Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

[HereWeGoAgain]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Q. Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

A. Because it is fake news!

...except for that huge mound of ever-growing EVIDENCE ... something snowflakes / Democrats have not been able to find / prodice to support their witch hunt since day 1.

Please post the "ever-growing EVIDENCE" - Bullet point by Bullet point (or continue to prove you are out of touch with reality, i.e. insane).

I expect you'll see when the memo comes out.
I have a feeling it's just going to corroborate what we already know,info which has been posted all over this board for months.

Yet I have seen zero evidence that you say they have on Trump.

So enlighten me.....
Maybe your piles of evidence will change my mind.

You may be correct, but I doubt it (I'll explain in a moment why).

However, we have seen zero evidence yet, presentation of the evidence will go to the establishment of a Grand Jury if culpability can be discovered, if innocence is the outcome be assured Mr. Mueller will offer an statement that no blame was discovered and the investigation is complete.

Why do I doubt that? Because Trump has engaged in behaviors which are suspicious, to wit:

Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition: Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something).​

Yet you can never tell us what those suspicious behaviors involve....nitwit.

 

[del]

i'm not a democrat, but i'm also not stupid enough to believe the neverending stream of horseshit that the republicans in congress are putting out.

like russia interfered? let me know what the russians interfered with will you?

sure, jasper

here, edumicate your bad self

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

then you can come back and tell me the *deep state* is out to get trump

then i can laugh at you

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

i'm not a democrat, but i'm also not stupid enough to believe the neverending stream of horseshit that the republicans in congress are putting out.

like russia interfered? let me know what the russians interfered with will you?

sure, jasper

here, edumicate your bad self

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

then you can come back and tell me the *deep state* is out to get trump

then i can laugh at you

LOL...

"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion."

 

[del]

i'm not a democrat, but i'm also not stupid enough to believe the neverending stream of horseshit that the republicans in congress are putting out.

like russia interfered? let me know what the russians interfered with will you?

sure, jasper

here, edumicate your bad self

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

then you can come back and tell me the *deep state* is out to get trump

then i can laugh at you

LOL...

"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion."

We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US
presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process,
denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.We further assess
Putin and the RussianGovernment developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.
We have high confidence in these judgments
.

We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s
election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her
unfavorably to him.All three agencies agree with this judgment.
CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence
.

Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the
electoral prospects of the two main candidates.Whenit appeared to
Moscow that Secretary Clintonwas likely to win the election,the Russian influence
campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.

Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior
since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals.
Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert
intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by RussianGovernmentagencies, state funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid socialmedia users or “trolls.”Russia, like its Sovietpredecessor,has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that haveused intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage
candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.

Russia’sintelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US
presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.

We assess with high confidence thatRussian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data
This report is a declassified version of ahighly classifiedassessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.

Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of
multiple US state or local electoral boards
.
DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or
compromised were not involved in vote tallying.

Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a
platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.
We assess Moscow will apply lessons learned from its Putin-ordered campaign aimed at the US
presidential election to future influence efforts worldwide, including against US allies and their
election processes

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

it's okay. i'd be cranky if i was a russian dupe, too.
.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

i'm not a democrat, but i'm also not stupid enough to believe the neverending stream of horseshit that the republicans in congress are putting out.

like russia interfered? let me know what the russians interfered with will you?

sure, jasper

here, edumicate your bad self

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

then you can come back and tell me the *deep state* is out to get trump

then i can laugh at you

LOL...

"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion."

We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US
presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process,
denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.We further assess
Putin and the RussianGovernment developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.
We have high confidence in these judgments
.

We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s
election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her
unfavorably to him.All three agencies agree with this judgment.
CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence
.

Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the
electoral prospects of the two main candidates.Whenit appeared to
Moscow that Secretary Clintonwas likely to win the election,the Russian influence
campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.

Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior
since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals.
Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert
intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by RussianGovernmentagencies, state funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid socialmedia users or “trolls.”Russia, like its Sovietpredecessor,has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that haveused intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage
candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.

Russia’sintelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US
presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.

We assess with high confidence thatRussian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data
This report is a declassified version of ahighly classifiedassessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.

Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of
multiple US state or local electoral boards
.
DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or
compromised were not involved in vote tallying.

Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a
platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.
We assess Moscow will apply lessons learned from its Putin-ordered campaign aimed at the US
presidential election to future influence efforts worldwide, including against US allies and their
election processes

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

it's okay. i'd be cranky if i was a russian dupe, too.
.

Why would I be cranky?
Trumps mopping the floor with you dems.
Add the fact that they obviously have nothing connecting Trump to Russian interference and I wake up smiling everyday.

 

[easyt65]

i'm not a democrat, but i'm also not stupid enough to believe the neverending stream of horseshit that the republicans in congress are putting out.

like russia interfered? let me know what the russians interfered with will you?

sure, jasper

here, edumicate your bad self

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

then you can come back and tell me the *deep state* is out to get trump

then i can laugh at you

LOL...

"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion."

We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US
presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process,
denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.We further assess
Putin and the RussianGovernment developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.
We have high confidence in these judgments
.

We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s
election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her
unfavorably to him.All three agencies agree with this judgment.
CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence
.

Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the
electoral prospects of the two main candidates.Whenit appeared to
Moscow that Secretary Clintonwas likely to win the election,the Russian influence
campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.

Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior
since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals.
Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert
intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by RussianGovernmentagencies, state funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid socialmedia users or “trolls.”Russia, like its Sovietpredecessor,has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that haveused intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage
candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.

Russia’sintelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US
presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.

We assess with high confidence thatRussian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data
This report is a declassified version of ahighly classifiedassessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.

Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of
multiple US state or local electoral boards
.
DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or
compromised were not involved in vote tallying.

Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a
platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.
We assess Moscow will apply lessons learned from its Putin-ordered campaign aimed at the US
presidential election to future influence efforts worldwide, including against US allies and their
election processes

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

it's okay. i'd be cranky if i was a russian dupe, too.
.

No evidence of a crime involving Trump....which can't be said about the majority of Obama's Cabinet...

 

[jc456]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Q. Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

A. Because it is fake news!

...except for that huge mound of ever-growing EVIDENCE ... something snowflakes / Democrats have not been able to find / prodice to support their witch hunt since day 1.

Please post the "ever-growing EVIDENCE" - Bullet point by Bullet point (or continue to prove you are out of touch with reality, i.e. insane).

please do, post bullet point by bullet point on what evidence you have on trump.

 

[jc456]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Democrats aren't "horrified" about that because there wasn't anything to it.

OMG OMG OMG some agents didn't like Trump. I guess yu think every agent should be a dumbass duped Republican like you? Really?

then why did they care if it got released? Dude, that doesn't have any logic to it. I would say they are afraid of what is in it. and... that's why they didn't want it out. now that is logical to their stance.

 

[jc456]

i'm not a democrat, but i'm also not stupid enough to believe the neverending stream of horseshit that the republicans in congress are putting out.

like russia interfered? let me know what the russians interfered with will you?

sure, jasper

here, edumicate your bad self

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

then you can come back and tell me the *deep state* is out to get trump

then i can laugh at you

LOL...

"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion."

We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US
presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process,
denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.We further assess
Putin and the RussianGovernment developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.
We have high confidence in these judgments
.

We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s
election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her
unfavorably to him.All three agencies agree with this judgment.
CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence
.

Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the
electoral prospects of the two main candidates.Whenit appeared to
Moscow that Secretary Clintonwas likely to win the election,the Russian influence
campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.

Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior
since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals.
Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert
intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by RussianGovernmentagencies, state funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid socialmedia users or “trolls.”Russia, like its Sovietpredecessor,has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that haveused intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage
candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.

Russia’sintelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US
presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.

We assess with high confidence thatRussian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data
This report is a declassified version of ahighly classifiedassessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.

Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of
multiple US state or local electoral boards
.
DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or
compromised were not involved in vote tallying.

Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a
platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.
We assess Moscow will apply lessons learned from its Putin-ordered campaign aimed at the US
presidential election to future influence efforts worldwide, including against US allies and their
election processes

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

it's okay. i'd be cranky if i was a russian dupe, too.
.

Why would I be cranky?
Trumps mopping the floor with you dems.
Add the fact that they obviously have nothing connecting Trump to Russian interference and I wake up smiling everyday.

dude, no one knows what the interference even is so how can they go look into it? funny shit if I do say so myself.

 

[easyt65]

please do, post bullet point by bullet point on what evidence you have on trump.

1. He beat Hillary Clinton for the Presidency, when he knew 'IT WAS HER TURN'!

2. ONLY beat Hillary in the Electoral College, NOT in the 'popularity contest', which - EVERY liberal who loses the Electoral College race knows - is the only method that really matters in a Presidential election.

3. Trump is NOT a Democrat

4. Liberals / Snowflakes HATE Trump (#1 crime Trump is responsible for)

5. Is TOO 'clean'... If he were REALLY 'innocent' he would have left some evidence for the Democrats to use against him. (Instead they have nothing)

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

like russia interfered? let me know what the russians interfered with will you?

sure, jasper

here, edumicate your bad self

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

then you can come back and tell me the *deep state* is out to get trump

then i can laugh at you

LOL...

"We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion."

We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US
presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process,
denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.We further assess
Putin and the RussianGovernment developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.
We have high confidence in these judgments
.

We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s
election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her
unfavorably to him.All three agencies agree with this judgment.
CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence
.

Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the
electoral prospects of the two main candidates.Whenit appeared to
Moscow that Secretary Clintonwas likely to win the election,the Russian influence
campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.

Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior
since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals.
Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert
intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by RussianGovernmentagencies, state funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid socialmedia users or “trolls.”Russia, like its Sovietpredecessor,has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US presidential elections that haveused intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage
candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.

Russia’sintelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US
presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.

We assess with high confidence thatRussian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data
This report is a declassified version of ahighly classifiedassessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.

Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of
multiple US state or local electoral boards
.
DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or
compromised were not involved in vote tallying.

Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a
platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.
We assess Moscow will apply lessons learned from its Putin-ordered campaign aimed at the US
presidential election to future influence efforts worldwide, including against US allies and their
election processes

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

it's okay. i'd be cranky if i was a russian dupe, too.
.

Why would I be cranky?
Trumps mopping the floor with you dems.
Add the fact that they obviously have nothing connecting Trump to Russian interference and I wake up smiling everyday.

dude, no one knows what the interference even is so how can they go look into it? funny shit if I do say so myself.

All they have is russian bots.

 

[jc456]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Q. Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

A. Because it is fake news!

...except for that huge mound of ever-growing EVIDENCE ... something snowflakes / Democrats have not been able to find / prodice to support their witch hunt since day 1.

Please post the "ever-growing EVIDENCE" - Bullet point by Bullet point (or continue to prove you are out of touch with reality, i.e. insane).

please do, post bullet point by bullet point on what evidence you have on trump.

Yo Wry baby, where'd you go? where is that bulleted list.

 

[koshergrl]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Useful idiot - Wikipedia

 

[Dirk the Daring]

The answer should be obvious; because their party benefited from it.

At the expense of their country I might add. It's pathetic.

 

[Dschrute3]

The same reason they don't care that Hillary Clinton and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz rigged her nomination. Criminal corruption is fine, just as long as it's fellow Democrats involved. It is what it is.

 

[xyz]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Because they don't get their info from Russian re-tweeters?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Oh they're horrified alright....horrified they've been busted.

 

[BS Filter]

The Democrats are corrupt. Therefore, corruption in government institutions that benefits them is promoted and protected. Simple stuff here.

 

[JoeB131]

So if you hate corruption among high level bureaucrats you hate law enforcement?

If you believe in justice you're whoring for Russia?

You guys have lost it.

You are literally kicking and screaming over the American people being informed about what their government is doing. What is up with that?

Isn't an issue of Justice. We went well beyond that when we ignored the will of the people.

This is about Trump attacking the people investigating him because hes probably as guilty as shit, never really thought anyone would investigate his money laundering.

 

[JoeB131]

Trump is apparently under a BULLSHIT investigation BECAUSE of McCabe.

Imagine that.

Except he and his cronies really did meet with the Russians.

Imagine that.