Zone1 Yet another hoax by Darwinian "scientists." But this one was tragic - Human zoos

[alang1216]

Not science now. Now we must "trust the science". Now, we cannot "question the science"

Untrue. You're confusing science with religion.

 

[SweetSue92]

Untrue. You're confusing science with religion.

Oh. No one said "trust the science" in the last three years?

huh

 

[alang1216]

Oh. No one said "trust the science" in the last three years?

huh

Science is well aware it does not have a monopoly on the truth and that is part of the self-correction. Evidence interpretation and explanatory theories are constantly questioned but the fundamental scientific processes are well proven and can be trusted.

 

[Woodznutz]

By definition, science is the study of the natural world. Many have tried to study the supernatural but have failed.


Right, because nature could never create something as intricate as a snowflake.

Science is the study of God's creation.

I would credit God with creating the process that produces these designs.

 

[Woodznutz]

Nothing wrong with faith unless you want to learn something new.

We don't know how to properly deal with the 'old' yet. Even in sports when things go off the rails the coaches return to 'fundamentals'.

Disorder is not order.

 

[Woodznutz]

Science is well aware it does not have a monopoly on the truth and that is part of the self-correction. Evidence interpretation and explanatory theories are constantly questioned but the fundamental scientific processes are well proven and can be trusted.

Science deals with effects.
Religion deals with causes.
We should work together.

 

[alang1216]

Science is the study of God's creation.

I would credit God with creating the process that produces these designs.

So why not credit God with creating evolution?

 

[alang1216]

We don't know how to properly deal with the 'old' yet. Even in sports when things go off the rails the coaches return to 'fundamentals'.

Disorder is not order.

Poverty and disease were much more common even 100 years ago than they are today. I think it is fair to say we have science to thank for that. I don't see that religion played any part.

 

[alang1216]

Science deals with effects.
Religion deals with causes.
We should work together.

Science deals with the natural world.
Religion deals with the moral and spiritual world.
Working together and respecting the other is always a good idea.

 

[Woodznutz]

Poverty and disease were much more common even 100 years ago than they are today. I think it is fair to say we have science to thank for that. I don't see that religion played any part.

Actually, science did examine the Jewish tradition of cleanliness during the various plagues that stuck Europe in the Dark Ages. They fared much better than the 'gentiles' around them and because of this were even accused of spreading these diseases. Sadly, simple sanitation measures, and quarantining the sick, continued to be ignored for centuries.

Science hasn't had much impact on poverty. The poor are still with us. Religion suggests that "if a man won't work, he shouldn't eat." Many have chosen not to work, thus...poverty.

 

[Woodznutz]

Science deals with the natural world.
Religion deals with the moral and spiritual world.
Working together and respecting the other is always a good idea.

Then you need to amend your statement in post #28.

 

[Woodznutz]

So why not credit God with creating evolution?

There is no evidence to support it.

 

[cnm]

Chimps do not evolve into apes and apes do not evolve into humans. Turtles do not evolve into birds etc. There is evolution within a distinct species.

???

 

[cnm]

So why not credit God with creating evolution?

There is no evidence to support it.

I love it.

 

[alang1216]

Actually, science did examine the Jewish tradition of cleanliness during the various plagues that stuck Europe in the Dark Ages. They fared much better than the 'gentiles' around them and because of this were even accused of spreading these diseases. Sadly, simple sanitation measures, and quarantining the sick, continued to be ignored for centuries.

Anti-Semitic Karma strikes again.

Science hasn't had much impact on poverty. The poor are still with us. Religion suggests that "if a man won't work, he shouldn't eat." Many have chosen not to work, thus...poverty.

If you compare the poverty of today with that of the past the difference is dramatic. For much of history it was barely possible to grow more food than you needed for yourself.

 

[AMart]

???

Do you not understand English?

 

[alang1216]

Then you need to amend your statement in post #28.

I don't why? It is a good thing if they work together, sadly, it is also a rare thing.

 

[alang1216]

There is no evidence to support it.

Except, like snowflakes, results are there for all to see. ID can't explain the continuous creation of new species in the fossil record unless you believe ID is also a continuous process. If that is the case it would be indistinguishable from classic evolution.

 

[Woodznutz]

I don't why? It is a good thing if they work together, sadly, it is also a rare thing.

If you don't believe religion has any part in finding solutions, we can hardly cooperate, can we?

 

[Woodznutz]

Except, like snowflakes, results are there for all to see. ID can't explain the continuous creation of new species in the fossil record unless you believe ID is also a continuous process. If that is the case it would be indistinguishable from classic evolution.

The fossil/geological pattern is "ruin/restoration", which is God's pattern. The restoration of Genesis One is the prime written example of this.

All creatures found in the fossil record were fully developed with no evidence of having evolved or evolving.