miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,555
- 70,536
- 2,645
- Banned
- #521
Come get them pussy.No, it's just I'm sick of talking about it is all. You're starting to sound like my mother for crying out loud.
Does your mom call you out on your bullshit too?
"I don't wear body armor because it's illegal, duh. Oops I mean I don't wear body armor because it's so difficult to put on. Oops I mean I don't wear body armor because it's just so difficult to clean. Oops I mean...I don't want to talk about this anymore."
Yes, you talk like my mother. You don't get to a point. You just ramble on and on expecting me to guess your motive.
I have better things to do than to play games with somebody that is too inept to carry on a conversation; especially when you ask the same question I answered over and over again.
Now grown ups are discussing issues here. Go away.
I already told you what the point is: Self-defense clearly isn't as high of a priority as you guys claim it to be.
And each of the responses you provided has been complete bullshit. Maybe you should try giving an actual answer next time instead of just rattling off bullshit after bullshit and expecting it to work. Here is a list of stupid excuses that you have come up with:
- It's illegal. (It isn't)
- It takes too long to put on. (It takes 2 seconds to put on. I showed you a video)
- A gun works better than a vest. (It isn't a choice between the two. You can have both)
- A gun works better than a vest. (You made the same stupid argument twice.)
- A vest is not practical in warm weather. (Yet you won't wear one in cold weather?)
- Tanks are better for self defense. (But they are illegal)
- They cost money. (If self-defense is so important, then why not spend money on both guns and a bullet-proof vest?)
- They need to be washed. (Looks pretty easy to me. You just throw it in the washing machine.)
Again....inept.
I told you over and over again that an American's choice of self-defense is up to them--not you, and it's not your place to repeatedly question their choice.
So let's try this an eleventh time: I prefer to use a firearm for self defense--not a stupid vest. Why? Because vests only provide additional protection; guns provide the main protection. For the price of a vest, I can purchase a cheap firearm. Vests do not scare away an attacker, guns do. Vests are impractical, bulky, and going back to the OP, completely useless if you are in danger of an attack by an animal. Vests may be a good idea if you expect to create confrontations as our police have to do; not to get your mail from the mailbox.
Now, if you have any other questions, please ask somebody else unless you have some sort of point.
I can question your choices all I want, princess. Your hissy fit isn't going to change that.
Once again, I am not comparing which is the better form of self-defense. I'm simply asking why you choose not to use BOTH when we already agreed that both a gun and a vest is better than just the gun. But good, you rattled off a few more reasons.
"They're impractical": How are they impractical? They can save your life in the event that you get shot. How is that impractical?
"They're bulky": Finally your first sensible response. You don't like how they feel. You prefer comfort over an extra layer of self-defense. Right?
"They're useless if you're attacked by an animal": When you go to the store, you carry a gun. Do you think you're more likely to be attacked by an animal or a person?