iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
Why obstruction and cover-up charges smack of desperation
we have point and counter point from sharyl attkisson. of course she doesn't take a side but just explains how each point of view could play out.
trump haters hate her also because she doesn't join in so please spare met he RIGHT WING SHILL crap.
only thing i can hope for are people who cry OBSTRUCTION will put their "i must be right" goggles down and consider other reasons for actions that also make sense.
-----
If you were a person of some authority and murdered someone, and prosecutors set out to investigate, and if you spoke publicly against the investigation, proclaiming your innocence and calling the probe a “witch hunt,” and if you worked behind the scenes to use your influence to fire the lead investigator on the murder case — that would seem to be a pretty clear case of obstruction of justice. You, as a guilty man, would be trying to stop authorities from finding out the truth.
But imagine, on the other hand, that you are innocent — accused of a murder you didn’t commit. Not only that, imagine you knew there was no murder to begin with because you saw the victim walking around after the supposed murder. Then, imagine you found yourself the target of the murder investigation by a team that included people who had declared you to be their sworn enemy and expressed strong desires to take you out. Then, imagine this team that included biased investigators began leaking false information to the national media to implicate you in this crime that you knew you didn’t commit.
-----
so if you didn't commit these crimes, would you not defend yourself along the way?
the left is not listening to reason - only hate. if you feel otherwise please show me examples of giving trump the benefit of doubt as say hillary or obama. if you do the WELL HILLARY AND OBAMA DIDN'T GET IT then you are simply telling me this is about revenge to you, not right or wrong and ending the hate.
we have point and counter point from sharyl attkisson. of course she doesn't take a side but just explains how each point of view could play out.
trump haters hate her also because she doesn't join in so please spare met he RIGHT WING SHILL crap.
only thing i can hope for are people who cry OBSTRUCTION will put their "i must be right" goggles down and consider other reasons for actions that also make sense.
-----
If you were a person of some authority and murdered someone, and prosecutors set out to investigate, and if you spoke publicly against the investigation, proclaiming your innocence and calling the probe a “witch hunt,” and if you worked behind the scenes to use your influence to fire the lead investigator on the murder case — that would seem to be a pretty clear case of obstruction of justice. You, as a guilty man, would be trying to stop authorities from finding out the truth.
But imagine, on the other hand, that you are innocent — accused of a murder you didn’t commit. Not only that, imagine you knew there was no murder to begin with because you saw the victim walking around after the supposed murder. Then, imagine you found yourself the target of the murder investigation by a team that included people who had declared you to be their sworn enemy and expressed strong desires to take you out. Then, imagine this team that included biased investigators began leaking false information to the national media to implicate you in this crime that you knew you didn’t commit.
-----
so if you didn't commit these crimes, would you not defend yourself along the way?
the left is not listening to reason - only hate. if you feel otherwise please show me examples of giving trump the benefit of doubt as say hillary or obama. if you do the WELL HILLARY AND OBAMA DIDN'T GET IT then you are simply telling me this is about revenge to you, not right or wrong and ending the hate.