Why the Political Establishment FEARS Ted Cruz

He sure does make them nervous.

Of making the Republican Party an irrelevant force on the national stage.

Not really.

Heck, I could see a scenario where Cruz could end up as the 45th President.

Again- about 45% will always vote for the GOP, 45% will always vote for the Democrat. those are the floors.

All he has to do is convince 6 of the 10% that remains to vote for him.

And frankly, Cruz is a lot more articulate than Romney and a lot less inclined to look down his nose at working folks, so he could probably pull it off.

Also, no matter who the Democrats nominate, that person will not be as charismatic as Obama.

Now, I'm an old guy, but I remember in 1979 when Democrats WISHED the GOP would nominate a guy they thought was so radical they could easily win the election.

That guy was Ronald Reagan.

Damn, you got one mostly right.

Except the regular Democrat voters are closer to 35% of the population, and 45% of the popular vote. Big difference.

A three way split works to the advantage of a conservative party, but there runs a risk of demographics changing that before the political system reflects it.

Not really.

Let's look at the Democratic Performance in the last 30 years.


1980- 44% in a three way
1984- 41%
1988- 45%
1992- 43% in a three way.
1996- 49 in a three way.
2000 49.5
2004 49
2008 53
2012 51

The Democratic floor is pretty freaking stable... It's republicans who can be all over the map.

There are a lot of people who claim up and down to be "independents", and they vote for the same party pretty consistantly.
 
And your lies continue by your dodging giving answers to honest queries.

Of course for any lurkers reading, you just acted like a big ****, but that's OK cause we know you are a ****.

For the lurkers, Lonestar is an outlier racist and reactionary. His time is almost over in America. Good riddance.

lol, you are such a fucking retard.

NO! He is not a retard! He is "Jake, King of the Unsubstantiated Statement." He doesnt need to prove or even defend anything he writes. It just IS.
All hail, King!
 
He sure does make them nervous.

Of making the Republican Party an irrelevant force on the national stage.

Not really.

Heck, I could see a scenario where Cruz could end up as the 45th President.

Again- about 45% will always vote for the GOP, 45% will always vote for the Democrat. those are the floors.

All he has to do is convince 6 of the 10% that remains to vote for him.

And frankly, Cruz is a lot more articulate than Romney and a lot less inclined to look down his nose at working folks, so he could probably pull it off.

Also, no matter who the Democrats nominate, that person will not be as charismatic as Obama.

Now, I'm an old guy, but I remember in 1979 when Democrats WISHED the GOP would nominate a guy they thought was so radical they could easily win the election.

That guy was Ronald Reagan.

Damn, you got one mostly right.

Except the regular Democrat voters are closer to 35% of the population, and 45% of the popular vote. Big difference.

A three way split works to the advantage of a conservative party, but there runs a risk of demographics changing that before the political system reflects it.

The Dems figured out that a clean articulate black man promising free gov't cheese could get all the negroes in Cincinnatti, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Charlotte, and Miami to turn out and vote. That throws OH, PA, NC, and FL to the Democrats. The rest of it is easy for them.
 
He sure does make them nervous.

Of making the Republican Party an irrelevant force on the national stage.

Not really.

Heck, I could see a scenario where Cruz could end up as the 45th President.

Again- about 45% will always vote for the GOP, 45% will always vote for the Democrat. those are the floors.

All he has to do is convince 6 of the 10% that remains to vote for him.

And frankly, Cruz is a lot more articulate than Romney and a lot less inclined to look down his nose at working folks, so he could probably pull it off.

Also, no matter who the Democrats nominate, that person will not be as charismatic as Obama.

Now, I'm an old guy, but I remember in 1979 when Democrats WISHED the GOP would nominate a guy they thought was so radical they could easily win the election.

That guy was Ronald Reagan.

First, he was born in Canada, so that probably makes him ineligible anyways.

Second, the winning President in at least five of the last six elections have won moderates. Only Bush in 2000 won the election while losing moderates. It's hard to see Ted Cruz winning moderates.

Third, Democrats also wished Barry Goldwater would get the nod in 1964. He did.
 
He sure does make them nervous.

Of making the Republican Party an irrelevant force on the national stage.

Not really.

Heck, I could see a scenario where Cruz could end up as the 45th President.

Again- about 45% will always vote for the GOP, 45% will always vote for the Democrat. those are the floors.

All he has to do is convince 6 of the 10% that remains to vote for him.

And frankly, Cruz is a lot more articulate than Romney and a lot less inclined to look down his nose at working folks, so he could probably pull it off.

Also, no matter who the Democrats nominate, that person will not be as charismatic as Obama.

Now, I'm an old guy, but I remember in 1979 when Democrats WISHED the GOP would nominate a guy they thought was so radical they could easily win the election.

That guy was Ronald Reagan.

First, he was born in Canada, so that probably makes him ineligible anyways.

Second, the winning President in at least five of the last six elections have won moderates. Only Bush in 2000 won the election while losing moderates. It's hard to see Ted Cruz winning moderates.

Third, Democrats also wished Barry Goldwater would get the nod in 1964. He did.

Some think it's up for debate. What is the definition of a natural born citizen?
 
Not really.

Heck, I could see a scenario where Cruz could end up as the 45th President.

Again- about 45% will always vote for the GOP, 45% will always vote for the Democrat. those are the floors.

All he has to do is convince 6 of the 10% that remains to vote for him.

And frankly, Cruz is a lot more articulate than Romney and a lot less inclined to look down his nose at working folks, so he could probably pull it off.

Also, no matter who the Democrats nominate, that person will not be as charismatic as Obama.

Now, I'm an old guy, but I remember in 1979 when Democrats WISHED the GOP would nominate a guy they thought was so radical they could easily win the election.

That guy was Ronald Reagan.

First, he was born in Canada, so that probably makes him ineligible anyways.

Second, the winning President in at least five of the last six elections have won moderates. Only Bush in 2000 won the election while losing moderates. It's hard to see Ted Cruz winning moderates.

Third, Democrats also wished Barry Goldwater would get the nod in 1964. He did.

Some think it's up for debate. What is the definition of a natural born citizen?

I always thought it was you had to be born in the United States or American territory.
 
First, he was born in Canada, so that probably makes him ineligible anyways.

Second, the winning President in at least five of the last six elections have won moderates. Only Bush in 2000 won the election while losing moderates. It's hard to see Ted Cruz winning moderates.

Third, Democrats also wished Barry Goldwater would get the nod in 1964. He did.

Some think it's up for debate. What is the definition of a natural born citizen?

I always thought it was you had to be born in the United States or American territory.

That is my opinion also. But advisers to Cruz — a Harvard Law-educated appellate lawyer who has argued dozens of cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and knows a thing or two about constitutional law — say that because his mother had U.S. citizenship at the time of his birth, it transferred to him on foreign soil.

Read more: Ted Cruz draws presidential buzz, but is he eligible? - David Catanese - POLITICO.com
 
"Natural born" as opposed to a naturalized citizen. When Cruz was born he was a U.S. citizen. He's never been a citizen of any other country.
 
Yeah, I don't know. It could be. I always thought it was born in the US. There is a guy at work who was born in Thailand to American parents who says he can't be President. But maybe he's wrong.
 
Ted Cruz is unelectable outside of Texas. He will soon wear out his welcome there

It's obvious you have no idea what us Texans think of Cruz. He will be around Texas politics for as long as he wants and the majority of Texans support him. On the national front, just wait and see and I hope you like crow.

House Republicans are still steamed at Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) for what they claim is an apparent last minute retreat in an effort to defund Obamacare in exchange for funding the federal government.

House GOP aides exchanged angry emails and even cursed at "amateur" Cruz in the cloakroom Wednesday, according to a National Review Online report published Thursday.

“Cruz keeps raising conservatives’ hopes, and then, when we give him what he wants, he doesn’t have a plan to follow through,” one aide said, according to NRO. “Nancy Pelosi is more well-liked around here," said another.

In a joint statement Wednesday with Sens. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Marco Rubio (R-FL), Cruz said that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) "likely" has the votes to strip language defunding Obamacare from any bill that makes its way over from the House.

"This is outrageous," a senior House GOP aide told TPM on Wednesday. "They demand a fight for two months, supposedly on behalf of the grassroots and constituents and then within hours of getting the fight, they slink away, abandon those same people and do nothing."

Cruz explained to NRO that his intention was never to spark a defund effort in the Senate, but to galvanize the country into doing so instead.

“And on Obamacare, I’ve said, from the start, that if typical Washington rules apply, we can’t win this fight,” he said. “If the forums in which we make this case consist of the smoke-filled rooms of Washington, the votes aren’t there. The only way this fight will be won is if the American people rise up and hold our elected officials accountable.”


House GOP Aide: 'Nancy Pelosi Is More Well-Liked' Than Ted Cruz


:)
 
It's obvious you have no idea what us Texans think of Cruz. He will be around Texas politics for as long as he wants and the majority of Texans support him. On the national front, just wait and see and I hope you like crow.

I will concede you are correct in that you can never overestimate the stupidity of the Texas voter. After all, they did elect Rick Perry Governor three times.
However, I have seen politicians like Ted Cruz my whole life. They exist solely to grab the microphone and appear on camera. They do not last long in the limelight

Yes and Texas is doing better than all the other states. We've produced more jobs than all the other states COMBINED!!!

According to U.S. Department of Commerce estimates, Texas’s GDP (gross domestic product) was $1.14 trillion. And that ranks Texas as the world’s 14th largest economy in 2009

Texas Is America's Top State for Business 2012

Texas dominates economic recovery rankings

Houston Is Unstoppable: Why Texas' Juggernaut Is America's #1 Job Creator
Texas is killing it. It dominated the recession, crushed the recovery, and in a new analysis of jobs recovered since the downturn, its largest city stands apart as the most powerful job engine in the country -- by far.
Tuesday, May 07, 2013

CEOs Name Texas Best State for Business for 9th Year in a Row
More than 700 top CEOs around the nation are ranking Texas as the best state to do business for the ninth year in a row in Chief Executive magazine's annual Best and Worst States survey. CEO opinions were gauged on a variety of metrics, including regulations, tax policies, workforce quality, educational resources, quality of living and infrastructure.
Monday, May 06, 2013

Texas Tops Site Selection’s Most Competitive States of 2012
Texas has taken the top spot in another of Site Selection Magazine's annual rankings - this time in the magazine's ranking of the most competitive states in 2012. Earlier this year, Texas was awarded Site Selection's 2012 Governor's Cup for the most new and expanded corporate facilities announced over the year.
Tuesday, April 02, 2013

In Case You Missed It: Texas Leads Nation in Job Creation According to Brookings Institution
A report released this week by the Brookings Institution is the latest to highlight the Lone Star State's strong jobs climate, finding that Texas leads the nation in job creation with Austin, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Dallas and McAllen creating more jobs now than before the recession. According to the report, Austin saw the highest percentage increase in jobs of any city in the nation.
Thursday, March 28, 2013

In Case You Missed It: New Study Highlights Texas as Leader in Clinical Trials
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) has released a report highlighting Texas as a leader in clinical trials conducted by biopharmaceutical companies in collaboration with the state's clinical research centers, university medical schools and hospitals over the last 13 years. This study comes the same week as the announcement of a major partnership between the Texas A&M University system and GlaxoSmithKline to create a state-of-the-art influenza vaccine manufacturing facility at the Texas A&M Center for Innovation in Advanced Development and Manufacturing.
Monday, March 04, 2013

Texas Wins Site Selection Magazine’s 2012 Governor’s Cup for Most New, Expanded Corporate Facilities
Texas has won Site Selection Magazine's Governor's Cup for 2012, which is awarded annually to the state with the most new and expanded corporate facilities announced over the year. Texas easily took the top spot with 761 projects in 2012, up substantially from 464 in 2011, and 270 projects more than the second best state.
Friday, February 08, 2013

Texas Ranked Top Exporting State for 11th Consecutive Year
Texas is ranked as the number one exporting state for the 11th year in a row, according to 2012 annual trade data released today by the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Texas Is Business Facilities’ 2012 State Of The Year
Business Facilities magazine has again named Texas its State of the Year, citing the aggressive economic development strategies that have helped attract jobs and investment to the Lone Star State.

Wednesday, January 23, 2013
America's Fastest Growing Cities
Texas dominates Forbes’ “America’s Fastest Growing Cities” list. Austin topped the list for the third year in a row, followed by Houston (#2), Dallas (#3), and San Antonio (#9). Robust labor markets, unemployment rates under 6% (well below the national average), no state income tax, a business-friendly regulatory environment, and strong population inflows all contributed to Texas towns’ high rankings.
Saturday, January 19, 2013

Best Cities for Job Seekers
Texas tops NerdWallet.com’s list of “Top Ten Cities for Job Seekers”. Austin topped the list, which was based on population growth, median income, unemployment rate, and cost of living index, followed by Houston (#5), Fort Worth (#6), Dallas (#7), and San Antonio (#9).
Saturday, January 12, 2013

Allied Van Lines Announces 45th Annual Magnet States Report
Texas tops the list in U.S. for 8th straight year. More individuals and families chose to settle deep in the heart of Texas than anywhere in the United States in 2009, according to Allied Van Lines' 42nd Annual Magnet States Report released today.
Monday, December 17, 2012

Texas Electricity Market Design Most Successful in North America
The residential and commercial/industrial electric markets in Texas top the 2012 list of competitive electric markets in the Annual Baseline Assessment of Choice in Canada and the United States (ABACCUS) that was released today. Texas has now earned the top spot for six consecutive years while achieving the 2012 top rating of “Excellent” for its implementation of customer choice.
Thursday, October 18, 2012

Texas Ranked Top State to Do Business by Area Development Magazine
Texas' pro-business approach continues to receive national recognition, and Area Development Magazine is the latest organization to take notice by naming Texas the top state to do business in their third annual "Top States for Doing Business Survey." The award is given to the state that most exemplifies industrial competitiveness related to its business environment, labor climate, infrastructure and global access and economy.
Friday, September 21, 2012

Texas has Largest Increase in Employment of All States Last Month
According to data released today by the U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS), Texas saw the largest increase in employment of any state over the last month, with 38,000 jobs added in the Lone Star State. From August 2011 to August 2012, Texas added 259,500 jobs.
Monday, August 20, 2012

Gov. Perry Wins fDi Magazine’s 2012 Governor’s Award
Texas' pro-business approach continues to receive national accolades, and fDi Magazine is the latest organization to take notice by awarding Gov. Rick Perry with its inaugural Governor's Award 2012. The award is given to the governor most successful in attracting new investments to their state.

Source

Texas is kicking ass and taking names.... not bad for stupid people huh?

You forgot the part about being ranked the worst in healthcare in the nation.
 
I wonder if Ted Cruz is better at cooking fajitas or poutine...
 

Forum List

Back
Top