gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 67,261
- 35,827
- 2,605
- Thread starter
- #101
There is no way the soviets could control the region. They had no navy and nearly no air forces. The USA had an enormous military presence surrounding Japan.If they had surrendered to stalin, then stalin would have controlled the region.The US military had complete control of the air and sea around Japan. It would not have mattered if they surrendered to the USSR, the US controlled the region.Ok, you won't answer the question. It's cool.Doesn't matter. That is the choice that ends the war and saves lots of lives. EASY PEASY.Those were not one of the choices.Easy. Accept Japan's surrender. Done and lots of innocent lives saved.
Just to repeat.
Long drawn out war with the USSR?
Or
Drop the bombs?
Those are the choices.
What do you do?
Oh and on a side note, if Japan planned on surrendering to the USSR, what do you do?
For the record, they were not surrendering.
You realize they did not surrender until USSR backed off and after the second bomb, right?
Just wasn't sure if you knew that.
Understand that the cold war had begun.
Understand that the bombs were to prevent a war with the USSR.
You don't buy that. I get it.
The question is, if dropping the bombs prevented a war with the USSR, was it worth it?
You don't have to believe it to answer. Remember, August 8th 1945, the USSR declared war on Japan. August 9th, fat boy was dropped. Is that a bizarre coincidence? Russia was clearly trying to take over the whole region. Stalin knew the American people would not be behind another long war. If anything, the USSR spies certainly had the pulse of the American people. That only emboldened the encroachment.
Patton knew all too well what was happening and he wanted a war with them.
The bombs were dropped in order to save us from a long drawn out war with Russia.
Period. Still not quite sure what your choice would be if what I am saying is true.