- Jan 19, 2010
- 70,276
- 65,758
- 3,605
Keep dreaming...That will be the Democratsā chant going into the election.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs š
Keep dreaming...That will be the Democratsā chant going into the election.
Spits the idiot who applauds trump for taking us towards our first $2 trillion deficit.[
Adding a trillion dollars of debt per year (on top of the existing debt increases) is your idea of making America great again?
America is already great. This is just fucking us over.
Oh yeah, you totally care about the debt.
We saw you Stalinist fucks decrying the $10 trillion in debt Obama racked up.
Oh wait.
You Marxists are such fucking frauds...
Keep deflecting, moron.Or it's this:
The Trump Teamās Account of the Stormy Daniels Story Is So Bad Itās Funny
f you think that professional reporters regularly invent stories out of whole cloth, it may seem defensible to do so yourself in the name of fighting fire with fire. So when a conservative operative tried to pose as a victim of former Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore in order to dupe The Washington Post into reporting a false charge against him, her cover was blown when reporters uncovered a post she had written in which she gleefully announced that sheād āaccepted a job to work in the conservative media movement to combat the lies and deceipt [sic] of the liberal MSM.ā
Thereās also a feedback loop between Trumpāand Republicans in Congressāand the conservative media. Trump tweets out policy statements based on the nonsense he sees on Fox and Friends, while Attorney General Jeff Sessions names a prosecutor to follow up on House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunesās (R-CA) discredited claims suggesting that Kremlingate is a ādeep-stateā conspiracy and the real problem is the FBIās supposed bias against Republicans. Thereās an alternative narrative for every damning story about the regime, even something as straightforward as EPA chief Scott Pruittās notorious penchant for traveling first class on the taxpayerās dime.
So if you watch Fox and read Breitbart, itās quite likely that you believe the Trump regime has been disciplined and effective and free of scandals, while the mainstream press continues to cover up the greatest political crimes of our generation, all of which revolve around the Clintons or Barack Obama. Itās a scam, but one that works to keep those who want to believe it in the fold.
Cross-posted to the Stormy Daniels thread with a different three paragraphs quoted.
You've given yourself permission to believe lies in the face of factual information. Nothing can interfere with your narrative, and THAT is why you don't trust the MSM.
Yeah, because the Stormy Daniels thing totally worked. You really got the Trump base to turn on him...
Or something...
Fucking commies, dumb as dog shit....
That will be the Democratsā chant going into the election.It's the economy stupid....LOLOL
Try selling that to America in November when Republicans, led by Trump, turn in our first $2 trillion deficit. Roughly half of it due to Trumpās tax cuts
Yes, thatās right. Itās a mid-term election and trump isnāt running, ya moron. Any votes he gets are cast by abject imbeciles.LOLI don't care --I'm voting Trump no matter whatDumbfuck. This has nothing to do with Obama. This additional trillion dollar deficit is due entirely to trumpās tax cut. Obama has nothing to do with that.And you're fucking deranged to think that we can fix what the last president broke without taking on debt....we are going to have to add to the debt in order to fix the broken Obamacare system...secure our deliberately broken borders...repair our intentionally ignored roads, bridges, and infrastructure...Youāre fucking deranged if you think it was designed for the tax cuts to add a trillion dollars to the debt for FY2018
You are barking up the wrong tree Faun...you should be angry at the last administration for not doing what they said they would do with the stimulus money...
Did you really think we could elect and give two terms to Obama...8 years with a socialist in the white house without paying a price? This is what your stupidity has brought us....this is our penalty for electing a moron because he was black...
Live with it...
Now we have an America first president...he wil'l fix Obama's mess with you or without you...take your crying elsewhere....
This is all on trump and Republicans.
The fiscal year ends at the end of September. 5 weeks before the November mid-term elections. How do you think America is going to vote when Trump and Republicans post a roughly $2 trillion deficit?
Great, Trump will get 1 vote.
Izzatrite Li' Kim?
Yes, thatās right. Itās a mid-term election and trump isnāt running, ya moron. Any votes he gets are cast by abject imbeciles.LOLI don't care --I'm voting Trump no matter whatDumbfuck. This has nothing to do with Obama. This additional trillion dollar deficit is due entirely to trumpās tax cut. Obama has nothing to do with that.And you're fucking deranged to think that we can fix what the last president broke without taking on debt....we are going to have to add to the debt in order to fix the broken Obamacare system...secure our deliberately broken borders...repair our intentionally ignored roads, bridges, and infrastructure...
You are barking up the wrong tree Faun...you should be angry at the last administration for not doing what they said they would do with the stimulus money...
Did you really think we could elect and give two terms to Obama...8 years with a socialist in the white house without paying a price? This is what your stupidity has brought us....this is our penalty for electing a moron because he was black...
Live with it...
Now we have an America first president...he wil'l fix Obama's mess with you or without you...take your crying elsewhere....
This is all on trump and Republicans.
The fiscal year ends at the end of September. 5 weeks before the November mid-term elections. How do you think America is going to vote when Trump and Republicans post a roughly $2 trillion deficit?
Great, Trump will get 1 vote.
Izzatrite Li' Kim?
LOLOL4% unemployment and heading down...bank account heading up...GNP going up...border wall going up...swamp draining down...Spits the idiot who applauds trump for taking us towards our first $2 trillion deficit.
Thatās because Obama inherited a trillion dollar deficit along with a massive recession and falling revenue which added to it. Whereas Obama handed trump a good economy with rising revenue. Thereās no reason for s $2 trillion deficit in a good economy.Spits the idiot who applauds trump for taking us towards our first $2 trillion deficit.[
Adding a trillion dollars of debt per year (on top of the existing debt increases) is your idea of making America great again?
America is already great. This is just fucking us over.
Oh yeah, you totally care about the debt.
We saw you Stalinist fucks decrying the $10 trillion in debt Obama racked up.
Oh wait.
You Marxists are such fucking frauds...
Yeah, you Marxists are such deficit hawks.
I remember just how much you condemned ISIS Barry.
Oh wait, that never happened.
Nah, you're just a little commie fuck spewing shit because you think you can hurt America.
See the thing is Li'l Kim, I did condemn the latest heist by Congress - as I have condemned all of the bullshit through the Obama regime, as I condemned the bullshit under Dubya.
You are just a little commie scum, you have no integrity - actually you are an agent of hostile foreign government, a North Korean spy. But even if you were just a Marxist democrat, you would still be a fucking fraud.
How are you deflecting??? Just how fucking senile are you, gramps? Youāre injecting Stormy Daniels into a debate about the economy.Keep deflecting, moron.Or it's this:
The Trump Teamās Account of the Stormy Daniels Story Is So Bad Itās Funny
f you think that professional reporters regularly invent stories out of whole cloth, it may seem defensible to do so yourself in the name of fighting fire with fire. So when a conservative operative tried to pose as a victim of former Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore in order to dupe The Washington Post into reporting a false charge against him, her cover was blown when reporters uncovered a post she had written in which she gleefully announced that sheād āaccepted a job to work in the conservative media movement to combat the lies and deceipt [sic] of the liberal MSM.ā
Thereās also a feedback loop between Trumpāand Republicans in Congressāand the conservative media. Trump tweets out policy statements based on the nonsense he sees on Fox and Friends, while Attorney General Jeff Sessions names a prosecutor to follow up on House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunesās (R-CA) discredited claims suggesting that Kremlingate is a ādeep-stateā conspiracy and the real problem is the FBIās supposed bias against Republicans. Thereās an alternative narrative for every damning story about the regime, even something as straightforward as EPA chief Scott Pruittās notorious penchant for traveling first class on the taxpayerās dime.
So if you watch Fox and read Breitbart, itās quite likely that you believe the Trump regime has been disciplined and effective and free of scandals, while the mainstream press continues to cover up the greatest political crimes of our generation, all of which revolve around the Clintons or Barack Obama. Itās a scam, but one that works to keep those who want to believe it in the fold.
Cross-posted to the Stormy Daniels thread with a different three paragraphs quoted.
You've given yourself permission to believe lies in the face of factual information. Nothing can interfere with your narrative, and THAT is why you don't trust the MSM.
Yeah, because the Stormy Daniels thing totally worked. You really got the Trump base to turn on him...
Or something...
Fucking commies, dumb as dog shit....
What am I deflecting, Li'l Kim? The utter failure of your attempt to drive a wedge between Trump and his supporters?
Nah, I want to blast that from the rooftops. You filthy fucks are losers. 60 Minutes put on a bad impression of Howard Stern and no one gave a shit except you resist motherfuckers. You changed not a single mind.
You Communists already hated Trump, almost as much as you hate America.
LOLYes, thatās right. Itās a mid-term election and trump isnāt running, ya moron. Any votes he gets are cast by abject imbeciles.LOLI don't care --I'm voting Trump no matter whatDumbfuck. This has nothing to do with Obama. This additional trillion dollar deficit is due entirely to trumpās tax cut. Obama has nothing to do with that.
This is all on trump and Republicans.
The fiscal year ends at the end of September. 5 weeks before the November mid-term elections. How do you think America is going to vote when Trump and Republicans post a roughly $2 trillion deficit?
Great, Trump will get 1 vote.
Izzatrite Li' Kim?
Yet you North Koreans will still probably stuff the ballot boxes for Hillary, just as you did in the last election....
LOLOL4% unemployment and heading down...bank account heading up...GNP going up...border wall going up...swamp draining down...Spits the idiot who applauds trump for taking us towards our first $2 trillion deficit.
Only a fucking moron like you could possibly credit trumpās tax cuts for the 4% unemployment rate. Here, I had to magnify the period since his tax cuts went into effect because itās such a small part of the total drop in unemployment...
[
Thatās because Obama inherited a trillion dollar deficit along with a massive recession and falling revenue which added to it. Whereas Obama handed trump a good economy with rising revenue. Thereās no reason for s $2 trillion deficit in a good economy.
How are you deflecting??? Just how fucking senile are you, gramps? Youāre injecting Stormy Daniels into a debate about the economy.Keep deflecting, moron.Or it's this:
The Trump Teamās Account of the Stormy Daniels Story Is So Bad Itās Funny
f you think that professional reporters regularly invent stories out of whole cloth, it may seem defensible to do so yourself in the name of fighting fire with fire. So when a conservative operative tried to pose as a victim of former Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore in order to dupe The Washington Post into reporting a false charge against him, her cover was blown when reporters uncovered a post she had written in which she gleefully announced that sheād āaccepted a job to work in the conservative media movement to combat the lies and deceipt [sic] of the liberal MSM.ā
Thereās also a feedback loop between Trumpāand Republicans in Congressāand the conservative media. Trump tweets out policy statements based on the nonsense he sees on Fox and Friends, while Attorney General Jeff Sessions names a prosecutor to follow up on House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunesās (R-CA) discredited claims suggesting that Kremlingate is a ādeep-stateā conspiracy and the real problem is the FBIās supposed bias against Republicans. Thereās an alternative narrative for every damning story about the regime, even something as straightforward as EPA chief Scott Pruittās notorious penchant for traveling first class on the taxpayerās dime.
So if you watch Fox and read Breitbart, itās quite likely that you believe the Trump regime has been disciplined and effective and free of scandals, while the mainstream press continues to cover up the greatest political crimes of our generation, all of which revolve around the Clintons or Barack Obama. Itās a scam, but one that works to keep those who want to believe it in the fold.
Cross-posted to the Stormy Daniels thread with a different three paragraphs quoted.
You've given yourself permission to believe lies in the face of factual information. Nothing can interfere with your narrative, and THAT is why you don't trust the MSM.
Yeah, because the Stormy Daniels thing totally worked. You really got the Trump base to turn on him...
Or something...
Fucking commies, dumb as dog shit....
What am I deflecting, Li'l Kim? The utter failure of your attempt to drive a wedge between Trump and his supporters?
Nah, I want to blast that from the rooftops. You filthy fucks are losers. 60 Minutes put on a bad impression of Howard Stern and no one gave a shit except you resist motherfuckers. You changed not a single mind.
You Communists already hated Trump, almost as much as you hate America.
[
LOL
Youāre such a fucking loon.
You need to watch more MSM, not less.
Overall, do you approve or disapprove of President Trump's job performance?
Approve
303,305(55%)
Disapprove
238,910(44%)
Do you approve or disapprove of President Trumpās handling of foreign policy and the war on terror?
Approve
306,782(56%)
Disapprove
236,221(43%)
Do you approve of his job handling the U.S. economy?
Approve
311,439(57%)
Disapprove
227,233(42%)
Do you approve of his handling of immigration?
Approve
304,602(56%)
Disapprove
235,142(43%)
Read Newsmax Article: Newsmax.com - Breaking news from around the globe: U.S. news, politics, world, health, finance, video, science, technology, live news stream
Urgent: Do you approve of Pres. Trumpās job performance? Vote Here!
They prefer to get their "gospel Truth", from Wikileaks!So the President Trump scores low on University of Missouri journalism instituteās trustworthiness survey
Trusting News Project Report 2017
More than two-thirds of those sampled (67.3%) reported being ālikelyā
(34.8%) or āvery likelyā
(32.5%) to believe mainstream journalism organizations
while 32.7% or respondents reported being āunlikelyā (17.3%) or āvery unlikelyā (15.3%).
Data were collected in the February and March 2017 using an online survey made available to users (N = 8,728) of the digital media platforms of twenty-eight different newsrooms across the United States.
So the authors congratulate themselves on supposedly so scientific so methodical research...
YEA...
So here is what they explain as to how they came up with the figures...
In addition to the demographic variables described above, respondents were asked to report their political ideology on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very conservative) to 5 (very liberal).
The distribution for political ideology can be seen in the bar plot below.
Overall, the sample leaned slighly liberal (M = 3.41, SD = 1.03), which could be a reflection of the specific newsrooms participating in the current investigation,
a tendency to among conservatives to avoid surveys conducted by āthe media,ā or a general preference among conservatives toward less mainstrean news sources. Future research conducted in collaboration with newsrooms should incorporate experimental and/or longitudinal study designs to better explain systematic differences in online samples.
So 8,728 people polled breaks down this way:
- very conservative 0.25% 22 people
- conservative 15.0% 1,309
- moderate 32.0% 2,793
- liberal 32.0% 2,793
- very liberal 15.0% 1,309
Totals
conservative/very conservative 1,331
Liberal/very liberal 4,102...
Think about it folks.. 3 times the number of liberals compared to conservatives!
IS THERE ANY Wonder why we conservatives DON"T TRUST THE MSM!!!
View attachment 185373
You people are just fucking crazy, thatās the reason. Even after itās explained, you still canāt understand.All that fancy talk and can you explain why liberals were sampled at 3 times the rate of conservatives?
But no, there IS NO BIAS in the media. Sure there isn't.
That would be why Bernie Goldberg wrote a book entitled "BIAS" from working at CBS for decades.
Here, maybe this can help you?
Why You Shouldnāt Trust āPollsā Conducted Online
The report shows that the mainstream polls oversample an average of 29 percent more Democrats than Republicans and the results skew anti-Trump. The result is that it robs Trump of about 8 points in his approval ratings, from 46 percent to 38 percent, it said.
"In every poll, Democrat respondents outnumbered Republicans by significant amounts.
The Economist poll was the worst.
Only 24 percent of respondents (360) were Republicans compared to 38 percent (570) Democrats ā which means that 58 percent more Democrats were polled than Republicans, as shown in the %D/R column.
On average, in these seven widely recognized national polls, only 29 percent (409 people) of the total 1,383 polled were Republicans, while 37 percent (518) were Democrats. Another way of saying it is that, on average, 29 percent more Democrats than Republicans were polled," wrote James Simpson, an economist, businessman and journalist.
'Fraud': Mainstream polls use 29% more Democrats than Republicans
It is consistently the way pollsters influence public opinion which influences politicians that make policies that affect all our lives.
It is wrong and only through educating more people that the MSM IS biased that headlines/30 second sound bites should be questioned and NOT believed!
I've constantly used the example "Trump anti-immigrant" and as this Google search shows..
Look at the headlines.."Trump's Anti-Immigrant Racism"... "Anti-Immigrant Agenda"...
Why don't they be honest and use the accurate word "ILLEGAL"?
With those biased headlines the MSM doesn't seem to realize they are not only calling Trump "anti-immigrant" (who by the way has a LEGAL Immigrant for a wife who like millions of
"LEGAL" immigrants like relatives of mine renounced their country's citizenship to become Americans!) The MSM seems to forget that over 90 million Americans like me or like my "LEGAL" immigrant relatives are grossly offended and consequently DISBELIEVE anything the MSM puts out because these 90 million plus Trump ARE NOT ANTI-IMMIGRANT!
View attachment 185485
The report shows that the mainstream polls oversample an average of 29 percent more Democrats than Republicans and the results skew anti-Trump.
That "public issue" pollsters are almost always forced to conduct non-random samples is precisely what he's getting at and it's precisely why above I discussed weighting and provided a link to a document that explains weighting.This occurs because of the way these polls are constructed. Most use a methodology that queries a random sample of adults. That sounds āfairā and one would expect it to produce roughly equivalent numbers of Republicans and Democrats, but it does not.
I can't say what one would do, but I can speak to what is sound to do given the theorems of probability and statistics. Only in one instance should one expect what Simpson notes, and that if and only if:This occurs because of the way these polls are constructed. Most use a methodology that queries a random sample of adults. That sounds āfairā and one would expect it to produce roughly equivalent numbers of Republicans and Democrats, but it does not.
It's true that they won't; however, reputable pollsters will expose their methodology, so readers/(potential) dependers-on the poll's results can know how credible and representationally faithful the poll is or isn't and, in turn, make an informed decision about whether to cite/rely on the poll.Typically, the mainstream media and the major polling companies will never admit their bias to you.
-- Raghavan Mayur, president of TechnoMetrica
the Economistpoll claims to query āregistered voters,ā however, voter registration is not verified by directly questioning poll respondents. It is calculated using Census Bureau estimates of the overall registered voter population.
-- James Simpson
LOLOL4% unemployment and heading down...bank account heading up...GNP going up...border wall going up...swamp draining down...Spits the idiot who applauds trump for taking us towards our first $2 trillion deficit.
Only a fucking moron like you could possibly credit trumpās tax cuts for the 4% unemployment rate. Here, I had to magnify the period since his tax cuts went into effect because itās such a small part of the total drop in unemployment...
Poor Fawn, he hates it when America does well.
Hey, your dictator is going to meet with Trump. Will Un suck Trump's cock?
Yeah, he sure will - that's just the way you North Koreans roll.
They prefer to get their "gospel Truth", from Wikileaks!