Quid pro quo?Try not to confuse the facts. Biden was sent by Obama along with officials fromthat my friend is extortion, and blackmail...from a desperate country that was being invaded by Putin, who obama had just promised to be more flexible with for help in the 2012 electionTIT-FOR-TAT???Yo bro, National television didn't show Mr. Chaos holding up 391 million dollars in aid, yes? That was the key and not his phone call to demand dirt on the Bidenswe know that's a lie...hence why Shit for Brains had to resort to lies....and when they had to present their case...had zippy and the President was exonerated.Trump didn't care about corruption in Ukraine. He wanted dirt to be manufactured just like in his conversation with the Georgia official.um...no it's perfectly reasonable to ensure a country we are giving aid to, isn't corrupt.Trump's effort to hold Ukraine hostage, by withholding aid, was an abuse of power.That's all parody...the entire impeachment was parody...even Shit of Brains admitted itActually, no. I think that you have not included the whole enchilada in your ridiculous rhetoric. Schiff to jail? For what?According to the Daily Beast, citing an anonymous source said to be “familiar with the matter,” Willis is “actively researching” whether Georgia Code §16-10-20 can be applied to Giuliani’s performance before a Georgia Senate Panel in early December 2020.Giuliani could face felony charges for precisely that sort of bullshit youre peddling.Right... NO Evidence because there was no chain of custody to show the fraud.Georgia: 61,837 votes separate Trump and Biden (0.2%), 16 electoral votes at stake.It is voter suppression. The legislature can recall local voting officials and replace them with people of its choice. The voting in Georgia was fine and would have retreated to pre-covid standards without new rules, obviously. The BlobNo it in fact changes a lot...the law expands early voting, and makes it much easier to vote early.That changes nothing.Good...so it actually EXPANDS voting.....like I saidBut it expands voting....early voting for example...and allows the State to come in before the fact now, and add polling stations and machinesThe purpose is to SUPPRESS the vote and nothing more. Closing the polling stations at 5 pm so that workers can't make it to the polls? Totally unnecessary to legislate all of a sudden. He should be making it easier to vote. We all know what he is trying to do regardless of the excuses you make for his actions.Who's talking about police stations and going online?Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.Yes it is.water is not prohibited.You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.
ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.
Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.
Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!
Fuck you leftist liars
YOU LIE
This is about polling stations. A couple points about that, 1) people should learn to be prepared, they know they are going to a polling station..,which might be quite different about knowing if you are going to a police station 2) water can be given to you by anyone if you don't prepare (so long as iit's given to you 150 feet before the polling station) 3) if within the 150 feet, or if you are in line beyond that, the polling station can have it for you, to get yourself...and anyone can donate water to the station to make available.
Regarding long lines...this law actually goes a long way to fix the issue. Prior to the law, the State could only get involved AFTER the fact, after the election. The polling stations are run by localities, and frankly where the long lines were, were dem controlled areas...in and around ATL.
Now that the law has passed, the State can act in real time, and address the issues by adding more machines, or more polling stations....here's the new law: If, at the previous general election, a precinct contained more than 2,000 electors and if [voters] desiring to vote on the day of the election had to wait in line for more than one hour before checking in to vote, the superintendent shall either reduce the size of such precinct so that it shall contain not more than 2,000 electors…or provide additional voting equipment or poll workers, or both, before the next general election….The chief manager of a precinct which contained more than 2,000 electors at the previous general election shall submit a report thereof to the superintendent of the reported time from entering the line to checking in to vote. Such wait time shall be measured no fewer than three different times throughout the day (in the morning, at midday, and prior to the close of polls) and such results shall be recorded on a form provided by the Secretary of State.
I have not seen that the law changes the time the polls close to 5pm. What I have seen is that the polling stations can start tabulating absentee ballots earlier..two weeks eariler, and that all, including votes on election day, start being counted non-stop after the polls close and be done by 5pm the following day.
In actual fact, it does NOT mandate polls closing by 5 pm. What it does is require sparsely-populated areas, where the people who work on elections would normally only be part-time, to have polls open at least 8 hours a day, which some places were not doing previously.If you have 159 counties in a state the size of GA, there is a county in virtually every back yard. You have early voting and absentee voting for all in GA. If you wait in a line--YOU are the dumb f***!Who the hell arrives at a police station thirsty before going online? You get thirsty because you wait a long time. You dumb f***Completely false. Folks are allowed to bring water...folks are free to donate water to the polling station and make it available to anyone who wants water, beyond the 150 feet, folks are even free to hand it out to people if they aren't waiting in line yet.Yes it is.water is not prohibited.You guys are confused. The threat author says it's just not true that water is prohibited, and you said it's true and it's perfect. Which one is it?Democrats believe making buying votes illegal is wrong.Poll workers and other people in line can give out water.
ONLY CAMPAIGN WORKERS CANNOT GIVE OUT ANYTHING OF VALUE, LEST IT BE CONSIDERED A BRIBE.
Not to mention, Campaign workers must stay like 150 feet away from the poll.
Sooooo.....Biden fucking lied at his “presser” as is every single leftist who said GEORGIA MADE IT ILLEGAL TO GIVE PEOPLE WATER!
Fuck you leftist liars
YOU LIE
Oh and of course the law makes absentee voting harder as well
Absentee voting, simply reverts to the standard prior to Covid, and makes it in line with voting by person.
The reality is, this faux outrage was mere propaganda by the left....and frankly Xiden's comments are a backhanded attempt to downplay the Dems Jim Crow era, and deflect from his part in trying to fight against Brown v Board of Education enforcement.
falsely complained about the "fraudulent" election, and conned his supporters, which resulted in 3 recounts and millions of taxpayer dollars wasted, and this is the unnecessary one-sided result.
Of the total Georgia votes of 4,935,487 almost 404,000 absentee ballots didn't have a record of being signed by the voter.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News.The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
Read closely what The Georgia Star News has found in their efforts to get the audit trails and other verifications from the
159 GA counties. 56 counties have complied accounting for 32.5% of the absentee ballots. WHY NOT???
Four Months After 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia No Chain of Custody Documents Produced for 404,000 Absentee Ballots Deposited in Drop Boxes; Fulton County One of 35 Scofflaw Counties
"There were myriad problems with the absentee processing system at Fulton Government headquarters," the report states, including no chain of custody forms being used as ballots move from room to room and a failure to sufficiently protect spoiled and rejected ballots in the mail room.
Still, the report said, there is no evidence of fraud.
Report Shows No Fraud But Many Problems With Fulton Voting Process
Fulton County's November and January elections had no fraud but faced problems with its mail-in absentee voting process, according to a report from a State Election Board-appointed monitor.www.gpb.org
Remember the premise of absentee voting is
A) The voter requests a form to complete and return WITH the voter's signature.
B) The voter receives a envelope containing another envelope that contains the ballot.
C) The voter checks off their choices and puts the ballot in the envelope.
D) Voter signs the envelope that contains the ballot.
E) Puts that envelope into the envelope that has the election office.
F) Election office opens the outside envelope retains the signed envelope.
G) Signed envelope is compared then with the voter's signed request for absentee ballot signature.
H) IF the poll worker that is comparing the request form signature to the envelope signature is truly
1) Qualified to recognize differences, i.e. vision is good and can distinguish distinctions
2) The ballot is considered valid and then removed from the envelope.
I) The ballot is now entered.
How many distinct handlings of this absentee ballot request, the returned request, the envelope containing the
absentee ballot envelope, the ballot comparison report, and finally the supposedly valid ballot has occurred?
See I know how this works as I've voted absentee and followed the trail.
Here is a GA signature comparison that was accepted:
View attachment 476869
The high-profile and scandal-plagued attorney also presented an edited security camera video which he told legislators was proof that an elections official had removed ballots from underneath a table and then “added in secret.” Giuliani claimed this footage was a “powerful smoking gun.”
That video and the claims made by Giuliani were immediately debunked by numerous Republican Party elections officials in the Peach State—including Georgia Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling.
Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy
Do you think Schiff’s ridiculous dramatization of the Trump Ukraine phone call warrants prison for schiff? It was a lie. We all know it because we have the recording of the call.
What Trump Said on the Ukraine Call
Key exchanges in the president’s July phone call with the Ukrainian leader
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
Two Key Takeaways From the Ukraine Call Record
A call record released Wednesday by the White House shows that President Trump asked his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains what elements of the call could be the most damaging and what could be the most helpful for the president as he tries to make the case he did nothing improper.
In key moments from a July phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Mr. Trump highlighted the aid that Washington provides to Kyiv while also asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son.
Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to probe matters related to Russia’s 2016 hack of Democratic computers, according to a record of the conversation released by the White House.
Some highlights of the conversation, and what the exchanges meant:
1. Reminder of U.S. Aid
President Trump emphasizes the aid that the U.S. provides to Ukraine, comparing it favorably with the level of European support. He also intimates that the support from Washington may not always be reciprocated by Kyiv. More than a week before the call, Mr. Trump had asked his acting chief of staff to place a hold on $391 million in aid.“I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. Much more than the European countries are doing and they should be helping you more than they are. Germany does almost nothing for you. All they do is talk and I think it’s something that you should really ask them about. … The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.” — President Trump
Adam Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks
Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.www.washingtontimes.com
Yeah, the call was so damning that the Dems had to resort to "parody" to impeach him. The impeachment was a clear abuse of power.
It was on national television bro...not sure how you missed it
Bro. Keep reinventing history if it makes you feel better. A phone call in itself means nothing but backed up with a stoppage of promised aid changes everything.
I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion.
I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.
FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor
In this clip from a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations, former Vice President Joe Biden seems to brag about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the firing of a prosecutor he did not like. In September 2019, House Democrats...www.realclearpolitics.com
40 other countries to tell the president of Ukraine to fire a known corrupt prosecutor or they would withhold aid. That is hardly extortion. Trump put a stop to aid and used it to extort because he wanted some dirt to be invented. Get the facts straight.
Obama asks Medvedev for THIS QUID PRO QUO for Obama's re-election...
President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
(QUID..."give me space"...) in other words...flexibility."
President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.
That is your idea of Quid pro quo? Obama wasn't holding up aid or threatening
in any manner, shape, or form.
Well he did in Ukraine...but that's another point
But yes, that is a quid pro quo "a thing for a thing" - you don't need to extort anyone for a quid pro quo to take place. Especially, when you are the one asking for the help. Obama wanted help in the 2012 election, he got it, and then was more flexible with Putin in return. Putin invaded Ukraine, (which chaos created a cash cow for dems), Obama turned a blind eye, then he invited them in to the Middle East, expanding the Syrian war
That kind of quid pro quo is hardly unusual as it just bides time. But you surely know that to withhold a 391 million dollar package wields a lot of clout when a country is desperately trying to defend itself from invasion. The threat didn't work
anyway since Trump was obligated to release the aid, and did so. He got nothing in his quest to get dirt on the Bidens because their was nothing.
Syria:
Chris Christie mostly wrong that Barack Obama ... - PolitiFact
https://www.politifact.com › factchecks › dec › chris-ch...
Claim: Says the Obama administration invited "Russia into Syria."
Claimed by: Chris Christie
Fact check by PolitiFact: Mostly False
It's not unusal for a President to ask a foreign country for help to win an election? Really? Maybe in the Dems world...Obama did, and we know Xiden asked China...but frankly it's a big no no
It is against the law to withhold Congressionally approved aid to try and get dirt on your opposition, especially when you want false info. You say it is not unusual to ask a foreign country to meddle in our election? Sure it is. You know that Biden did?
You are full of horsediddly squat.
nobody did that. We heard the transcript not the parody. The dems put their parody on...trump was exonerated of your accusations
sorry no it is unusual...you said it happens all the time. What obama was caught doing and what xiden did with china is wrong.
Acquittal means a jury has found you not guilty, which is a legal status. Sometimes people are acquitted of crimes that they in fact committed. That doesn’t matter. They can’t be tried again for the same crimes. Exoneration means that evidence has been produced that proves that a person cannot be guilty of a crime with which they were charged. If their case hasn’t come to trial, the charges are dropped. If they have been convicted and sent to prison, legal action is taken to erase the conviction.
Trump claims 'full exoneration' after acquittal but Pelosi insists he remains impeached 'forever' â as it happened
Trump acquitted of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, making him the third president in US history to survive impeachmentwww.theguardian.com
In this case he accused...obviously remained innocent, went to trial...and the evidence, or should I say, lack of evidence from Shifty et al, ended with a not guilty and more over the evidence that was produced...fully exonerated him.
President Trump’s call with Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was part of a protracted effort by the President, his personal attorney, and administration officials to use the power and prestige of the United States government to get Ukraine to pursue investigations for Trump’s personal and political advantage.
Trump's Ukraine call was damning, and the context makes it even worse - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
The evidence gathered to date shows that Trump, with the help of Giuliani and senior U.S. officials, engaged in a protracted campaign to pressure Zelensky.www.citizensforethics.org
Proved false in a court of law.
There was never a court case because a sitting president cannot be indicted, its a high crime.
The trial was held in the senate moron. He was exonerated.
The senate acquitted, because they ignored Lev Parnas and other witnesses like Bolton.
Counter evidence wasnt given, so he remains impeached and aquitted.
Bolton wasn't a witness...the House never attempted to get him to testify at their hearings
Lev Parnas, was never a party to the call...but he was in US Custody, arrested by the Trump Admin...so Shifty could have tried to get him to come testify...but never did