Will Gloria Allred be arrested for election tampering?

[bripat9643]

Roy Moore's accusers only piece of actual evidence is phony.

Allred is implicated in over 7 of the 25 Trump Accusers who were found to be liars. She was involved in their payment and story creations... I hope this happens fast.. Stop this kind of lies and personal destruction politics.. It needs to be swift and sever punishment.

If the signature turns out to be forged, then Allred could go to jail. That is, she could if there is any justice in our legal system.

----- For??

Gonna run away again, like you did when I asked you for a basis for resignation?

Wimp.

Obstruction of justice and conspiracy, to name two.

You have any idea what "obstruction of justice" actually means?

Doesn't seem so.

First thing you need is some kind of legal action going on. That's how you get something to "obstruct".

Now connect the dots. If you can find any.

Quit pretending to be smart. We all know the truth.

 

[Zander]

She is a disgusting person and her daughter is even worse. She pretends she is a "champion of women's rights" ....while she defends Harvey Pigstein.

Women's rights attorney Lisa Bloom defends Weinstein

 

[william the wie]

Is there ever a situation where someone can protest the results? If so, if Moore loses he could demand the assessment of the yearbook, sue for defamation and demand a re-election.

No, he can't. Not even remotely close.

Also, if this yearbook is proven to be fake it could really open up some serious suspicions from voters and push an even deeper interest in the anti-establishment candidates. In fact, one could argue, that Moore losing could be the worst thing to happen to the establishment than if he lost.

What planet do you come from that you think the world works this way?

If that were the case John McCain could sue George W. Bush for pushing the idea that he "fathered an illegitimate black child". Among many.

This is physical evidence that would have been tampered with in an effort to in effect frame someone. This isn't free speech or opinion, this is them providing a yearbook with his apparent signature. Forging a signature in and of itself could represent some sort of illegal act, though I realize it wasn't on an official document or contract.

I would imagine even if he can't get a new election, that he would have a pretty strong case against the accuser. In fact, isn't he already in the process of suing her?

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

Is there ever a situation where someone can protest the results? If so, if Moore loses he could demand the assessment of the yearbook, sue for defamation and demand a re-election.

No, he can't. Not even remotely close.

Also, if this yearbook is proven to be fake it could really open up some serious suspicions from voters and push an even deeper interest in the anti-establishment candidates. In fact, one could argue, that Moore losing could be the worst thing to happen to the establishment than if he lost.

What planet do you come from that you think the world works this way?

If that were the case John McCain could sue George W. Bush for pushing the idea that he "fathered an illegitimate black child". Among many.

This is physical evidence that would have been tampered with in an effort to in effect frame someone. This isn't free speech or opinion, this is them providing a yearbook with his apparent signature. Forging a signature in and of itself could represent some sort of illegal act, though I realize it wasn't on an official document or contract.

I would imagine even if he can't get a new election, that he would have a pretty strong case against the accuser. In fact, isn't he already in the process of suing her?

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

To accuse someone of a crime using forged or tampered evidence is a crime and Gloria did just that but that is only if she is fool enough to keep the yearbook so it can be presented in evidence. Also the owner of the year book will get a new lawyer so she can rollover on Gloria. How this will work out depends on whether Gloria can keep everything in civil court, consult a lawyer in AL for all of the potential booby traps involving the yearbook.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Allred is already trying to back away from the yearbook.

WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook

 

[bripat9643]

Allred is already trying to back away from the yearbook.

WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook

She obviously realizes that she just stuck her head in a noose.

 

[Pogo]

Is there ever a situation where someone can protest the results? If so, if Moore loses he could demand the assessment of the yearbook, sue for defamation and demand a re-election.

No, he can't. Not even remotely close.

Also, if this yearbook is proven to be fake it could really open up some serious suspicions from voters and push an even deeper interest in the anti-establishment candidates. In fact, one could argue, that Moore losing could be the worst thing to happen to the establishment than if he lost.

What planet do you come from that you think the world works this way?

If that were the case John McCain could sue George W. Bush for pushing the idea that he "fathered an illegitimate black child". Among many.

This is physical evidence that would have been tampered with in an effort to in effect frame someone. This isn't free speech or opinion, this is them providing a yearbook with his apparent signature. Forging a signature in and of itself could represent some sort of illegal act, though I realize it wasn't on an official document or contract.

I would imagine even if he can't get a new election, that he would have a pretty strong case against the accuser. In fact, isn't he already in the process of suing her?

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

Is there ever a situation where someone can protest the results? If so, if Moore loses he could demand the assessment of the yearbook, sue for defamation and demand a re-election.

No, he can't. Not even remotely close.

Also, if this yearbook is proven to be fake it could really open up some serious suspicions from voters and push an even deeper interest in the anti-establishment candidates. In fact, one could argue, that Moore losing could be the worst thing to happen to the establishment than if he lost.

What planet do you come from that you think the world works this way?

If that were the case John McCain could sue George W. Bush for pushing the idea that he "fathered an illegitimate black child". Among many.

This is physical evidence that would have been tampered with in an effort to in effect frame someone. This isn't free speech or opinion, this is them providing a yearbook with his apparent signature. Forging a signature in and of itself could represent some sort of illegal act, though I realize it wasn't on an official document or contract.

I would imagine even if he can't get a new election, that he would have a pretty strong case against the accuser. In fact, isn't he already in the process of suing her?

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

To accuse someone of a crime using forged or tampered evidence is a crime and Gloria did just that but that is only if she is fool enough to keep the yearbook so it can be presented in evidence. Also the owner of the year book will get a new lawyer so she can rollover on Gloria. How this will work out depends on whether Gloria can keep everything in civil court, consult a lawyer in AL for all of the potential booby traps involving the yearbook.

Again, fourth time now, there is nothing "criminal" about signing a yearbook. Therefore it cannot be "evidence of a crime".

 

[bripat9643]

No, he can't. Not even remotely close.


What planet do you come from that you think the world works this way?

If that were the case John McCain could sue George W. Bush for pushing the idea that he "fathered an illegitimate black child". Among many.

This is physical evidence that would have been tampered with in an effort to in effect frame someone. This isn't free speech or opinion, this is them providing a yearbook with his apparent signature. Forging a signature in and of itself could represent some sort of illegal act, though I realize it wasn't on an official document or contract.

I would imagine even if he can't get a new election, that he would have a pretty strong case against the accuser. In fact, isn't he already in the process of suing her?

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

No, he can't. Not even remotely close.


What planet do you come from that you think the world works this way?

If that were the case John McCain could sue George W. Bush for pushing the idea that he "fathered an illegitimate black child". Among many.

This is physical evidence that would have been tampered with in an effort to in effect frame someone. This isn't free speech or opinion, this is them providing a yearbook with his apparent signature. Forging a signature in and of itself could represent some sort of illegal act, though I realize it wasn't on an official document or contract.

I would imagine even if he can't get a new election, that he would have a pretty strong case against the accuser. In fact, isn't he already in the process of suing her?

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

To accuse someone of a crime using forged or tampered evidence is a crime and Gloria did just that but that is only if she is fool enough to keep the yearbook so it can be presented in evidence. Also the owner of the year book will get a new lawyer so she can rollover on Gloria. How this will work out depends on whether Gloria can keep everything in civil court, consult a lawyer in AL for all of the potential booby traps involving the yearbook.

Again, fourth time now, there is nothing "criminal" about signing a yearbook. Therefore it cannot be "evidence of a crime".

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

 

[Thinker101]

This is physical evidence that would have been tampered with in an effort to in effect frame someone. This isn't free speech or opinion, this is them providing a yearbook with his apparent signature. Forging a signature in and of itself could represent some sort of illegal act, though I realize it wasn't on an official document or contract.

I would imagine even if he can't get a new election, that he would have a pretty strong case against the accuser. In fact, isn't he already in the process of suing her?

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

This is physical evidence that would have been tampered with in an effort to in effect frame someone. This isn't free speech or opinion, this is them providing a yearbook with his apparent signature. Forging a signature in and of itself could represent some sort of illegal act, though I realize it wasn't on an official document or contract.

I would imagine even if he can't get a new election, that he would have a pretty strong case against the accuser. In fact, isn't he already in the process of suing her?

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

To accuse someone of a crime using forged or tampered evidence is a crime and Gloria did just that but that is only if she is fool enough to keep the yearbook so it can be presented in evidence. Also the owner of the year book will get a new lawyer so she can rollover on Gloria. How this will work out depends on whether Gloria can keep everything in civil court, consult a lawyer in AL for all of the potential booby traps involving the yearbook.

Again, fourth time now, there is nothing "criminal" about signing a yearbook. Therefore it cannot be "evidence of a crime".

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

Then she can join the ranks with Bill Clinton.

 

[Pogo]

This is physical evidence that would have been tampered with in an effort to in effect frame someone. This isn't free speech or opinion, this is them providing a yearbook with his apparent signature. Forging a signature in and of itself could represent some sort of illegal act, though I realize it wasn't on an official document or contract.

I would imagine even if he can't get a new election, that he would have a pretty strong case against the accuser. In fact, isn't he already in the process of suing her?

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

This is physical evidence that would have been tampered with in an effort to in effect frame someone. This isn't free speech or opinion, this is them providing a yearbook with his apparent signature. Forging a signature in and of itself could represent some sort of illegal act, though I realize it wasn't on an official document or contract.

I would imagine even if he can't get a new election, that he would have a pretty strong case against the accuser. In fact, isn't he already in the process of suing her?

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

To accuse someone of a crime using forged or tampered evidence is a crime and Gloria did just that but that is only if she is fool enough to keep the yearbook so it can be presented in evidence. Also the owner of the year book will get a new lawyer so she can rollover on Gloria. How this will work out depends on whether Gloria can keep everything in civil court, consult a lawyer in AL for all of the potential booby traps involving the yearbook.

Again, fourth time now, there is nothing "criminal" about signing a yearbook. Therefore it cannot be "evidence of a crime".

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

First you told us signing a yearbook is a rape certificate. Now you're saying it's sexual assault?

So those girls who signed my high school yearbook were only sexually assaulting me, huh.

Damn. Should have got more signatures.

 

[Thinker101]

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

To accuse someone of a crime using forged or tampered evidence is a crime and Gloria did just that but that is only if she is fool enough to keep the yearbook so it can be presented in evidence. Also the owner of the year book will get a new lawyer so she can rollover on Gloria. How this will work out depends on whether Gloria can keep everything in civil court, consult a lawyer in AL for all of the potential booby traps involving the yearbook.

Again, fourth time now, there is nothing "criminal" about signing a yearbook. Therefore it cannot be "evidence of a crime".

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

First you told us signing a yearbook is a rape certificate. Now you're saying it's sexual assault?

So those girls who signed my high school yearbook were only sexually assaulting me, huh.

Damn. Should have got more signatures.

Hate to tell ya, those were sympathy signatures.

 

[Faun]

We want the year book!

LOL

Who cares what you want?

 

[bripat9643]

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

You can't "frame" someone unless some kind of crime or transgression has been committed with which to frame him.

So I ask again ---- is signing a yearbook illegal now?

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

To accuse someone of a crime using forged or tampered evidence is a crime and Gloria did just that but that is only if she is fool enough to keep the yearbook so it can be presented in evidence. Also the owner of the year book will get a new lawyer so she can rollover on Gloria. How this will work out depends on whether Gloria can keep everything in civil court, consult a lawyer in AL for all of the potential booby traps involving the yearbook.

Again, fourth time now, there is nothing "criminal" about signing a yearbook. Therefore it cannot be "evidence of a crime".

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

First you told us signing a yearbook is a rape certificate. Now you're saying it's sexual assault?

So those girls who signed my high school yearbook were only sexually assaulting me, huh.

Damn. Should have got more signatures.

You're congenitally incapable of telling the truth or commiting logic, aren't you, Pogo?

 

[Thinker101]

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

Creating a false perception and story to wrongfully accuse some one is a crime... MORON...

To accuse someone of a crime using forged or tampered evidence is a crime and Gloria did just that but that is only if she is fool enough to keep the yearbook so it can be presented in evidence. Also the owner of the year book will get a new lawyer so she can rollover on Gloria. How this will work out depends on whether Gloria can keep everything in civil court, consult a lawyer in AL for all of the potential booby traps involving the yearbook.

Again, fourth time now, there is nothing "criminal" about signing a yearbook. Therefore it cannot be "evidence of a crime".

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

First you told us signing a yearbook is a rape certificate. Now you're saying it's sexual assault?

So those girls who signed my high school yearbook were only sexually assaulting me, huh.

Damn. Should have got more signatures.

You're congenitally incapable of telling the truth or commiting logic, aren't you, Pogo?

That's Pogo's Law.

 

[bripat9643]

To accuse someone of a crime using forged or tampered evidence is a crime and Gloria did just that but that is only if she is fool enough to keep the yearbook so it can be presented in evidence. Also the owner of the year book will get a new lawyer so she can rollover on Gloria. How this will work out depends on whether Gloria can keep everything in civil court, consult a lawyer in AL for all of the potential booby traps involving the yearbook.

Again, fourth time now, there is nothing "criminal" about signing a yearbook. Therefore it cannot be "evidence of a crime".

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

First you told us signing a yearbook is a rape certificate. Now you're saying it's sexual assault?

So those girls who signed my high school yearbook were only sexually assaulting me, huh.

Damn. Should have got more signatures.

You're congenitally incapable of telling the truth or commiting logic, aren't you, Pogo?

That's Pogo's Law.

I love the way she demands that we answer a question. Then when 15 people answer the question, she says no one answered the question. It's like reality simply doesn't matter to her.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Roy Moore's accusers only piece of actual evidence is phony.

Calls Grow for Arrest of Gloria Allred Over Forged Document – Including Accuser's Stepson!

nov 19 2017 Following The Gateway Pundit’s viral story on Judge Roy Moore’s alleged signature inside accuser Beverly Young Nelson’s yearbook, more evidence suggested it was a forgery.

The signature says “To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say, ‘Merry Christmas.’ Love, Roy Moore DA, 12-22-77, Olde Hickory House.”

Strangely, “To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say, ‘Merry Christmas.’ Love, Roy,” is written in black ink, while “Moore DA, 12-22-77, Olde Hickory House,” is in blue ink.

Judge Roy Moore was not the DA in 1978. He would not have signed a signature with DA after it.
Moore insists this is not his signature.

And Beverly Nelson’s stepson Darrel Nelson also called for the arrest of Gloria Allred.

"Alabama needs to call for the arrest of Gloria Allred for election tampering and fraud. And more importantly for pissing us off."

Oh please. Hateway Plundit indeed. Pulled out a self-described failed music journalist who photographs phantom cats and tried to pass him off as a "handwriting expert", a profession he's never dabbled in in his life.... besides which, how the fuck can you "tamper" with an election that doesn't even happen until next month?

SMH

Isn’t that what you Libs are accusing Russia of doing, tampering before the election. Not really feasible to tamper after the election. Perhaps,you should crawl out of the basement and have your mom read your post before you actually post.

 

[Thinker101]

Again, fourth time now, there is nothing "criminal" about signing a yearbook. Therefore it cannot be "evidence of a crime".

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

First you told us signing a yearbook is a rape certificate. Now you're saying it's sexual assault?

So those girls who signed my high school yearbook were only sexually assaulting me, huh.

Damn. Should have got more signatures.

You're congenitally incapable of telling the truth or commiting logic, aren't you, Pogo?

That's Pogo's Law.

I love the way she demands that we answer a question. Then when 15 people answer the question, she says no one answered the question. It's like reality simply doesn't matter to her.

And you somehow are expecting something different from a liberal.

 

[Pogo]

Roy Moore's accusers only piece of actual evidence is phony.

Calls Grow for Arrest of Gloria Allred Over Forged Document – Including Accuser's Stepson!

nov 19 2017 Following The Gateway Pundit’s viral story on Judge Roy Moore’s alleged signature inside accuser Beverly Young Nelson’s yearbook, more evidence suggested it was a forgery.

The signature says “To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say, ‘Merry Christmas.’ Love, Roy Moore DA, 12-22-77, Olde Hickory House.”

Strangely, “To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say, ‘Merry Christmas.’ Love, Roy,” is written in black ink, while “Moore DA, 12-22-77, Olde Hickory House,” is in blue ink.

Judge Roy Moore was not the DA in 1978. He would not have signed a signature with DA after it.
Moore insists this is not his signature.

And Beverly Nelson’s stepson Darrel Nelson also called for the arrest of Gloria Allred.

"Alabama needs to call for the arrest of Gloria Allred for election tampering and fraud. And more importantly for pissing us off."

Oh please. Hateway Plundit indeed. Pulled out a self-described failed music journalist who photographs phantom cats and tried to pass him off as a "handwriting expert", a profession he's never dabbled in in his life.... besides which, how the fuck can you "tamper" with an election that doesn't even happen until next month?

SMH

Isn’t that what you Libs are accusing Russia of doing, tampering before the election. Not really feasible to tamper after the election. Perhaps,you should crawl out of the basement and have your mom read your post before you actually post.

No idea. Why don't you go try to find a post where I broached the subject at all.
Happy huntin'.

 

[Pogo]

Again, fourth time now, there is nothing "criminal" about signing a yearbook. Therefore it cannot be "evidence of a crime".

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

First you told us signing a yearbook is a rape certificate. Now you're saying it's sexual assault?

So those girls who signed my high school yearbook were only sexually assaulting me, huh.

Damn. Should have got more signatures.

You're congenitally incapable of telling the truth or commiting logic, aren't you, Pogo?

That's Pogo's Law.

I love the way she demands that we answer a question. Then when 15 people answer the question, she says no one answered the question. It's like reality simply doesn't matter to her.

Who the fuck are you even talking about?
Are you lost, Fingerfuck? Didn't you leave a trail of face-jelly to find your way home?

 

[bripat9643]

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

First you told us signing a yearbook is a rape certificate. Now you're saying it's sexual assault?

So those girls who signed my high school yearbook were only sexually assaulting me, huh.

Damn. Should have got more signatures.

You're congenitally incapable of telling the truth or commiting logic, aren't you, Pogo?

That's Pogo's Law.

I love the way she demands that we answer a question. Then when 15 people answer the question, she says no one answered the question. It's like reality simply doesn't matter to her.

And you somehow are expecting something different from a liberal.

That's pretty much the definition of a liberal, isn't it?

 

[bripat9643]

It is criminal when you sign someone else's name and then use that as evidence in a sexual assault case. If you're a lawyer, then you are gullty of a serious violation of your code of ethics and should be disbarred.

First you told us signing a yearbook is a rape certificate. Now you're saying it's sexual assault?

So those girls who signed my high school yearbook were only sexually assaulting me, huh.

Damn. Should have got more signatures.

You're congenitally incapable of telling the truth or commiting logic, aren't you, Pogo?

That's Pogo's Law.

I love the way she demands that we answer a question. Then when 15 people answer the question, she says no one answered the question. It's like reality simply doesn't matter to her.

Who the fuck are you even talking about?
Are you lost, Fingerfuck? Didn't you leave a trail of face-jelly to find your way home?

My, my, my. Are we having a little hissy fit?