Godboy
Diamond Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 37,318
- 20,236
His ridiculous description of BLM and what they did is a total lie.Why is any of what he posted untrue?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His ridiculous description of BLM and what they did is a total lie.Why is any of what he posted untrue?
You're a liar and the story you linked directly contradicts your claim.
I'm sure you didn't think I'd notice because you wanted me to go to a website that requires you send your email address to a religious cult to read the material.
A confession of what? First we need an accusation. Who stated the device was used to cause any pain in any person?Sez who?
the authorities who used the device?
i was not expecting a confession
the very fact that they have such a weapon is troubling to true civil libertarians
Just stick to joe rogue on to get your information then....
The articled doesn't claim the device was used to harm anyone.No, you didn't even read it. It doesn't require an email and it contradicts nothing. Those are facts. Quit lying.
How so?His ridiculous description of BLM and what they did is a total lie.
You make a fair pointA confession of what? First we need an accusation. Who stated the device was used to cause any pain in any person?
Show me.
If that disturbs you, wait until you hear about the other weapons that police have.
Guns.
are you suggesting there are no laws on the books to deal with the lawless? Is that your play today? hahahahahahahahahahaha. If they broke the law, arrest them. It's really just that simple. What is it big guy?So they're violating the law, hence they're lawless.
The articled doesn't claim the device was used to harm anyone.
If only guns were more selective. Nothing prevents a bullet from hitting an innocent bystander. Bullets cause a lot more trauma than ringing in the ears.You make a fair point
but guns are more selective than weapons of mass destruction
which is what the sound cannon is
still funny, the demofks could give a shit about the cops, and conservative law respecting citizens respect the shit out of police. Why would the police support the people who hate and despise every once of dignity they carry around with them. Strange. Same as blacks who vote for kkk people.The real issue is for Deplorables to be wary of the police they support. Deplorables are seeing their asses stomped on for things minor compared to what Progs do.
You claimed that they used them to harm people.It doesn't need to. The police have violently beaten the populace over there for over 6 months now. They bring out LRADS to push even further.
The USA pushed back HARD on the federal government being used to stop VIOLENT ANTIFABLM RIOTS.
Now we see governments are resorting to martial law and fascism to squash a peaceful protest with no murders, no looting, no burning down government buildings, no assaults.
We have seen a protest change from a “small fringe minority” to the greatest threat in the history of a nation in 2 weeks.
The response to the demands of the protestors to end mandates is for the government to declare maritial law and steal assets of the protestors.
THIS WILL HAPPEN IN THE USA. IF NOT THIS TIME, IT WILL NEXT TIME.
We need to wake up and push back against this left wing authoritarianism.
You claimed that they used them to harm people.
You're a liar.
Says who? You?Thats why they brought them out............to harm people.
Accidents happenIf only guns were more selective. Nothing prevents a bullet from hitting an innocent bystander. Bullets cause a lot more trauma than ringing in the ears.
Don't pretend to be a civil libertarian. You're not.
From another paper,Did you read the article?
This is what it actually said.
“ACT Policing has deployed several types of loudspeakers and amplification devices to quickly and effectively convey voice messages to large, and often loud, crowds of people during the recent protest activity in Canberra,” an ACT Policing spokesperson said in a statement to The Epoch Times on Feb. 16.
“The [LRADs] were only used to convey spoken-word messages. The ‘alert’ function was not used.”
You're a liar or a moron.
Kershaw insisted that the question had already been taken on notice.“That would be something that is with our police methodology which we would have to look at some type of public interest immunity claim, Senator,” said the Australia Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw, when questioned by Senator Roberts.
“Surely it’s in the public interest to know whether or not they [LRADs] were there without delving too much into it?”
“I’d have to […] If I could take that on notice, I’d have to get advice.”
says the man who is in charge of the police. It is a threat to remove a crowd. It's like taking guns to a protest and pointing them and saying if you don't move. Same kind of threat. sorry.Says who? You?
You're a liar.
but the report I read said it can be used to target the people. Like a gun, and if you think they can't miss their target, you're still in your zombie world.If only guns were more selective. Nothing prevents a bullet from hitting an innocent bystander. Bullets cause a lot more trauma than ringing in the ears.
Don't pretend to be a civil libertarian. You're not.
I've provided video evidence which contradicts everything you just said.
I'm done trying to bring a loser like yourself back to reality. It's impossible. Your politics overrides all.