Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ahh fuck you.
Still pretending not to be CreativeDreams I see.
You seem to be obsessed with me or something....maybe we should just **** and call a truce?
yet you just asked a guy if he wanted sex with youSorry Dive...I'm not gay so I will not go out with you....I'm all male and only go after women that are on the feminine side of the spectrum...
No I did not...candycorn is female....
he is a heBelieve me....I argue with her on a few forums and she is a she...
and you are a fucking idiot for thinking that just because HE uses females as his avatar that it makes him female
Echo Zulu here uses men as her avatar many times, and she is very FEMALE
If you can truly prove candycorn is a male I will puke on my keyboard....but I truly believe candy is female....
you seem to be obsessed with me or something
you pulled the same shit on awe.com. For the same reason. Nobody will talk to you when you're not making a fool of yourself so you do it. You did it over there and you're doing it here. I could care less either way. Unlike you i don't have a casual relationship with the truth and think it should be upheld.
so is dwivecon lying again or are you man ? My guess is a lonely fat woman with a cat...one thing for sure is you are a hired troll
he is a he
and you are a fucking idiot for thinking that just because HE uses females as his avatar that it makes him female
Echo Zulu here uses men as her avatar many times, and she is very FEMALE
If you can truly prove candycorn is a male I will puke on my keyboard....but I truly believe candy is female....
Your wrong big time,for the first time in Ditzcons life,he is telling the truth about candyfag,candyfag is a HE.
If you can truly prove candycorn is a male I will puke on my keyboard....but I truly believe candy is female....
Your wrong big time,for the first time in Ditzcons life,he is telling the truth about candyfag,candyfag is a HE.
I would appreciate the proper credit for having made that discovery first.
Don't forget the light poles!!! THAT proves EVERYTHING!!!!!!
Don't forget the light poles!!! THAT proves EVERYTHING!!!!!!
It would sure be simple if the most important building in the military establishment had a security system showing a video of the "plane". Amazing this most valued military installation doesn't have the security of a 7-11. I find that odd...and troubling.
proof that I am telling the truth about that is just look here at this thread.despite my HUNDREDS of requests to people like LIAR ability,Toto,and slackass to address this video and refute it,NONE of them took me up on my challenge.thats hardly the way to debate.myself and dozens of others handed his ass to him on a platter on that over a year ago.he has alzheimers diseace cause he never remembers the answers you give him obviously since he is STILL asking that question here at THIS message board as well.
beeotch.
According to the Laws of Physics, the only way for something to fall at the speed of freefall there has to be zero resistance,
so for WTC7 to collapse in its own footprint at freefall speeds, there has to be no resistance. How was the resistance removed?
Fire cannot account for melting steel, because it can't reach even close to those temps.
Fire couldnt of bent/bowed and collapsed the inner structure because the building showed zero deformities until the main collapse.
So thats leads to the question of what could it of been?
Who said anything about "melting steel". Are you familiar with the terms "thermal expansion", "creep", "beams walking off supports", and "the weakening of steel due to heat"?
According to the Laws of Physics, the only way for something to fall at the speed of freefall there has to be zero resistance,
According to you and your version of Newtonian physics, nothing can fall at free fall because even AIR provides resistance.
so for WTC7 to collapse in its own footprint at freefall speeds, there has to be no resistance. How was the resistance removed?
But you just admitted in the other thread that it is possible for a falling body to get close to (indistinguishable from) free fall speeds based on having enough of a load to overcome the resistance? Did you not just admit that?
Who said anything about "melting steel". Are you familiar with the terms "thermal expansion", "creep", "beams walking off supports", and "the weakening of steel due to heat"?
At what temperature does steel START to lose it's strength? Now apply the stress of a load to that same, weakened steel.
Fire couldnt of bent/bowed and collapsed the inner structure because the building showed zero deformities until the main collapse.
Really? Then explain how the columns beneath the east mechanical penthouse failed and the penthouse fell into the building. That happened and there was no sign of these "deformities" either. Watch the video. You can see the windows breaking on the perimeter facade as the penthouse fell into the the building. Here is a photo of STEEL railroad tracks and what happened from thermal expansion. Thermal expansion caused my the SUN beating down on them.
So thats leads to the question of what could it of been?
No, that leads to NO other questions because you have not proven that NIST explanations and calculations of how WTC7 collapsed is not possible OR what the errors in their report are. You dismiss their report with evidence that is incorrect.
Who said anything about "melting steel". Are you familiar with the terms "thermal expansion", "creep", "beams walking off supports", and "the weakening of steel due to heat"?
Who said anything about melting steel? Many eyewitnesses saw molten steel. One fire fighter said he saw a steel beam, molten hot and dripping at one end.
According to the Laws of Physics, the only way for something to fall at the speed of freefall there has to be zero resistance,
According to you and your version of Newtonian physics, nothing can fall at free fall because even AIR provides resistance.
But you just admitted in the other thread that it is possible for a falling body to get close to (indistinguishable from) free fall speeds based on having enough of a load to overcome the resistance? Did you not just admit that?
Who said anything about "melting steel". Are you familiar with the terms "thermal expansion", "creep", "beams walking off supports", and "the weakening of steel due to heat"?
At what temperature does steel START to lose it's strength? Now apply the stress of a load to that same, weakened steel.
Really? Then explain how the columns beneath the east mechanical penthouse failed and the penthouse fell into the building. That happened and there was no sign of these "deformities" either. Watch the video. You can see the windows breaking on the perimeter facade as the penthouse fell into the the building. Here is a photo of STEEL railroad tracks and what happened from thermal expansion. Thermal expansion caused my the SUN beating down on them.
So thats leads to the question of what could it of been?
No, that leads to NO other questions because you have not proven that NIST explanations and calculations of how WTC7 collapsed is not possible OR what the errors in their report are. You dismiss their report with evidence that is incorrect.
Your train tracks were not deformed from sunlight. The cause of these bent rails is what is called "creep". It is a geological term for drift in earth near or at the surface. Creep happens very slowly under normal conditions and rapidly by earthquake. It is usually ground moving by gravity from a higher to a lower level but it can also be earth moving almost horizontally or even upwards with enough preassure.
According to you and your version of Newtonian physics, nothing can fall at free fall because even AIR provides resistance.
But you just admitted in the other thread that it is possible for a falling body to get close to (indistinguishable from) free fall speeds based on having enough of a load to overcome the resistance? Did you not just admit that?
Who said anything about "melting steel". Are you familiar with the terms "thermal expansion", "creep", "beams walking off supports", and "the weakening of steel due to heat"?
At what temperature does steel START to lose it's strength? Now apply the stress of a load to that same, weakened steel.
Really? Then explain how the columns beneath the east mechanical penthouse failed and the penthouse fell into the building. That happened and there was no sign of these "deformities" either. Watch the video. You can see the windows breaking on the perimeter facade as the penthouse fell into the the building. Here is a photo of STEEL railroad tracks and what happened from thermal expansion. Thermal expansion caused my the SUN beating down on them.
No, that leads to NO other questions because you have not proven that NIST explanations and calculations of how WTC7 collapsed is not possible OR what the errors in their report are. You dismiss their report with evidence that is incorrect.
Your train tracks were not deformed from sunlight. The cause of these bent rails is what is called "creep". It is a geological term for drift in earth near or at the surface. Creep happens very slowly under normal conditions and rapidly by earthquake. It is usually ground moving by gravity from a higher to a lower level but it can also be earth moving almost horizontally or even upwards with enough preassure.
Sorry Huggy that is thermal expansion.
Thermal expansion is a particularly serious problem where railroad tracks are concerned, since the tracks on which the trains run are made of steel. Steel, as noted earlier, expands by a factor of 12 parts in 1 million for every Celsius degree change in temperature, and while this may not seem like much, it can create a serious problem under conditions of high temperature.
Most tracks are built from pieces of steel supported by wooden ties, and laid with a gap between the ends. This gap provides a buffer for thermal expansion, but there is another matter to consider: the tracks are bolted to the wooden ties, and if the steel expands too much, it could pull out these bolts. Hence, instead of being placed in a hole the same size as the bolt, the bolts are fitted in slots, so that there is room for the track to slide in place slowly when the temperature rises.
Read more: Real-life applications - Thermal Expansion
Your train tracks were not deformed from sunlight. The cause of these bent rails is what is called "creep". It is a geological term for drift in earth near or at the surface. Creep happens very slowly under normal conditions and rapidly by earthquake. It is usually ground moving by gravity from a higher to a lower level but it can also be earth moving almost horizontally or even upwards with enough preassure.
Sorry Huggy that is thermal expansion.
Thermal expansion is a particularly serious problem where railroad tracks are concerned, since the tracks on which the trains run are made of steel. Steel, as noted earlier, expands by a factor of 12 parts in 1 million for every Celsius degree change in temperature, and while this may not seem like much, it can create a serious problem under conditions of high temperature.
Most tracks are built from pieces of steel supported by wooden ties, and laid with a gap between the ends. This gap provides a buffer for thermal expansion, but there is another matter to consider: the tracks are bolted to the wooden ties, and if the steel expands too much, it could pull out these bolts. Hence, instead of being placed in a hole the same size as the bolt, the bolts are fitted in slots, so that there is room for the track to slide in place slowly when the temperature rises.
Read more: Real-life applications - Thermal Expansion
Objects cannot freefall through eachother, thus the 8 floors collapsing at freefall in WTC7 are impossible, unless those floors were simultaneously removed. Fire cannot do this, fire cannot cause 'thermal expansion' to cause this, fire cannot melt steel to cause this, fire cannot symmetrically burn 8 floors and have them fail simultaneously. And if they did, there wouldn't be freefall/symmetrical collapse. Why do you over look this simple fact? This fact is ALL you need to know that the NIST report is a fraud, and there is a coverup.
How does a steel highrise freefall into its own footprint? For 2.25 seconds, or 8 floors, there was ZERO resistance. This is the same resistance AIR gives. 8 floors of building is NOT the same make up as air, thus this is impossible, unless explosives removed all supports, making the resistance makeup the equivalent of air.
Ollie, care to address this fact?
Sorry Huggy that is thermal expansion.
Thermal expansion is a particularly serious problem where railroad tracks are concerned, since the tracks on which the trains run are made of steel. Steel, as noted earlier, expands by a factor of 12 parts in 1 million for every Celsius degree change in temperature, and while this may not seem like much, it can create a serious problem under conditions of high temperature.
Most tracks are built from pieces of steel supported by wooden ties, and laid with a gap between the ends. This gap provides a buffer for thermal expansion, but there is another matter to consider: the tracks are bolted to the wooden ties, and if the steel expands too much, it could pull out these bolts. Hence, instead of being placed in a hole the same size as the bolt, the bolts are fitted in slots, so that there is room for the track to slide in place slowly when the temperature rises.
Read more: Real-life applications - Thermal Expansion
Objects cannot freefall through eachother, thus the 8 floors collapsing at freefall in WTC7 are impossible, unless those floors were simultaneously removed. Fire cannot do this, fire cannot cause 'thermal expansion' to cause this, fire cannot melt steel to cause this, fire cannot symmetrically burn 8 floors and have them fail simultaneously. And if they did, there wouldn't be freefall/symmetrical collapse. Why do you over look this simple fact? This fact is ALL you need to know that the NIST report is a fraud, and there is a coverup.
How does a steel highrise freefall into its own footprint? For 2.25 seconds, or 8 floors, there was ZERO resistance. This is the same resistance AIR gives. 8 floors of building is NOT the same make up as air, thus this is impossible, unless explosives removed all supports, making the resistance makeup the equivalent of air.
Ollie, care to address this fact?
NIST proved it, if you disagree then find some solid physical evidence and disprove them. And please remember that they did not say it was simultaneous. They said it was a progressive collapse.
We'll wait; at least another 9 years.
Objects cannot freefall through eachother, thus the 8 floors collapsing at freefall in WTC7 are impossible, unless those floors were simultaneously removed. Fire cannot do this, fire cannot cause 'thermal expansion' to cause this, fire cannot melt steel to cause this, fire cannot symmetrically burn 8 floors and have them fail simultaneously. And if they did, there wouldn't be freefall/symmetrical collapse. Why do you over look this simple fact? This fact is ALL you need to know that the NIST report is a fraud, and there is a coverup.
How does a steel highrise freefall into its own footprint? For 2.25 seconds, or 8 floors, there was ZERO resistance. This is the same resistance AIR gives. 8 floors of building is NOT the same make up as air, thus this is impossible, unless explosives removed all supports, making the resistance makeup the equivalent of air.
Ollie, care to address this fact?
NIST proved it, if you disagree then find some solid physical evidence and disprove them. And please remember that they did not say it was simultaneous. They said it was a progressive collapse.
We'll wait; at least another 9 years.
Why don't you answer my question, sir? Why are you afraid? Stop avoiding the facts.
How does a steel highrise freefall into its own footprint? For 2.25 seconds, or 8 floors, there was ZERO resistance. This is the same resistance AIR gives. 8 floors of building is NOT the same make up as air, thus this is impossible, unless explosives removed all supports, making the resistance makeup the equivalent of air.
