Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh so that's bad but hiring a British national and former spy to get dirt on Trump with his contacts in other countries which included Russians that's all above board and nothing to see here. If you going to claim the Trump tower meeting was collusion then what the DNC and the Clinton camp did is as well."No meetings with Russians. Well except this one. Oh, and this one. And I forgot about this one. And then there was that thing where four or five of us met this one Russian. Well ok, there were two or three of them. Oh, and then he went to russia." And so on and so forth ad nauseum. Those lies and denials. Remember them?Do you mean the denials of collusion? The one that to date zero evidence has been presented to support.Without the denials and lies we wouldn't have needed one, the FBI investigation would have been sufficient.Just curious how many believe a special prosecutor would have been empowered to investigate possible Russian interference and collusion by the Trump campigan If Hillary had won in 2016?
No, as this was prompted by Trump's firing of Comey.
Of course it wasn't. An investigation into Russian interference and his campaign officials involvement in it was already underway, before the election. When trump fired the head of it, then said on national TV that he did so because of "the Russian thing".... the Republican Congress then requested that the Republican DAG appoint a Republican special prosecutor.This was prompted by Trump winning the Presidency
I said what I wanted to say there is nothing loaded about it any President can fire an FBI director whenever they want the President doing something he has the legal authority to do does not warrant a special prosecutor doesn't matter who the President or FBI director is.Correct. Why the loaded question? Do you have something you want to say?This was prompted by the firing of Comey the same Comey the left has bashed as much as the right has
Of course it wasn't. An investigation into Russian interference and his campaign officials involvement in it was already underway, before the election. When trump fired the head of it, then said on national TV that he did so because of "the Russian thing".... the Republican Congress then requested that the Republican DAG appoint a Republican special prosecutor.This was prompted by Trump winning the Presidency
So yeah, what you are saying is ridiculous fantasy on every imaginable level.
Apparently, the circumstances do matter, as evidenced by reality contradicting your empty claims.I said what I wanted to say there is nothing loaded about it any President can fire an FBI director whenever they want the President doing something he has the legal authority to do does not warrant a special prosecutor doesn't matter who the President or FBI director is.
Pure Trumpkin fantasy.Of course it wasn't. An investigation into Russian interference and his campaign officials involvement in it was already underway, before the election. When trump fired the head of it, then said on national TV that he did so because of "the Russian thing".... the Republican Congress then requested that the Republican DAG appoint a Republican special prosecutor.This was prompted by Trump winning the Presidency
So yeah, what you are saying is ridiculous fantasy on every imaginable level.
Not really.
Obama knew and blew it off, actually laughed it off publicly. It didn't get traction until the Oh Shit he is President moment on Nov 8/9, 2016
Obama’s secret struggle to punish Russia for Putin’s election assault
If HILLARY would have won it would have all gone away.Pure Trumpkin fantasy.
The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Hmm, no, it would not have. You don't believe that either.If HILLARY would have won it would have all gone away.
So tell us what they got?"No meetings with Russians. Well except this one. Oh, and this one. And I forgot about this one. And then there was that thing where four or five of us met this one Russian. Well ok, there were two or three of them. Oh, and then he went to russia." And so on and so forth ad nauseum. Those lies and denials. Remember them?Do you mean the denials of collusion? The one that to date zero evidence has been presented to support.Without the denials and lies we wouldn't have needed one, the FBI investigation would have been sufficient.Just curious how many believe a special prosecutor would have been empowered to investigate possible Russian interference and collusion by the Trump campigan If Hillary had won in 2016?
How would he know? What a bizarre demand.So tell us what the got?
I'm not sure they didn't. It seems like you're making a lot of assumptions. It is funny that the same guy who swears that voter ID is important now suddenly says that voter registration isn't that important and dismisses Trump's business partner (Russia's) hacking of their systems.State websites or voter registration systems aren't going to have much if any impact on an election. If they felt it was serious why didn't the intelligence community inform these states they believed Russia was doing it? Seems like a rather important piece of information to leave out.U.S. intel: Russia compromised seven states prior to 2016 electionWhat voting apparatus? Unless they hacked into voting machines which you can't do as they are not online that would have accomplished nothing.Because the Russians hacked the DNC and tried to hack into the voting apparatus of several states.Why would there be an investigation if Hillary had won?Well, I did say "yes" in the poll and "the investigation would be over by now".... I believe any reasonable person would know that I said "yes".
The mandate of the special prosecutor....you should read it.
It is not alleged, it is fact.The alleged Russian interference....
I don't think so.It seems extremely unlikely a President Hillary Clinton would have her AG appoint a special prosecutor to look into an election she won.
Not me...it's the CIA, FBI and ONI.That fact you believe it's a fact does not make it one that is your opinion and opinions are not facts never have been never will be.
Again you might not think so but that to is just your opinion Hillary Clintons history does not show someone who likes having people she really can't control looking into things so that makes it dubious in my opinion she would want a special prosecutor.
I'm pretty sure Clinton would want to get to the bottom of it. Which is why the Russians helped Trump. Trump accepted the help. Likely funded it the same way he paid off his lovers....which is why there is an investigation.
Again why didn't CIA, FBI and ONI inform these states of what they suspected Russia of doing? It seems telling these states you suspect a foreign government of trying to hack them should be SOP..
The way Clinton handeled her own scandals suggest getting to the bottom of something is the last thing she would want. It's more likely she would just push her rest button and move on.
Can you really not see the difference or is it just that you won't admit it?Oh so that's bad but hiring a British national and former spy to get dirt on Trump with his contacts in other countries which included Russians that's all above board and nothing to see here. If you going to claim the Trump tower meeting was collusion then what the DNC and the Clinton camp did is as well."No meetings with Russians. Well except this one. Oh, and this one. And I forgot about this one. And then there was that thing where four or five of us met this one Russian. Well ok, there were two or three of them. Oh, and then he went to russia." And so on and so forth ad nauseum. Those lies and denials. Remember them?Do you mean the denials of collusion? The one that to date zero evidence has been presented to support.Without the denials and lies we wouldn't have needed one, the FBI investigation would have been sufficient.Just curious how many believe a special prosecutor would have been empowered to investigate possible Russian interference and collusion by the Trump campigan If Hillary had won in 2016?
It’s why obama sat on his hands. She was going to win. Going to.Hmm, no, it would not have. You don't believe that either.If HILLARY would have won it would have all gone away.
Look, I know you guys are infatuated with Clinton but I'm pretty sure she's not interested.So tell us what they got?"No meetings with Russians. Well except this one. Oh, and this one. And I forgot about this one. And then there was that thing where four or five of us met this one Russian. Well ok, there were two or three of them. Oh, and then he went to russia." And so on and so forth ad nauseum. Those lies and denials. Remember them?Do you mean the denials of collusion? The one that to date zero evidence has been presented to support.Without the denials and lies we wouldn't have needed one, the FBI investigation would have been sufficient.Just curious how many believe a special prosecutor would have been empowered to investigate possible Russian interference and collusion by the Trump campigan If Hillary had won in 2016?
Hillary has a fat ass?
For one, he didn't, instead focusing on making sure our voting systems were secure. For two, he demonstrated class and an appreciation for not giving the appearance of impropriety by focusing only on physical security amd not filling our airwaves with the story. Could or should he have done more? Probably yes and yes, but your reason for it is garbage. As if you would have been or now be "pleased", had Obama come out strongly and often about Russian interference on behalf of trump, in the runup to the election. You would have lost your shit over that, and you know it.It’s why obama sat on his hands.
Great so the fact the Russians had no direct impact on votes is not only validated but securing those voting systems was the focus of the Obama administration. It’s what we have been saying.For one, he didn't, instead focusing on making sure our voting systems were secure.
.
The investigation would be over by now...President HRC wouldn't have gone into the witness protection program, she would have answered the questions, and the country would have moved on. But instead, we have a President who is prolonging the investigation by not cooperating and then complaining about how long the investigation is taking.
Great so the fact the Russians had no direct impact on votes is not only validated but securing those voting systems was the focus of the Obama administration. It’s what we have been saying.
