Who is Lying?

DGS49

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2012
16,595
14,713
2,415
Pittsburgh

On the one side you have career government employees who risk criminal prosecution as well as loss of jobs and retirement benefits if they are lying, and on the other side you have government officials who have repeatedly lied, evaded the truth, and misled Congress and the public, with impunity.

Whom to believe?

Draw your own conclusion.

The Biden family enterprise is the gross commercialization of international corruption. Why is nobody asking Hunter Biden what is the source of the millions on which he did not pay taxes, and what, exactly, he did to "earn" them?
 

On the one side you have career government employees who risk criminal prosecution as well as loss of jobs and retirement benefits if they are lying, and on the other side you have government officials who have repeatedly lied, evaded the truth, and misled Congress and the public, with impunity.

Whom to believe?

Draw your own conclusion.

The Biden family enterprise is the gross commercialization of international corruption. Why is nobody asking Hunter Biden what is the source of the millions on which he did not pay taxes, and what, exactly, he did to "earn" them?
People bad, government good.
 
Why is nobody asking Hunter Biden what is the source of the millions on which he did not pay taxes, and what, exactly, he did to "earn" them?
Weiss wouldn't be much of an investigator if he didn't learn the answer to that question over the course of 5 years. I don't think there's any question Hunter used the family name for his own financial benefit. That's unethical but not illegal.

BTW, I had just read that hit piece before I saw this thread. Turley's a clever guy. It's unfortunate he's decided to make a name for himself, and profit, by being a right wing media darling while losing any pretense to integrity.

The Republican-led House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday released a transcript of testimony from Gary Shapley, an IRS official who, among other things, claimed that Garland had denied a request from U.S. Attorney David Weiss of Delaware to be appointed special counsel. That designation would have would have given Weiss the same status as the prosecutor leading the investigation into former President Donald Trump.

Weiss never made such a request, Garland said Friday, and always had full authority to file charges wherever and however he saw fit against President Joe Biden’s son. And Garland added that if Weiss — first appointed U.S. Attorney by Donald Trump — agrees to testify before Congress, the Justice Department will not stand in the way.
 
Weiss’ office referred request for comment about the whistleblower testimony to a June 7 letter he wrote to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan saying he had “ultimate authority” over the investigation.
 
The value to the Right of this whistle blower story is it will not matter if it is debunked or not. Those who believe the whistle blower testimony will keep believing it as they do all allegations of wrongdoing by Dems.
 

On the one side you have career government employees who risk criminal prosecution as well as loss of jobs and retirement benefits if they are lying, and on the other side you have government officials who have repeatedly lied, evaded the truth, and misled Congress and the public, with impunity.

Whom to believe?

Draw your own conclusion.

The Biden family enterprise is the gross commercialization of international corruption. Why is nobody asking Hunter Biden what is the source of the millions on which he did not pay taxes, and what, exactly, he did to "earn" them?
Now lets pretend you got some evidence...

Oh Shit, you got none...

So all we have is a raving lunatic, want to provide evidence and change that..
 

Forum List

Back
Top