Youtube Being Censored, We Can't Question the Government on Youtube

[ChrisL]

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Really though? Fondly? I doubt you've ever felt that way towards a conservative for any reason. Lol. And if it WAS conservatives saying such things, you would laugh it off and call them paranoid. Let's be honest.

Actually I have quite a few conservative friends- actual conservatives- who are actually concerned by what Russia is doing.

And I am old enough to remember when Conservatives couldn't stop talking about the dangerous Russkies- now the Trump Conservatards want to talk about anything but how the Russians tried to influence our election.

Flacal tries to make a big deal out of how the number of American intelligence agencies was blown up- but conveniently ignores that the 3 intelligence agencies actually responsible for investigating Russian interference all concluded that the Russians did try to influence our election.

Nobody thinks it's a big deal except agenda driven liberals. You people have been screaming and crying incessantly since Hillary lost the election. She lost because she was a terrible candidate.

 

[Syriusly]

Still waiting for you to have the balls to try to stand up to your claims:
a) That I am a socialist
b) That I don't understand economics or business or
c) That you do.

Because as I pointed out before- so far all you are doing is pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold.

Or you can just admit you were lying.

I already did. You cut off, like, most of my post. If you're going to be that intellectually dishonest, and THAT obvious about it, replies to you are a waste of time.

You mean I cut off the part where you were pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold?

You called me a socialist- because I disagreed with you- like the majority of economists- regarding FDR.

And that- that is not only intellectually dishonest- it is just down right idiotic.

'Economists' is merely an appeal to authority fallacy with no citations to back it up. Only Keynsian economists agree with FDR, and they're frauds.

You cite a total of 2 or 3 economists- that is your appeal to authority fallacy.

Your description of FDR causing the Great Depression is just your appeal to idiocy.

You asked her and she provided the links for you.

Yes indeed- she provided 2 links- one to one economist- and one to a paper authoried by 2 economists- I have read them before because we have had this discussion before.

That was his/her/its appeal to authority fallacy.

None of those economists claim that FDR 'caused' the Great Depression- as Pumpkin has claimed- they claim that his policies exacerbated it.

Most economists disagree. There is no way for us to definitively know now- we do know that FDR became President after the Great Depression started- and it was over before he died while still President.

I strongly suggest you read more about the events leading up to FDR's election- the United States was on the verge of anarchy- farmers had already taken action in a few places in the United States shutting down cities due to the crisis. In my opinion- based upon both my reading of history- and based upon the opinions of other economists- FDR both prevented a possible collapse of government in the Midwest- but also ended the Great Depression.

 

[ChrisL]

I already did. You cut off, like, most of my post. If you're going to be that intellectually dishonest, and THAT obvious about it, replies to you are a waste of time.

You mean I cut off the part where you were pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold?

You called me a socialist- because I disagreed with you- like the majority of economists- regarding FDR.

And that- that is not only intellectually dishonest- it is just down right idiotic.

'Economists' is merely an appeal to authority fallacy with no citations to back it up. Only Keynsian economists agree with FDR, and they're frauds.

You cite a total of 2 or 3 economists- that is your appeal to authority fallacy.

Your description of FDR causing the Great Depression is just your appeal to idiocy.

You asked her and she provided the links for you.

Yes indeed- she provided 2 links- one to one economist- and one to a paper authoried by 2 economists- I have read them before because we have had this discussion before.

That was his/her/its appeal to authority fallacy.

None of those economists claim that FDR 'caused' the Great Depression- as Pumpkin has claimed- they claim that his policies exacerbated it.

Most economists disagree. There is no way for us to definitively know now- we do know that FDR became President after the Great Depression started- and it was over before he died while still President.

I strongly suggest you read more about the events leading up to FDR's election- the United States was on the verge of anarchy- farmers had already taken action in a few places in the United States shutting down cities due to the crisis. In my opinion- based upon both my reading of history- and based upon the opinions of other economists- FDR both prevented a possible collapse of government in the Midwest- but also ended the Great Depression.

You asked for links. She provided them, and now you are poo-pooing the source. Like this is surprising? Like she didn't SAY that this is what you would do?

 

[Syriusly]

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Really though? Fondly? I doubt you've ever felt that way towards a conservative for any reason. Lol. And if it WAS conservatives saying such things, you would laugh it off and call them paranoid. Let's be honest.

Actually I have quite a few conservative friends- actual conservatives- who are actually concerned by what Russia is doing.

And I am old enough to remember when Conservatives couldn't stop talking about the dangerous Russkies- now the Trump Conservatards want to talk about anything but how the Russians tried to influence our election.

Flacal tries to make a big deal out of how the number of American intelligence agencies was blown up- but conveniently ignores that the 3 intelligence agencies actually responsible for investigating Russian interference all concluded that the Russians did try to influence our election.

Nobody thinks it's a big deal except agenda driven liberals. You people have been screaming and crying incessantly since Hillary lost the election. She lost because she was a terrible candidate.

See here is where you just are vomiting back the Trump fake news.

I never once mentioned Hillary. I never once claimed that Russian interference cost her the election- you are just parroting Trump's claims.

What I am pointing out is that Russia absolutely tried to influence the election- for their own purposes. And President Trump has spent the last year denying this.

And you are okay with both Trump's lies- and Russia's attack on our Democracy.

 

[ChrisL]

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Really though? Fondly? I doubt you've ever felt that way towards a conservative for any reason. Lol. And if it WAS conservatives saying such things, you would laugh it off and call them paranoid. Let's be honest.

Actually I have quite a few conservative friends- actual conservatives- who are actually concerned by what Russia is doing.

And I am old enough to remember when Conservatives couldn't stop talking about the dangerous Russkies- now the Trump Conservatards want to talk about anything but how the Russians tried to influence our election.

Flacal tries to make a big deal out of how the number of American intelligence agencies was blown up- but conveniently ignores that the 3 intelligence agencies actually responsible for investigating Russian interference all concluded that the Russians did try to influence our election.

Nobody thinks it's a big deal except agenda driven liberals. You people have been screaming and crying incessantly since Hillary lost the election. She lost because she was a terrible candidate.

See here is where you just are vomiting back the Trump fake news.

I never once mentioned Hillary. I never once claimed that Russian interference cost her the election- you are just parroting Trump's claims.

What I am pointing out is that Russia absolutely tried to influence the election- for their own purposes. And President Trump has spent the last year denying this.

And you are okay with both Trump's lies- and Russia's attack on our Democracy.

Are you okay with Hillary's lies and the DNC looking at you like a pawn?

 

[Syriusly]

You mean I cut off the part where you were pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold?

You called me a socialist- because I disagreed with you- like the majority of economists- regarding FDR.

And that- that is not only intellectually dishonest- it is just down right idiotic.

'Economists' is merely an appeal to authority fallacy with no citations to back it up. Only Keynsian economists agree with FDR, and they're frauds.

You cite a total of 2 or 3 economists- that is your appeal to authority fallacy.

Your description of FDR causing the Great Depression is just your appeal to idiocy.

You asked her and she provided the links for you.

Yes indeed- she provided 2 links- one to one economist- and one to a paper authoried by 2 economists- I have read them before because we have had this discussion before.

That was his/her/its appeal to authority fallacy.

None of those economists claim that FDR 'caused' the Great Depression- as Pumpkin has claimed- they claim that his policies exacerbated it.

Most economists disagree. There is no way for us to definitively know now- we do know that FDR became President after the Great Depression started- and it was over before he died while still President.

I strongly suggest you read more about the events leading up to FDR's election- the United States was on the verge of anarchy- farmers had already taken action in a few places in the United States shutting down cities due to the crisis. In my opinion- based upon both my reading of history- and based upon the opinions of other economists- FDR both prevented a possible collapse of government in the Midwest- but also ended the Great Depression.

You asked for links. She provided them, and now you are poo-pooing the source. Like this is surprising? Like she didn't SAY that this is what you would do?

When did I ask for links?

I challenged her to prove that I was a Socialist- as she claimed.

Her 'proof' was that I agreed with some of FDR's policies.

 

[ChrisL]

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Really though? Fondly? I doubt you've ever felt that way towards a conservative for any reason. Lol. And if it WAS conservatives saying such things, you would laugh it off and call them paranoid. Let's be honest.

Actually I have quite a few conservative friends- actual conservatives- who are actually concerned by what Russia is doing.

And I am old enough to remember when Conservatives couldn't stop talking about the dangerous Russkies- now the Trump Conservatards want to talk about anything but how the Russians tried to influence our election.

Flacal tries to make a big deal out of how the number of American intelligence agencies was blown up- but conveniently ignores that the 3 intelligence agencies actually responsible for investigating Russian interference all concluded that the Russians did try to influence our election.

Nobody thinks it's a big deal except agenda driven liberals. You people have been screaming and crying incessantly since Hillary lost the election. She lost because she was a terrible candidate.

See here is where you just are vomiting back the Trump fake news.

I never once mentioned Hillary. I never once claimed that Russian interference cost her the election- you are just parroting Trump's claims.

What I am pointing out is that Russia absolutely tried to influence the election- for their own purposes. And President Trump has spent the last year denying this.

And you are okay with both Trump's lies- and Russia's attack on our Democracy.

Pretty much anything you say about Trump or any conservative politician can easily be turned around on you to describe your own horrid candidate. In fact, he was the BETTER candidate because he addressed issues and didn't stick with a social justice agenda. You liberals need to get your priorities straight.

 

[ChrisL]

'Economists' is merely an appeal to authority fallacy with no citations to back it up. Only Keynsian economists agree with FDR, and they're frauds.

You cite a total of 2 or 3 economists- that is your appeal to authority fallacy.

Your description of FDR causing the Great Depression is just your appeal to idiocy.

You asked her and she provided the links for you.

Yes indeed- she provided 2 links- one to one economist- and one to a paper authoried by 2 economists- I have read them before because we have had this discussion before.

That was his/her/its appeal to authority fallacy.

None of those economists claim that FDR 'caused' the Great Depression- as Pumpkin has claimed- they claim that his policies exacerbated it.

Most economists disagree. There is no way for us to definitively know now- we do know that FDR became President after the Great Depression started- and it was over before he died while still President.

I strongly suggest you read more about the events leading up to FDR's election- the United States was on the verge of anarchy- farmers had already taken action in a few places in the United States shutting down cities due to the crisis. In my opinion- based upon both my reading of history- and based upon the opinions of other economists- FDR both prevented a possible collapse of government in the Midwest- but also ended the Great Depression.

You asked for links. She provided them, and now you are poo-pooing the source. Like this is surprising? Like she didn't SAY that this is what you would do?

When did I ask for links?

I challenged her to prove that I was a Socialist- as she claimed.

Her 'proof' was that I agreed with some of FDR's policies.

How else would you prove something to some online partisan? Lol!

 

[Syriusly]

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Really though? Fondly? I doubt you've ever felt that way towards a conservative for any reason. Lol. And if it WAS conservatives saying such things, you would laugh it off and call them paranoid. Let's be honest.

Actually I have quite a few conservative friends- actual conservatives- who are actually concerned by what Russia is doing.

And I am old enough to remember when Conservatives couldn't stop talking about the dangerous Russkies- now the Trump Conservatards want to talk about anything but how the Russians tried to influence our election.

Flacal tries to make a big deal out of how the number of American intelligence agencies was blown up- but conveniently ignores that the 3 intelligence agencies actually responsible for investigating Russian interference all concluded that the Russians did try to influence our election.

Nobody thinks it's a big deal except agenda driven liberals. You people have been screaming and crying incessantly since Hillary lost the election. She lost because she was a terrible candidate.

See here is where you just are vomiting back the Trump fake news.

I never once mentioned Hillary. I never once claimed that Russian interference cost her the election- you are just parroting Trump's claims.

What I am pointing out is that Russia absolutely tried to influence the election- for their own purposes. And President Trump has spent the last year denying this.

And you are okay with both Trump's lies- and Russia's attack on our Democracy.

Are you okay with Hillary's lies and the DNC looking at you like a pawn?

I am not okay with Hillary's lies- and as more has come out regarding those lies I am less unhappy that she lost- though the alternative is Trump.

Are you okay with Trump's lies, and Russia looking at you like a pawn?

 

[Syriusly]

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Really though? Fondly? I doubt you've ever felt that way towards a conservative for any reason. Lol. And if it WAS conservatives saying such things, you would laugh it off and call them paranoid. Let's be honest.

Actually I have quite a few conservative friends- actual conservatives- who are actually concerned by what Russia is doing.

And I am old enough to remember when Conservatives couldn't stop talking about the dangerous Russkies- now the Trump Conservatards want to talk about anything but how the Russians tried to influence our election.

Flacal tries to make a big deal out of how the number of American intelligence agencies was blown up- but conveniently ignores that the 3 intelligence agencies actually responsible for investigating Russian interference all concluded that the Russians did try to influence our election.

Nobody thinks it's a big deal except agenda driven liberals. You people have been screaming and crying incessantly since Hillary lost the election. She lost because she was a terrible candidate.

See here is where you just are vomiting back the Trump fake news.

I never once mentioned Hillary. I never once claimed that Russian interference cost her the election- you are just parroting Trump's claims.

What I am pointing out is that Russia absolutely tried to influence the election- for their own purposes. And President Trump has spent the last year denying this.

And you are okay with both Trump's lies- and Russia's attack on our Democracy.

Pretty much anything you say about Trump or any conservative politician can easily be turned around on you to describe your own horrid candidate. In fact, he was the BETTER candidate because he addressed issues and didn't stick with a social justice agenda. You liberals need to get your priorities straight.

Well he got elected- so he was a 'better candidate' in that sense.

And pretty much anything you say about Clinton- is describing Trump to the third power.

 

[Syriusly]

You cite a total of 2 or 3 economists- that is your appeal to authority fallacy.

Your description of FDR causing the Great Depression is just your appeal to idiocy.

You asked her and she provided the links for you.

Yes indeed- she provided 2 links- one to one economist- and one to a paper authoried by 2 economists- I have read them before because we have had this discussion before.

That was his/her/its appeal to authority fallacy.

None of those economists claim that FDR 'caused' the Great Depression- as Pumpkin has claimed- they claim that his policies exacerbated it.

Most economists disagree. There is no way for us to definitively know now- we do know that FDR became President after the Great Depression started- and it was over before he died while still President.

I strongly suggest you read more about the events leading up to FDR's election- the United States was on the verge of anarchy- farmers had already taken action in a few places in the United States shutting down cities due to the crisis. In my opinion- based upon both my reading of history- and based upon the opinions of other economists- FDR both prevented a possible collapse of government in the Midwest- but also ended the Great Depression.

You asked for links. She provided them, and now you are poo-pooing the source. Like this is surprising? Like she didn't SAY that this is what you would do?

When did I ask for links?

I challenged her to prove that I was a Socialist- as she claimed.

Her 'proof' was that I agreed with some of FDR's policies.

How else would you prove something to some online partisan? Lol!

Like Trump- Pumpkin feels free to lie about people online- just Pumpkin feels braver about her lies because she is anonymous.

 

[Syriusly]

"They tell US at USMB what content we can't allow if we want their ad service."


flacaltenn can you give examples of what you'd like to allow, but are unable to allow, due to restrictions imposed by google..?

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I'm quite sure that Russian ads and trolls didn't influence the outcome of the election, regardless of what the dems claim.

Why are you so very sure? Myself- I don't know- personally I think it is immaterial because Trump was legally elected. But I think we should find out- because I really don't want Russia being able think it can get away with turning enough votes to change America's election results.

 

[Valerie]

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

your patent dishonesty is showing...




our country is currently being toyed with and attacked by russia.

"None of these facts is seriously in question. And they're reflected in the consensus conclusion of our intelligence agencies."

Bouncing Ball

Russia is at war with our democracy; will we defend it?

Guess what shoe Mueller will drop next

Trump's attack on the FBI is an attack on the US constitution itself

 

[Syriusly]

And just because- here is an interesting response to Pumpkin's claims about the Depression

Causes of the Great Depression - Wikipedia

In a survey of economic historians conducted by Robert Whaples, Professor of Economics at Wake Forest University, anonymous questionnaires were sent to members of the Economic History Association. Members were asked to either disagree, agree, or agree with provisos with the statement that read: "Taken as a whole, government policies of the New Deal served to lengthen and deepen the Great Depression." While only 6% of economic historians who worked in the history department of their universities agreed with the statement, 27% of those that work in the economics department agreed. Almost an identical percent of the two groups (21% and 22%) agreed with the statement "with provisos" (a conditional stipulation), while 74% of those who worked in the history department, and 51% in the economic department disagreed with the statement outright.[76]

There are arguments on both sides of the issue regarding whether FDR's policies prolonged the Great Depression or not- but no one but Pumpkin girl argues that somehow FDR went back in a time machine and started the Great Depression.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Orwell’s “1984” was supposed be a warning about political correctness and censorship, but our Psychocrats are trying to use it as their instruction manual.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

But I think we should find out- because I really don't want Russia being able think it can get away with turning enough votes to change America's election results.

That belief of yours has long been discredited. Time to give it up.
I
The ONLY collusion with Russia was with the Democrats

 

[Carl in Michigan]

but Pumpkin girl argues that somehow FDR went back in a time machine and started the Great Depression.

You lie!

Show us where she said that.

YOUR credibility is at stake.

 

[Pogo]

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Really though? Fondly? I doubt you've ever felt that way towards a conservative for any reason. Lol. And if it WAS conservatives saying such things, you would laugh it off and call them paranoid. Let's be honest.

Actually I have quite a few conservative friends- actual conservatives- who are actually concerned by what Russia is doing.

And I am old enough to remember when Conservatives couldn't stop talking about the dangerous Russkies- now the Trump Conservatards want to talk about anything but how the Russians tried to influence our election.

Flacal tries to make a big deal out of how the number of American intelligence agencies was blown up- but conveniently ignores that the 3 intelligence agencies actually responsible for investigating Russian interference all concluded that the Russians did try to influence our election.

Nobody thinks it's a big deal except agenda driven liberals. You people have been screaming and crying incessantly since Hillary lost the election. She lost because she was a terrible candidate.

See here is where you just are vomiting back the Trump fake news.

I never once mentioned Hillary. I never once claimed that Russian interference cost her the election- you are just parroting Trump's claims.

What I am pointing out is that Russia absolutely tried to influence the election- for their own purposes. And President Trump has spent the last year denying this.

And you are okay with both Trump's lies- and Russia's attack on our Democracy.

Pretty much anything you say about Trump or any conservative politician can easily be turned around on you to describe your own horrid candidate. In fact, he was the BETTER candidate because he addressed issues and didn't stick with a social justice agenda. You liberals need to get your priorities straight.

Oh PLEASE. Rump was the world class clown candidate. He sold "feelings", which is exactly the same thing he told his fraudulent university to do --- "you don't sell products, benefits or solutions; you sell FEELINGS". "Feelings" like Mexican rapists jumping over a fence so we'll build a wall and they'll pay for it. "Feelings" like "umma ban Muslims until we figure out what the hell is going on". "Feelings" like "knock the crap out of 'im".

It was a sale sold by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing of any substance. Pure snake oil. And anyone who bought that line of con artistry is a freaking dolt.

 

[skye]

Orwell’s “1984” was supposed be a warning about political correctness and censorship, but our Psychocrats are trying to use it as their instruction manual.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

The last time I bothered replying to your economically illiterate ass was in a thread regarding FDR.

Still waiting for you to have the balls to try to stand up to your claims:
a) That I am a socialist
b) That I don't understand economics or business or
c) That you do.

Because as I pointed out before- so far all you are doing is pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold.

Or you can just admit you were lying.

I already did. You cut off, like, most of my post. If you're going to be that intellectually dishonest, and THAT obvious about it, replies to you are a waste of time.

You mean I cut off the part where you were pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold?

You called me a socialist- because I disagreed with you- like the majority of economists- regarding FDR.

And that- that is not only intellectually dishonest- it is just down right idiotic.

No, I mean you cut off the part you disagreed with and didn't bother debunking it because you know it's true. In other words, you're being the most common type of Socialist; One who ignores all contrary points instead of debunking them and just repeats himself.

I called you a socialist because you agree with FDR's policies, which are Socialist and factually did not work, because Socialism does not work. He extended the Great Depression by many years.

"Socialism" has nothing in the world to do with "points" or "debunking" anything.

"Ignoring points", especially documented ones like that chart I put up, isn't "Socialism" either. That's just abject and obtuse Denialism. As you've continue to demonstrate by digging yourself deeper into this "FDR brought the Depression" canard, even though it wasn't your revisionist claim in the first place. That poster at least had the presence of mind to run away and hide when he was called on it.

'Economists' is merely an appeal to authority fallacy with no citations to back it up. Only Keynsian economists agree with FDR, and they're frauds.

And that right there is a No True Scotsman fallacy.

I didn't see any poster run away, and I haven't ignored anything. I pointed out that the graph didn't help your point since the graph isn't what caused the Depression, it was a result of the recession. We face a recession every so often, the government implemented policies that turned the recession into a depression, which was elaborated upon in the links you didn't bother reading.