Why should ANYONE support Kamala given her track record?

[BackAgain]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

 

[crossbody]

They were against Trump for paying a mistress/side slut

Kamala Harris is "THE" mistress/side slut

Now democrats have to shut their hypocrite mouths, and throw their vote away on that.

 

[Concerned American]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

Kamala Harris has been stuck in the blocks since the first time she held elected office. She has NEVER DONE ANYTHING beneficial to ANYONE. She also has NEVER WON A SO MUCH AS A PRIMARY IN ANY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

 

[MarathonMike]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

Cackles will get 10s of millions of votes from people who do what they are told without thinking of the consequences.

 

[surada]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

You're a riot. Compared to Trump's track record?

Remember how Trump spent $90,000 to trash Reagan in 1987?

 

[surada]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

It's PROSECUTOR, not persecutor. Are you a convicted felon?