progressives" who've based your world-view on concepts from Joseph Stalin in the 1930's. BTW, why did the Kyoto Treaty exempt China and India despite the fact they pump more smoke into the atmosphere than the rest of the world combined? :eusa_eh:

Nope. The reactionaries are people who try to cite the 10% of Glaciers that are not retreating as proof that there is no real global warming. The Alarmist are the ones who predicted run-away AGW.
 
We know that no single weather episode proves or disproves climate change. Climate refers to the patterns observed in the weather over time and space – in terms of averages, variations, and probabilities. But we also know that this week’s cold spell is of a type there’s reason to believe may become more frequent in a world that’s getting warmer, on average, because of greenhouse-gas pollution.

We the Geeks: ?Polar Vortex? and Extreme Weather | The White House

It may or it may not.

You reactionaries are a hoot.

Turns out the "reactionaries" are you "progressives" who've based your world-view on concepts from Joseph Stalin in the 1930's. BTW, why did the Kyoto Treaty exempt China and India despite the fact they pump more smoke into the atmosphere than the rest of the world combined? :eusa_eh:

Nope. The reactionaries are people who try to cite the 10% of Glaciers that are not retreating as proof that there is no real global warming. The Alarmist are the ones who predicted run-away AGW.

:lol:
 
Our deadbeat atheists found RELIGON with gorebal warming. Don't stand for something, fall for anything...and boy howdy did they ever!
bongload.gif


Remember the "melting glaciers"? Nothin but a hoax...read em and weep ya angry old hippies:



Our glaciers are growing, not melting - More falsehoods from Al Gore

Although Glaciologists measure year-to-year changes in glacier activity, it is the long term changes which provide the basis for statements such as "Global Glacier Recession Continues". Some Skeptics confuse these issues by cherry picking individual glaciers or by ignoring long term trends. Diversions such as these do not address the most important question of what is the real state of glaciers globally?

The answer is not only clear but it is definitive and based on the scientific literature. Globally glaciers are losing ice at an extensive rate (Figure 1). There are still situations in which glaciers gain or lose ice more than typical for one region or another but the long term trends are all the same, and about 90% of glaciers are shrinking worldwide

It is also very important to understand that glacier changes are not only dictated by air temperature changes but also by precipitation. Therefore, there are scenarios in which warming can lead to increases in precipitation (and thus glacier ice accumulation) such as displayed in part of southwestern Norway during the 1990s (Nesje et al 2008).

The bottom line is that glacier variations can be dependent on localized conditions but that these variations are superimposed on a clear and evident long term global reduction in glacier volume which has accelerated rapidly since the 1970s.

Are glaciers growing or retreating?

:lol:
 
Our deadbeat atheists found RELIGON with gorebal warming. Don't stand for something, fall for anything...and boy howdy did they ever!
bongload.gif


Remember the "melting glaciers"? Nothin but a hoax...read em and weep ya angry old hippies:



Our glaciers are growing, not melting - More falsehoods from Al Gore

Although Glaciologists measure year-to-year changes in glacier activity, it is the long term changes which provide the basis for statements such as "Global Glacier Recession Continues". Some Skeptics confuse these issues by cherry picking individual glaciers or by ignoring long term trends. Diversions such as these do not address the most important question of what is the real state of glaciers globally?

The answer is not only clear but it is definitive and based on the scientific literature. Globally glaciers are losing ice at an extensive rate (Figure 1). There are still situations in which glaciers gain or lose ice more than typical for one region or another but the long term trends are all the same, and about 90% of glaciers are shrinking worldwide

It is also very important to understand that glacier changes are not only dictated by air temperature changes but also by precipitation. Therefore, there are scenarios in which warming can lead to increases in precipitation (and thus glacier ice accumulation) such as displayed in part of southwestern Norway during the 1990s (Nesje et al 2008).

The bottom line is that glacier variations can be dependent on localized conditions but that these variations are superimposed on a clear and evident long term global reduction in glacier volume which has accelerated rapidly since the 1970s.

Are glaciers growing or retreating?

:lol:

Popped for Picking Cherries.
 
Al Gore is now looking like a jackass with all the cold weather we are getting. The asshole had to look smart by saying global warming instead of climate change...if he would have said climate change e would still look smart..
Side Note: While I think he is stupid on the environment, I would have voted for him in 2000...


Really? Did Al say there would be no more cold weather? Or did he say it (global warming) would be a long, drawn out process with no way to predict exactly what would happen?

He said the polar ice caps would be melted now.
 
That's not the fact.

Worldwide temperatures are getting hotter.

And the weather is getting more extreme.

Compared to what?
The last ten years?
Hundred years?
Thousand?
Million?
Billion?

How do we know for sure?

I've been alive for 5 decades.

Yeah, because you're five decades of life is quite the representative sample of the earth's history. Your argument is about as good as asking one person what their favorite song is, and then concluding that that song is humanity's favorite song.
 
Did you expect anyhing different from the people who claim global warming will cause an ice age? Just think about that for a minute.

Monday in New York City it was 4 degrees. This weekend it's expected to hit 56 degrees. That's in less than a week.

That seem normal to you?





Why yes. Yes it is.
 
Al Gore is now looking like a jackass with all the cold weather we are getting. The asshole had to look smart by saying global warming instead of climate change...if he would have said climate change e would still look smart..
Side Note: While I think he is stupid on the environment, I would have voted for him in 2000...


Really? Did Al say there would be no more cold weather? Or did he say it (global warming) would be a long, drawn out process with no way to predict exactly what would happen?

He said the polar ice caps would be melted now.

Here is what he actually said.

"Some of the models suggest that there is a 75 percent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years,” said Gore in 2008.
 
Did you expect anyhing different from the people who claim global warming will cause an ice age? Just think about that for a minute.

Monday in New York City it was 4 degrees. This weekend it's expected to hit 56 degrees. That's in less than a week.

That seem normal to you?

Yes it does,we have a January thaw just about every year,it could and most likely will be cold again very soon,then by some craz thing,it will get warm again.

Beside isn't your slant that local weather doesn't mean a thing compared the over all climate pattern Mmmmmmmmmmm?????
 
OK.....curious observers to this thread.......ask yourself........which board members on this thread are hyper-naïve and gullible beyond words considering THIS >>>>>


However, that’s not what the IPCC, the United Nations body which has become the supreme authority for global warming advocates, had to say in its 2007 report, which stated there was, “likely to be a decline in the frequency of cold air outbreaks… in [northern hemisphere] winter in most areas.”

FAQ 10.1 - AR4 WGI Chapter 10: Global Climate Projections




This religion has been making shit up for two decades and it is only in recent years that the level of absurd has just reached the circus level!!! And the internet fools embrace the established narrative NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES THEY LOOK STOOPID!!!!




 

Forum List

Back
Top