Why do people talk about "liberal bias" when the phrase is technically an oxymoron?

[Derideo_Te]

But the extreme right are perfect and do have the correct answers?

Nobody in this world is perfect but wanting to get government under control is a better way than to keep spending.

You are focused on the symptom and not the cause because it is easier to blame "big government spending" rather than to deal with the reason why we are spending trillions on enriching the Koch bros and the corporate special interests.

Which side is trying to get the tax code changed that would stop most of the big corporations in their lobbing for lower taxes?
It isn't the left.

Then why did the right just push through more deregulation for big corporations in the latest spending bill?

Their not fully in charge yet, they will be in January. Good things are fixing to happen.

Non sequitur!

 

[jknowgood]

They are not facts.
Those are lefty opinions

Really?

Reagan didn't raise taxes?

Reagan didn't increase the size of "big government"?

Reagan didn't run up the National Debt into the Trillions?

None of those are facts according to the extreme right?

Who controlled both houses while Reagan was president?

Who signed those tax increases and massive spending bills?

Reagan did what he had to do, and didn't whine like Obama does. Clinton benefited from Reagan's policies big time.

Your inability to refute the facts has been confirmed. Your baseless claim in null and void. Have a nice day.

I understand, facts run liberals off every time.

 

[peach174]

Liberals usually cannot tell the difference between disagreement and bias or hatred. If they could understand the difference ... They would have to address the fact they are not perfect and don't have the correct answer to every equation.

.

But the extreme right are perfect and do have the correct answers?

Nobody in this world is perfect but wanting to get government under control is a better way than to keep spending.

You are focused on the symptom and not the cause because it is easier to blame "big government spending" rather than to deal with the reason why we are spending trillions on enriching the Koch bros and the corporate special interests.

Which side is trying to get the tax code changed that would stop most of the big corporations in their lobbing for lower taxes?
It isn't the left.

Then why did the right just push through more deregulation for big corporations in the latest spending bill?

They didn't.
That's Senator Elizabeth Warren's opinion and she did not read the bill.

 

[Derideo_Te]

But the extreme right are perfect and do have the correct answers?

Nobody in this world is perfect but wanting to get government under control is a better way than to keep spending.

You are focused on the symptom and not the cause because it is easier to blame "big government spending" rather than to deal with the reason why we are spending trillions on enriching the Koch bros and the corporate special interests.

Which side is trying to get the tax code changed that would stop most of the big corporations in their lobbing for lower taxes?
It isn't the left.

Then why did the right just push through more deregulation for big corporations in the latest spending bill?

They didn't.
That's Senator Elizabeth Warren's opinion and she did not read the bill.

In which case the onus is on you to provide a credible proving her wrong.

 

[peach174]

Nobody in this world is perfect but wanting to get government under control is a better way than to keep spending.

You are focused on the symptom and not the cause because it is easier to blame "big government spending" rather than to deal with the reason why we are spending trillions on enriching the Koch bros and the corporate special interests.

Which side is trying to get the tax code changed that would stop most of the big corporations in their lobbing for lower taxes?
It isn't the left.

Then why did the right just push through more deregulation for big corporations in the latest spending bill?

They didn't.
That's Senator Elizabeth Warren's opinion and she did not read the bill.

In which case the onus is on you to provide a credible proving her wrong.

Is was in another thread.
I guess you missed it.

 

[Unkotare]

That's Senator Elizabeth Warren's opinion and she did not read the bill.

She was busy with Native American business.

 

[SwimExpert]

Hello. I thought this would be the best forum to ask this and I've wondered it for a few years now. It doesn't make sense if you think about it (even by con standards). Liberalism is neutral by definition. The farther to the right you move, the more partisan you become. It's an obvious fact if you look at the US today. The Left is where all of the groups fighting for social justice and against bigotry and intolerance lay. The more right wing an individual or group is, the more they represent causes that the Left opposes.

You post a question about liberal bias, and your rationale is one of the most abhorrent examples of liberal bias ever.

 

[Derideo_Te]

You are focused on the symptom and not the cause because it is easier to blame "big government spending" rather than to deal with the reason why we are spending trillions on enriching the Koch bros and the corporate special interests.

Which side is trying to get the tax code changed that would stop most of the big corporations in their lobbing for lower taxes?
It isn't the left.

Then why did the right just push through more deregulation for big corporations in the latest spending bill?

They didn't.
That's Senator Elizabeth Warren's opinion and she did not read the bill.

In which case the onus is on you to provide a credible proving her wrong.

Is was in another thread.
I guess you missed it.

Yeah right, and the check is in the mail!

Thank you for conceding that you cannot substantiate your opinion about Senator Warren's facts.

 

[SwimExpert]

Whether or not one agrees with the OP, I think the school yard bully routines are:

1) Unnecessary;

2) Boring;

3) Intentionally degrading;

4) A sad commentary on the state of the conservative mind these days.

Liberal bias.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Assumes facts not in evidence.

St Reagan would never make it through today's extreme rightwing primaries because he would be way too "liberal" for the Tea Party voters.

The facts are that the extreme right has moved so far to the right that they are no longer capable of thinking, instead they just emote.

30 years of ever greater extremism by the far right has resulted in wars, economic collapse and the financial gutting of the middle class while enriching only the 1%.

Those are indisputable facts.

They are not facts.
Those are lefty opinions

Really?

Reagan didn't raise taxes?

Reagan didn't increase the size of "big government"?

Reagan didn't run up the National Debt into the Trillions?

None of those are facts according to the extreme right?

Who controlled both houses while Reagan was president?

Who signed those tax increases and massive spending bills?

Reagan did what he had to do, and didn't whine like Obama does. Clinton benefited from Reagan's policies big time.

good gawd, and here I thought you were a serious poster

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

But the extreme right are perfect and do have the correct answers?

Nobody in this world is perfect but wanting to get government under control is a better way than to keep spending.

You are focused on the symptom and not the cause because it is easier to blame "big government spending" rather than to deal with the reason why we are spending trillions on enriching the Koch bros and the corporate special interests.

Which side is trying to get the tax code changed that would stop most of the big corporations in their lobbing for lower taxes?
It isn't the left.

Then why did the right just push through more deregulation for big corporations in the latest spending bill?

Their not fully in charge yet, they will be in January. Good things are fixing to happen.

magical thinking?

jesus. I have to remember how you are before I post seriously with you ever again

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

That's Senator Elizabeth Warren's opinion and she did not read the bill.

She was busy with Native American business.

yet again you stay true to form
nothing substantive or useful to add

 

[Derideo_Te]

That's Senator Elizabeth Warren's opinion and she did not read the bill.

She was busy with Native American business.

yet again you stay true to form
nothing substantive or useful to add

You noticed that too?

Unkotare's drive by posts with less value than a happy meal toy in them.

 

[Bfgrn]

Assumes facts not in evidence.

St Reagan would never make it through today's extreme rightwing primaries because he would be way too "liberal" for the Tea Party voters.

The facts are that the extreme right has moved so far to the right that they are no longer capable of thinking, instead they just emote.

30 years of ever greater extremism by the far right has resulted in wars, economic collapse and the financial gutting of the middle class while enriching only the 1%.

Those are indisputable facts.

They are not facts.
Those are lefty opinions

Really?

Reagan didn't raise taxes?

Reagan didn't increase the size of "big government"?

Reagan didn't run up the National Debt into the Trillions?

None of those are facts according to the extreme right?

Who controlled both houses while Reagan was president?

Who signed those tax increases and massive spending bills?

Reagan did what he had to do, and didn't whine like Obama does. Clinton benefited from Reagan's policies big time.

Reagan whined for years blaming Carter. NO ONE benefited from the Reagan years, we are still paying the price for his failed 'revolution'...

 

[jknowgood]

Conservatives are in charge again. I mean president Clinton did get a balanced budget because of them.

 

[The Rabbi]

They are not facts.
Those are lefty opinions

Really?

Reagan didn't raise taxes?

Reagan didn't increase the size of "big government"?

Reagan didn't run up the National Debt into the Trillions?

None of those are facts according to the extreme right?

Who controlled both houses while Reagan was president?

Who signed those tax increases and massive spending bills?

Reagan did what he had to do, and didn't whine like Obama does. Clinton benefited from Reagan's policies big time.

Reagan whined for years blaming Carter. NO ONE benefited from the Reagan years, we are still paying the price for his failed 'revolution'...

Reagan never blamed Carter, you ignornat piece of Monkey shit. That's Obama who whines about his predecessors.

 

[jknowgood]

They are not facts.
Those are lefty opinions

Really?

Reagan didn't raise taxes?

Reagan didn't increase the size of "big government"?

Reagan didn't run up the National Debt into the Trillions?

None of those are facts according to the extreme right?

Who controlled both houses while Reagan was president?

Who signed those tax increases and massive spending bills?

Reagan did what he had to do, and didn't whine like Obama does. Clinton benefited from Reagan's policies big time.

Reagan whined for years blaming Carter. NO ONE benefited from the Reagan years, we are still paying the price for his failed 'revolution'...

We aren't talking about Obama.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

They are not facts.
Those are lefty opinions

Really?

Reagan didn't raise taxes?

Reagan didn't increase the size of "big government"?

Reagan didn't run up the National Debt into the Trillions?

None of those are facts according to the extreme right?

Who controlled both houses while Reagan was president?

Who signed those tax increases and massive spending bills?

Reagan did what he had to do, and didn't whine like Obama does. Clinton benefited from Reagan's policies big time.

Reagan whined for years blaming Carter. NO ONE benefited from the Reagan years, we are still paying the price for his failed 'revolution'...

yep

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Conservatives are in charge again. I mean president Clinton did get a balanced budget because of them.

And we can thank them for the repeal of Glass/Steagal too leading to the financial disaster of 2007/2008

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Really?

Reagan didn't raise taxes?

Reagan didn't increase the size of "big government"?

Reagan didn't run up the National Debt into the Trillions?

None of those are facts according to the extreme right?

Who controlled both houses while Reagan was president?

Who signed those tax increases and massive spending bills?

Reagan did what he had to do, and didn't whine like Obama does. Clinton benefited from Reagan's policies big time.

Reagan whined for years blaming Carter. NO ONE benefited from the Reagan years, we are still paying the price for his failed 'revolution'...

Reagan never blamed Carter, you ignornat piece of Monkey shit. That's Obama who whines about his predecessors.

more insults with little in the way of value? par for the course