You know what happens when you launch multiple stun grenades into peaceful J6 crowds?

[pyetro]

Read the twitter thread. Innocent Americans were attacked on January 6 by the police. It was all a setup by Pelosi.

According to the textbook "Police Field Operations: Theory Meets Practice" by Michael Birzer and Cliff Roberson: "Stun grenades, also known as flashbangs, are designed to temporarily disorient and distract a suspect while law enforcement officers conduct a raid or make an arrest. These devices should only be used in situations where there is a clear and present danger to officers or other individuals, and where other methods of apprehension have been deemed ineffective or too risky. Stun grenades should be deployed by trained professionals who understand their potential hazards and have taken steps to mitigate any unintended consequences." (Birzer and Roberson, 2018, p. 155)

The OP thought he could equate a stun grenade with a nuclear bomb. LOL

 

[Coyote]

We get another show trial J6 hearing?


Just with better information.

How is a selective release through a far right outlet better information?

 

[CowboyTed]

All I saw were a crowd of people standing around peacefully exercising their constitutional rights.

Then the cops started bombing them with smoke and gas grenades.

Guess that wasn't such a good idea.

The cops got their asses handed to them.

They were trespassing, they had already broken down barriers to get there...

There was violence happening at that time...

They were told to disperse and they refused...

So Tear Gas... If this happened with black protestors you be asking why aren't they opening fire...

 

[Lesh]

Read the twitter thread. Innocent Americans were attacked on January 6 by the police. It was all a setup by Pelosi.

But wait...I thought these people were FBI plants?

Now they were justified in their violence because police used tear gas and flash bangs to move them back after they breeched police barricades?

That's what made them chant "Hang Mike Pence"?

That's what made them search for Nacy Pelosi to "put a bullet in her brain"?

That's what made them invade the Senate and House Chambers?

 

[toobfreak]

How is a selective release through a far right outlet better information?

First of all, who says there is anything "selective" going on other than just showing the public some of the video that the J6 committee refused to show and excluded and the FBI have fought so long to suppress?

Cheney had months and years to spin her case as she saw fit, now the rest of us will have some reference to see how hard her spin was!

If the J6 protest was as bad and clear-cut as we've been told now for two years, how can more evidence from that day possibly change that---

---unless the committee's claims have all been dishonest, exaggerated and a lie to what really happened?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Looked like the only people being violent there were the cops.

Smoke is an effective measure for crowds that are refusing lawful orders. They had already broken through barricades to get to those locations.

Charging horsemen with sabers are better. If its good enough for MacArthur against the Bonus Army, its good enough for you!

 

[toobfreak]

They were trespassing, they had already broken down barriers to get there...

Guess you ain't bright enough to remember many of the police taking the barriers down and waving the crowd in. It isn't possible to trespass in your own Capitol building, or maybe you never read the DOI where it says that government operates at the CONSENT of the people?

There was violence happening at that time...

Post the video.

They were told to disperse and they refused...

There is your only valid point. Even though you are only guessing unless you have audio of that moment, they likely were but I guess the 9,000 behind them didn't get the message! Too bad Nancy refused to bring in the added security that Trump had requested!

If this happened with black protestors you be asking why aren't they opening fire...

Shove your racism and hate up your ass .. .. .. this was not some casual looting of Walmart as has happened a hundred times, this was the people of the country following the dictates of our Founders over a highly specious and disputed, illegal national election to seek redress of their grievances before that bum was formalized into an office he does not merit by integrity, honesty, nor clear electoral decision.

 

[toobfreak]

Charging horsemen with sabers are better. If its good enough for MacArthur against the Bonus Army, its good enough for you!

Few things in this world are good enough for me!

 

[Zincwarrior]

Few things in this world are good enough for me!

Mucho respect!

 

[Lesh]

It isn't possible to trespass in your own Capitol building,

The hell it isn't

Too bad Nancy refused to bring in the added security that he had requested!

You bitch that "Nancy" didn't have adequate police presence (she wasn't responsible for that) and then you bitch at how those few police were used to defend against that MAGA riot?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Here's how they used to clear the Capital:

 

[Winco]

They spend their entire lives in denial.

Raised by idiot parents who were raised by idiot parents. What can you say?

Why are you calling your parents and grandparents idiots?

 

[Coyote]

First of all, who says there is anything "selective" going on other than just showing the public some of the video that the J6 committee refused to show and excluded and the FBI have fought so long to suppress?

Cheney had months and years to spin her case as she saw fit, now the rest of us will have some reference to see how hard her spin was!

If the J6 protest was as bad and clear-cut as we've been told now for two years, how can more evidence from that day possibly change that---

---unless the committee's claims have all been dishonest, exaggerated and a lie to what really happened?

If they don’t show all of it or make it all freely available, then yes,it is a selective release by definition. Why are they afraid to release all of It?

IMO, either release none or release all.

 

[toobfreak]

If they don’t show all of it or make it all freely available, then yes,it is a selective release by definition.

But wait. It was the J6 committee and the FBI who refused to show all of it or to release it to the public! Jamie Raskin said it was all so dangerous to allow the general public freedom of access to everything to decide freely for themselves! All these people (Tucker, et al) are doing now is picking through the massive volume of video taken from that day to allow us to see those things which were left out of the J6 show trial so that we can see it ALL and see both sides all around so we can really make up our own minds what the truth is rather than having that fat slut Cheney try to TELL US what to think.

If the J6 Committee was really giving us and the DOJ the skinny, then seeing ALL of the video recorded that afternoon-- both what the J6C AND Tucker's people will find, can only FURTHER CEMENT THEIR CONCLUSIONS, if just, accurate and fair. No one ever learned MORE from LESS information, right?

 

[Skylar]

Read the twitter thread. Innocent Americans were attacked on January 6 by the police. It was all a setup by Pelosi.

There are a lot of cuts in that video. Why?

'Smoking guns' don't usually look Liam Neeson climbing a fence in a Taken movie.

 

[Coyote]

But wait. It was the J6 committee and the FBI who refused to show all of it or to release it to the public! Jamie Raskin said it was all so dangerous to allow the general public freedom of access to everything to decide freely for themselves! All these people (Tucker, et al) are doing now is picking through the massive volume of video taken from that day to allow us to see those things which were left out of the J6 show trial so that we can see it ALL and see both sides all around so we can really make up our own minds what the truth is rather than having that fat slut Cheney try to TELL US what to think.

I think you miss the issue.

The J6 Committee did not release anything to just one news outlet did they?

McCarthy released all to just one outlet with a known bias, to pick and choose what to release.

Are you ok with that?

How would you react if the Pelosi had realized it ALL but only to Daily Kos to pick and choose what to release?

Aren’t you concerned that selective release by Carlson could endanger individual police acting in defense of tbe Capitol and the peop,e working there?

 

[Lesh]

I think you miss the issue.

The J6 Committee did not release anything to just one news outlet did they?

McCarthy released all to just one outlet with a known bias, to pick and choose what to release.

Are you ok with that?

How would you react if the Pelosi had realized it ALL but only to Daily Kos to pick and choose what to release?

Aren’t you concerned that selective release by Carlson could endanger individual police acting in defense of tbe Capitol and the peop,e working there?

They are not.

In fact they are using these cherry picked releases to ATTACK the police

 

[Coyote]

They are not.

In fact they are using these cherry picked releases to ATTACK the police

So much for their hypocritical “support the blue” right?

 

[jc456]

How is a selective release through a far right outlet better information?

It’s information withheld. Why?

 

[toobfreak]

The J6 Committee did not release anything to just one news outlet did they?

I couldn't tell you, but I imagine after selectively assembling the salient bits telling the story the way they wanted it told, they tried to release it everywhere.

What I assume Tucker and Co will do is look for the stuff that the J6C DIDN'T release to anyone and release THAT stuff now to anyone interested which adds to the overall picture of what happened that day. This will be the test whether the J6C was truthful or not and how much so.

McCarthy released all to just one outlet with a known bias, to pick and choose what to release.

So what? It is still evidence from that day. And it will probably be NEW evidence. So your complaint is that they are only releasing it to a very few people willing to look at it or that they AREN'T releasing to others who are?

Can you give me a list of any major MSM news outlets which WANT to see this additional info to which Tucker has refused? I have to figure that even if very limited in release, it will make its way around the globe to everyone interested in time.

And if the outlet getting it is very biased (name one that isn't), then all the others have to do is look at the material themselves and offer up anything wrong with their analysis and why with proof. BTW, how many of these same outlets had ANY criticism of any of the J6C's releases or conclusions? Maybe if they had openly included more republicans as picked by the GOP to stand on the committee, we wouldn't have this issue now?

I think we should wait to see what, if anything new and interesting or revelatory that Tucker finds and their analysis and conclusions first before we get our hair all in a dander. After all, isn't this exactly how the J6 committee operated? They picked and chose to the exclusion of other parties then drew their conclusions and mapped it out according to their sole dialog on a big screen televised all around the planet giving the finger to anyone who complained.

Now it's the other side's turn (which if still left to the democrats, no one ever would had any chance of ever seeing or doing).