You Democrats Need To.....

[Sbiker]

I think if Trump wins and makes American Media stop slandering Russia, many of you will be very surprised to find out that Fury is absolutely right.

"Makes" the Media stop? So you are against freedom of speech and instead approve of dictatorship of the media by a president?

Don't do a poker face If your president just stop to pay money for the anti-russian propaganda, we will see a changed situation....

Have you seen, for example, Graham Phillips, one of free, independent journalists, at your TV? So, how could you believe in "freedom" of your media?

By "free and independent", do you mean on the Kremlin payroll?

No, I mean free and independent, as it possible: Graham Phillips

I know, what are the bots on the Kremlin payroll - they periodically attacking me at Russian forums, because I'm "foreign agent", "anti-russian liberal" and how they usually saying "shaking a boat" by asking simple questions...

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I think if Trump wins and makes American Media stop slandering Russia, many of you will be very surprised to find out that Fury is absolutely right.

"Makes" the Media stop? So you are against freedom of speech and instead approve of dictatorship of the media by a president?

Don't do a poker face If your president just stop to pay money for the anti-russian propaganda, we will see a changed situation....

Have you seen, for example, Graham Phillips, one of free, independent journalists, at your TV? So, how could you believe in "freedom" of your media?

By "free and independent", do you mean on the Kremlin payroll?

No, I mean free and independent, as it possible: Graham Phillips

I know, what are the bots on the Kremlin payroll - they periodically attacking me at Russian forums, because I'm "foreign agent", "anti-russian liberal" and how they usually saying "shaking a boat" by asking simple questions...

Graham Phillips is employed by Russia Today, which is owned and controlled directly by the Kremlin. You are aware of that, right?

 

[Sbiker]

I think if Trump wins and makes American Media stop slandering Russia, many of you will be very surprised to find out that Fury is absolutely right.

"Makes" the Media stop? So you are against freedom of speech and instead approve of dictatorship of the media by a president?

Don't do a poker face If your president just stop to pay money for the anti-russian propaganda, we will see a changed situation....

Have you seen, for example, Graham Phillips, one of free, independent journalists, at your TV? So, how could you believe in "freedom" of your media?

By "free and independent", do you mean on the Kremlin payroll?

No, I mean free and independent, as it possible: Graham Phillips

I know, what are the bots on the Kremlin payroll - they periodically attacking me at Russian forums, because I'm "foreign agent", "anti-russian liberal" and how they usually saying "shaking a boat" by asking simple questions...

Graham Phillips is employed by Russia Today, which is owned and controlled directly by the Kremlin. You are aware of that, right?

I know it, but Russia Today works as a world media, it cannot seriously distort a facts...

Emm, ok RT is financed by Kremlin... Do you think, at US media space must work only media, financed by US? Why? How it coexists with freedom?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

"Makes" the Media stop? So you are against freedom of speech and instead approve of dictatorship of the media by a president?

Don't do a poker face If your president just stop to pay money for the anti-russian propaganda, we will see a changed situation....

Have you seen, for example, Graham Phillips, one of free, independent journalists, at your TV? So, how could you believe in "freedom" of your media?

By "free and independent", do you mean on the Kremlin payroll?

No, I mean free and independent, as it possible: Graham Phillips

I know, what are the bots on the Kremlin payroll - they periodically attacking me at Russian forums, because I'm "foreign agent", "anti-russian liberal" and how they usually saying "shaking a boat" by asking simple questions...

Graham Phillips is employed by Russia Today, which is owned and controlled directly by the Kremlin. You are aware of that, right?

I know it, but Russia Today works as a world media, it cannot seriously distort a facts...

Emm, ok RT is financed by Kremlin... Do you think, at US media space must work only media, financed by US? Why? How it coexists with freedom?

I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Is English not your first language?

 

[Stratford57]

By "free and independent", do you mean on the Kremlin payroll?

Actually Sbiker lives in Russia if you noticed. And you don't. So, which of you two can judge both Kremlin&Western sources and see which one actually tells more truth about Russia?

 

[Sbiker]

Don't do a poker face If your president just stop to pay money for the anti-russian propaganda, we will see a changed situation....

Have you seen, for example, Graham Phillips, one of free, independent journalists, at your TV? So, how could you believe in "freedom" of your media?

By "free and independent", do you mean on the Kremlin payroll?

No, I mean free and independent, as it possible: Graham Phillips

I know, what are the bots on the Kremlin payroll - they periodically attacking me at Russian forums, because I'm "foreign agent", "anti-russian liberal" and how they usually saying "shaking a boat" by asking simple questions...

Graham Phillips is employed by Russia Today, which is owned and controlled directly by the Kremlin. You are aware of that, right?

I know it, but Russia Today works as a world media, it cannot seriously distort a facts...

Emm, ok RT is financed by Kremlin... Do you think, at US media space must work only media, financed by US? Why? How it coexists with freedom?

I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Is English not your first language?

Yes, offcourse, English is not my first language... So, almost all US media are sponsored by US finances - is it true? Maybe it would be necessary to have some media in US, sponsored by Kremlin, to have an opportunity to know different opinions?

 

[Sbiker]

By "free and independent", do you mean on the Kremlin payroll?

Actually Sbiker lives in Russia if you noticed. And you don't. So, which of you two can judge both Kremlin&Western sources and see which one tells more truth about Russia?

And don't forget - agents of Putin are coming... They're seeking me to prove the freedom absence in Russia to DISGRUNTLED_AMERICAN

 

[theDoctorisIn]

By "free and independent", do you mean on the Kremlin payroll?

No, I mean free and independent, as it possible: Graham Phillips

I know, what are the bots on the Kremlin payroll - they periodically attacking me at Russian forums, because I'm "foreign agent", "anti-russian liberal" and how they usually saying "shaking a boat" by asking simple questions...

Graham Phillips is employed by Russia Today, which is owned and controlled directly by the Kremlin. You are aware of that, right?

I know it, but Russia Today works as a world media, it cannot seriously distort a facts...

Emm, ok RT is financed by Kremlin... Do you think, at US media space must work only media, financed by US? Why? How it coexists with freedom?

I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Is English not your first language?

Yes, offcourse, English is not my first language... So, almost all US media are sponsored by US finances - is it true? Maybe it would be necessary to have some media in US, sponsored by Kremlin, to have an opportunity to know different opinions?

There are no US media sources that are funded by the US government.

 

[Sbiker]

No, I mean free and independent, as it possible: Graham Phillips

I know, what are the bots on the Kremlin payroll - they periodically attacking me at Russian forums, because I'm "foreign agent", "anti-russian liberal" and how they usually saying "shaking a boat" by asking simple questions...

Graham Phillips is employed by Russia Today, which is owned and controlled directly by the Kremlin. You are aware of that, right?

I know it, but Russia Today works as a world media, it cannot seriously distort a facts...

Emm, ok RT is financed by Kremlin... Do you think, at US media space must work only media, financed by US? Why? How it coexists with freedom?

I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Is English not your first language?

Yes, offcourse, English is not my first language... So, almost all US media are sponsored by US finances - is it true? Maybe it would be necessary to have some media in US, sponsored by Kremlin, to have an opportunity to know different opinions?

There are no US media sources that are funded by the US government.

Even CNN?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Graham Phillips is employed by Russia Today, which is owned and controlled directly by the Kremlin. You are aware of that, right?

I know it, but Russia Today works as a world media, it cannot seriously distort a facts...

Emm, ok RT is financed by Kremlin... Do you think, at US media space must work only media, financed by US? Why? How it coexists with freedom?

I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Is English not your first language?

Yes, offcourse, English is not my first language... So, almost all US media are sponsored by US finances - is it true? Maybe it would be necessary to have some media in US, sponsored by Kremlin, to have an opportunity to know different opinions?

There are no US media sources that are funded by the US government.

Even CNN?

CNN is owned by Ted Turner and Turner Broadcasting. It gets no funding from the US government.

 

[boilermaker55]

Name the failures.
Not your conjectures.
What was unemployment when he took office compared to what it is today.
What was the stock market then as today.
List the failures.
Not the conjectures you have.

The OP believes that Putin is a better leader....and more likely to follow the law...than Obama. It's awesome.

Lol, you still think Obama is a leader. Bless your heart.

Yes he is...and has done quite well as President these last 7 + years.

He is a failure, racial unrest is high, healthcare sucks even Hillary is stating it, foreign policy sucks. Just to name a few.

 

[jknowgood]

Name the failures.
Not your conjectures.
What was unemployment when he took office compared to what it is today.
What was the stock market then as today.
List the failures.
Not the conjectures you have.

The OP believes that Putin is a better leader....and more likely to follow the law...than Obama. It's awesome.

Lol, you still think Obama is a leader. Bless your heart.

Yes he is...and has done quite well as President these last 7 + years.

He is a failure, racial unrest is high, healthcare sucks even Hillary is stating it, foreign policy sucks. Just to name a few.

Let's start with the Iran deal, more up to date.
Obamacare, even Hillary is running against it.
Unemployment is still high. If it wasn't people would be getting off welfare in record numbers.
The red line he drew with his crayon.
Just to name a few.

 

[boilermaker55]

The Iran deal is a conjecture on your part along with those that opposed the deal.
Will it work? Maybe.
ACA allows millions to get on an insurance for better health care.
What is the rights proposal?
Unemployment, as much as you hate to admit, has been dropping since President Obama took office.

Name the failures.
Not your conjectures.
What was unemployment when he took office compared to what it is today.
What was the stock market then as today.
List the failures.
Not the conjectures you have.

The OP believes that Putin is a better leader....and more likely to follow the law...than Obama. It's awesome.

Lol, you still think Obama is a leader. Bless your heart.

Yes he is...and has done quite well as President these last 7 + years.

He is a failure, racial unrest is high, healthcare sucks even Hillary is stating it, foreign policy sucks. Just to name a few.

Let's start with the Iran deal, more up to date.
Obamacare, even Hillary is running against it.
Unemployment is still high. If it wasn't people would be getting off welfare in record numbers.
The red line he drew with his crayon.
Just to name a few.

 

[jknowgood]

The Iran deal is a conjecture on your part along with those that opposed the deal.
Will it work? Maybe.
ACA allows millions to get on an insurance for better health care.
What is the rights proposal?
Unemployment, as much as you hate to admit, has been dropping since President Obama took office.

Name the failures.
Not your conjectures.
What was unemployment when he took office compared to what it is today.
What was the stock market then as today.
List the failures.
Not the conjectures you have.

Lol, you still think Obama is a leader. Bless your heart.

Yes he is...and has done quite well as President these last 7 + years.

He is a failure, racial unrest is high, healthcare sucks even Hillary is stating it, foreign policy sucks. Just to name a few.

Let's start with the Iran deal, more up to date.
Obamacare, even Hillary is running against it.
Unemployment is still high. If it wasn't people would be getting off welfare in record numbers.
The red line he drew with his crayon.
Just to name a few.

Then why do we have record number on welfare?

 

[Igrok_]

By the way, Russia still has a lot of pro-soviet people even among young generation. Many people support Stalin and dream about good days of USSR. Mostly these ones support mr. Putin and watch federal TV. Not so far, yesterday, there were news about painting monument of Stalin in Crimea, and most of commentators were supporting Stalin, not the painters. Even commentaries with facts about killed by USSR and Stalin's regime relatives got negative marks. So, till now there is a chance that when this generation grows and starts rule the country we could see another tens of millions killed only because they have another way of thinking than such communists and putin-supporters.

Here is the link on news: В Крыму осквернили мемориальную доску Сталина

PS. Anyway if in 20th century people from Russia had a small chance to live in normal conditions in western countries, nowadays it seems like West is becoming not so different from USSR tyranny by supporting the freedom of sin and prosecuting whose who against it.

 

[Timmy]

The Iran deal is a conjecture on your part along with those that opposed the deal.
Will it work? Maybe.
ACA allows millions to get on an insurance for better health care.
What is the rights proposal?
Unemployment, as much as you hate to admit, has been dropping since President Obama took office.

Name the failures.
Not your conjectures.
What was unemployment when he took office compared to what it is today.
What was the stock market then as today.
List the failures.
Not the conjectures you have.

Yes he is...and has done quite well as President these last 7 + years.

He is a failure, racial unrest is high, healthcare sucks even Hillary is stating it, foreign policy sucks. Just to name a few.

Let's start with the Iran deal, more up to date.
Obamacare, even Hillary is running against it.
Unemployment is still high. If it wasn't people would be getting off welfare in record numbers.
The red line he drew with his crayon.
Just to name a few.

Then why do we have record number on welfare?

You mean food stamps . Most people on stamps work.

And that stamps boost is due to end this spring I believe .

But go ahead and pretend unemployment is at 30% (lol) because it doesn't fit your agenda .

 

[jknowgood]

The Iran deal is a conjecture on your part along with those that opposed the deal.
Will it work? Maybe.
ACA allows millions to get on an insurance for better health care.
What is the rights proposal?
Unemployment, as much as you hate to admit, has been dropping since President Obama took office.

Name the failures.
Not your conjectures.
What was unemployment when he took office compared to what it is today.
What was the stock market then as today.
List the failures.
Not the conjectures you have.

He is a failure, racial unrest is high, healthcare sucks even Hillary is stating it, foreign policy sucks. Just to name a few.

Let's start with the Iran deal, more up to date.
Obamacare, even Hillary is running against it.
Unemployment is still high. If it wasn't people would be getting off welfare in record numbers.
The red line he drew with his crayon.
Just to name a few.

Then why do we have record number on welfare?

You mean food stamps . Most people on stamps work.

And that stamps boost is due to end this spring I believe .

But go ahead and pretend unemployment is at 30% (lol) because it doesn't fit your agenda .

If the economy was booming there would be plenty of good paying jobs available, people would be getting off welfare. They aren't a lot of good paying jobs available, so people stay on welfare. So the economy isn't booming. So are you saying the unemployment rate is at 5% with part time jobs, because of obamacare?

 

[Syriusly]

Why else would you hate against a man seeking stronger stiffer laws against homo's raping children?

Why do you only care about child rape when it is a 'homo's raping' them?

Why are you so in love with a man who invades his neighbors- and kills those who dare complain about him?

Why are so many Conservatives so in love with a former KGB totalitarian like Putin?

 

[DarkFury]

Why else would you hate against a man seeking stronger stiffer laws against homo's raping children?

Why do you only care about child rape when it is a 'homo's raping' them?

Why are you so in love with a man who invades his neighbors- and kills those who dare complain about him?

Why are so many Conservatives so in love with a former KGB totalitarian like Putin?

I have written MANY threads against ALL forms of rape. So your first comment is a LIE.

He invaded the Ukraine to secure his weapons from being STOLEN and used against another.

"Former KGB" just like Bush was "Former CIA"

 

[Syriusly]

Why else would you hate against a man seeking stronger stiffer laws against homo's raping children?

Why do you only care about child rape when it is a 'homo's raping' them?

Why are you so in love with a man who invades his neighbors- and kills those who dare complain about him?

Why are so many Conservatives so in love with a former KGB totalitarian like Putin?

I have written MANY threads against ALL forms of rape. So your first comment is a LIE.

He invaded the Ukraine to secure his weapons from being STOLEN and used against another.

"Former KGB" just like Bush was "Former CIA"

LOL- quite the love fest for the totalitarian Putin.

Lets see- Russia today- quite the capitalist paradise there that Putin has made it.....

The spread of corruption in contemporary Russia
A notable worsening of this ranking for Russia – from 90th place to 126th – occurred at the beginning of Vladimir Putin's second term as president; a drop of 36 places in only one year

Russia is the 51st best country in the world for doing business in- the United States is #7
Ease of doing business index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Russia's middle class, according to the Russian business journal Kommersant, has remained stable for the past 15 years at approximately 20% of the population.

Meanwhile- how concerned is Putin about 'rape'?

Stopping Sexual Abuse of Children in Russia

Russia is now one of the main producers of child pornography in the world, and it registers significant incidences of child prostitution and child trafficking for sexual purposes, according to the Russian National Consultation on the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children.


St. Petersburg and northwestern Russia report a high incidence of sex tourism, which is widely advertised on the Internet and is aimed at people from neighboring Scandinavian countries. Child prostitution is the most common form of child exploitation in that region.

Meanwhile of course- dissent is not tolerated in Russia- journalists are arrested, political opponents assasinated.