shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 29,913
- 27,180
With absolutely no democrat daring to "cross the line" (A Canadian political term as parties here are purely Group Think) on the voting for the Healthcare replacement, and the absolute disdain for anything related to small government, state powers and individual rights as expressed in the Constitution, are the Democrats simply the Groupthink Party? We see it now with the unprecedented filibuster against the Supreme Court nomination...democrats call it "banding together" I call it "Groupthink Lemmings".
I don't say this to be offensive, I genuinely mean this. Look at how many didn't attend the inauguration, or how many went to the well of "stolen election" because they lost to an outsider. It seems the diversity that Democrats espouse is not within their own party. Nothing exposes this more than their system in the Primaries in which they had Superdelegates who single handedly can basically make voters choices inconsequential. CNN was in the bag so deep for Clinton they actually included the Superdelegate numbers in their projections!
I agree that there should be a general philosophy of a party, but there should be some variation within a particular policy or Bill as it were. Zero votes for a Bill? That's batting better than Saddam Hussein and his 98% election voting results...
I don't say this to be offensive, I genuinely mean this. Look at how many didn't attend the inauguration, or how many went to the well of "stolen election" because they lost to an outsider. It seems the diversity that Democrats espouse is not within their own party. Nothing exposes this more than their system in the Primaries in which they had Superdelegates who single handedly can basically make voters choices inconsequential. CNN was in the bag so deep for Clinton they actually included the Superdelegate numbers in their projections!
I agree that there should be a general philosophy of a party, but there should be some variation within a particular policy or Bill as it were. Zero votes for a Bill? That's batting better than Saddam Hussein and his 98% election voting results...
Last edited: