- Moderator
- #41
No. They don’t usually go after losers.Just curious how many believe a special prosecutor would have been empowered to investigate possible Russian interference and collusion by the Trump campigan If Hillary had won in 2016?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. They don’t usually go after losers.Just curious how many believe a special prosecutor would have been empowered to investigate possible Russian interference and collusion by the Trump campigan If Hillary had won in 2016?
The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Your nose is growing.
The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Your nose is growing.
So is the realization that Trump's crime syndicate is starting to fall apart.
This week saw the first member of his campaign (the so-called "best people") admit in court to embezzlement and money laundering.
More indictments and convictions to follow. Stay tuned. I've got the popcorn and I'm willing to share.
Okay, but it still looks pretty bad. Flynn, Manafort, Gates, Junior, Cohen....where there is smoke, ....The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Your nose is growing.
So is the realization that Trump's crime syndicate is starting to fall apart.
This week saw the first member of his campaign (the so-called "best people") admit in court to embezzlement and money laundering.
More indictments and convictions to follow. Stay tuned. I've got the popcorn and I'm willing to share.
Keep grasping at straws. Manafort may have some tax issues, that is a long way from anything on Trump. You turkeys take the cake that is for sure.
Okay, but it still looks pretty bad. Flynn, Manafort, Gates, Junior, Cohen....where there is smoke, ....The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Your nose is growing.
So is the realization that Trump's crime syndicate is starting to fall apart.
This week saw the first member of his campaign (the so-called "best people") admit in court to embezzlement and money laundering.
More indictments and convictions to follow. Stay tuned. I've got the popcorn and I'm willing to share.
Keep grasping at straws. Manafort may have some tax issues, that is a long way from anything on Trump. You turkeys take the cake that is for sure.
What voting apparatus? Unless they hacked into voting machines which you can't do as they are not online that would have accomplished nothing.Because the Russians hacked the DNC and tried to hack into the voting apparatus of several states.Why would there be an investigation if Hillary had won?I did not ask when the investigation would be over I asked if a special prosecutor would have been empowered. Given the reason coming from the left for this investigation is Putin and Russia cost Hillary the election would the DOJ appointed a special prosecutor if Hillary had won? I know this will be tough for some but try and answer the question without going into an anti Trump rant.The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Well, I did say "yes" in the poll and "the investigation would be over by now".... I believe any reasonable person would know that I said "yes".
The mandate of the special prosecutor....you should read it.
It is not alleged, it is fact.The alleged Russian interference....
I don't think so.It seems extremely unlikely a President Hillary Clinton would have her AG appoint a special prosecutor to look into an election she won.
That fact you believe it's a fact does not make it one that is your opinion and opinions are not facts never have been never will be.
Again you might not think so but that to is just your opinion Hillary Clintons history does not show someone who likes having people she really can't control looking into things so that makes it dubious in my opinion she would want a special prosecutor.
If, by "even more", you mean, "nowhere really close", then, okay....Okay, but it still looks pretty bad. Flynn, Manafort, Gates, Junior, Cohen....where there is smoke, ....The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Your nose is growing.
So is the realization that Trump's crime syndicate is starting to fall apart.
This week saw the first member of his campaign (the so-called "best people") admit in court to embezzlement and money laundering.
More indictments and convictions to follow. Stay tuned. I've got the popcorn and I'm willing to share.
Keep grasping at straws. Manafort may have some tax issues, that is a long way from anything on Trump. You turkeys take the cake that is for sure.
Even more with Podesta, Bruce Ohr and rest of the anti Trump JD crowd.
The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Your nose is growing.
So is the realization that Trump's crime syndicate is starting to fall apart.
This week saw the first member of his campaign (the so-called "best people") admit in court to embezzlement and money laundering.
More indictments and convictions to follow. Stay tuned. I've got the popcorn and I'm willing to share.
Keep grasping at straws. Manafort may have some tax issues, that is a long way from anything on Trump. You turkeys take the cake that is for sure.
Here are a couple of facts for you they did that on something that was decommissioned a long time ago and had no internal memory security so that's not really much of challenge. Stealing e-mails is serious which is why it would smart to have something better than gameboy level security for them.What voting apparatus? Unless they hacked into voting machines which you can't do as they are not online that would have accomplished nothing.Because the Russians hacked the DNC and tried to hack into the voting apparatus of several states.Why would there be an investigation if Hillary had won?I did not ask when the investigation would be over I asked if a special prosecutor would have been empowered. Given the reason coming from the left for this investigation is Putin and Russia cost Hillary the election would the DOJ appointed a special prosecutor if Hillary had won? I know this will be tough for some but try and answer the question without going into an anti Trump rant.
Well, I did say "yes" in the poll and "the investigation would be over by now".... I believe any reasonable person would know that I said "yes".
The mandate of the special prosecutor....you should read it.
It is not alleged, it is fact.The alleged Russian interference....
I don't think so.It seems extremely unlikely a President Hillary Clinton would have her AG appoint a special prosecutor to look into an election she won.
That fact you believe it's a fact does not make it one that is your opinion and opinions are not facts never have been never will be.
Again you might not think so but that to is just your opinion Hillary Clintons history does not show someone who likes having people she really can't control looking into things so that makes it dubious in my opinion she would want a special prosecutor.
Lets give you a couple of actual facts, crimes against America was committed... Stealing emails is a serious crime...
As for the voting machine... at a hacking convention in Vegas a 16 year old hacked a voting machine in 45 mins...
How a 16-Year-Old Coder Hacked a Voting Machine at DEF CON | Inverse
The competition was from 8 to 16 year olds...
The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Your nose is growing.
Great so the fact the Russians had no direct impact on votes is not only validated but securing those voting systems was the focus of the Obama administration. It’s what we have been saying.For one, he didn't, instead focusing on making sure our voting systems were secure.
.
There are a lot of Trumpians who seem to think that this investigation, as it is currently empowered, is looking strictly into voter manipulation.I did not ask when the investigation would be over I asked if a special prosecutor would have been empowered. Given the reason coming from the left for this investigation is Putin and Russia cost Hillary the election would the DOJ appointed a special prosecutor if Hillary had won? I know this will be tough for some but try and answer the question without going into an anti Trump rant.The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
How has it been obstructed? Being critical of it is not obstruction Mueller has not been fired the investigation has been going for a year and half and counting I believe odd way to obstruct the people who have done the most damage to the investigation have been members of the FBI namely Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.There are a lot of Trumpians who seem to think that this investigation, as it is currently empowered, is looking strictly into voter manipulation.I did not ask when the investigation would be over I asked if a special prosecutor would have been empowered. Given the reason coming from the left for this investigation is Putin and Russia cost Hillary the election would the DOJ appointed a special prosecutor if Hillary had won? I know this will be tough for some but try and answer the question without going into an anti Trump rant.The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
The fact is this nation was attacked by a foreign power and that attack was to cause suspicion and mistrust in our electoral system. That attack manifested itself by Russians offering and Trump campaign officials soliciting information about the Democrat nominee, her campaign and its strategy.
No matter which candidate won, there should be an investigation. What a pity this current investigation has been obstructed publically and privately by the current president.
The FBI was already on it before the election and they would certainly have continued investigating.Just curious how many believe a special prosecutor would have been empowered to investigate possible Russian interference and collusion by the Trump campigan If Hillary had won in 2016?
Then why did we need a special prosecutor? Why is all the anger and outrage about Russian attempts interfer in the election being directed at Trump instead of the people who were in charge when it was happening? Either they had no idea this was going on which would be incompetence or they knew and didn't take it serious which would be indifference either one is bad and that is really not being addressed by anyone.The FBI was already on it before the election and they would certainly have continued investigating.Just curious how many believe a special prosecutor would have been empowered to investigate possible Russian interference and collusion by the Trump campigan If Hillary had won in 2016?
How has it been obstructed? Being critical of it is not obstruction Mueller has not been fired the investigation has been going for a year and half and counting I believe odd way to obstruct the people who have done the most damage to the investigation have been members of the FBI namely Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.There are a lot of Trumpians who seem to think that this investigation, as it is currently empowered, is looking strictly into voter manipulation.I did not ask when the investigation would be over I asked if a special prosecutor would have been empowered. Given the reason coming from the left for this investigation is Putin and Russia cost Hillary the election would the DOJ appointed a special prosecutor if Hillary had won? I know this will be tough for some but try and answer the question without going into an anti Trump rant.The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
The fact is this nation was attacked by a foreign power and that attack was to cause suspicion and mistrust in our electoral system. That attack manifested itself by Russians offering and Trump campaign officials soliciting information about the Democrat nominee, her campaign and its strategy.
No matter which candidate won, there should be an investigation. What a pity this current investigation has been obstructed publically and privately by the current president.
Then why did we need a special prosecutor? Why is all the anger and outrage about Russian attempts interfer in the election being directed at Trump instead of the people who were in charge when it was happening? Either they had no idea this was going on which would be incompetence or they knew and didn't take it serious which would be indifference either one is bad and that is really not being addressed by anyone.The FBI was already on it before the election and they would certainly have continued investigating.Just curious how many believe a special prosecutor would have been empowered to investigate possible Russian interference and collusion by the Trump campigan If Hillary had won in 2016?
yes, of course.... they serve a 10 year term, she would have felt she had no choice but to keep him until his appointed term ran out.... Trump basically broke protocol, by firing him.... every rule, every govt protocol, every ethics standard has been broken by Trump since he's gotten there...Really you think Hillary would have keep the FBI director who over the past year and a half she has blamed among others for costing her the election? Seems unlikely.There would probably not be one.... because she would not have fired the FBI director, and gone on Lester Holt confessing that she fired him, because he was investigation her campaign members who conspired with the Russians on the releasing of the DNC etc emails that were stolen among other things....What voting apparatus? Unless they hacked into voting machines which you can't do as they are not online that would have accomplished nothing.Because the Russians hacked the DNC and tried to hack into the voting apparatus of several states.Why would there be an investigation if Hillary had won?Well, I did say "yes" in the poll and "the investigation would be over by now".... I believe any reasonable person would know that I said "yes".
The mandate of the special prosecutor....you should read it.
It is not alleged, it is fact.The alleged Russian interference....
I don't think so.It seems extremely unlikely a President Hillary Clinton would have her AG appoint a special prosecutor to look into an election she won.
That fact you believe it's a fact does not make it one that is your opinion and opinions are not facts never have been never will be.
Again you might not think so but that to is just your opinion Hillary Clintons history does not show someone who likes having people she really can't control looking into things so that makes it dubious in my opinion she would want a special prosecutor.
and she probably would not have had the Russians who were the ones interfering in our election process to her oval office, telling them as well, that the heat has been removed on Russia because she fired the head of the investigation.
![]()
Great so the fact the Russians had no direct impact on votes is not only validated but securing those voting systems was the focus of the Obama administration. It’s what we have been saying.For one, he didn't, instead focusing on making sure our voting systems were secure.
.
So if someone breaks into your computer you're okay as long as they don't do anything?
Isn't breaking in a crime that should be investigated?
Why would there be an investigation if Hillary had won? The alleged Russian interference went on during the Obama Presidency and neither he or the intelligence community seemed to know about and if they did they didn’t take it very seriously. It seems extremely unlikely a President Hillary Clinton would have her AG appoint a special prosecutor to look into an election she won.I did not ask when the investigation would be over I asked if a special prosecutor would have been empowered. Given the reason coming from the left for this investigation is Putin and Russia cost Hillary the election would the DOJ appointed a special prosecutor if Hillary had won? I know this will be tough for some but try and answer the question without going into an anti Trump rant.The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Well, I did say "yes" in the poll and "the investigation would be over by now".... I believe any reasonable person would know that I said "yes".
The mandate of the special prosecutor....you should read it.