Yeah…more gun control in Europe..that's the ticket…since the illegal guns were obtained illegally...

I posted all of the ones that should not have happened, since you guys confiscated guns...

as well....there were more than a few where nothing stopped the shooter from comiitting a mass shooting ....they had an illegal gun and chose not to kill more people.....so mass shootings,have happened, and the only thing that has prevented more was the shooter......


..all of your confiscation of guns and the only thing stopping mass shooters...they just don't do it...that is some policy...

and on top of that....most of your gun crime is foreign immigrants.....somehow they easily get guns despite the gun confiscation.....

and your gun crime is no different than ours....the majority is criminals killing criminals...especially gangs...and it is increasing.....

What do you mean they should not have happened? There is a myth that guns are banned in Australia. They are not. Certain types have been banned and they are hard to obtain, but a total confiscation? Nope...

Your second paragraph has nothing to do with the debate. Mass shooting are carried out by whackjobs who don't care who they harm. None of those have occurred in Australia since the bans were enacted. Do you really want to go into the figures comparing the US to Australia where people only inflicted pain on those they intended? You guys would be in the 100s of 1000s if not millions.


These were either mass shootings or could have been mass shootings, the only thing that kept them from being mass shootings was simply the shooter not wanting to shoot more people…not one of your gun control laws or confiscation stopped them from shooting up a mall, a theater or a school……not one…


So no, the gun confiscation in Austrulia did not stop mass shootings....dumb luck did.....since all of these shooters had no trouble getting guns.....right?


Tell me.....how is anything other than luck that kept these from being mass shootings...since the shooter obviously was able to get a gun and shoot people in gun free Australia...right?

Timeline of major crimes in Australia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
16 August 1998 – Victorian police officers Gary Silk and Rodney Miller were shot dead in an ambush by Bendali Debs and Jason Joseph Roberts in the Moorabbin Police murders.

The next 5 are actually mass shootings……..how do you pretend that they aren't.?
  • 3 August 1999 – La Trobe University shooting – Jonathan Brett Horrocks walked into the cafeteria in La Trobe university in Melbourne Victoria armed with a 38 caliber revolver handgun and opened fire killing Leon Capraro the boss and manager off the cafeteria and wounding a woman who was a student at the university.
  • 26 May 2002 – A Vietnamese man walked into a Vietnamese wedding reception in Cabramatta Sydney, New South Wales armed with a handgun and opened fire wounding seven people.
  • 18 June 2007 – Melbourne CBD shooting – Christopher Wayne Hudson opened fire on three people, killing one and seriously wounding two others who intervened when Hudson was assaulting his girlfriend at a busy Melbourne intersection during the morning peak. He gave himself up to police in Wallan, Victoria on 20 June.[71]
The next ones……could easily have killed innocent people….had they simply chosen to take out their rage on other people..
  • 28 April 2012 – A man opened fire in a busy shopping mall in Robina on the Gold Coast shooting Bandidos bikie Jacques Teamo. A woman who was an innocent bystander was also injured from a shotgun blast to the leg. Neither of the victims died, but the incident highlighted the recent increase in gun crime across major Australian cities including Sydney, Brisbane and Adelaide.[citation needed]
  • 23 May 2012 – Christopher 'Badness' Binse, a career criminal well known to police, was arrested after a 44-hour siege at an East Keilor home in Melbourne's north west. During the siege, Binse fired several shots at police and refused to co-operate with negotiators; eventually tear gas had to be used to force him out of the house, at which point he refused to put down his weapon and was then sprayed with a volley of non-lethal bullets.[citation needed]
  • 8 March 2013 – Queen Street mall siege – Lee Matthew Hiller entered the shopping mall on Queen Street Brisbane Queensland armed with a revolver and threatened shoppers and staff with the revolver, causing a 90-minute siege which ended when Hiller was shot and wounded in the arm by a police officer from the elite Specialist Emergency Response Team. Hiller was then later taken to hospital and was treated for his injury; he pleaded gulity to 20 charges and was sentenced to four-and-a-half years in jail with a non-parole period of two years and three months.[citation needed]
  • 9 September 2014 – Lockhart massacre – Geoff Hunt shot and killed his wife, Kim, his 10-year-old son Fletcher, and his daughters Mia, eight and Phoebe, six before killing himself on a farm in Lockhart in the Riverina district near Wagga Wagga New South Wales. The body of Geoff Hunt and a firearm are later found in a dam on the farm by police divers and a suicide note written by Geoff Hunt is also found inside the house on the farm.[citation needed]
  • 7 November 2014 – Jordy Brook carjacked a Channel 7 news cameraman at gun point during a crime spree on the Sunshine Coast, Queensland. He was later captured and arrested by police after luring police on a high speed chase and crashing the car.[citation needed
  • 27 June 2015 – Hermidale triple murder – the bodies of three people, two men and a woman are found shot dead on a property in a rural farming community in the town of Hermidale west of Nyngan, the bodies of 28-year-old Jacob Cumberland his father 59-year-old Stephen Cumberland and a 36-year-old woman were found with gun shot wounds, the body of Jacob Cumberland was found on the drive way of the property, the body of the 36-year-old woman was found in the backyard of the property and the body of Stephen Cumberland was found in a burnt out caravan on the property. 61-year-old Allan O'Connor is later arrested and charged with the murders.
  • 10 September 2015 – A 49-year-old woman is shot dead in a Mc Donald's restaurant in Gold Coast by her 57-year-old ex partner, who then turned the gun on himself afterwards and shot himself dead.
ANd the next three……..the only thing that kept them from being mass shootings was that the shooter didn't shoot more people….none of your gun laws, or confiscation would have stopped these shooters from being mass shooters...

  • 2 October 2015 - 2015 Parramatta shooting On 2 October 2015, Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar, a 15-year-old boy, shot and killed Curtis Cheng, an unarmed police civilian finance worker, outside the New South Wales Police Force headquarters in Parramatta, Australia. Jabar was subsequently shot and killed by special constables who were protecting the police station.
  • 15 December 2014 – 2014 Sydney hostage crisis – Seventeen people were taken hostage in a cafe in Martin Place, Sydney by Man Haron Monis. The hostage crisis was resolved in the early hours of 16 December, sixteen hours after it commenced, when armed police stormed the premises. Monis and two hostages were killed in the course of the crisis.[87]
8 March 2013 – Queen Street mall siege – Lee Matthew Hiller entered the shopping mall on Queen Street Brisbane Queensland armed with a revolver and threatened shoppers and staff with the revolver, causing a 90-minute siege which ended when Hiller was shot and wounded in the arm by a police officer from the elite Specialist Emergency Response Team. Hiller was then later taken to hospital and was treated for his injury; he pleaded gulity to 20 charges and was sentenced to four-and-a-half years in jail with a non-parole period of two years and three months.[citation needed]


So….blind, dumb luck and the choices of mass shooters have kept down your mass shooting rate….not your gun control and not your gun confiscation…..
 
They don't want them because the technology doesn't work yet.

Still waiting for the police to limit their mags to the same # of rounds as the rest of us as well.
Oh, they work well enough, the NRA just doesn't want them here. They're afraid once they are, then that's all you'll be able to buy. Research it, I have.


they don't work..and mandating that all guns have useless technology is a non starter.....
They work more than well enough to be on the market here, which the NRA will not allow. Capitalism allows for such a thing but not the NRA.

lying isn't promoting your argument…...
That's nothing like a lie, there are several valid versions out there and I'd make them even better by requiring that you be implanted with a chip. The price of a gun would be blood, yours.


None of them work….and forcing people to have only those defecting products and put their lives on the line with the defective devices is exactly what you nuts want.
 
Oh, they work well enough, the NRA just doesn't want them here. They're afraid once they are, then that's all you'll be able to buy. Research it, I have.


they don't work..and mandating that all guns have useless technology is a non starter.....
They work more than well enough to be on the market here, which the NRA will not allow. Capitalism allows for such a thing but not the NRA.

lying isn't promoting your argument…...
That's nothing like a lie, there are several valid versions out there and I'd make them even better by requiring that you be implanted with a chip. The price of a gun would be blood, yours.


None of them work….and forcing people to have only those defecting products and put their lives on the line with the defective devices is exactly what you nuts want.
1. Not true.
2. We aren't even close to that, yet.

3. Have some balls, let the market decide.
 
they don't work..and mandating that all guns have useless technology is a non starter.....
They work more than well enough to be on the market here, which the NRA will not allow. Capitalism allows for such a thing but not the NRA.

lying isn't promoting your argument…...
That's nothing like a lie, there are several valid versions out there and I'd make them even better by requiring that you be implanted with a chip. The price of a gun would be blood, yours.


None of them work….and forcing people to have only those defecting products and put their lives on the line with the defective devices is exactly what you nuts want.
1. Not true.
2. We aren't even close to that, yet.

3. Have some balls, let the market decide.

There is nothing wrong with the market deciding, however mandating their exclusive use is not letting the market decide.

Have New Jersey take that law off the books, then we can talk.
 
They work more than well enough to be on the market here, which the NRA will not allow. Capitalism allows for such a thing but not the NRA.

lying isn't promoting your argument…...
That's nothing like a lie, there are several valid versions out there and I'd make them even better by requiring that you be implanted with a chip. The price of a gun would be blood, yours.


None of them work….and forcing people to have only those defecting products and put their lives on the line with the defective devices is exactly what you nuts want.
1. Not true.
2. We aren't even close to that, yet.

3. Have some balls, let the market decide.

There is nothing wrong with the market deciding, however mandating their exclusive use is not letting the market decide.

Have New Jersey take that law off the books, then we can talk.
They have already offered to but the NRA is still saying no. N.J. Lawmakers Compromise on Smart-Gun Legislation
 
lying isn't promoting your argument…...
That's nothing like a lie, there are several valid versions out there and I'd make them even better by requiring that you be implanted with a chip. The price of a gun would be blood, yours.


None of them work….and forcing people to have only those defecting products and put their lives on the line with the defective devices is exactly what you nuts want.
1. Not true.
2. We aren't even close to that, yet.

3. Have some balls, let the market decide.

There is nothing wrong with the market deciding, however mandating their exclusive use is not letting the market decide.

Have New Jersey take that law off the books, then we can talk.
They have already offered to but the NRA is still saying no. N.J. Lawmakers Compromise on Smart-Gun Legislation

it would still force sellers to have them in inventory, even if they are not proven.

Just repeal the law, no need for compromise.
 
That's nothing like a lie, there are several valid versions out there and I'd make them even better by requiring that you be implanted with a chip. The price of a gun would be blood, yours.


None of them work….and forcing people to have only those defecting products and put their lives on the line with the defective devices is exactly what you nuts want.
1. Not true.
2. We aren't even close to that, yet.

3. Have some balls, let the market decide.

There is nothing wrong with the market deciding, however mandating their exclusive use is not letting the market decide.

Have New Jersey take that law off the books, then we can talk.
They have already offered to but the NRA is still saying no. N.J. Lawmakers Compromise on Smart-Gun Legislation

it would still force sellers to have them in inventory, even if they are not proven.

Just repeal the law, no need for compromise.
We can require business to stock things, if we wish to. We, not they, set the rules. Deal with it.
 

Then let police departments volunteer their officers to start using the technology right away. They would be a shining example to all of us.
THEY CAN'T GET THEM HERE. How many times do I have to fucking say this???

The police have always gotten exceptions to rules, why not now.

ITS BECAUSE THEY DON'T WORK AS ADVERTISED YET YOU THUNDERING IDIOT.
 
None of them work….and forcing people to have only those defecting products and put their lives on the line with the defective devices is exactly what you nuts want.
1. Not true.
2. We aren't even close to that, yet.

3. Have some balls, let the market decide.

There is nothing wrong with the market deciding, however mandating their exclusive use is not letting the market decide.

Have New Jersey take that law off the books, then we can talk.
They have already offered to but the NRA is still saying no. N.J. Lawmakers Compromise on Smart-Gun Legislation

it would still force sellers to have them in inventory, even if they are not proven.

Just repeal the law, no need for compromise.
We can require business to stock things, if we wish to. We, not they, set the rules. Deal with it.

So I can require a Jewish Butcher to stock Pork?
 

Then let police departments volunteer their officers to start using the technology right away. They would be a shining example to all of us.
THEY CAN'T GET THEM HERE. How many times do I have to fucking say this???

The police have always gotten exceptions to rules, why not now.

ITS BECAUSE THEY DON'T WORK AS ADVERTISED YET YOU THUNDERING IDIOT.
They cannot get an exception to this rule. And they do work, you just don't want them to since that might fuck with your ability to play with your deadly toys.
 

Then let police departments volunteer their officers to start using the technology right away. They would be a shining example to all of us.
THEY CAN'T GET THEM HERE. How many times do I have to fucking say this???

The police have always gotten exceptions to rules, why not now.

ITS BECAUSE THEY DON'T WORK AS ADVERTISED YET YOU THUNDERING IDIOT.
They cannot get an exception to this rule. And they do work, you just don't want them to since that might fuck with your ability to play with your deadly toys.

Oh yeah?

Shocking test results for the Armatix iP1 “smart gun”

Once paired, a “cold start” still requires a minimum of seven push-button commands and a duration of 12 seconds before the gun can be fired.

The pistol must be within 10 inches of the watch during “start up.” This slows and complicates the use of the pistol if one hand is injured or otherwise unavailable.

and why can't the police get an exception?
 
1. Not true.
2. We aren't even close to that, yet.

3. Have some balls, let the market decide.

There is nothing wrong with the market deciding, however mandating their exclusive use is not letting the market decide.

Have New Jersey take that law off the books, then we can talk.
They have already offered to but the NRA is still saying no. N.J. Lawmakers Compromise on Smart-Gun Legislation

it would still force sellers to have them in inventory, even if they are not proven.

Just repeal the law, no need for compromise.
We can require business to stock things, if we wish to. We, not they, set the rules. Deal with it.

So I can require a Jewish Butcher to stock Pork?
Nope, that would have a 1st amendment problem but requiring a gun store to sell smart guns is the same as requiring a boating supply store to sell life jackets, or life boats.
 

Then let police departments volunteer their officers to start using the technology right away. They would be a shining example to all of us.
THEY CAN'T GET THEM HERE. How many times do I have to fucking say this???

The police have always gotten exceptions to rules, why not now.

ITS BECAUSE THEY DON'T WORK AS ADVERTISED YET YOU THUNDERING IDIOT.
They cannot get an exception to this rule. And they do work, you just don't want them to since that might fuck with your ability to play with your deadly toys.

Oh yeah?

Shocking test results for the Armatix iP1 “smart gun”

Once paired, a “cold start” still requires a minimum of seven push-button commands and a duration of 12 seconds before the gun can be fired.

The pistol must be within 10 inches of the watch during “start up.” This slows and complicates the use of the pistol if one hand is injured or otherwise unavailable.

and why can't the police get an exception?
Because the local Barney Fifes cannot import weapons.
 
There is nothing wrong with the market deciding, however mandating their exclusive use is not letting the market decide.

Have New Jersey take that law off the books, then we can talk.
They have already offered to but the NRA is still saying no. N.J. Lawmakers Compromise on Smart-Gun Legislation

it would still force sellers to have them in inventory, even if they are not proven.

Just repeal the law, no need for compromise.
We can require business to stock things, if we wish to. We, not they, set the rules. Deal with it.

So I can require a Jewish Butcher to stock Pork?
Nope, that would have a 1st amendment problem but requiring a gun store to sell smart guns is the same as requiring a boating supply store to sell life jackets, or life boats.

So your original statement required clarification? BIG fucking surprise from an oxygen thief such as yourself.
 
Then let police departments volunteer their officers to start using the technology right away. They would be a shining example to all of us.
THEY CAN'T GET THEM HERE. How many times do I have to fucking say this???

The police have always gotten exceptions to rules, why not now.

ITS BECAUSE THEY DON'T WORK AS ADVERTISED YET YOU THUNDERING IDIOT.
They cannot get an exception to this rule. And they do work, you just don't want them to since that might fuck with your ability to play with your deadly toys.

Oh yeah?

Shocking test results for the Armatix iP1 “smart gun”

Once paired, a “cold start” still requires a minimum of seven push-button commands and a duration of 12 seconds before the gun can be fired.

The pistol must be within 10 inches of the watch during “start up.” This slows and complicates the use of the pistol if one hand is injured or otherwise unavailable.

and why can't the police get an exception?
Because the local Barney Fifes cannot import weapons.

Then why don't the feds start using them?

and I noticed you didn't answer the technical part of this.

THEY DON'T WORK.
 
They have already offered to but the NRA is still saying no. N.J. Lawmakers Compromise on Smart-Gun Legislation

it would still force sellers to have them in inventory, even if they are not proven.

Just repeal the law, no need for compromise.
We can require business to stock things, if we wish to. We, not they, set the rules. Deal with it.

So I can require a Jewish Butcher to stock Pork?
Nope, that would have a 1st amendment problem but requiring a gun store to sell smart guns is the same as requiring a boating supply store to sell life jackets, or life boats.

So your original statement required clarification? BIG fucking surprise from an oxygen thief such as yourself.
It only required it because you are too fucking stupid to understand business regulations.
 
THEY CAN'T GET THEM HERE. How many times do I have to fucking say this???

The police have always gotten exceptions to rules, why not now.

ITS BECAUSE THEY DON'T WORK AS ADVERTISED YET YOU THUNDERING IDIOT.
They cannot get an exception to this rule. And they do work, you just don't want them to since that might fuck with your ability to play with your deadly toys.

Oh yeah?

Shocking test results for the Armatix iP1 “smart gun”

Once paired, a “cold start” still requires a minimum of seven push-button commands and a duration of 12 seconds before the gun can be fired.

The pistol must be within 10 inches of the watch during “start up.” This slows and complicates the use of the pistol if one hand is injured or otherwise unavailable.

and why can't the police get an exception?
Because the local Barney Fifes cannot import weapons.

Then why don't the feds start using them?

and I noticed you didn't answer the technical part of this.

THEY DON'T WORK.
They do work, more than well enough for the market, which you will not allow to work.
 

Forum List

Back
Top