NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2009
- 117,063
- 13,888
No, because you dishonestly took the quote out of context or ommitted paramount information your attempt at your argument is slanderous. What you are doing is exactly what creationists do. In fact the exact body of work you submitted can be found on numerous creationist sites. What you are doing is deliberate fraud and deceit.Ever hear of quote mining. which you have done many times before. A very dishonest tatic.Pleeeeezzzze.....am I gonna have to prove you're a fool????
1. First.....a vocabulary lesson-
Abrupt: a: characterized by or involving action or change without preparation or warning :unexpected<came to an abrupt stop><an abrupt turn><anabrupt decision to retire
Abrupt Definition of abrupt by Merriam-Webster
2. ":Charles Darwin believed that evolution was a slow and gradual process."
Gradual Change Vs. Punctuated Equilibrium The Study of Change Over Time Evolution 101 University of Vermont
3. "Sudden appearance.In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and 'fully formed.'"6.5 Stephen Jay Gould and
4. Your understanding of mutation is tenuous at best.
The mutation does not allow for reproduction if it is harmful....the initiate dies.
Your statement "-rarely a very significant mutation
survives and thus A NEW SPECIES seems to come
out of nowhere.."
....is absurd. If the evidence is not there because the recipient of the mutation died, it died before it could pass on genes.
This is like trying to play chess with three year olds.
I'm the only one in this thread who understands science.
Quote Mine Project Sudden Appearance andStasis
Quote Mine Project Gould Eldredge and PunctuatedEquilibria Quotes
"Quote mining" is the pretend defense by morons like you who cannot defeat the argument.
Every quote I provide is correct and accurate....and, why you hate.....proves my point.
She will neither confirm nor deny she's a Creationist, which is an additional aspect of her odious character.
What I've found is that searching for the edited "quotes" she cuts and pastes into theses threads will link to the most extreme of the fundamentalist Christian ministries.
Of course. It goes without saying she's trying to discredit evolution as a means to elevate creationism.
Why not just admit that? Most creationists wear that title proudly.