Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- Thread starter
- #441
We all know that one can use a gun to stop a crime and not have to fire it.Not the national news. It's not news unless someone gets killed.
Even you can't be so stupid to think that simply because something doesn't get national coverage that it didn't happen
Either he knows and is simply trolling...or he actually thinks that.....which one do you think it is...?
It is a fantasy. You have posted many defenses that didn't involve shooting yet made the news.
So there are many times where there is no shooting at all even though a gun was used. Those instances do not make the news
And shows we should have smart guns.
It shows no such thing.
Your statement shows there is no downside to smart guns.
Of course there is.We all know that one can use a gun to stop a crime and not have to fire it.It is a fantasy. You have posted many defenses that didn't involve shooting yet made the news.
So there are many times where there is no shooting at all even though a gun was used. Those instances do not make the news
And shows we should have smart guns.
It shows no such thing.
Your statement shows there is no downside to smart guns.
There are many actually but here's just one.
A guy and his wife are walking the streets of Boston in the winter taking in the sights and two piece of shit criminals set upon them so the guy pulls his gun and then politely asks the two piece of shit thugs to kindly wait while he takes his solves off so the fingerprint scanner can then disengage the safety of his gun.
You were just arguing that defenses don't involve shooting. That being the case the above contradicts your previous claim. Also one can pull a glove off and grab a gun quite fast.