Part of what equation ya moron? The issue is about gay marriage not procreation ya dumb ass. If you want to start a thread about gay sex being as productive as you screwing a cherry pie effing go for it. Your admission that procreation and sex are non issues with regard to the gay marriage debate is SUMMARILY NOTED. I would suggest you drop it vs. continuing to get your butt beat.What I said to you pop was... So you admit your argument was baseless from the start? There is no requirement for "coupling" in a marriage. There is no requirement for marriages producing kids. The only requirement going on around here is that gays can't get married.. and that will soon end.Is your name Kaz? You said gay marriages can't result in procreation, multiple times. How many links do you want this time, before you run off crying like a baby like you did last time you demanded links?
If I said it multiple times it should be easy to produce the links.
You can't, so you have just been proven a liar dood.
You've been![]()
1: Quote by POP23 "Only opposite sex coupling produce population. Without population there is no need for a government, and we question if same sex coupling should get tax benefits when the contribution is zero?" Citation:
Why should other taxpayers have to subsidize gay mating?
2: Quote by POP23 "100% of all children born come from male/female couplings, 0% of all children born come from same sex couplings." Citation:
Why should other taxpayers have to subsidize gay mating?
3: Quote by POP23 "Where the children come from A same sex coupling has never produced a child. One coupling can One coupling cannot." Citation:
Gays Speak Against Gays Adopting, Politics Not Reported.
4: Quote by POP23 "Can't parent until a child is produced. And that always involves a male/female." Citation:
Why should other taxpayers have to subsidize gay mating?
5: Quote by POP23 "Wouldn't 100% of all gay and lesbian couples with children have them outside of wedlock?" Citation:
Can someone tell me when it was that Gays had different drinking fountains?...
6: Quote by POP23 "All that and you fail to realize that same sex couplings which would include same sex siblings cannot produce children." Citation:
Is gay marriage the most important issue in the USA?
All of these citations in "gay marriage" threads, every single one of them. Not one of them in a gay sex thread, not one, not a single one of them. Thus the context of EVERY SINGLE STATEMENT YOU MADE was to point out that there is no point to gay marriages since gay couples can't create children.
Definition of COUPLING
1: the act of bringing or coming together : pairing
websters
In the context of gay marriage. The coming together of two people of the same sex in marriage. Which may also include having sex, having children, adopting children, raising families... etc.
And nowhere in that entire tirade can you find where I said gays can't procreate.
I'll be right back with your original quote.
That's not what you sa
We know that zero percent of infertile heterosexual marriages will bear children from both partners- and we don't care.
We do know that gay marriages can- and do have children the same way that millions of heterosexual marriages do.
But you want to exclude homosexual marriages entirely because they are homosexual- and for no other reason.
So you can get your bennies- and deny those bennies to them.
So that a gay couple raising 8 kids has to pay bennies to 2 80 year olds who get married on a whim in Las Vegas.
Ummmm, many infertile couples use in vitro to combine and produce a child from the couple.
So what?
What state marriage law requires fertility to qualify for a marriage license?
Name one.
Several mumicipalities require the lack of the ability
Shall I repeat the question and give you the opportunity to show off your retardation even more?
Shall I repeat the answer, which implies........
Procreation is indeed part of the equation
Is that too deep for your simple mind.
But it was a nice way to try to save RK's ass