Why Benghazi Matters

[Soggy in NOLA]

Who the fuck is Ben Ghazi?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Idiot.....who is this Ben Ghazzi?

Is he some Italian Ben Stein?

Dainty is a mental retard. Mock him or ignore him, but never take him seriously.

 

[kaz]

Will Right Wingers Care About Ben Ghazzi On November 7th?

yes

 

[BlindBoo]

Turn off Fox.

It's Bad News for America.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

 

[Claudette]

Perhaps you should tune into FOX.

You might actually learn something.

Oh wait. You want that fuck back in for another four years. Never mind.

 

[Dreamy]

Turn off Fox.

It's Bad News for America.

What do you watch?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Turn off Fox.

It's Bad News for America.

“(The) basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta told Pentagon reporters. “And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

 

[BlindBoo]

Turn off Fox.

It's Bad News for America.

What do you watch?

Does it really matter? Faithful Faux viewers tell me that all other news sources are part of the ubber-liberal plot to turn America into a socialist haven.

 

[BlindBoo]

Perhaps you should tune into FOX.

You might actually learn something.

Oh wait. You want that fuck back in for another four years. Never mind.

I did tune into Faux the other day and I did learn something. They're still the same hacks and liars that they were the last time I watched them.

 

[Dreamy]

Turn off Fox.

It's Bad News for America.

What do you watch?

Does it really matter? Faithful Faux viewers tell me that all other news sources are part of the ubber-liberal plot to turn America into a socialist haven.

No it does matter. I think Fox leans right and others lean left. So I want to know which one you watch that is so neutral. I don't think it is any big deal which way a network leans as long as the viewer is not a partisan hack and actually looks up news independently of the TV news.

I bet you do being the discriminate and astute political talent that you are.

So tell me which TV news keeps you informed without bias.

 

[Avatar4321]

It sure isnt going anywhere if Obama is reelected. But even if he isn't, we aren't going to rest till we have some answers.

 

[Nightson]

Will Right Wingers Care About Ben Ghazzi On November 7th?

Will Ben Ghazzi still rule USMB after Nov 6th?

I think most Americans--throughout the coming months--will continue to question the details of the Benghazi killings.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Perhaps you should tune into FOX.

You might actually learn something.

Oh wait. You want that fuck back in for another four years. Never mind.

I did tune into Faux the other day and I did learn something. They're still the same hacks and liars that they were the last time I watched them.

exactly


“(The) basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta told Pentagon reporters. “And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

 

[Neotrotsky]

Pew: MSNBC’s coverage of Romney more negative than Fox’s of Obama

h/t Hotair

MSNBC was especially negative in its treatment of Romney’s policy prescriptions. Fully 75% of the stories focused on Romney’s policies were negative compared with 1% that were positive. For Obama, by comparison, 32% of policy stories were favorable while 18% were negative.​

 

[Synthaholic]

Will Right Wingers Care About Ben Ghazzi On November 7th?


Huma Abedin

 

[Vel]

Perhaps you should tune into FOX.

You might actually learn something.

Oh wait. You want that fuck back in for another four years. Never mind.

I did tune into Faux the other day and I did learn something. They're still the same hacks and liars that they were the last time I watched them.

exactly


“(The) basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta told Pentagon reporters. “And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

Really? What real time information did they have on the ground when they sent forces into Abbottabad?

 

[Katzndogz]

You can see your socialist heaven right now. It's called Staten Island.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Turn off Fox.

It's Bad News for America.

How CBS ?


CBS (11/01/12): If the MSM reports on this,,,, The dam’s starting to break.

“The [Counterterrorism Security Group] is the one group that’s supposed to know what resources every agency has. They know of multiple options and have the ability to coordinate counterterrorism assets across all the agencies,” a high-ranking government official told CBS News. “They were not allowed to do their job. They were not called upon.”…

Counterterrorism sources and internal emails reviewed by CBS News express frustration that key responders were ready to deploy, but were not called upon to help in the attack…

Another senior counter terrorism official says a hostage rescue team was alternately asked to get ready and then stand down throughout the night, as officials seemed unable to make up their minds.

A third potential responder from a counter-terror force stationed in Europe says components of AFICOM — the military’s Africa Command based in Stuttgart, Germany — were working on course of action during the assault. But no plan was put to use…

“The response process was isolated at the most senior level,” says an official referring to top officials in the executive branch. “My fellow counterterrorism professionals and I (were) not consulted.”​

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Pew: MSNBC’s coverage of Romney more negative than Fox’s of Obama

h/t Hotair

MSNBC was especially negative in its treatment of Romney’s policy prescriptions. Fully 75% of the stories focused on Romney’s policies were negative compared with 1% that were positive. For Obama, by comparison, 32% of policy stories were favorable while 18% were negative.​

http://media.hotair.com/greenroom/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/p.jpgIMG][/quote]

[FONT="Comic Sans MS"][SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]MSNBC? [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]

who cares?