Women need birth control because "they can't control their libido"

Wait...did she have a point?

I so missed it.

That I'm mean to democrats by speaking the facts.

The only reason that I say they are filthy demagogues and lying scumbags is because the mindless drones who make up the party engage in the most disgusting personal attacks and rarely say anything that's true.

If democrats don't want to be viewed as lying scum, they could try being honest occasionally.

George W. Bush was a crappy President and took the nation in the wrong direction. Few on the right would disagree - most will honestly acknowledge this.

Barack Obama is even worse than Bush. This is a statement of fact, but NO democrat will ever acknowledge this, because party is held above all, and integrity is openly despised by the party.
 
ummmm, private insurance insuring private citizens ..... I'm not seeing the socialism angle here. Not that obamacare may lead to single payor, but on contraception .... no.

Sometimes, well, most of the time, they know not of what they speak.....they probably heard it come out of one of their dumb spokesperson's mouth, it sounded good to them......so the regurgitate....don't know the definition of Socialism to begin with.
 
You're the liar. Almost every post you write is a lie.

Of course I am, Pillowbite. I falsely claimed that you excused sexual abuse by Catholic priest..

Oh wait, that was your false accusation against me..

Oops, guess it's actually you who is the lying sack of shit.

You wrote:

Are you claiming that Government schools do NOT have vastly more instances of sexual abuse than the Catholic Church?

And then you write about "impressions"?

Puddly, the reason that you're a leftist is because you're stupid.


Post facts that support your claim that "government schools have vastly nore instances of sexual abuse than the catholic church'.


Learn to read, retard.

{The 2002 Department of Education report estimated that from 6 percent to 10 percent of all students in public schools would be victims of abuse before graduation — a staggering statistic.}

You won't because you can't.

Instead, you'll post another insult that reflects your own sexual dysfunction.

I suggest that you just keep right on posting "ditto" to your fellow brain dead idiots.

You are truly a retard, Pillowbite.

{ "From my own experience _ this could get me in trouble _ I think every single school district in the nation has at least one perpetrator. At least one," says Mary Jo McGrath, a California lawyer who has spent 30 years investigating abuse and misconduct in schools. "It doesn't matter if it's urban or rural or suburban."

One report mandated by Congress estimated that as many as 4.5 million students, out of roughly 50 million in American schools, are subject to sexual misconduct by an employee of a school sometime between kindergarten and 12th grade. That figure includes verbal harassment that's sexual in nature.

Jennah Bramow, one of Lindsey's accusers in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, wonders why there isn't more outrage.

"You're supposed to be able to send your kids to school knowing that they're going to be safe," says Bramow, now 20. While other victims accepted settlement deals and signed confidentiality agreements, she sued her city's schools for failing to protect her and others from Lindsey _ and won. Only then was Lindsey's teaching license finally revoked. }

AP: Sexual Misconduct Plagues US Schools
 
Uncensored's argument is quite rational. He sourced using vile leftist sources, and he made his point quite concisely.

:lol:

Let's just take a good look at his "rational" and "concise" rantings.



What DT means is that SHE can't make a rational argument. Which we already knew.

Please provide links and actual quotes where I have used spurious insults instead of rational and concise arguments.

You have a very deep voice for a woman. I suggest you quit smoking.

And now if you'll excuse me, I need to go howl with laughter. Be back in a bit.

:lmao:

Because of KG's limited understanding and what she is accustomed to, the vitriol appears rational while the rational confuses her......:razz::razz:
 
Fact is, if you want to find child molesters, go where there are children.

The catholic church hides child molesters. Schools do not.

As usual, you fools are defending the indefensible.

Lying again, Pillowbite?

Well, you're a democrat, thus without honor or even a shred of integrity.

{OMAHA, Neb. – Authorities have accused a Nebraska school superintendent, principal and coach of failing to report the alleged sexual assault of a young high school wrestler by several teammates last summer.}

Nebraska school officials accused of covering up sexual abuse | Fox News

You mindless fuckwad.
 
ummmm, private insurance insuring private citizens ..... I'm not seeing the socialism angle here. Not that obamacare may lead to single payor, but on contraception .... no.

Sometimes, well, most of the time, they know not of what they speak.....they probably heard it come out of one of their dumb spokesperson's mouth, it sounded good to them......so the regurgitate....don't know the definition of Socialism to begin with.


Both the Catholic church and in some public schools there has been instances of sexual abuse on children. It's a frequent problem.

Sexual Predators often deliberately seek out employment or other volunteer work that put themselves in direct contact with children.

So what is the argument here?
 
Hundreds of thousands of them over a period of hundreds of years? That's what the catholic church as done. Why doesn't THAT upset your lily white sensibilities?

Give it a rest and admit you don't give a flip about children. You're just on your usual tear about teachers/schools.

Hundreds of thousands, shit fer brains?

BWAHAHAHA

Standard Disclaimer: Truthmatters actually represents the high point of intelligence and integrity found among democrats.
 
ummmm, private insurance insuring private citizens ..... I'm not seeing the socialism angle here. Not that obamacare may lead to single payor, but on contraception .... no.

Sometimes, well, most of the time, they know not of what they speak.....they probably heard it come out of one of their dumb spokesperson's mouth, it sounded good to them......so the regurgitate....don't know the definition of Socialism to begin with.


Both the Catholic church and in some public schools there has been instances of sexual abuse on children. It's a frequent problem.

Sexual Predators often deliberately seek out employment or other volunteer work that put themselves in direct contact with children.

So what is the argument here?
Our argument had nothing to do with sexual predators but with righties calling Obamacare a socialist program.....how did you interpret that being about sexual predators?
 
Because of KG's limited understanding and what she is accustomed to, the vitriol appears rational while the rational confuses her......:razz::razz:

Can you point to an honest democrat, anywhere on this board?
Yes, and I can point to several honest Republicans on this board, and you and KG are not among the list.

Just one, who doesn't openly lie to slander the opposition?
Just because you consider everything that goes against your twisted logic a lie doesn't mean it is.

I've yet to encounter one.
You're not going to find one under the rocks where you do most of your living.
 
Sometimes, well, most of the time, they know not of what they speak.....they probably heard it come out of one of their dumb spokesperson's mouth, it sounded good to them......so the regurgitate....don't know the definition of Socialism to begin with.


Both the Catholic church and in some public schools there has been instances of sexual abuse on children. It's a frequent problem.

Sexual Predators often deliberately seek out employment or other volunteer work that put themselves in direct contact with children.

So what is the argument here?
Our argument had nothing to do with sexual predators but with righties calling Obamacare a socialist program.....how did you interpret that being about sexual predators?

I don't know about the "sexual predator" part, but Obamacare is unambiguously socialism. Socialism is central economic planning. The difference between government controling the health care system and single payer is a distinction without a difference.
 
Both the Catholic church and in some public schools there has been instances of sexual abuse on children. It's a frequent problem.

Sexual Predators often deliberately seek out employment or other volunteer work that put themselves in direct contact with children.

So what is the argument here?
Our argument had nothing to do with sexual predators but with righties calling Obamacare a socialist program.....how did you interpret that being about sexual predators?

I don't know about the "sexual predator" part, but Obamacare is unambiguously socialism. Socialism is central economic planning. The difference between government controling the health care system and single payer is a distinction without a difference.

Obamacare is nowhere near being Socialist.....when the government starts selling the insurance, then you can say it is, but the way it is now, with insurance companies selling the insurance, you either don't know the definition of socialism or you are just regurgitating something you heard and don't understand.
 
The government is selling the insurance, in that it's forcing us to purchase it, and paying the insurance companies to provide it.

You already know that, but for those who are young and stupid, make no mistake..you are part of a socialist takeover of the US.
 
Apparently, Huckabee is unaware that there are actually couples out there that are happy without children and don't want any, thus needing contraception to ensure they are not burdened with offspring they do not want.
The man is a knuckle-dragging Neanderthal.
 
No, he knows they exist. He maintains they are intelligent enough and can exert enough control that they are capable of managing their own reproductive decisions.

Rather than having them subsidized and implemented by the feds.
 
Apparently, Huckabee is unaware that there are actually couples out there that are happy without children and don't want any, thus needing contraception to ensure they are not burdened with offspring they do not want.
The man is a knuckle-dragging Neanderthal.

Huckabee is just like all other conservatives, he wants every sexual encounter to produce a fertilized egg and every fertilized egg to become a child, so they can then weed out the poor ones by cutting off their food stamps, medicaid, welfare, education and anything that might help them survive in their utopia Bubbleland.
 

Forum List

Back
Top