Will Trump Start a War?

[Uncensored2008]

... “German banks pull plug on trade with Iran

Despite Berlin's pledge to keep the Iranian nuclear deal alive, German banks are so scared of breaching US sanctions that they are refusing to process payments from “
https://www.handelsblatt.com/today/...ml?ticket=ST-1629205-qANMiD0IC0f6yfyaa5ml-ap3


Sure looks like the rest of the world is paying attention.

What "you" are doing is in this case to attack the sovereignity of the federal republic of Germany - or in other words: You declared an asymetric war on Germany. To make this clear: No one in Germany supports the politics of sanctions against the Iran of the USA. This politics of the USA is wrong. It will bring the Persians into the situation of a nation, which has nothing to lose any longer.

Folks like you are the reason they still have to put directions on shampoo.

The only policy Germany or any European nation has is that which will fatten their wallets.

The proof it that they are copacetic with allowing the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.

Now.....get lost.

If "world's worst state sponsor of terrorism" was an honorable title, the USA would be claiming it.

Apart from the actions of the Pentagon, the USA is providing political cover to Saudi Arabia, the birthplace, the arms provider, and the financier of Sunni suicide bombers and terrorists.

If a festering pile of shit were an honorable title, you might change your ways.

You may be a liar and a scumbag, but other than that you have no redeeming qualities.

You have won a Golden shower to clean up your act.

 

[cnm]

I don't want the US to be the world's cop, but it seems that is our role.

Cops answer to a court. The US is the world's Capo.

 

[cnm]

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

What I'd like to know is how many questions you could beg at one time if you really put what passes for your mind to it.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy which occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of circular reasoning and an informal fallacy, in which an arguer makes an argument that requires the desired conclusion to be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden or at least not easily apparent.
Begging the question - Wikipedia​

 

[PoliticalChic]

... “German banks pull plug on trade with Iran

Despite Berlin's pledge to keep the Iranian nuclear deal alive, German banks are so scared of breaching US sanctions that they are refusing to process payments from “
https://www.handelsblatt.com/today/...ml?ticket=ST-1629205-qANMiD0IC0f6yfyaa5ml-ap3


Sure looks like the rest of the world is paying attention.

What "you" are doing is in this case to attack the sovereignity of the federal republic of Germany - or in other words: You declared an asymetric war on Germany. To make this clear: No one in Germany supports the politics of sanctions against the Iran of the USA. This politics of the USA is wrong. It will bring the Persians into the situation of a nation, which has nothing to lose any longer.

Folks like you are the reason they still have to put directions on shampoo.

The only policy Germany or any European nation has is that which will fatten their wallets.

The proof it that they are copacetic with allowing the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.


Now.....get lost.

If "world's worst state sponsor of terrorism" was an honorable title, the USA would be claiming it.

Apart from the actions of the Pentagon, the USA is providing political cover to Saudi Arabia, the birthplace, the arms provider, and the financier of Sunni suicide bombers and terrorists.

I'll help ya' pack.......

 

[PoliticalChic]

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

What I'd like to know is how many questions you could beg at one time if you really put what passes for your mind to it.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy which occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of circular reasoning and an informal fallacy, in which an arguer makes an argument that requires the desired conclusion to be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden or at least not easily apparent.
Begging the question - Wikipedia​

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?


Try

 

[zaangalewa]

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

What I'd like to know is how many questions you could beg at one time if you really put what passes for your mind to it.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy which occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of circular reasoning and an informal fallacy, in which an arguer makes an argument that requires the desired conclusion to be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden or at least not easily apparent.
Begging the question - Wikipedia​

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Try

Are you an AI-App for a stupid political Nazi-propaganda strategy? It exists not any plausible reason for all decisions of the USA under Trump in case of the Iran. He had cancelled without any reason to do so a decision of the United Nations Security Council P5+1: United States, United Kingdom, Russia, France, China and Germany. No one worldwide agrees with the USA in case of its sanctions against the Iran - except Saudi Arabia and Israel. And Trump provoked also all European nations by cancelling the INF treaty between Russia and the USA. You are not only on the way to a war between the Perisians and the USA. You are on the way to a world war. A nuclear world war.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

What I'd like to know is how many questions you could beg at one time if you really put what passes for your mind to it.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy which occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of circular reasoning and an informal fallacy, in which an arguer makes an argument that requires the desired conclusion to be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden or at least not easily apparent.
Begging the question - Wikipedia​

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Try

Are you an AI-App for a stupid political Nazi-propaganda strategy? It exists not any plausible reason for all decisions of the USA under Trump in case of the Iran. He had cancelled without any reason to do so a decision of the United Nations Security Council P5+1: United States, United Kingdom, Russia, France, China and Germany. No one worldwide agrees with the USA in case of its sanctions against the Iran - except Saudi Arabia and Israel. And Trump provoked also all European nations by cancelling the INF treaty between Russia and the USA. You are not only on the way to a war between the Perisians and the USA. You are on the way to a world war. A nuclear world war.

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

 

[zaangalewa]

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

What I'd like to know is how many questions you could beg at one time if you really put what passes for your mind to it.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy which occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of circular reasoning and an informal fallacy, in which an arguer makes an argument that requires the desired conclusion to be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden or at least not easily apparent.
Begging the question - Wikipedia​

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Try

Are you an AI-App for a stupid political Nazi-propaganda strategy? It exists not any plausible reason for all decisions of the USA under Trump in case of the Iran. He had cancelled without any reason to do so a decision of the United Nations Security Council P5+1: United States, United Kingdom, Russia, France, China and Germany. No one worldwide agrees with the USA in case of its sanctions against the Iran - except Saudi Arabia and Israel. And Trump provoked also all European nations by cancelling the INF treaty between Russia and the USA. You are not only on the way to a war between the Perisians and the USA. You are on the way to a world war. A nuclear world war.

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Artificial stupidity helps you nothing at all. Problems will find a solution on its own if no one cares about. And no none knows how a real war will end. "Your" best case scenario seem to be Trump will win his economic war in the end with nuclear weapons. But whatever this will mean - no none knows in the moment: You - the american taxpayer - will also pay the price of the economic war of Trump (tariffs = taxes). Me remembers the nuclear part of this vision of the future to the sentence: "Die Lebenden werden die Toten beneiden." (=The dead will envy the living.)

 

[Likkmee]

War sells flags. Lots of flags and body bags. It's just business.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

What I'd like to know is how many questions you could beg at one time if you really put what passes for your mind to it.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy which occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of circular reasoning and an informal fallacy, in which an arguer makes an argument that requires the desired conclusion to be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden or at least not easily apparent.
Begging the question - Wikipedia​

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Try

Are you an AI-App for a stupid political Nazi-propaganda strategy? It exists not any plausible reason for all decisions of the USA under Trump in case of the Iran. He had cancelled without any reason to do so a decision of the United Nations Security Council P5+1: United States, United Kingdom, Russia, France, China and Germany. No one worldwide agrees with the USA in case of its sanctions against the Iran - except Saudi Arabia and Israel. And Trump provoked also all European nations by cancelling the INF treaty between Russia and the USA. You are not only on the way to a war between the Perisians and the USA. You are on the way to a world war. A nuclear world war.

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Artificial stupidity helps you nothing at all. Problems will find a solution on itsbown. And no none knows how a war will end. What bnyou thni what a "!bets case screanroiso" coud be is perhjasoju Truno wuil win his ecoicoimcin war with bnueclear weapons. But whjatevfer thei wil mena - weno0 none knows it in the moment - and me remembers such a vision if the future to sentence "Die Toten werden die Lebenden beneiden."

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



Why are you afraid to answer the question?

 

[zaangalewa]

War sells flags. Lots of flags and body bags. It's just business.

War and war are different words. One problem of the stupid politics of the USA is for example the irreversibility of some actions.

 

[PoliticalChic]

War sells flags. Lots of flags and body bags. It's just business.

War and war are different words. One problem of the stupid politics of the USA is for example the irreversibility of some actions.

You can't possibly be this stupid.

 

[zaangalewa]

What I'd like to know is how many questions you could beg at one time if you really put what passes for your mind to it.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy which occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of circular reasoning and an informal fallacy, in which an arguer makes an argument that requires the desired conclusion to be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden or at least not easily apparent.
Begging the question - Wikipedia​

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Try

Are you an AI-App for a stupid political Nazi-propaganda strategy? It exists not any plausible reason for all decisions of the USA under Trump in case of the Iran. He had cancelled without any reason to do so a decision of the United Nations Security Council P5+1: United States, United Kingdom, Russia, France, China and Germany. No one worldwide agrees with the USA in case of its sanctions against the Iran - except Saudi Arabia and Israel. And Trump provoked also all European nations by cancelling the INF treaty between Russia and the USA. You are not only on the way to a war between the Perisians and the USA. You are on the way to a world war. A nuclear world war.

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Artificial stupidity helps you nothing at all. Problems will find a solution on itsbown. And no none knows how a war will end. What bnyou thni what a "!bets case screanroiso" coud be is perhjasoju Truno wuil win his ecoicoimcin war with bnueclear weapons. But whjatevfer thei wil mena - weno0 none knows it in the moment - and me remembers such a vision if the future to sentence "Die Toten werden die Lebenden beneiden."

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



Why are you afraid to answer the question?

I do not have any idea what you ask with this question. I'm a German.

 

[zaangalewa]

War sells flags. Lots of flags and body bags. It's just business.

War and war are different words. One problem of the stupid politics of the USA is for example the irreversibility of some actions.

You can't possibly be this stupid.

I'm much more stupid than you are able to imagine. But still I was able to solve my problems.

 

[Likkmee]

War sells flags. Lots of flags and body bags. It's just business.

War and war are different words. One problem of the stupid politics of the USA is for example the irreversibility of some actions.

If the US had no military industrial complex unemployment would be 50 plus %.

 

[zaangalewa]

War sells flags. Lots of flags and body bags. It's just business.

War and war are different words. One problem of the stupid politics of the USA is for example the irreversibility of some actions.

If the US had no military industrial complex unemployment would be 50 plus %.

So your military system is a covered social system - and you send your young man away, so they are not able to cause problems for your own country. What about the idea to "sell" all US-American families from your army, who are in Germany in the moment? We could qualify them and give them new jobs. Would this help your country? Needs your country help at all?

 

[Likkmee]

War sells flags. Lots of flags and body bags. It's just business.

War and war are different words. One problem of the stupid politics of the USA is for example the irreversibility of some actions.

If the US had no military industrial complex unemployment would be 50 plus %.

So your military system is a covered social system - and you send your young man away, so they are not able to cause problems for your country. What about the idea to "sell" all US-American soldiers, who are in Germany the moment? We could qualify them and give them new jobs.

As what ? Walmart parking lot guards ? Forklift operators at Amazon ?
If it were me they'd be building a wall !

 

[zaangalewa]

War sells flags. Lots of flags and body bags. It's just business.

War and war are different words. One problem of the stupid politics of the USA is for example the irreversibility of some actions.

If the US had no military industrial complex unemployment would be 50 plus %.

So your military system is a covered social system - and you send your young man away, so they are not able to cause problems for your country. What about the idea to "sell" all US-American soldiers, who are in Germany the moment? We could qualify them and give them new jobs.

As what ? Walmart

Walmart is not a good concept for Germany.

parking lot guards ?

We don't have parking lot guards as far as I know.

Forklift operators at Amazon ?

Amazon is special problem. A criminal company in my eyes.

If it were me they'd be building a wall !

Okay.

 

[Uncensored2008]

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

What I'd like to know is how many questions you could beg at one time if you really put what passes for your mind to it.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy which occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of circular reasoning and an informal fallacy, in which an arguer makes an argument that requires the desired conclusion to be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden or at least not easily apparent.
Begging the question - Wikipedia​

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Try

Are you an AI-App for a stupid political Nazi-propaganda strategy? It exists not any plausible reason for all decisions of the USA under Trump in case of the Iran. He had cancelled without any reason to do so a decision of the United Nations Security Council P5+1: United States, United Kingdom, Russia, France, China and Germany. No one worldwide agrees with the USA in case of its sanctions against the Iran - except Saudi Arabia and Israel. And Trump provoked also all European nations by cancelling the INF treaty between Russia and the USA. You are not only on the way to a war between the Perisians and the USA. You are on the way to a world war. A nuclear world war.

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Artificial stupidity helps you nothing at all. Problems will find a solution on its own if no one cares about. And no none knows how a real war will end. "Your" best case scenario seem to be Trump will win his economic war in the end with nuclear weapons. But whatever this will mean - no none knows in the moment: You - the american taxpayer - will also pay the price of the economic war of Trump (tariffs = taxes). Me remembers the nuclear part of this vision of the future to the sentence: "Die Lebenden werden die Toten beneiden." (=The dead will envy the living.)

You - Iran - do not have functional nuclear weapons. If you did, you would have already started a war with Israel, because you think that piece of shit, two bit demon you bow to in the idol of the Kaaba wants you to. (Pro tip - Allah is just a hunk of stone - a meteorite.)

We Americans mean to keep you from gaining weapons which we ALL know you will use to start a nuclear war.

 

[zaangalewa]

What I'd like to know is how many questions you could beg at one time if you really put what passes for your mind to it.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy which occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of circular reasoning and an informal fallacy, in which an arguer makes an argument that requires the desired conclusion to be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden or at least not easily apparent.
Begging the question - Wikipedia​

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Try

Are you an AI-App for a stupid political Nazi-propaganda strategy? It exists not any plausible reason for all decisions of the USA under Trump in case of the Iran. He had cancelled without any reason to do so a decision of the United Nations Security Council P5+1: United States, United Kingdom, Russia, France, China and Germany. No one worldwide agrees with the USA in case of its sanctions against the Iran - except Saudi Arabia and Israel. And Trump provoked also all European nations by cancelling the INF treaty between Russia and the USA. You are not only on the way to a war between the Perisians and the USA. You are on the way to a world war. A nuclear world war.

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Artificial stupidity helps you nothing at all. Problems will find a solution on its own if no one cares about. And no none knows how a real war will end. "Your" best case scenario seem to be Trump will win his economic war in the end with nuclear weapons. But whatever this will mean - no none knows in the moment: You - the american taxpayer - will also pay the price of the economic war of Trump (tariffs = taxes). Me remembers the nuclear part of this vision of the future to the sentence: "Die Lebenden werden die Toten beneiden." (=The dead will envy the living.)

You - Iran -

I have nothing to do with the Iran.

do not have functional nuclear weapons.

Every idiot is able to produce nuclear weapons. If not functional then this weapons are only more worse.

If you did, you would have already started a war with Israel,

Israel? ... I do not see how a destabilized Persian region is able to be good for Israel. It needs much more positive communication between Israel and Persia. Anyway I fear in Israel the people will have to change something, if I understand god in the right way. I don't know what it is - but I would suggest to everyone in Israel to listen very carefully to everything what could be a real message of god.

because you think that piece of shit,

Piece of shit?

two bit demon you bow to in the idol of the Kaaba wants you to. (Pro tip - Allah is just a hunk of stone - a meteorite.)

When I said I'm able to be much more stupid, than an US-American is able to imagine, I thought not about such an insane form of stupidity.

We Americans

US-Americans. And you are also not able to speak for all US-Americans.

mean to keep you from gaining weapons which we ALL know you will use to start a nuclear war.

And why do you tell this a German? It was Lise Meitner who found out the physical principle which explains nuclear fission. Did we throw nuclear bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki?