- Sep 16, 2012
- 59,638
- 53,534
Yes, folks that come here to give birth, can be deported.There is no such thing as an "anchor baby."
With that said, if you acknowledge that folks are coming here to give birth, as a strategy to eventually become citizens, then you are being disingenuous, and equivocating with those who are concerned with foreigners manipulating immigration policy.
"However, once they reach 21 years of age, American-born children, as birthright citizens, are able to sponsor their foreign families' U.S. citizenship and residency."
It is a slimy dog shit thing to do by saying, "there are no anchor babies," when you know what is the intention by those who are concerned with the birth right citizenship policy.
Generally? I think of you as having more integrity in the discussions on this site, then to do this sort of thing.
There are posters like CNM and meaner gene that debate like this, it is garbage.
One of my best friends from high school, married a Chinese national he met in med school. After they were married, and when she finally became a citizen, she was able to sponsor one of her parents.
And then, once that parent gained citizenship after four or five years, she sponsored her husband. . . And after HE became a citizen, last I heard, they were sponsering, or trying to, one of my friends brother-in-laws. . . apparently at that point, the Chinese government was, um, starting to push back. I saw some photos of a trip they made to China a year before the pandemic to resolve that issue.
I don't know WHY you are being this way. . . I honestly don't.
It is like the leftists, they don't like the WORD, "illegal alien," so they say, "there is no such thing as an 'illegal person," but we all know damn well what that reality is, and what we are talking about.
SO, go on and keep parroting your narrative, it doesn't change reality, or the laws.
Last edited: