Youtube Being Censored, We Can't Question the Government on Youtube

[ChrisL]

"They tell US at USMB what content we can't allow if we want their ad service."


flacaltenn can you give examples of what you'd like to allow, but are unable to allow, due to restrictions imposed by google..?

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I'm quite sure that Russian ads and trolls didn't influence the outcome of the election, regardless of what the dems claim.

 

[ChrisL]

You can use Vimeo for music videos. I don't know if they have any other types of videos though.

Vimeo is a profit based platform


For politics, it seems to all be going to either Steemit or Bitchute.

What do you mean profit based? Aren't they all profit based? That is why they have ads and sponsors. Anyhow, you can go on Vimeo and search and post videos just like you can on YouTube, I think, and that's really the only thing I use YouTube for. Let's see.

 

[del]

That's a dangerously low bar since the NYTimes, the WashPo, CNN and the networks are doing MOST of the lying and the lying by omission....

Link?


Yeah --- guess not.

LIST: 24 Pieces of MSM Fake News in 5 Days

Oh, there's more..

Journalists Who Were Caught Lying

35 things the media reported as FACTS that were later found to be total lies

---- and the comparison table is where again?

Oh yeah --- MIA.

Dumbass.

PergDerp sez "muh proof"

Here's one fer ya:

"2. (Huffington Post, New York Times, FiveThirtyEight, et al.) Hillary Has a 98% Chance of Winning The Election"

Some links are dead, any you have in question, just consult me, and I'll straighten ya right out, k? My Google-Fu is strong, grasshoppa!

25 Fake News Stories From The Mainstream Media - IVN.us

being wrong about an election prediction isn't fake news

y'all trumplings got some very elastic definitions of things

 

[ChrisL]

That's a dangerously low bar since the NYTimes, the WashPo, CNN and the networks are doing MOST of the lying and the lying by omission....

Link?


Yeah --- guess not.

LIST: 24 Pieces of MSM Fake News in 5 Days

Oh, there's more..

Journalists Who Were Caught Lying

35 things the media reported as FACTS that were later found to be total lies

---- and the comparison table is where again?

Oh yeah --- MIA.

Dumbass.

PergDerp sez "muh proof"

Here's one fer ya:

"2. (Huffington Post, New York Times, FiveThirtyEight, et al.) Hillary Has a 98% Chance of Winning The Election"

Some links are dead, any you have in question, just consult me, and I'll straighten ya right out, k? My Google-Fu is strong, grasshoppa!

25 Fake News Stories From The Mainstream Media - IVN.us

being wrong about an election prediction isn't fake news

y'all trumplings got some very elastic definitions of things

Lol!

 

[Pogo]

"They tell US at USMB what content we can't allow if we want their ad service."


flacaltenn can you give examples of what you'd like to allow, but are unable to allow, due to restrictions imposed by google..?

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I'm quite sure that Russian ads and trolls didn't influence the outcome of the election, regardless of what the dems claim.

You mean regardless what the content of this and similar message boards claim?

"Three million Amish mobilize to vote for Rump" --- read that here.
"Hillary a no-show at rally, replaced by hologram" --- read that here.
"Hillary has Parkinson's" --- read that here.
"Hillary has dementia" --- read that here.
"Hillary has cancer" --- read that here.
"Clintons kill FBI agent" --- read that here.
"Bill Clinton's secret black son" --- read that here.

Etc etc etc etc etc.....

 

[ChrisL]

"They tell US at USMB what content we can't allow if we want their ad service."


flacaltenn can you give examples of what you'd like to allow, but are unable to allow, due to restrictions imposed by google..?

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I'm quite sure that Russian ads and trolls didn't influence the outcome of the election, regardless of what the dems claim.

You mean regardless what the content of this and similar message boards claim?

"Three million Amish mobilize to vote for Rump" --- read that here.
"Hillary a no-show at rally, replaced by hologram" --- read that here.
"Hillary has Parkinson's" --- read that here.
"Hillary has dementia" --- read that here.
"Hillary has cancer" --- read that here.
"Clintons kill FBI agent" --- read that here.
"Bill Clinton's secret black son" --- read that here.

Etc etc etc etc etc.....

This is not really anything different than what our candidates say about one another OR anything that was or is said about Trump.

 

[Pogo]

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I'm quite sure that Russian ads and trolls didn't influence the outcome of the election, regardless of what the dems claim.

You mean regardless what the content of this and similar message boards claim?

"Three million Amish mobilize to vote for Rump" --- read that here.
"Hillary a no-show at rally, replaced by hologram" --- read that here.
"Hillary has Parkinson's" --- read that here.
"Hillary has dementia" --- read that here.
"Hillary has cancer" --- read that here.
"Clintons kill FBI agent" --- read that here.
"Bill Clinton's secret black son" --- read that here.

Etc etc etc etc etc.....

This is not really anything different than what our candidates say about one another OR anything that was or is said about Trump.

I must say I've watched a lot of political campaigns and have yet to see anything like a candy claiming "my opponent didn't show up and was replaced by a hologram".

 

[ChrisL]

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I'm quite sure that Russian ads and trolls didn't influence the outcome of the election, regardless of what the dems claim.

You mean regardless what the content of this and similar message boards claim?

"Three million Amish mobilize to vote for Rump" --- read that here.
"Hillary a no-show at rally, replaced by hologram" --- read that here.
"Hillary has Parkinson's" --- read that here.
"Hillary has dementia" --- read that here.
"Hillary has cancer" --- read that here.
"Clintons kill FBI agent" --- read that here.
"Bill Clinton's secret black son" --- read that here.

Etc etc etc etc etc.....

This is not really anything different than what our candidates say about one another OR anything that was or is said about Trump.

I must say I've watched a lot of political campaigns and have yet to see anything like a candy claiming "my opponent didn't show up and was replaced by a hologram".

Well, I heard nothing about that, and I can tell you that no Russians or Pogos can influence me or my decisions when it comes to important elections.

 

[Syriusly]

Face it, America: YouTube and Facebook have got ya by the short and curlies. The question is: Will you choose freedom or convenience? I wish they had a competitor, but they don't. I'm certain there's a market for one. I'd prefer one that is neutral, like USMB, because I don't care to be in a right-wing echo chamber, either.

Not sure how they have me by the 'short hairs'.

I rarely use Youtube but when I do it is great for finding video's on how to repair my car.

As far as FB- FB doesn't prevent me from posting anything I am interested in posting- great way to keep me in touch with my far flung family and friends though.

I bet they would if it was right-wing political stuff(unlikely to happen). After a couple times of that, they'd reduce the number of your "friends" that see what you post to like 7 or something. You could have 600 people on your friends list, but only 7 would see it.

They're definitely manipulating the narrative, as is Google.

Believe whatever you will.

Not as if there is anything anyone could say which would convince you otherwise.

 

[Syriusly]

"They tell US at USMB what content we can't allow if we want their ad service."


flacaltenn can you give examples of what you'd like to allow, but are unable to allow, due to restrictions imposed by google..?

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

 

[skye]

 

[Marion Morrison]

Face it, America: YouTube and Facebook have got ya by the short and curlies. The question is: Will you choose freedom or convenience? I wish they had a competitor, but they don't. I'm certain there's a market for one. I'd prefer one that is neutral, like USMB, because I don't care to be in a right-wing echo chamber, either.

Not sure how they have me by the 'short hairs'.

I rarely use Youtube but when I do it is great for finding video's on how to repair my car.

As far as FB- FB doesn't prevent me from posting anything I am interested in posting- great way to keep me in touch with my far flung family and friends though.

I bet they would if it was right-wing political stuff(unlikely to happen). After a couple times of that, they'd reduce the number of your "friends" that see what you post to like 7 or something. You could have 600 people on your friends list, but only 7 would see it.

They're definitely manipulating the narrative, as is Google.

Believe whatever you will.

Not as if there is anything anyone could say which would convince you otherwise.

You could prove that what people post, all their "friends" can see.

Good luck, because I know better.

 

[Syriusly]

There's no hurry on figuring out those dates. I understand it may take some research. Especially with blinders on.

Perhaps a visual aid will help. Note the years listed on the bottom axis:

​

Oh look --- there's one of the dates I mentioned right there on the chart. That's a clue for ya.

So are these numbers "fake"?

See that spike at the right edge of the pink area? The one marked "March 15, 1933 Dow gained 15.34%, largest one-day gain")?

That point would be eleven days after FDR was inaugurated.

Now look at the plunge marked "Great Depression" (the pink area) and essplain to the class how Roosevelt came into office and "brought" that retroactively.

This oughta be a hoot.

FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate

The Stock Crash is a symptom, not a cause of the Great Depression, so the chart doesn't help your case at all.

How FDR Made the Depression Worse | Robert Higgs

FDR's policies, practically all of them, increased the cost of living and made it harder to do business. He made the Recession we were already experiencing worse in every way.

As I said earlier, combine inability to afford hiring employees with the government forcing your business to hire more employees, and your economy is destroyed. In this particular case, your economy is plunged into a Depression and then dragged through it for many years.

Are you seriously claiming the period from 1929 through 1933 was a recession and not a depression? Kind of goofy since you also claim the crash of '29 was a "symptom" of the Grear Depression but call it a recession in '33.

The beginning of "the Great Depression" was a recession, which only became a Depression when FDR decided to screw things up more. Don't hurt yourself too much pretending to think about it.

Your post and claim is complete bullcrap only an uneducated fool could make. When FDR was inaugurated into the Presidency unemployment was over 30% and hundreds of banks had gone broke and closed their doors leaving funds unavailable and lost to depositors. What kind of jerk would call that a recession? In other words, the banks being broke prevented people from getting their cash out of the bank. Referring to 1933 USA as being in a recession instead of a depression is jackassery or outright lying.

It fits his anti-FDR revisionist history.

 

[ChrisL]

"They tell US at USMB what content we can't allow if we want their ad service."


flacaltenn can you give examples of what you'd like to allow, but are unable to allow, due to restrictions imposed by google..?

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Really though? Fondly? I doubt you've ever felt that way towards a conservative for any reason. Lol. And if it WAS conservatives saying such things, you would laugh it off and call them paranoid. Let's be honest.

 

[Syriusly]

Okay- prove all of those things.

Go for it.

This should be interesting.

Because so far all you are doing is pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold.

The last time I bothered replying to your economically illiterate ass was in a thread regarding FDR.

Still waiting for you to have the balls to try to stand up to your claims:
a) That I am a socialist
b) That I don't understand economics or business or
c) That you do.

Because as I pointed out before- so far all you are doing is pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold.

Or you can just admit you were lying.

I already did. You cut off, like, most of my post. If you're going to be that intellectually dishonest, and THAT obvious about it, replies to you are a waste of time.

You mean I cut off the part where you were pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold?

You called me a socialist- because I disagreed with you- like the majority of economists- regarding FDR.

And that- that is not only intellectually dishonest- it is just down right idiotic.

I called you a socialist because you agree with FDR's policies, which are Socialist and factually did not work, because Socialism does not work. He extended the Great Depression by many years..

Like I said- you called me a socialist because I disagreed with you.

I agree with some of FDR's policies and not with others.

To you that makes me a Socialist.

And you calling me a Socialist makes it clear to you me that you are just another partisan idiot.

 

[Syriusly]

Okay- prove all of those things.

Go for it.

This should be interesting.

Because so far all you are doing is pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold.

The last time I bothered replying to your economically illiterate ass was in a thread regarding FDR.

Still waiting for you to have the balls to try to stand up to your claims:
a) That I am a socialist
b) That I don't understand economics or business or
c) That you do.

Because as I pointed out before- so far all you are doing is pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold.

Or you can just admit you were lying.

I already did. You cut off, like, most of my post. If you're going to be that intellectually dishonest, and THAT obvious about it, replies to you are a waste of time.

You mean I cut off the part where you were pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold?

You called me a socialist- because I disagreed with you- like the majority of economists- regarding FDR.

And that- that is not only intellectually dishonest- it is just down right idiotic.

'Economists' is merely an appeal to authority fallacy with no citations to back it up. Only Keynsian economists agree with FDR, and they're frauds.

You cite a total of 2 or 3 economists- that is your appeal to authority fallacy.

Your description of FDR causing the Great Depression is just your appeal to idiocy.

 

[Syriusly]

It is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.

Google is a private company. And can enter any rules. In Russia, long accustomed to the fact that any Western company can without any announcement delete messages or entire accounts for any reason

Want real freedom of speech - this can only provide decentralized networks. For example, ZeroNet. Not surprisingly, in ZeroNet the first place among all users is occupied by the Chinese. Surprisingly, the second place is occupied by Americans Apparently, someone in the US is not satisfied with the current system.

So if USMB didn't like what you said, or lets say that you liked Trump and just because your LIKE TRUMP and post him proudly DOES USMB HAVE THE RIGHT TO CENSOR YOU RIGHT THE FK OFF THIER BOARD BECAUSE IT'S THEIR RIGHT TO DO SO........ YOU TARDS HAVEN'T A CLUE WTF FREE SPEECH AND RIGHTS EVEN ARE.

ONLY WHEN IT'S ONE SIDED AND FITS YOUR RETARD BOX..

USMB could kick me off of USMB because I said I like the color purple.

As Americans we have free speech rights- which means our speech is supposedly protected against government censorship- but an individual business can censor content anyway it wants.

Which is why newspapers censor letters to the editors.

 

[ChrisL]

It's very important to start using other companies when these companies start to get too big for their britches. They must be hit in the pocketbook because that is the only place that it will hurt.

 

[ChrisL]

The last time I bothered replying to your economically illiterate ass was in a thread regarding FDR.

Still waiting for you to have the balls to try to stand up to your claims:
a) That I am a socialist
b) That I don't understand economics or business or
c) That you do.

Because as I pointed out before- so far all you are doing is pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold.

Or you can just admit you were lying.

I already did. You cut off, like, most of my post. If you're going to be that intellectually dishonest, and THAT obvious about it, replies to you are a waste of time.

You mean I cut off the part where you were pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold?

You called me a socialist- because I disagreed with you- like the majority of economists- regarding FDR.

And that- that is not only intellectually dishonest- it is just down right idiotic.

'Economists' is merely an appeal to authority fallacy with no citations to back it up. Only Keynsian economists agree with FDR, and they're frauds.

You cite a total of 2 or 3 economists- that is your appeal to authority fallacy.

Your description of FDR causing the Great Depression is just your appeal to idiocy.

You asked her and she provided the links for you.

 

[Syriusly]

"They tell US at USMB what content we can't allow if we want their ad service."


flacaltenn can you give examples of what you'd like to allow, but are unable to allow, due to restrictions imposed by google..?

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Really though? Fondly? I doubt you've ever felt that way towards a conservative for any reason. Lol. And if it WAS conservatives saying such things, you would laugh it off and call them paranoid. Let's be honest.

Actually I have quite a few conservative friends- actual conservatives- who are actually concerned by what Russia is doing.

And I am old enough to remember when Conservatives couldn't stop talking about the dangerous Russkies- now the Trump Conservatards want to talk about anything but how the Russians tried to influence our election.

Flacal tries to make a big deal out of how the number of American intelligence agencies was blown up- but conveniently ignores that the 3 intelligence agencies actually responsible for investigating Russian interference all concluded that the Russians did try to influence our election.