'Without Merit' Judge Shuts Down Trump's Latest Trial Requent.

If they are appointed as special counsel, yes, they have to go through advice and consent.

Also, smith was a private citizen when garland appointed him, so, as far as I’m aware, he can’t take up federal cases…as a civilian attorney
Did Robert Mueller get appointed by the AG without advise and consent? YES. It is common practice....and legal.
 
No, there is no ruling that Jack smith is legally appointed

You lie
Yes, there is precedent in the DC courts/appeals that has been ruled on. Chutkan is following precedent, by ruling Smith is a validly appointed special prosecutor. Trump is not arguing Smith is not legal, in the DC case.... because precedent was set in DC that he was.....
 
Yes, there is precedent in the DC courts/appeals that has been ruled on. Chutkan is following precedent, by ruling Smith is a validly appointed special prosecutor. Trump is not arguing Smith is not legal, in the DC case.... because precedent was set in DC that he was.....
No court has ruled Jack smith is legally appointed
 
The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.”


The decision Thursday afternoon by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan finds that making public Special Counsel Jack Smith’s latest redacted filing is “appropriate,” and that Trump’s “blanket objections to further unsealing are without merit.”

As in his previous filing, he identifies no specific substantive objections to particular proposed redactions,” Chutkan wrote in the ruling.

Trump had attempted to keep any further evidence against him in his criminal case out of the view of voters until after the Nov. 5 election.
More election interference by the DOJ.
 

Forum List

Back
Top