dont you think in would be incumbent on nist to show forensic evidence of tempatures predicted as required for structural failure
Don't you think that the people accusing government officials and anyone else involved in this massive cover-up of the murder of 3,000 innocent people need forensic evidence to back their claims?
Or is it sufficient in your pathetic little world you reside in to make these claims and believe them?
Where is the forensic evidence of molten steel? What evidence do you have that proves it was molten steel?
there is only wittiness testimony as the perpetrators have control of the evidence..however
it is there theory..so it is required they show that the temperatures they theorize as required to cause failure actually existed
So you don't believe Dr. Quintiere when he says that he believes that the floor trusses are what failed and lead to the collapse?