Why gay marriage is wrong!

[Skylar]

Then you would have to admit that Lincoln was nothing more than some tyrant bent on expanding his empire - no better than Napoleon or Hitler.

Or the United States when they invaded Mexico. With both Grant and Lee fighting side by side against the Mexicans in the invasion of Mexico City.

Robert E. Lee would be a Nazi in your bizarre fulfillment of Godwin's Law.

Is that your argument? If so, wow!

Invasion is a legit excuse for invasion?

A military attack against the United States is a legit excuse for invasion. If the South couldn't hold their own territory, they probably shouldn't have attacked the United States by firing on Ft. Sumter.

Just sayin'.

Ft Sumter wasn't part of the United STates, moron. It was South Carolina territory.

Not according to the Confederacy which tried to buy it and other US holdings from the United States government.

It was a US federal holding. And as such was not part of South Carolina. You can't secede what isn't yours. And in offering to buy US federal holdings from the United States the Confederacy acknowledged that they lacked ownership.

Next revisionist fallacy, please.

 

[Skylar]

Oh, and since you claimed that there's nothing more American that what the Confederacy fought for, and the Confederacy fought for slavery, are you claiming that there's nothing more American than slavery?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Then you would have to admit that Lincoln was nothing more than some tyrant bent on expanding his empire - no better than Napoleon or Hitler.

Or the United States when they invaded Mexico. With both Grant and Lee fighting side by side against the Mexicans in the invasion of Mexico City.

Robert E. Lee would be a Nazi in your bizarre fulfillment of Godwin's Law.

Is that your argument? If so, wow!

Invasion is a legit excuse for invasion?

A military attack against the United States is a legit excuse for invasion. If the South couldn't hold their own territory, they probably shouldn't have attacked the United States by firing on Ft. Sumter.

Just sayin'.

Ft Sumter wasn't part of the United STates, moron. It was South Carolina territory.

It's pointless to argue with morons like you because I keep explaining the same points over and over and over. You just proceed based on all your bogus premises as if no one had already exploded them.

In short, you're a clueless moron who isn't capable of committing logic.

Ft. Sumter was a federal installation. Apparently, not only do you openly support a country that fought for slavery, but you also openly support a "country" that attacked the U.S. Military.

Sadly, for your feelings, the US Federal Government was not relevant to South Carolina, at the time; which was part and parcel of the Confederate States of America.

If you had any kinship with the history of the Confederate States and its sibling nation; The United States, you'd know that South Carolina was the FIRST of the States to leave the Union.


But, in fairness... mouthy British Socialists aren't expected to know much of anything, except their needs and how bad they NEED to have those needs met, by any means.

 

[-S-]

Then you would have to admit that Lincoln was nothing more than some tyrant bent on expanding his empire - no better than Napoleon or Hitler.

Or the United States when they invaded Mexico. With both Grant and Lee fighting side by side against the Mexicans in the invasion of Mexico City.

Robert E. Lee would be a Nazi in your bizarre fulfillment of Godwin's Law.

Is that your argument? If so, wow!

Invasion is a legit excuse for invasion?

A military attack against the United States is a legit excuse for invasion. If the South couldn't hold their own territory, they probably shouldn't have attacked the United States by firing on Ft. Sumter.

Just sayin'.

Ft Sumter wasn't part of the United STates, moron. It was South Carolina territory.

It's pointless to argue with morons like you because I keep explaining the same points over and over and over. You just proceed based on all your bogus premises as if no one had already exploded them.

In short, you're a clueless moron who isn't capable of committing logic.

Ft. Sumter was a federal installation. Apparently, not only do you openly support a country that fought for slavery, but you also openly support a "country" that attacked the U.S. Military.

Sadly, for your feelings, the US Federal Government was not relevant to South Carolina, at the time; which was part and parcel of the Confederate States of America.

If you had any kinship with the history of the Confederate States and its sibling nation; The United States, you'd know that South Carolina was the FIRST of the States to leave the Union.


But, in fairness... mouthy British Socialists aren't expected to know much of anything, except their needs and how bad they NEED to have those needs met, by any means.

Are you a supporter of the Confederacy over the USA too, Keys?

 

[-S-]

Oh, and since you claimed that there's nothing more American that what the Confederacy fought for, and the Confederacy fought for slavery, are you claiming that there's nothing more American than slavery?

I've hit him on this inconsistency in his logic. He just flip flops haha.

Poor, insignificant Dixiecrat has no idea what he really believes. Push him on the subject and he pusses out.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Oh, and since you claimed that there's nothing more American that what the Confederacy fought for, and the Confederacy fought for slavery, are you claiming that there's nothing more American than slavery?

LOL! Am I the only one that can't get their fill of watching Leftists try to reason?

 

[bripat9643]

Then you would have to admit that Lincoln was nothing more than some tyrant bent on expanding his empire - no better than Napoleon or Hitler.

Or the United States when they invaded Mexico. With both Grant and Lee fighting side by side against the Mexicans in the invasion of Mexico City.

Robert E. Lee would be a Nazi in your bizarre fulfillment of Godwin's Law.

Is that your argument? If so, wow!

Invasion is a legit excuse for invasion?

A military attack against the United States is a legit excuse for invasion. If the South couldn't hold their own territory, they probably shouldn't have attacked the United States by firing on Ft. Sumter.

Just sayin'.

Ft Sumter wasn't part of the United STates, moron. It was South Carolina territory.

It's pointless to argue with morons like you because I keep explaining the same points over and over and over. You just proceed based on all your bogus premises as if no one had already exploded them.

In short, you're a clueless moron who isn't capable of committing logic.

Ft. Sumter was a federal installation. Apparently, not only do you openly support a country that fought for slavery, but you also openly support a "country" that attacked the U.S. Military.

Sadly, for your feelings, the US Federal Government was not relevant to South Carolina, at the time; which was part and parcel of the Confederate States of America.

If you had any kinship with the history of the Confederate States and its sibling nation; The United States, you'd know that South Carolina was the FIRST of the States to leave the Union.


But, in fairness... mouthy British Socialists aren't expected to know much of anything, except their needs and how bad they NEED to have those needs met, by any means.

It's pointless to argue with these vegetables. They behave as if they haven't read a thing you have posted. I am thinking about putting them all on ignore.

 

[bripat9643]

Oh, and since you claimed that there's nothing more American that what the Confederacy fought for, and the Confederacy fought for slavery, are you claiming that there's nothing more American than slavery?

I've hit him on this inconsistency in his logic. He just flip flops haha.

Poor, insignificant Dixiecrat has no idea what he really believes. Push him on the subject and he pusses out.

You morons don't even need me to participate in this discussion since you simply ignore whatever I post.

 

[Skylar]

Then you would have to admit that Lincoln was nothing more than some tyrant bent on expanding his empire - no better than Napoleon or Hitler.

Or the United States when they invaded Mexico. With both Grant and Lee fighting side by side against the Mexicans in the invasion of Mexico City.

Robert E. Lee would be a Nazi in your bizarre fulfillment of Godwin's Law.

Is that your argument? If so, wow!

Invasion is a legit excuse for invasion?

A military attack against the United States is a legit excuse for invasion. If the South couldn't hold their own territory, they probably shouldn't have attacked the United States by firing on Ft. Sumter.

Just sayin'.

Ft Sumter wasn't part of the United STates, moron. It was South Carolina territory.

It's pointless to argue with morons like you because I keep explaining the same points over and over and over. You just proceed based on all your bogus premises as if no one had already exploded them.

In short, you're a clueless moron who isn't capable of committing logic.

Ft. Sumter was a federal installation. Apparently, not only do you openly support a country that fought for slavery, but you also openly support a "country" that attacked the U.S. Military.

Sadly, for your feelings, the US Federal Government was not relevant to South Carolina, at the time; which was part and parcel of the Confederate States of America.

Federal Holdings aren't part of South Carolina. As the Confederacy demonstrated by trying to buy them from the United States Government. Proving that even the Confederacy acknowledged the very point you're arguing against.

 

[bripat9643]

Oh, and since you claimed that there's nothing more American that what the Confederacy fought for, and the Confederacy fought for slavery, are you claiming that there's nothing more American than slavery?

LOL! Am I the only one that can't get their fill of watching Leftists try to reason?

It's totally nauseating, if you ask me.

 

[Skylar]

Oh, and since you claimed that there's nothing more American that what the Confederacy fought for, and the Confederacy fought for slavery, are you claiming that there's nothing more American than slavery?

I've hit him on this inconsistency in his logic. He just flip flops haha.

Poor, insignificant Dixiecrat has no idea what he really believes. Push him on the subject and he pusses out.

You morons don't even need me to participate in this discussion since you simply ignore whatever I post.

Did I misquote you? If no, then how am I ignoring what you're posting?

 

[bripat9643]

Then you would have to admit that Lincoln was nothing more than some tyrant bent on expanding his empire - no better than Napoleon or Hitler.

Or the United States when they invaded Mexico. With both Grant and Lee fighting side by side against the Mexicans in the invasion of Mexico City.

Robert E. Lee would be a Nazi in your bizarre fulfillment of Godwin's Law.

Is that your argument? If so, wow!

Invasion is a legit excuse for invasion?

A military attack against the United States is a legit excuse for invasion. If the South couldn't hold their own territory, they probably shouldn't have attacked the United States by firing on Ft. Sumter.

Just sayin'.

Ft Sumter wasn't part of the United STates, moron. It was South Carolina territory.

It's pointless to argue with morons like you because I keep explaining the same points over and over and over. You just proceed based on all your bogus premises as if no one had already exploded them.

In short, you're a clueless moron who isn't capable of committing logic.

Ft. Sumter was a federal installation. Apparently, not only do you openly support a country that fought for slavery, but you also openly support a "country" that attacked the U.S. Military.

You're too much of a moron to bother arguing with. You wouldn't get the point if I stuffed it down your throat.

 

[-S-]

Oh, and since you claimed that there's nothing more American that what the Confederacy fought for, and the Confederacy fought for slavery, are you claiming that there's nothing more American than slavery?

I've hit him on this inconsistency in his logic. He just flip flops haha.

Poor, insignificant Dixiecrat has no idea what he really believes. Push him on the subject and he pusses out.

You morons don't even need me to participate in this discussion since you simply ignore whatever I post.

You don't post anything but conflicting ideals. It's like trying to watch a eunuch procreate.

If you actually had something to say, instead of pussing out of every response, maybe we'd include you in the conversation, Dixiecrat.

 

[bripat9643]

Oh, and since you claimed that there's nothing more American that what the Confederacy fought for, and the Confederacy fought for slavery, are you claiming that there's nothing more American than slavery?

I've hit him on this inconsistency in his logic. He just flip flops haha.

Poor, insignificant Dixiecrat has no idea what he really believes. Push him on the subject and he pusses out.

You morons don't even need me to participate in this discussion since you simply ignore whatever I post.

Did I misquote you? If no, then how am I ignoring what you're posting?

I'm done arguing with morons like you.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Then you would have to admit that Lincoln was nothing more than some tyrant bent on expanding his empire - no better than Napoleon or Hitler.

Or the United States when they invaded Mexico. With both Grant and Lee fighting side by side against the Mexicans in the invasion of Mexico City.

Robert E. Lee would be a Nazi in your bizarre fulfillment of Godwin's Law.

Is that your argument? If so, wow!

Invasion is a legit excuse for invasion?

A military attack against the United States is a legit excuse for invasion. If the South couldn't hold their own territory, they probably shouldn't have attacked the United States by firing on Ft. Sumter.

Just sayin'.

Ft Sumter wasn't part of the United STates, moron. It was South Carolina territory.

It's pointless to argue with morons like you because I keep explaining the same points over and over and over. You just proceed based on all your bogus premises as if no one had already exploded them.

In short, you're a clueless moron who isn't capable of committing logic.

Ft. Sumter was a federal installation. Apparently, not only do you openly support a country that fought for slavery, but you also openly support a "country" that attacked the U.S. Military.

Sadly, for your feelings, the US Federal Government was not relevant to South Carolina, at the time; which was part and parcel of the Confederate States of America.

If you had any kinship with the history of the Confederate States and its sibling nation; The United States, you'd know that South Carolina was the FIRST of the States to leave the Union.


But, in fairness... mouthy British Socialists aren't expected to know much of anything, except their needs and how bad they NEED to have those needs met, by any means.

Are you a supporter of the Confederacy over the USA too, Keys?

Oh I am... Although, I am for the South invading the North... and returning the nation to its constitutional moorings, returning the negro to his native land and beatin' the man out of their women... after a proper lashin' of course.

OH!~ Wait... that's the loomin' civil war.

Freeing the slaves was divine providence... and it had zip to do with the south leaving the Union. That war started over the same thing that is going to cause the up and coming war: Relativism.

But in fairness... every war is caused by Relativism.

 

[bripat9643]

Oh, and since you claimed that there's nothing more American that what the Confederacy fought for, and the Confederacy fought for slavery, are you claiming that there's nothing more American than slavery?

I've hit him on this inconsistency in his logic. He just flip flops haha.

Poor, insignificant Dixiecrat has no idea what he really believes. Push him on the subject and he pusses out.

You morons don't even need me to participate in this discussion since you simply ignore whatever I post.

You don't post anything but conflicting ideals. It's like trying to watch a eunuch procreate.

If you actually had something to say, instead of pussing out of every response, maybe we'd include you in the conversation, Dixiecrat.

I'm done debating morons like you. It's like trying to teach quantum mechanics to a cat.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Oh, and since you claimed that there's nothing more American that what the Confederacy fought for, and the Confederacy fought for slavery, are you claiming that there's nothing more American than slavery?

I've hit him on this inconsistency in his logic. He just flip flops haha.

Poor, insignificant Dixiecrat has no idea what he really believes. Push him on the subject and he pusses out.

You morons don't even need me to participate in this discussion since you simply ignore whatever I post.

You don't post anything but conflicting ideals. It's like trying to watch a eunuch procreate.

If you actually had something to say, instead of pussing out of every response, maybe we'd include you in the conversation, Dixiecrat.

LOL! The projections common to your straw reasoning, does not a conflict on the part of another... make.

 

[-S-]

LOL! The projections common to your straw reasoning, does not a conflict on the part of another... make.

I'm sure that made sense in your head, at least.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

LOL! The projections common to your straw reasoning, does not a conflict on the part of another... make.

I'm sure that made sense in your head, at least.

That it didn't make sense in your head, demonstrates the fact that you're an imbecile (go ahead... look it up).

 

[bripat9643]

LOL! The projections common to your straw reasoning, does not a conflict on the part of another... make.

I'm sure that made sense in your head, at least.

where_r_my_keys said that, not me.

Having trouble figuring out how to work the quote thingy?