EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,445
- 9,880
- 2,138
- Thread starter
- #61
So no data proving the atmospheric makeup doesn’t effect the temp up and down then?
One more time...
We have TWO and ONLY TWO MEASURES of ATMOSPHERIC TEMPS = satellites and balloons
For three decades, they were in perfect correlation = no warming in the atmosphere
So your fudgebaking taxpayer funded "heroes" had a choice
Admit Co2 went up and atmosphere did not warm, lose job, file for unemployment
or
FUDGE BOTH with uncorrelated "corrections" to show "warming" THAT DID NOT EXIST IN THE ACTUAL DATA....
![www.nbcnews.com](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/v1696280772/newsgroup-logos/nbcnews/social/primary-white-1680x840.png)
Key claim against global warming evaporates
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.
![www.nbcnews.com](https://nodeassets.nbcnews.com/cdnassets/projects/ramen/favicon/nbcnews/all-other-sizes-PNG.ico/favicon-16x16.png)
YOUR THEORY is that increasing Co2 in the ATMOSPHERE would warm THE ATMOSPHERE
It did not do that.
Only FUDGE you parrot....