Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

[easyt65]

If the end result is the same, then why do you all feel the need to represent it in a way that is not accurate?

We're not - we are simply not allowing you to put your Snowflake BS Spin on this.

The links provided report new FBI Director Wray went to Congress, reviewed the Intel Committee's Summary of Evidence, returned to the FBI, and pressured McCabe, who is under DOJ investigation, to GTFO...to take that Terminal Leave he had been planning to take, that NOW was the time for him to do it.

McCabe, it is being reported, did not go to Wray and tell him he wanted to start taking his Terminal Leave' 'NOW'. It was Wray who went to McCabe and pressured him to take that leave NOW. That makes all the difference in the world.

I have no doubt McCabe had been saving up time to slip out the door quietly and ride out his last official days in obscurity...but FIT HIT THE SHAN...in the form of:
- Strzok's texts exposing how McCabe stated the FBI did not want Trump to win and had an 'Insurance Policy' to act on if he did
- Strzok's texts exposing the FBI's 'Secret Society' that met off-site
- Strzok's texts that exposed McCabe was the one who leaked classified after a meeting HE (McCabe) arranged
- McCabe being placed under DOJ investigation.
- The Summary of Evidence about to be released exposing McCabe's (suspected criminal) actions....

Wray reportedly pressured Wray to move up his plans and GTFO 'NOW'....which he did.

No spin, no playing with the definition of words.....just what is being reported / has been reported

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Those all have very different meanings, dope.

and only you care. gone is gone. next we'll see if he committed a crime. can't wait. got popcorn,

We know you don't care. You twist words in every post.

so tell us what the difference is and why it matters big guy! In the grand scheme of things, gone is gone right?

If the end result is the same, then why do you all feel the need to represent it in a way that is not accurate?

what difference does it make? I asked why it matters. fk man, you can't even answer that. amazing the stupid from the left. they know absolutely nothing. they fking never answer a question. evah!!!!!!

I asked you why it has to fit your narrative, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

How about we see all the facts related to the alleged corruption so we can decide?
What are you afraid of?

I’m not the one that is yelling and screaming about how horrible it is that we are getting more evidence released

Why aren't you?

Because I want all evidence shown so corrupt actors can be rooted out

unless of course they're the corrupt and criminal actions of the orange one.

what did russia interfere with?

what did russia interfere with?

Your brain.

 

[jc456]

If the end result is the same, then why do you all feel the need to represent it in a way that is not accurate?

We're not - we are simply not allowing you to put your Snowflake BS Spin on this.

The links provided report new FBI Director Wray went to Congress, reviewed the Intel Committee's Summary of Evidence, returned to the FBI, and pressured McCabe, who is under DOJ investigation, to GTFO...to take that Terminal Leave he had been planning to take, that NOW was the time for him to do it.

McCabe, it is being reported, did not go to Wray and tell him he wanted to start taking his Terminal Leave' 'NOW'. It was Wray who went to McCabe and pressured him to take that leave NOW. That makes all the difference in the world.

I have no doubt McCabe had been saving up time to slip out the door quietly and ride out his last official days in obscurity...but FIT HIT THE SHAN...in the form of:
- Strzok's texts exposing how McCabe stated the FBI did not want Trump to win and had an 'Insurance Policy' to act on if he did
- Strzok's texts exposing the FBI's 'Secret Society' that met off-site
- Strzok's texts that exposed McCabe was the one who leaked classified after a meeting HE (McCabe) arranged
- McCabe being placed under DOJ investigation.
- The Summary of Evidence about to be released exposing McCabe's (suspected criminal) actions....

Wray reportedly pressured Wray to move up his plans and GTFO 'NOW'....which he did.

No spin, no playing with the definition of words.....just what is being reported / has been reported

ewwwwww watch out

 

[jc456]

and only you care. gone is gone. next we'll see if he committed a crime. can't wait. got popcorn,

We know you don't care. You twist words in every post.

so tell us what the difference is and why it matters big guy! In the grand scheme of things, gone is gone right?

If the end result is the same, then why do you all feel the need to represent it in a way that is not accurate?

what difference does it make? I asked why it matters. fk man, you can't even answer that. amazing the stupid from the left. they know absolutely nothing. they fking never answer a question. evah!!!!!!

I asked you why it has to fit your narrative, dope.

it doesn't have to. I really don't give a fk. I just read the news outlet reports and posted. why do you care?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If the end result is the same, then why do you all feel the need to represent it in a way that is not accurate?

We're not - we are simply not allowing you to put your Snowflake BS Spin on this.

The links provided report new FBI Director Wray went to Congress, reviewed the Intel Committee's Summary of Evidence, returned to the FBI, and pressured McCabe, who is under DOJ investigation, to GTFO...to take that Terminal Leave he had been planning to take, that NOW was the time for him to do it.

McCabe, it is being reported, did not go to Wray and tell him he wanted to start taking his Terminal Leave' 'NOW'. It was Wray who went to McCabe and pressured him to take that leave NOW. That makes all the difference in the world.

I have no doubt McCabe had been saving up time to slip out the door quietly and ride out his last official days in obscurity...but FIT HIT THE SHAN...in the form of:
- Strzok's texts exposing how McCabe stated the FBI did not want Trump to win and had an 'Insurance Policy' to act on if he did
- Strzok's texts exposing the FBI's 'Secret Society' that met off-site
- Strzok's texts that exposed McCabe was the one who leaked classified after a meeting HE (McCabe) arranged
- McCabe being placed under DOJ investigation.
- The Summary of Evidence about to be released exposing McCabe's (suspected criminal) actions....

Wray reportedly pressured Wray to move up his plans and GTFO 'NOW'....which he did.

No spin, no playing with the definition of words.....just what is being reported / has been reported

We're not

You are.
You're attempting to create a narrative that suggests some further nefariousness.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

The FBI is the most conservative agency in all of our Government

If they are corrupt.......it is conservative corruption

So all of those Hillary supporters are actually conservatives?

Too funny!

I am amazed that your brain cell has not died of loneliness by now!

Dummy

How many Hillary supporters are in the FBI? Two?

I bet if you polled FBI agents, you would find most are staunch conservatives
Why not release all the emails from FBI agents so we can see where they stand

Here's two that absolutely hate Trump and they were investigating him.
Lisa Page, key player in Mueller's Russia probe, in DC | Daily Mail Online

Two?

In the whole FBI?
What about all the rest of the FBI which leans decidedly Conservative?

I believe you were already given a comprehensive list.
What made these two particular miscreants so bad is they were part of the Trump investigation.

So tell me,how did two extreme anti Trump FBI agents end up on the Mewler team?

 

[jc456]

I’m not the one that is yelling and screaming about how horrible it is that we are getting more evidence released

Why aren't you?

Because I want all evidence shown so corrupt actors can be rooted out

unless of course they're the corrupt and criminal actions of the orange one.

what did russia interfere with?

what did russia interfere with?

Your brain.

how did they do it?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If the end result is the same, then why do you all feel the need to represent it in a way that is not accurate?

We're not - we are simply not allowing you to put your Snowflake BS Spin on this.

The links provided report new FBI Director Wray went to Congress, reviewed the Intel Committee's Summary of Evidence, returned to the FBI, and pressured McCabe, who is under DOJ investigation, to GTFO...to take that Terminal Leave he had been planning to take, that NOW was the time for him to do it.

McCabe, it is being reported, did not go to Wray and tell him he wanted to start taking his Terminal Leave' 'NOW'. It was Wray who went to McCabe and pressured him to take that leave NOW. That makes all the difference in the world.

I have no doubt McCabe had been saving up time to slip out the door quietly and ride out his last official days in obscurity...but FIT HIT THE SHAN...in the form of:
- Strzok's texts exposing how McCabe stated the FBI did not want Trump to win and had an 'Insurance Policy' to act on if he did
- Strzok's texts exposing the FBI's 'Secret Society' that met off-site
- Strzok's texts that exposed McCabe was the one who leaked classified after a meeting HE (McCabe) arranged
- McCabe being placed under DOJ investigation.
- The Summary of Evidence about to be released exposing McCabe's (suspected criminal) actions....

Wray reportedly pressured Wray to move up his plans and GTFO 'NOW'....which he did.

No spin, no playing with the definition of words.....just what is being reported / has been reported

The links provided report new FBI Director Wray went to Congress, reviewed the Intel Committee's Summary of Evidence, returned to the FBI, and pressured McCabe, who is under DOJ investigation, to GTFO...to take that Terminal Leave he had been planning to take, that NOW was the time for him to do it.

This is where you're retarded logic is in full view.
If McCabe were already planning on taking terminal leave, then how could he have been forced? Terminal leave is using banked vacation days until the retirement date.

 

[Flash]

Liberals wanted the Obama administration to use the power of government to insure the vicotry for Crooked Hillary so that is why they see nothing worn on the FBI corruption. Just like they saw nothing wrong with Obama using the IRS to shut down the grass root conservative movements.

Liberals are always lacking in moral clarity. They think their agenda to make America a socialist shithole is more important than doing the right thing, either legally or morally.

Liberals are the scum of America.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

We know you don't care. You twist words in every post.

so tell us what the difference is and why it matters big guy! In the grand scheme of things, gone is gone right?

If the end result is the same, then why do you all feel the need to represent it in a way that is not accurate?

what difference does it make? I asked why it matters. fk man, you can't even answer that. amazing the stupid from the left. they know absolutely nothing. they fking never answer a question. evah!!!!!!

I asked you why it has to fit your narrative, dope.

it doesn't have to. I really don't give a fk. I just read the news outlet reports and posted. why do you care?

I don't. Carry on.

 

[jc456]

so tell us what the difference is and why it matters big guy! In the grand scheme of things, gone is gone right?

If the end result is the same, then why do you all feel the need to represent it in a way that is not accurate?

what difference does it make? I asked why it matters. fk man, you can't even answer that. amazing the stupid from the left. they know absolutely nothing. they fking never answer a question. evah!!!!!!

I asked you why it has to fit your narrative, dope.

it doesn't have to. I really don't give a fk. I just read the news outlet reports and posted. why do you care?

I don't. Carry on.

fk dude, sure you do. you be spanking all kinds of ass in here for not reporting it the way you want. why? why does how it's reported matter so much to you? why are you afraid to let us know your feelings here? you are pssed big time.

 

[hadit]

Post up anything that has confirmed he was fired.

McCabe Forced Out Over Role In 2016 Election Investigations

"FBI director Christopher Wray put pressure on deputy director Andrew McCabe to resign after reviewing an inspector general report on the bureau's handling of investigations pertaining to the 2016 presidential election"

'Pressured to Resign' = FORCED OUT, GIVEN AN ULTIMATUM, FIRED, GONE!

He wasn't fired, dope

What exactly are you trying to accomplish here, other than troll over excruciatingly small differences in word meanings?

I don't think anyone with an above room temperature IQ believes he would have left at this precise moment on his own. Do you believe that this is all just a coincidence?

If not, and I believe you don't, you are merely trolling.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Q. Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

A. Because it is fake news!

...except for that huge mound of ever-growing EVIDENCE ... something snowflakes / Democrats have not been able to find / prodice to support their witch hunt since day 1.

Please post the "ever-growing EVIDENCE" - Bullet point by Bullet point (or continue to prove you are out of touch with reality, i.e. insane).

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Q. Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

A. Because it is fake news!

...except for that huge mound of ever-growing EVIDENCE ... something snowflakes / Democrats have not been able to find / prodice to support their witch hunt since day 1.

Please post the "ever-growing EVIDENCE" - Bullet point by Bullet point (or continue to prove you are out of touch with reality, i.e. insane).

I expect you'll see when the memo comes out.
I have a feeling it's just going to corroborate what we already know,info which has been posted all over this board for months.

Yet I have seen zero evidence that you say they have on Trump.

So enlighten me.....
Maybe your piles of evidence will change my mind.

 

[easyt65]

If the end result is the same, then why do you all feel the need to represent it in a way that is not accurate?

We're not - we are simply not allowing you to put your Snowflake BS Spin on this.

The links provided report new FBI Director Wray went to Congress, reviewed the Intel Committee's Summary of Evidence, returned to the FBI, and pressured McCabe, who is under DOJ investigation, to GTFO...to take that Terminal Leave he had been planning to take, that NOW was the time for him to do it.

McCabe, it is being reported, did not go to Wray and tell him he wanted to start taking his Terminal Leave' 'NOW'. It was Wray who went to McCabe and pressured him to take that leave NOW. That makes all the difference in the world.

I have no doubt McCabe had been saving up time to slip out the door quietly and ride out his last official days in obscurity...but FIT HIT THE SHAN...in the form of:
- Strzok's texts exposing how McCabe stated the FBI did not want Trump to win and had an 'Insurance Policy' to act on if he did
- Strzok's texts exposing the FBI's 'Secret Society' that met off-site
- Strzok's texts that exposed McCabe was the one who leaked classified after a meeting HE (McCabe) arranged
- McCabe being placed under DOJ investigation.
- The Summary of Evidence about to be released exposing McCabe's (suspected criminal) actions....

Wray reportedly pressured Wray to move up his plans and GTFO 'NOW'....which he did.

No spin, no playing with the definition of words.....just what is being reported / has been reported

We're not

You are.
You're attempting to create a narrative that suggests some further nefariousness.

Hey Hutch....your simply saying, 'Uh-Uh' every time looks kinda silly. Just sayin'.... ;p

 

[easyt65]

Please post the "ever-growing EVIDENCE" - Bullet point by Bullet point

You sure as hell haven't been paying attention, have you. I have been doing that for a long time now.... Go back through this thread and look / read...

 

[RealDave]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Democrats aren't "horrified" about that because there wasn't anything to it.

OMG OMG OMG some agents didn't like Trump. I guess yu think every agent should be a dumbass duped Republican like you? Really?

 

[Wry Catcher]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Q. Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

A. Because it is fake news!

...except for that huge mound of ever-growing EVIDENCE ... something snowflakes / Democrats have not been able to find / prodice to support their witch hunt since day 1.

Please post the "ever-growing EVIDENCE" - Bullet point by Bullet point (or continue to prove you are out of touch with reality, i.e. insane).

I expect you'll see when the memo comes out.
I have a feeling it's just going to corroborate what we already know,info which has been posted all over this board for months.

Yet I have seen zero evidence that you say they have on Trump.

So enlighten me.....
Maybe your piles of evidence will change my mind.

You may be correct, but I doubt it (I'll explain in a moment why).

However, we have seen zero evidence yet, presentation of the evidence will go to the establishment of a Grand Jury if culpability can be discovered, if innocence is the outcome be assured Mr. Mueller will offer an statement that no blame was discovered and the investigation is complete.

Why do I doubt that? Because Trump has engaged in behaviors which are suspicious, to wit:

Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition: Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something).​

 

[easyt65]

The answer is that Democrats are traitorous scum who hate America. They support dicatorship so long as they are running the show.

Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

It is becoming clearer by the day, after over a year of investigations, that the Obama administration did indeed weaponize the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the IRS and the NSA. Over those eight years, each of the above agencies was transformed into an arm of the Democratic Party tasked with crippling the opposition and abrogating the Constitution.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The public has seen only a fraction of the material that, according to those who have seen it, proves higher-ups at the DOJ and FBI colluded to clear Hillary Clinton of any responsibility for her many crimes. These operatives knew she had ignored all the rules regarding classified material by having her own private server. They likely all knew the Clinton Foundation was nothing but a pay-to-play outfit to enrich the Clintons (only 6% of its funds went to charity). And this bunch still thought she was qualified to be President, this woman with a forty-year history of lying, cheating and scheming!

Are there no essential values among these persons privileged to wield power over the rest of us?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

What is so distressing is that no elected Democrat, not one, has expressed shock or concern that these agencies have been so corrupted. Given what we know so far, every member of Congress and every member of the press should be equally horrified. This level of criminality should offend everyone, every citizen and every elected official. But to the left, it's just another dust-up created by those rascally Republicans. Use our law enforcement agencies to destroy a campaign and/or to bring about the impeachment of a President? "So what" seems to be the attitude on the left. The Constitution be damned.

Among these culprits, who include Obama, Hillary Clinton ...​

Q. Why aren't the Democrats horrified by the corruption at the FBI and DOJ?

A. Because it is fake news!

...except for that huge mound of ever-growing EVIDENCE ... something snowflakes / Democrats have not been able to find / prodice to support their witch hunt since day 1.

Please post the "ever-growing EVIDENCE" - Bullet point by Bullet point (or continue to prove you are out of touch with reality, i.e. insane).

I expect you'll see when the memo comes out.
I have a feeling it's just going to corroborate what we already know,info which has been posted all over this board for months.

Yet I have seen zero evidence that you say they have on Trump.

So enlighten me.....
Maybe your piles of evidence will change my mind.

You may be correct, but I doubt it (I'll explain in a moment why).

However, we have seen zero evidence yet, presentation of the evidence will go to the establishment of a Grand Jury if culpability can be discovered, if innocence is the outcome be assured Mr. Mueller will offer an statement that no blame was discovered and the investigation is complete.

Why do I doubt that? Because Trump has engaged in behaviors which are suspicious, to wit:

Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition: Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something).​

SUMMARY:

NO EVIDENCE ... GOING ON 2 YEARS...