Wikipedia Changes Its Article on Benford's Law (Election Fraud Detection)

[Norman]

The obvious fraud in the election has been exposed again and again. Leftists are in panic mode, trying to re-determine the effectiveness of statistical techniques in detecting fraud.

Let's see...

Three numbers rising in a row in frequency. That seems legit...


I wonder if they forgot that professional analysts don't get their information from wikipedia. Benford's law has been invoked as evidence of fraud before in Iranian election of 2009.

DIY Election Fraud Analysis Using Benford's Law - KDnuggets

In this article, we will talk about a Do-It-Yourself approach towards election analysis and coming to a conclusion whether the elections were conducted fairly or not.

www.kdnuggets.com

 

[The2ndAmendment]

The obvious fraud in the election has been exposed again and again. Leftists are in panic mode, trying to re-determine the effectiveness of statistical techniques in detecting fraud.

And the reason is obvious...

I wonder if they forgot that professional analysts don't get their information from wikipedia.

Too bad for them I archived Benford's Law earlier today.

 

[Norman]

The obvious fraud in the election has been exposed again and again. Leftists are in panic mode, trying to re-determine the effectiveness of statistical techniques in detecting fraud.

And the reason is obvious...

I wonder if they forgot that professional analysts don't get their information from wikipedia.

Too bad for them I archived Benford's Law earlier today.

It was changed earlier IIRC yesterday.

But you can just click the history or tap into internet archive to view the old page.

These people as always, are devoted to evil, fraud and distraction.

 

[RodISHI]

Attempts to discourage people from standing up against this tyranny.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Why do they deny science?