Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a region in the Eastern U.S. known as the Piedmont. It covers 9 states plus the District of Columbia and stretches from New Jersey to Alabama. There is similarly a region called Palestine that stretches from Jordan, Lebanon and Syria to Israel and Egypt. Piedmont is not a state and neither is Palestine. We dont call ourselves "Piedmonters" and those sandfleas in the Mid-East shouldn't call themselves "Palestinian". No such animal.Then why does the Balfour Declaration state a preference for a "Jewish homeland" in "Palestine."There is no such thing as "Palestine"
Read the Hamas Charter. It is a virulently hateful manifesto of muhammud (swish) -given Islamosupremacy, and it is the blueprint for the fascist ideology embraced by Hamas.
It spells out in explicit detail that all land in the area is an islamist waqf and belongs in perpetuity to The Moslems.
Stop being stupid, ya' moron.
The only link to the "Hamas Charter" I have ever seen comes from a pro jew site, have you a new link?
Look it up.Read the Hamas Charter. It is a virulently hateful manifesto of muhammud (swish) -given Islamosupremacy, and it is the blueprint for the fascist ideology embraced by Hamas.
It spells out in explicit detail that all land in the area is an islamist waqf and belongs in perpetuity to The Moslems.
Stop being stupid, ya' moron.
The only link to the "Hamas Charter" I have ever seen comes from a pro jew site, have you a new link?
In the spirit of trying to trick people into thinking you know something...Yes, I do.
In the spirit of trying to trick people into thinking you know something...Yes, I do.
...this ones for you!
Here's another link.Read the Hamas Charter. It is a virulently hateful manifesto of muhammud (swish) -given Islamosupremacy, and it is the blueprint for the fascist ideology embraced by Hamas.
It spells out in explicit detail that all land in the area is an islamist waqf and belongs in perpetuity to The Moslems.
Stop being stupid, ya' moron.
The only link to the "Hamas Charter" I have ever seen comes from a pro jew site, have you a new link?
(COMMENT)Read the Hamas Charter. It is a virulently hateful manifesto of muhammud (swish) -given Islamosupremacy, and it is the blueprint for the fascist ideology embraced by Hamas.
It spells out in explicit detail that all land in the area is an islamist waqf and belongs in perpetuity to The Moslems.
Stop being stupid, ya' moron.
The only link to the "Hamas Charter" I have ever seen comes from a pro jew site, have you a new link?
Yes, I do.
et al,
There are any number of places, on-line, that the HAMAS Charter can be acquired.
(COMMENT)The only link to the "Hamas Charter" I have ever seen comes from a pro jew site, have you a new link?
Yes, I do.
The most common links used are:
CHARTER OF THE ISLAMIC RESISTANCE MOVEMENT (HAMAS) OF PALESTINE from the Institute for Palestine Studies (IPS), a pro-Palestinian site.
OR
The Avalon Project from the Yale Law School: The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement 18 August 1988
Most Respectfully,
R
et al,
There are any number of places, on-line, that the HAMAS Charter can be acquired.
(COMMENT)Yes, I do.
The most common links used are:
CHARTER OF THE ISLAMIC RESISTANCE MOVEMENT (HAMAS) OF PALESTINE from the Institute for Palestine Studies (IPS), a pro-Palestinian site.
OR
The Avalon Project from the Yale Law School: The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement 18 August 1988
Most Respectfully,
R
Thanks, Rocco and Hoss, but there's not a chance, not a chance in hell that Jos was being honest when he claimed the Hamas Charter was only "them there Jooooooo" sites .
???what "ethnic cleansing" ?? In 1948----after years of violence directed against jews
by arab/muslims in the PALESTINE MANDATE-----the palestine mandate was
PARTITIONED. Partitioning lands left over from both the OTTOMAN EMPIRES
and the BRITISH EMPIRES in order to separate people at each others throats
was -----THE CUSTOM OF THE DAY. In 1948 INDIA was also PARTITIONED.
If you ever meet a pakistani or even an Indian muslim-----he will tell you about the
MASSIVE GENOCIDE hindus comitted against muslims I heard all about it more
than 45 years ago when I first ran into muslims from south east asia -------
IN MASSIVE DETAIL AND WITH ENDLESS INDIGNATION AND JOYFUL PREDICTIONS
OF BLOODY REVENGE (the hindu version was
not quite so exciting---more like "lots of people died")
In order to understand the situation of the middle east----you need a bit of a
grasp on history-----not the fairy tale version
btw ----even Cyprus was partitioned ---little calm peaceful cyprus
(COMMENT)Please remember that "ethnic cleansing" doesn't mean "genocide". Genocide can certainly be used in ethnic cleansing, but it is NOT part of the definition.
Para 6g said:The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition.
The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out man women and child."
SOURCE: A/AC.21/9 S/676 16 February 1948
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court said:Article 6 : Genocide
For the purpose of this Statute, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article 7 : Crimes against humanity
1. For the purpose of this Statute, crime against humanity means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:
(a) Murder;
(b) Extermination;
(c) Enslavement;
(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
(f) Torture;
(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;
(j) The crime of apartheid;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great
suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
SOURCE: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Are you going to suggest that this statement of 1948 is a justification for ethnic cleansing???Some evaluations consider the language used --- "wipe them out man women and child" as a threat communicating "extermination;" which was an expression of intent to commit a Crime Against Humanity (of the highest order). Others evaluations suggest that the intent was to " " a culture on the basis of a nationality, ethnical origin, or the Jewish religious component. This would make the threat more oriented towards "genocide."
In some respects, the intent, and the follow-on demonstration to carry-out that threat (3 wars, multiple intafada's, and Jihadist/Fedayeen acts of terrorism) are subjective.
Most Respectfully,
R
How about an atmosphere where people don't have to carry weapons all the time. Christ, the Palis act like they're living in 1870 Dodge City.Are you going to suggest that this statement of 1948 is a justification for ethnic cleansing???Some evaluations consider the language used --- "wipe them out man women and child" as a threat communicating "extermination;" which was an expression of intent to commit a Crime Against Humanity (of the highest order). Others evaluations suggest that the intent was to " " a culture on the basis of a nationality, ethnical origin, or the Jewish religious component. This would make the threat more oriented towards "genocide."
In some respects, the intent, and the follow-on demonstration to carry-out that threat (3 wars, multiple intafada's, and Jihadist/Fedayeen acts of terrorism) are subjective.
Most Respectfully,
R
These people were having their land stolen from them. They objected in the strongest terms they could muster.
Since then, they lost. Today, 65 YEARS later, Abbas states unequivocally that they are prepared to live in peace within the borders as set, plus negotiated modifications.
What do YOU consider to be justification for ethnic cleansing? Maybe we should just discuss that in the abstract so it doesn't get tangled with religious and ethnic hate. Then, we could move from there to determine cases where YOUR justifications might apply.
You're in favor of gun control?How about an atmosphere where people don't have to carry weapons all the time. Christ, the Palis act like they're living in 1870 Dodge City.Are you going to suggest that this statement of 1948 is a justification for ethnic cleansing???Some evaluations consider the language used --- "wipe them out man women and child" as a threat communicating "extermination;" which was an expression of intent to commit a Crime Against Humanity (of the highest order). Others evaluations suggest that the intent was to " " a culture on the basis of a nationality, ethnical origin, or the Jewish religious component. This would make the threat more oriented towards "genocide."
In some respects, the intent, and the follow-on demonstration to carry-out that threat (3 wars, multiple intafada's, and Jihadist/Fedayeen acts of terrorism) are subjective.
Most Respectfully,
R
These people were having their land stolen from them. They objected in the strongest terms they could muster.
Since then, they lost. Today, 65 YEARS later, Abbas states unequivocally that they are prepared to live in peace within the borders as set, plus negotiated modifications.
What do YOU consider to be justification for ethnic cleansing? Maybe we should just discuss that in the abstract so it doesn't get tangled with religious and ethnic hate. Then, we could move from there to determine cases where YOUR justifications might apply.
Palestine has referred to the land between the River and the sea since 1922 at least, Hossie. Syria and Lebanon were carved up by Sykes-Picot and Israel wasn't in existence until 1948. Apparently, Lord Rothschild wasn't up to the challenge of colonizing the Piedmont, yet I can't help wondering if he would have had your support?There is a region in the Eastern U.S. known as the Piedmont. It covers 9 states plus the District of Columbia and stretches from New Jersey to Alabama. There is similarly a region called Palestine that stretches from Jordan, Lebanon and Syria to Israel and Egypt. Piedmont is not a state and neither is Palestine. We dont call ourselves "Piedmonters" and those sandfleas in the Mid-East shouldn't call themselves "Palestinian". No such animal.Then why does the Balfour Declaration state a preference for a "Jewish homeland" in "Palestine."There is no such thing as "Palestine"
Only for Arab heathens do I favor gun control.You're in favor of gun control?How about an atmosphere where people don't have to carry weapons all the time. Christ, the Palis act like they're living in 1870 Dodge City.Are you going to suggest that this statement of 1948 is a justification for ethnic cleansing???
These people were having their land stolen from them. They objected in the strongest terms they could muster.
Since then, they lost. Today, 65 YEARS later, Abbas states unequivocally that they are prepared to live in peace within the borders as set, plus negotiated modifications.
What do YOU consider to be justification for ethnic cleansing? Maybe we should just discuss that in the abstract so it doesn't get tangled with religious and ethnic hate. Then, we could move from there to determine cases where YOUR justifications might apply.
I'm not sure I understand your point.
Hoss apples. You should take a course in history.Palestine has referred to the land between the River and the sea since 1922 at least, Hossie. Syria and Lebanon were carved up by Sykes-Picot and Israel wasn't in existence until 1948. Apparently, Lord Rothschild wasn't up to the challenge of colonizing the Piedmont, yet I can't help wondering if he would have had your support?There is a region in the Eastern U.S. known as the Piedmont. It covers 9 states plus the District of Columbia and stretches from New Jersey to Alabama. There is similarly a region called Palestine that stretches from Jordan, Lebanon and Syria to Israel and Egypt. Piedmont is not a state and neither is Palestine. We dont call ourselves "Piedmonters" and those sandfleas in the Mid-East shouldn't call themselves "Palestinian". No such animal.Then why does the Balfour Declaration state a preference for a "Jewish homeland" in "Palestine."
(COMMENT)Some evaluations consider the language used --- "wipe them out man women and child" as a threat communicating "extermination;" which was an expression of intent to commit a Crime Against Humanity (of the highest order). Others evaluations suggest that the intent was to " " a culture on the basis of a nationality, ethnical origin, or the Jewish religious component. This would make the threat more oriented towards "genocide."
In some respects, the intent, and the follow-on demonstration to carry-out that threat (3 wars, multiple intafada's, and Jihadist/Fedayeen acts of terrorism) are subjective.
Are you going to suggest that this statement of 1948 is a justification for ethnic cleansing???
These people were having their land stolen from them. They objected in the strongest terms they could muster.
(COMMENT)Since then, they lost. Today, 65 YEARS later, Abbas states unequivocally that they are prepared to live in peace within the borders as set, plus negotiated modifications.
Senior Hamas Official: The Resistance Is Entitled To Attack Israel's Embassies said:In an article published July 16, 2013 on Felesteen.ps, a website affiliated with Hamas, Hamas Refugee Affairs Department head Dr 'Issam 'Adwan argued that Hamas had the right to attack Israeli embassies and interests as well as senior Israeli officials anywhere in the world. He added that the resistance is also entitled to harm the interests of Israel's allies, headed by the U.S.
SOURCE: Friday, July 19, 2013 HAMAS
Gun cache uncovered at Palestinian diplomat's home following fatal blast said:A cache of unregistered weapons was found at a diplomatic residence where a Palestinian envoy was killed by an explosion, officials said Friday.
Ambassador Jamal al-Jamal died Wednesday after what authorities described as an accidental explosion involving the safe at his home in Prague, Czech Republic.
Officers searching the house following the blast found enough weapons to arm a ten-man combat unit, police said.
SOURCE: NBC World News Fri Jan 3, 2014 8:37 AM EST
(COMMENT)What do YOU consider to be justification for ethnic cleansing? Maybe we should just discuss that in the abstract so it doesn't get tangled with religious and ethnic hate. Then, we could move from there to determine cases where YOUR justifications might apply.
RoccoR said:I did not specify a justification. However, every nation has the right to self-defense under Chapter VII, Article 51 of the Charter.
RoccoR said:I did not specify a justification. However, every nation has the right to self-defense under Chapter VII, Article 51 of the Charter.
You never posted anything on how the Palestinians became exempt from international law.
You think that the Palestinians have no right to self defense.
