Why is the far left so upset that a 17 year old Patriot shoot arsonists and looters?

[L.K.Eder]

... stalinist ...

Before you use such words you should try to study real history.

I know more history than you ever will, clown boi.

That's why you call other people "Stalinists", joker?

Anybody who advocates sending people to camps is by definition a stalinist. Moron.

then trump must be a stalinist, eh?

A Crime by Any Name

The Trump administration’s commitment to deterring immigration through cruelty has made horrifying conditions in detention facilities inevitable.

www.theatlantic.com

Illegally entering this country is a crime. Sending ILLEGALS back to where they came from is not Stalinist.

Dumbass.

yeah, it was not me who barfed up such an idiotic definition of stalinism. that was you.

you know what stalin did as well? he rounded up people he defined as enemies and had them killed. exactly what that poster advocated. you know, the one you did not accuse of being a stalinist. just chalk it up to another senior moment, and move on, old man. it is time for a nap.

 

[BlueGin]

he nearly got you there. what a clever trap.

It isn't a trap Stasi man, it is just logic.

All of you who attack the person defending himself are engendering the criminal acts, themselves. It does not stand to reason that if you actually believed the criminal acts to be in the wrong, you would not be attacking the boy who is defending himself, therefore you must think these criminal acts should be legal.

I realize double-talk is pretty much hard wired into you, but there are limits to my tolerance of such.

interesting pretzel logic. what happens when your limits are reached?

do you then stomp your feet, old man?

vigilantes have never made anything better. they make things worse. this is not a batman movie.

Exactly.

Here's a list of those murdered by peaceful protesters. Can ANY of you show us where you posted any condemnation of these murderers? I'm expecting crickets, but I'm willing to give it a shot

Deadly unrest: Here are the people who have died amid George Floyd protests across US

Among those killed as protests over the death of George Floyd have roiled American cities in the past week are a retired police captain, a beloved owner of a barbecue restaurant, and a former star football player known as “Mr. Indianapolis."

www.google.com

Did anyone try to make the killers heros?

They weren't heroes. Neither were they DEFENDING THEMSELVES

Again, the right isn't for law and order. They pick and choose who has to obey laws, there is no order in that.

Unlike the left that defends murderous mobs and pays their bail. You are an idiot.

 

[Brain357]

The Communist Democrats are upset because he shot one of the domestic terrorists that they are wholeheartedly supporting!

All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Kyle Rittenhouse did something.

He committed the worst crime of the night.

He committed no crime. He was assaulted by a gang trying to murder him

He committed several. He was illegally carrying a gun and broke curfew. Then he killed someone and tried to escape the crime scene. When people tried to stop him he killed them too.

Actually he was helping the victim and is the one that called 911 when he was chased by an angry mob and attacked. He shot other people that were attacking him and trying to take his gun away. Self defense.

He was committing crimes, but again the right doesn't believe in law an order. Hence why the country is in such bad shape after 4 years or trump.

 

[esalla]

The Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha and Guardian of Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, will be acquitted by a Jury of his Peers, the townsfolk of Kenosha who have suffered immense harm by the hands of Rioters, Rapists, Arsonists, Looters and Thugs.

Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.

So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.

It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.

Because now the young are in the fight against terror

 

[Brain357]

he nearly got you there. what a clever trap.

It isn't a trap Stasi man, it is just logic.

All of you who attack the person defending himself are engendering the criminal acts, themselves. It does not stand to reason that if you actually believed the criminal acts to be in the wrong, you would not be attacking the boy who is defending himself, therefore you must think these criminal acts should be legal.

I realize double-talk is pretty much hard wired into you, but there are limits to my tolerance of such.

interesting pretzel logic. what happens when your limits are reached?

do you then stomp your feet, old man?

vigilantes have never made anything better. they make things worse. this is not a batman movie.

Exactly.

Here's a list of those murdered by peaceful protesters. Can ANY of you show us where you posted any condemnation of these murderers? I'm expecting crickets, but I'm willing to give it a shot

Deadly unrest: Here are the people who have died amid George Floyd protests across US

Among those killed as protests over the death of George Floyd have roiled American cities in the past week are a retired police captain, a beloved owner of a barbecue restaurant, and a former star football player known as “Mr. Indianapolis."

www.google.com

Did anyone try to make the killers heros?

They weren't heroes. Neither were they DEFENDING THEMSELVES

Again, the right isn't for law and order. They pick and choose who has to obey laws, there is no order in that.

Unlike the left that defends murderous mobs and pays their bail. You are an idiot.

Who is defending the riots? Please share a link.

 

[BlueGin]

Great way to promote senseless killing on top of senseless rioting.

I'm beyond disgusted by what's happening on all sides.

Everyone seems to listen to the same echo chamber here. The so-called claims of "violent rape and assault" and "pedophilia" were deliberately made up to slander them. How low can you go West short of killing someone? Here's an idea for a start - go to the WI Sex Offender Registry and type in his name. Anything pop up? That is a start at trying untangle this complete mess of layered fakery, bogus claims, and incitements for more violence on both sides.

Second. If you claim these three men (2 dead and 1 injured) were rioters, please show it. Acts of rioting, looting and arson are illegal, we all agree on that. Show us that is what THOSE THREE PEOPLE were doing. Are you claiming EVERYONE at the protest was engaged in arson and looting? Then that must include the kid and the armed private militia people right? Or - wait - are you going to make some distinctions? hmmm....how about Right = lawful, Left = unlawful = legitimate target....cause that's where you guys are going with this. That's a good starting point for killing people on a political basis huh? No need to mess around trying to figure out who is engaged in unlawful activity and who is not. Now, if only there is some way to identify them before we kill them and have to make up crap to justify it AFTER THE FACT.

So what happened here?

Here's one news account with no speculation:

Social media footage surfaced surrounding the late-night fatal shooting during unrest. Witness accounts and video indicate the gunman first shot someone at a car lot just before midnight, but details on what sparked that shooting weren't immediately clear. ​

​

The alleged gunman then jogged away, fell in the street, and opened fire again as members of the crowd closed in on him, some appearing to kick and grab at his weapon. According to witness accounts and video footage, police apparently let the gunman walk past them and leave the scene with a rifle over his shoulder and his hands in the air as members of the crowd were yelling for him to be arrested because he had shot people.​

​

When asked why the gunman was not arrested in the moment, Kenosha County Sheriff David Beth said he couldn't say for certain, but noted the chaos surrounding officers that night.​

Since it's all caught on video, it's pretty damn hard to JUSTIFY but easier to UNDERSTAND the shootings - the fact he was there and (illegally) armed to begin with and the fact he was allowed to simply walk away and return to another state and the fact that in that video there was NO criminal behavior being conducted by any of the dead or injured victims speak for themselves. The rest is speculation, differing accounts, deliberate disinformation, witness statements and armchair quarterbacks dissecting a brief video.

So here are the questions:

WHY WAS A 17 YEAR OLD THERE????? WITH THAT KIND OF WEAPON???? Regardless of what was going on....no one else got shot. Regardless of how I personally feel about private militias (which, as you know, is pretty negative) - THEY didn't shoot anyone either. The police refused to deputize these citizens...for good reason, but they were and imo it's fine to do so - allowed to guard private property. That is FINE. That is what this kid was supposed to be doing, but he LEFT his spot. If he had stayed there nothing would have happened! He was in over his head and he panicked, understandably, when people in the crowd tried to restrain him and get rid of his weapon. As far as anyone could see - the kid was another mass shooter...like Parkland, or any number of events. How could anyone know otherwise when they witness a man shot in the head and another man trotting away with a rifle? He wasn't law enforcement. No badge. No ID. WE FAILED HIM BY ALLOWING HIM TO BE THERE! He is not a hero. He is not a thug. He's a mixed up kid, who badly wanted to be a policeman, who idolized law enforcement, who carried a MEDIC bag in case any protestors needed help, and damn, I just end up crying for HIM, for this one ruined life, someone who really did not seem to have any malice. The dead are dead, but he will have to live with this. It's so wrong.

WHO SHOULD WE BLAME for the riots? Oh, I know the answer that will come from some - commie lefties. Democrats. Sheesh. Get a new playbook. Responsibility ultimately comes down on the mayor. He, along with the city council are responsible for ensuring the safety of his citizens, and their livelyhoods and their homes. Just like if you are the president - it doesn't really matter what you do or don't do - the buck stops here.

But there is a bit more than that because nothing is really simple unless you are a business that got burned out, or the fiancé, with a 2 yr old daughter, of a man who is now dead and slandered, or a 17 year old kid who will now be facing a life he never envisioned, or the family of a man brutally shot in the back at close range, and you just want justice.

What could have been done differently?

Let's start at the beginning. What sparked the demonstrations that then turned into rioting?

A video. A video showing police come up to a man, leaning into his car, grabbing him by the shirt, pulling him back and pumping multiple rounds into his back at close range. It was brutal and against the backdrop of so many videos showing (justifiable and unjustifiable) police violence - there should be no surprise at public reaction. I don't care who the man was, there is no way to watch that (if you are a normal person) and not be horrified. This is our new reality - videos. Of EVERYTHING. Harder to sweep things under the rug, easier to spin, misconstrue, take out of context. Easier to inflame "the masses". Easier to see wrong doing.

What preceded that? Attempts at police reform by the Wisconsin governor, stalled by the legislature. Maybe, just maybe, if people see that something is happening and something is being done, and there is transparency the potential for violence is less. The governor is attempting, AGAIN, to pass it

Yet, the mayor himself appears to be tone deaf to his constituency. If he doesn't listen to the other half, and he fails to provide law and order, he's going to deservedly lose re-election. One example - curfews. A good way to tamp down the potential for violence which always seems to escalate at night. There are demonstrations ongoing described as "mostly peaceful". There is supposed to be a curfew. It's NOT BEING ENFORCED. What the hell?

What is your solution? Blame "commies"? Get real. We have a perfect storm with bitter political divisions at EVERY LEVEL, widespread public anger and unrest, a lot of restrictions and confusion with a pandemic, widespread distrust of our leadership, huge unemployment, Congress incapable of doing their job, a hugely divisive and incompetent president, and the worst recession in ages and more internet disinformation than ever before. Take your pick - it all feeds into the unrest.

But I will say this, I was wrong on one thing, I am now agreeing with you that we need law and order more than ever - we need to stop the violence and that means addressing ALL the participants, not politicizing who to go after. But that can't be with private militias, because they become PART of the problem, fed by the same disinformation as the rest of us. Private entities can guard private property but they have no business roaming the streets or public areas and if they kill someone, they face the law on that. The police and our national guard are the ones who need to be doing this. It's their job, it's what they are trained for. Crowd control. Arresting looters and arsonists. Enforcing curfews.

This kid is not a hero. He's a victim. And we are all to blame.

A few things are missing from your play by play of the events all caught on video.

Again. Like I said. Armchair Quarterbacks dissecting a video. You weren't there.

First guy shot was caught on video leading a group chasing Rittenhouse.

Does the video show what Rittenhouse did prior to that? No. Does the video show why he left his post guarding private property? No.

It's a useless speculation.

Earlier in the night he was filmed strutting around shouting at armed men defending property "shoot me, nigga!" as if to imply that bullets would only make him angry.

So what? There are a lot of assholes out there. On all sides. Haven't you noticed? Being an asshole is not a death sentence nor is it illegal. And, guess what - POLICE are trained to deal with that. They are mature trained adults. 17 year old kids are NOT.

Same guy threw a flaming object at Rittenhouse a moment before he cornered him in a parking lot and thats when you could hear shots fired. Rittenhouse then calls 911 to report that he had shot someone, also caught on video.

Debunked. That's part of the river of false information surrounding this. The only thing thrown was what appeared to be a lightweight bag of trash.

Yes. Rittenhouse did call 911. He did the right thing. He wasn't a bad kid. He was in the wrong place and the ADULTS who allowed it ought to take some responsibility.

Rosenbaum's assholish behavior sheds light onto the mindset that compelled him to begin chasing a guy armed with a rifle. He obviously took for granted that the men with guns were unlike himself, very restrained and disciplined, plus he was obviously intoxicated by mob mentality and probably a lifetime of leftist indoctrination into thinking that nothing bad could ever happen to him. I'll speculate that RIttenhouse "left his post" because the mob, like a pack of hyenas, recognized him as the weakest member of the herd and intentionally separated him from the group. That's what it looks like to me.

ASSHOLERY is not a CRIME. It's certainly not a death sentence. And, you are probably right - he was intoxicated with mob mentality (hardly confined to the left). You can speculate all you want but it doesn't change one important fact - it's speculation.

I can speculate too.

That he got angered by taunting and let loose.

Or, he saw a situation he thought he should get involved in.

Or, he decided to play "hero"

Or any number of things that don't change the essentials facts:

• He is not a policeman, trained to deal with volatile crowds and assholes.
• He had no business being there, illegally armed and underage.
• He had no business leaving his post and "patrolling" public streets.

One can only speculate what he planned to do once he caught Rittenhouse. Probably nothing good I'm guessing. Was he just supposed to just accept a beating and end up like this guy?
View attachment 381171

FYI, people carry guns to avoid ending up beaten half to death in the street by angry mobs.

Ok...so you've essentially GUTTED your whole "good guy with a gun" theory. We now know it's based on partisan politics.

Would they have beaten him? Possibly. They just witnessed him SHOOTING AN UNARMED MAN IN THE HEAD for god's sakes. Or, maybe the other guy with the gun (who, if he were a rightist would be a "good guy with a gun") might have held him at gunpoint until the police came.

Either way, it does not change the fact he shot and killed one two people and badly wounded another. None were committing illegal acts. Two, were trying to stop him from escaping after he killed the first.

The kid was heavily armed, NOT the police. No uniform. No authority. Could have been just another mass shooter shooting into a crowd.

Take the partisan politics out of the situation and what does it look like?

Rosenbaum was an angry little man with a history of violence boasting with stereotypical street-thug bravado. He chased the kid down, intending to do him harm and got what he quite literally asked for. You keep saying none of them committed illegal acts but ignore the fact that they were attacking him. Is assault not illegal? Do you have to wait until your blood is spilled before you're legally permitted to defend yourself? Nobody would have been shot if they had just left him alone. But no, they decided to chase him and corner him in a parking lot. The other two guys shot are also seen in the background during Rosenbaum's little "shoot me nigga" display so it's not like they were heroes confused about the situation into thinking it was a random mass-shooting type deal.

First Fact: the kid should not have been there and he was illegally armed.

No. Rosenbaum didn't ask for it. No evidence the kid was defending himself against Rosenbaum, that's your speculation. Words are words. No one is calling Rosenbaum any kind of hero. He's just a man. Who was unarmed I might add, and acting like jerk. None of which justifies murder.

The fact that people have to make up crap, like he was a child rapist, in order to justify it, kind of indicates that the case for killing him is weak and lawless and desperate.

Again. Assholery is not a crime. If it were, most of us here would be executed.

When a guy with a high-powered weapon starts shooting UNARMED people who are not actively engaged in crime, HE BECOMES A POTENTIAL MASS SHOOTER and at best - an ACTIVE SHOOTER.

I never said the shooting was justified because he was a "child rapist" or because he was an asshole. (As I've said multiple times I just think it's really weird that his sex offender registry was deleted which only feeds into conspiracy theories.)

It was justified because Rosenbaum chased and cornered Rittenhouse with the intent to do him harm. Nobody knows exactly how much violence he intended to dish out on that kid or what the mob would have done to him if Rosenbaum provided them with an opening but gosh it sure doesn't take a very active imagination to venture a guess, does it?

Exactly

 

[BlueGin]

The Communist Democrats are upset because he shot one of the domestic terrorists that they are wholeheartedly supporting!

All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Kyle Rittenhouse did something.

He committed the worst crime of the night.

He committed no crime. He was assaulted by a gang trying to murder him

He committed several. He was illegally carrying a gun and broke curfew. Then he killed someone and tried to escape the crime scene. When people tried to stop him he killed them too.

Escape the crime scene?

He was running straight at the flashing lights of LEO heavily armored MRAPS with his hands up, before and after the other two violent felons pulled a pistol out on him.

He ran from the crime scene quite clearly.

TO the police. Moron.

He was arrested at the scene?

He turned himself over to police.

 

[zaangalewa]

... stalinist ...

Before you use such words you should try to study real history.

I know more history than you ever will, clown boi.

That's why you call other people "Stalinists", joker?

only some people. posters who advocate sending people to shithole countries. posters who advocate killing people are apparently okay.

What do you think will a German answer to the question "What was the shithole country, which was governed from a megalomaniac asshole?". I guess most will anser "Nazi-Germany". And what will they answer to "What is the shithole country, which is governed from a megalomaniac asshole?" ...

 

[BlueGin]

he nearly got you there. what a clever trap.

It isn't a trap Stasi man, it is just logic.

All of you who attack the person defending himself are engendering the criminal acts, themselves. It does not stand to reason that if you actually believed the criminal acts to be in the wrong, you would not be attacking the boy who is defending himself, therefore you must think these criminal acts should be legal.

I realize double-talk is pretty much hard wired into you, but there are limits to my tolerance of such.

interesting pretzel logic. what happens when your limits are reached?

do you then stomp your feet, old man?

vigilantes have never made anything better. they make things worse. this is not a batman movie.

Exactly.

Here's a list of those murdered by peaceful protesters. Can ANY of you show us where you posted any condemnation of these murderers? I'm expecting crickets, but I'm willing to give it a shot

Deadly unrest: Here are the people who have died amid George Floyd protests across US

Among those killed as protests over the death of George Floyd have roiled American cities in the past week are a retired police captain, a beloved owner of a barbecue restaurant, and a former star football player known as “Mr. Indianapolis."

www.google.com

Did anyone try to make the killers heros?

They weren't heroes. Neither were they DEFENDING THEMSELVES

Again, the right isn't for law and order. They pick and choose who has to obey laws, there is no order in that.

Unlike the left that defends murderous mobs and pays their bail. You are an idiot.

Who is defending the riots? Please share a link.

So you are not here defending murderous mobs? Many of whom are felons?

 

[Nosmo King]

The Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha and Guardian of Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, will be acquitted by a Jury of his Peers, the townsfolk of Kenosha who have suffered immense harm by the hands of Rioters, Rapists, Arsonists, Looters and Thugs.

Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.

So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.

It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.

Let me get this straight. It's okay for the cops to shoot an unarmed Black man in the back seven time while his kids watch, but a White guy with a rifle can kill two then walk by the cops still carrying his gun.

And the White guy is considered a patriot while the Black guy had it coming.

And you donsee a racial bias here.

Is it any wonder America is divided between the decent and the deplorable?

 

[Brain357]

The Communist Democrats are upset because he shot one of the domestic terrorists that they are wholeheartedly supporting!

All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Kyle Rittenhouse did something.

He committed the worst crime of the night.

He committed no crime. He was assaulted by a gang trying to murder him

He committed several. He was illegally carrying a gun and broke curfew. Then he killed someone and tried to escape the crime scene. When people tried to stop him he killed them too.

Escape the crime scene?

He was running straight at the flashing lights of LEO heavily armored MRAPS with his hands up, before and after the other two violent felons pulled a pistol out on him.

He ran from the crime scene quite clearly.

TO the police. Moron.

He was arrested at the scene?

He turned himself over to police.

He was arrested at home. He ran from the crime scene. There were plenty of police there to turn himself into.

 

[NoNukes]

Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.

The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.

So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.

It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.

The 2nd Amendment mentions riots, arson and looting and communism?

Yes it does:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It says nothing about murder.

Nor did he commit murder. He defended himself from three violent felons.

He had his mother drive him there from another state to shoot people. That is murder.

Wrong. He didn't travel there to shoot people, he was forced to defend himself.

But you know that, you just don't want your violent felons killed while trying to hurt others.

He traveled there with a weapon. Yours st

Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.

The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.

So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.

It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.

The 2nd Amendment mentions riots, arson and looting and communism?

Yes it does:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It says nothing about murder.

Nor did he commit murder. He defended himself from three violent felons.

He had his mother drive him there from another state to shoot people. That is murder.

Wrong. He didn't travel there to shoot people, he was forced to defend himself.

But you know that, you just don't want your violent felons killed while trying to hurt others.

He traveled there with a weapon. Your stubbornness makes you look stupid.

we see that was a good idea since if he didnt have it he would have been killed,,,

Or, he could have minded his own business.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

The kid is a criminal and no better than the rioters. He was breaking laws before he ever shot anyone. And then he committed the worst crimes of the night.

No. Here's why.

Rioters went there to rob, loot, burn and cause destruction.
He went there with the intention to provide a presence to maintain and protect property and safety from rioters and looters and arsonists

He has the moral high ground

 

[beautress]

The second amendment was created to keep abusive govt. and their agents at bay. Right now we have abusive got. with police that think they can be paid assassins for the state. I say that we rise up and throw off these chains and shackles of oppression from the police state. The police are not your friends they are the enemy and threaten to kill all that do not submit.

Moonie, if you don't like America the President or other people who live here, you need to take a nice long sabbatical to a country that has government you can tolerate. If it's the Alinski's model that Hillary,s college thesis that became her substitute for God, visit Russia, China, or anyother Socialistic Republic that controls the hell out of people who speak their minds freely, so the first thing you need to know is to stfu about everything. That's your only friend there, abject silence. Sorry, I didn't make up the rules there, but I know what they are.

 

[Brain357]

he nearly got you there. what a clever trap.

It isn't a trap Stasi man, it is just logic.

All of you who attack the person defending himself are engendering the criminal acts, themselves. It does not stand to reason that if you actually believed the criminal acts to be in the wrong, you would not be attacking the boy who is defending himself, therefore you must think these criminal acts should be legal.

I realize double-talk is pretty much hard wired into you, but there are limits to my tolerance of such.

interesting pretzel logic. what happens when your limits are reached?

do you then stomp your feet, old man?

vigilantes have never made anything better. they make things worse. this is not a batman movie.

Exactly.

Here's a list of those murdered by peaceful protesters. Can ANY of you show us where you posted any condemnation of these murderers? I'm expecting crickets, but I'm willing to give it a shot

Deadly unrest: Here are the people who have died amid George Floyd protests across US

Among those killed as protests over the death of George Floyd have roiled American cities in the past week are a retired police captain, a beloved owner of a barbecue restaurant, and a former star football player known as “Mr. Indianapolis."

www.google.com

Did anyone try to make the killers heros?

They weren't heroes. Neither were they DEFENDING THEMSELVES

Again, the right isn't for law and order. They pick and choose who has to obey laws, there is no order in that.

Unlike the left that defends murderous mobs and pays their bail. You are an idiot.

Who is defending the riots? Please share a link.

So you are not here defending murderous mobs? Many of whom are felons?

That is breaking the law. I am lawful. I think the rioters should be jailed just like this murderer.

 

[BlueGin]

The kid is a criminal and no better than the rioters. He was breaking laws before he ever shot anyone. And then he committed the worst crimes of the night.

No. Here's why.

Rioters went there to rob, loot, burn and cause destruction.
He went there with the intention to provide a presence to maintain and protect property and safety from rioters and looters and arsonists

He has the moral high ground

He was also there as a medic. With his medic gear.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

The Communist Democrats are upset because he shot one of the domestic terrorists that they are wholeheartedly supporting!

All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Kyle Rittenhouse did something.

He committed the worst crime of the night.

He committed no crime. He was assaulted by a gang trying to murder him

He committed several. He was illegally carrying a gun and broke curfew. Then he killed someone and tried to escape the crime scene. When people tried to stop him he killed them too.

Escape the crime scene?

He was running straight at the flashing lights of LEO heavily armored MRAPS with his hands up, before and after the other two violent felons pulled a pistol out on him.

He ran from the crime scene quite clearly.

TO the police. Moron.

He was arrested at the scene?

He turned himself over to police.

He was arrested at home. He ran from the crime scene. There were plenty of police there to turn himself into.

Did the people who destroyed the cars turn themselves in?

Did they call the police and say I destroyed 50 cars?

 

[NoNukes]

Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.

The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.

So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.

It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.

Because what he did was murder

No....it likely wasn't..........

He had his mother drive him there from another state to kill people. He was not protecting property or his family. That is murder.

You are a moron............the reporter who was there and the New York Times talked about this guy before the shooting, he wasn't there to shoot anyone......he even talked to the police before the shooting and they knew he had the rifle......he was violently attacked by joe biden voters who burned, looted and violently attacked people in that neighborhood long before this guy showed up....you dumb twit.

You are the stupid one. As usual. He traveled there with a weapon. There was no reason for him to even be there.

who are you to say he had no reason to be there???
this is a free country,,,

He drove into a troubled area from another state. He was there for trouble.

 

[Brain357]

The kid is a criminal and no better than the rioters. He was breaking laws before he ever shot anyone. And then he committed the worst crimes of the night.

No. Here's why.

Rioters went there to rob, loot, burn and cause destruction.
He went there with the intention to provide a presence to maintain and protect property and safety from rioters and looters and arsonists

He has the moral high ground

He was illegally carrying a gun and breaking curfew. He was the worst criminal of the night. Police and national guard had it under control, he was a problem.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.

The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.

So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.

It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.

The 2nd Amendment mentions riots, arson and looting and communism?

People he shot had extensive criminal records and they attacked him first. Self defense is allowed.