Why isn't 15 weeks long enough for a woman to decide to destroy her fetus?

She was 80 years old and pregnant?
We know you are stupid!

I stated she is 80+, not was 80. She got pregnant around age 50, which is a very high risk pregnancy.

My neighbor at 60+ was still fertile & having periods. She just had a hysterectomy 6 months ago out of fear of getting pregnant without option to abort. Pregnancy at her age would most likely produce defective child, kill her, the fetus or both & she could not support it alone at that age as her husband has passed away.
 
Last edited:
We know you are stupid!

I stated she is 80+, not was 80. She got pregnant around age 50, which is a very high risk pregnancy.

My neighbor at 60+ was still fertile & having periods. She just had a hysterectomy 6 months ago out of fear of getting pregnant without option to abort. Pregnancy at her age would most likely produce defective child, kill her, the fetus or both & she could not support it alone at that age as her husband has passed away.

Nothing changes the fact that to not notice she was pregnant at 30 weeks she was fat, ignorant, stupid, or a combo of the 3.
 
Nothing changes the fact that to not notice she was pregnant at 30 weeks she was fat, ignorant, stupid, or a combo of the 3.
Nothing changes the fact you can't read, comprehend & have proven you're ignorant & stupid!

Again you have failed in your attempts to dehumanize her, kill her, jail her or out vote her.
 
And you haven't given at least a synopsis of why, so it has to be one of or a combo of those 3.

Your last statement is a glob of twattery.
il_1588xN.3996315838_jgw4.jpg
 
Read and weep in shame ghoul


Been banned for over 20 years


Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003’’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds and declares the following:
(1) A moral, medical, and ethical consensus exists that
the practice of performing a partial-birth abortion—an abortion in which a physician deliberately and intentionally vaginally delivers a living, unborn child’s body until either the entire baby’s head is outside the body of the mother, or any part of the baby’s trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother and only the head remains inside the womb, for the purpose of performing an overt act (usually the puncturing of the back of the child’s skull and removing the baby’s brains) that the person knows will kill the partially delivered infant, performs this act, and then completes delivery of the dead infant—is a gruesome and inhumane procedure that is never medically necessary and should be prohibited.
 
Last edited:
Do you have ANY exceptions ? Any ?
Women used to die in childbirth so certainly if there is a PHYSICAL RISK to the Mother that would be an exception. Rape/Incest is a gray area since the victim would have 3 months at least to deal with the unwanted pregnancy. But given where we are today, that would have to be an exception if we are EVER to put the ridiculous abortion charade behind us.
 
Women used to die in childbirth so certainly if there is a PHYSICAL RISK to the Mother that would be an exception. Rape/Incest is a gray area since the victim would have 3 months at least to deal with the unwanted pregnancy. But given where we are today, that would have to be an exception if we are EVER to put the ridiculous abortion charade behind us.
You're not gonna put the issue behind you because women refuse to accept second class citizenship.
 
You're not gonna put the issue behind you because women refuse to accept second class citizenship.
Cool, then we will make them fully equal and force them to sign up for the selective service and frontline combat roles.

Glad we agree on that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top