Why do so many people deny climate change

Sure, now were down to the "conspiracy" and "It's all made up."

Sure... The CPI is made up, the unemployment numbers are made up. The GDP is made up. The temperature readings are made up. It's all made up.

You really need to take your medication.

The temperature numbers are made up. The global warming magicians have been caught red-handed numerous times doing exactly that.

Your just demonstrating that your an uneducated moron. No such thing has happened except in your own mind. AWG has been carefully examined by a staunch denier and shown to be factual. Just saying "it's all a lie" doesn't make it so.

Showing that posting a map of the Northern Elephant Seal is bullshit given that the Southern Elephant Seal is used to do deep ocean measures demonstrated you to be a bullshitter.

Look, the psycho Chihauhau won't let go of my pant leg.

You still haven't provided a shred of evidence that Trenberth has any data prior to the mid 1990s. No amount of personal attacks is going to divert anyone's attention from that irrefutable fact. Neither will harping on trivial idiocies like whether there are two populations of Elephant seals. The Elephant seal data is a joke.

Proof done.

As usual, you have only proved that you're mentally unstable.
 
Last edited:
The temperature numbers are made up. The global warming magicians have been caught red-handed numerous times doing exactly that.

Your just demonstrating that your an uneducated moron. No such thing has happened except in your own mind. AWG has been carefully examined by a staunch denier and shown to be factual. Just saying "it's all a lie" doesn't make it so.

Showing that posting a map of the Northern Elephant Seal is bullshit given that the Southern Elephant Seal is used to do deep ocean measures demonstrated you to be a bullshitter.

Proof done.

Look, the psycho Chihauhau won't let go of my pant leg.

You still haven't provided a shred of evidence that Trenberth has any data prior to the mid 1990s. No amount of personal attacks is going to divert anyone's attention from that irrefutable fact. Neither will harping on trivial idiocies like whether there are two populations of Elephant seals. The Elephant seal data is a joke.

Yeah, that's right, keep replying to my posts and then claim your not obsessed.

I never said Trenberth has data prior to 1990. I don't even know who Trenberth is.

There are no irrefutable facts to draw attention from, you have none.

You don't know how science works and haven't demonstrated anything to the contrary. In fact, you continue to avoid doing so.

Basically, your just a troll.
 
You're the one with zero on the scoreboard. No data, no theories, no science at all. Only slavish devotion to corrupt self serving politics.

Only a true scientific ignoramus would believe that made up data is better than no data.

Here's my theory: The warmist cult members are all a bunch of communists who latched onto the AGW theory as a means of justifying mass plunder and socialist slavery.

There is only one way to discredit IPCC data. Produce better data with a scientific explanation as to why it's more credible.

You have nothing. No exaggeration, nothing. You're parroting what people who profit from the status quo instructed you to say. You fell for their line ignoring the obvious lack of any evidence because you wanted it to be true.

Realists don't fall for crap like that.

The IPCC data has already been discredited. For example, Michael Mann's Hockey Stick graph was torn to shreds and demonstrated to be pure fiction. The IPCC has discredited much of its own data. They have admitted the previous pronunciations were incorrect or unfounded.
 
You're the one with zero on the scoreboard. No data, no theories, no science at all. Only slavish devotion to corrupt self serving politics.

Only a true scientific ignoramus would believe that made up data is better than no data.

Here's my theory: The warmist cult members are all a bunch of communists who latched onto the AGW theory as a means of justifying mass plunder and socialist slavery.

There is only one way to discredit IPCC data. Produce better data with a scientific explanation as to why it's more credible.

You have nothing. No exaggeration, nothing. You're parroting what people who profit from the status quo instructed you to say. You fell for their line ignoring the obvious lack of any evidence because you wanted it to be true.

Realists don't fall for crap like that.

Here is my hypothesis. You were abused as a child, have an IQ less than 100, barely graduated high school, if at all, and have no formal college education.

The only way for you to make yourself feel important is to insult others. The problem is, you have no education so you can't actually attack science on it's own grounds. Instead, you have to say, "the data is made up."
 
Only a true scientific ignoramus would believe that made up data is better than no data.

Here's my theory: The warmist cult members are all a bunch of communists who latched onto the AGW theory as a means of justifying mass plunder and socialist slavery.

There is only one way to discredit IPCC data. Produce better data with a scientific explanation as to why it's more credible.

You have nothing. No exaggeration, nothing. You're parroting what people who profit from the status quo instructed you to say. You fell for their line ignoring the obvious lack of any evidence because you wanted it to be true.

Realists don't fall for crap like that.

The IPCC data has already been discredited. For example, Michael Mann's Hockey Stick graph was torn to shreds and demonstrated to be pure fiction. The IPCC has discredited much of its own data. They have admitted the previous pronunciations were incorrect or unfounded.

Only in your mind. At least Flatulance knows what a watt is.
 
In other words, I have demonstrated how and why, shown the units, and shown how the calculations for a budget work. I've even given it a name "abuse of notation". That's pretty fin good, so you have to resort to ad hominum bullshit.

You have nothing, I'm right, and you know it.

Nope.. Please continue to destroy your impersonation act...

Good come back.

Care to try something more scientific?

Yeah -- I don't have time to argue with clown impersonators who don't have a clue..
You are a fraud.. Want me to prove that?

Make it worth my while..
 
Good come back.

Care to try something more scientific?

Yeah -- I don't have time to argue with clown impersonators who don't have a clue..
You are a fraud.. Want me to prove that?

Make it worth my while..

Sure, you prove that.

You're proving it yourself without anyone's help. You lash out like a psycho Chihuahua, calling everyone you disagree with all manner of foul names, and then you provide nothing to support your claims.

You're so beautifully liberal!
 
The truth is that is simply doesn't matter because the time period is taken as a constant. As such, in budjet terms, 1W + 2W = 1J/s + 2J/s = (1J + 2J)/s which is the same as 1J + 2J with the time period assumed.

In the budjet balance of A=B, both sides have exactly the same time period and it cancels out, meaning it simply doesn't matter if it is done in watts or joules.

In economics, this is what is always done, because in econ, all data is time period dependent. Because it is always time period dependent, and the time period is always the same, it is just dropped. $/hr=$/hr is the same as $=$.

Watts = Watts is the same as J/s = J/s is the same as J=J. The same can be said about W/m^2=W/m^2. m^2 is the same and can be cancelled.

It is just shorthand. In mathematics, it is refered to as abuse of notation.

That someone thinks otherwise, that he's found something, simply makes it clear that he doesn't bother trying to figure out what the science is doing. Rather, he jumps tonthe conclusion that he had founf an error where no error exists. He just doesn't know whats going on.

Nope.. Pick another forum for your impersonation act..

In other words, I have demonstrated how and why, shown the units, and shown how the calculations for a budget work. I've even given it a name "abuse of notation". That's pretty fin good, so you have to resort to ad hominum bullshit.

You have nothing, I'm right, and you know it.






No, you're not. Go get a CRC and do some real research you phony.
 
Yeah -- I don't have time to argue with clown impersonators who don't have a clue..
You are a fraud.. Want me to prove that?

Make it worth my while..

Sure, you prove that.

You're proving it yourself without anyone's help. You lash out like a psycho Chihuahua, calling everyone you disagree with all manner of foul names, and then you provide nothing to support your claims.

You're so beautifully liberal!

Troll. Keep jerking yourself off it public....
 
Nope.. Pick another forum for your impersonation act..

In other words, I have demonstrated how and why, shown the units, and shown how the calculations for a budget work. I've even given it a name "abuse of notation". That's pretty fin good, so you have to resort to ad hominum bullshit.

You have nothing, I'm right, and you know it.






No, you're not. Go get a CRC and do some real research you phony.

Oh, good comeback. What I'd expect from you. "doo doo head:"
 
Yeah -- I don't have time to argue with clown impersonators who don't have a clue..
You are a fraud.. Want me to prove that?

Make it worth my while..

Sure, you prove that.

You're proving it yourself without anyone's help. You lash out like a psycho Chihuahua, calling everyone you disagree with all manner of foul names, and then you provide nothing to support your claims.

You're so beautifully liberal!

Coming from the guy that misrepresents the Northern Elephant Seal as being representative of all Elephant Seals, specifically the Southern Elephant Seal used in ocean temperature measurements.
 
Sure, you prove that.

You're proving it yourself without anyone's help. You lash out like a psycho Chihuahua, calling everyone you disagree with all manner of foul names, and then you provide nothing to support your claims.

You're so beautifully liberal!

Troll. Keep jerking yourself off it public....

The Freudian witch doctors call your symptoms "transference." That's where you attribute to others all the qualities you see in yourself.

Let's see how many minutes it takes before you start whining about your critics resorting to personal attacks.
 
Sure, you prove that.

You're proving it yourself without anyone's help. You lash out like a psycho Chihuahua, calling everyone you disagree with all manner of foul names, and then you provide nothing to support your claims.

You're so beautifully liberal!

Coming from the guy that misrepresents the Northern Elephant Seal as being representative of all Elephant Seals, specifically the Southern Elephant Seal used in ocean temperature measurements.

Even if that were true, how does it prove that Trenberth has data to support his magic chart of ocean energy?
 
You're proving it yourself without anyone's help. You lash out like a psycho Chihuahua, calling everyone you disagree with all manner of foul names, and then you provide nothing to support your claims.

You're so beautifully liberal!

Troll. Keep jerking yourself off it public....

The Freudian witch doctors call your symptoms "transference." That's where you attribute to others all the qualities you see in yourself.

No, I really don't like you personally because you misrepresented the Elephant Seal migration patterns. That isn't transference, it is specific disdain for you personally.

Nice to see you have been to therapy, though.

Come on. Explain what the central limit theorem is. What is analysis of variance? What is correlation and how is it calculated? What is the formula for the standard deviation, both the normal formulation and the formulation that works best for calculators?

How about the integral of e^(-1/x)?

How about the conjugate physical quantities in quantum physics? How does the Heisenberg uncertainty principle affect the line width of a laser?

Anything except your jerking off...
 
Last edited:
Ten minutes and not one actual demonstration of scientific prowness. No definition of the central limit theorem. No ANOVA. No integrals.... Nothing. Easy stuff too.

For some reason, when it comes down to something real, they got nothing.
 
Ten minutes and not one actual demonstration of scientific prowness. No definition of the central limit theorem. No ANOVA. No integrals.... Nothing. Easy stuff too.

For some reason, when it comes down to something real, they got nothing.

"Something real" would be actual temperatures from the ocean at all depths from before the mid 1990s.

Just admit you haven't got shit and that your arch Bishop of global warming magic, Kevin Trenberth, is a fraud.
 
Ten minutes and not one actual demonstration of scientific prowness. No definition of the central limit theorem. No ANOVA. No integrals.... Nothing. Easy stuff too.

For some reason, when it comes down to something real, they got nothing.

"Something real" would be actual temperatures from the ocean at all depths from before the mid 1990s.

Just admit you haven't got shit and that your arch Bishop of global warming magic, Kevin Trenberth, is a fraud.

I never claimed anything. You have.

I've demonstrated that your science illiterate.

You've demonstrated nothing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top