12/19/2022: Trump Criminal Referral Day

[Harry Dresden]

A slew of meritless, bad faith ‘investigations’ motivated solely by blind partisan revenge.

jones calling something partisan.....i wonder if he thinks his posts are partisan?........

 

[Lastamender]

Apparently a criminal referral from the J6 Committee won't carry much, if any, weight with the DOJ - so the experts say. However, I think it will carry some weight. Regardless, it serves as a great historical document on one of the darkest days in American history.

That day was darkened when Congress refused to investigate the election. That was the coup right there.

 

[Toro]

That day was darkened when Congress refused to investigate the election. That was the coup right there.

Lastdeadender hates the COTUS and America.

LOL

 

[Lastamender]

Lastdeadender hates the COTUS and America.

LOL

Fake news.

 

[Toro]

Fake news.

You supported a coup and a cult.

LOL

Keep thinking you're "American" Lastdeadender.

 

[Kilroy2]

Please explain to the class what part of "peacefully and patriotically march to the capitol" is "inciting a riot".

Spoiler Alert: You're an idiot.

So in your professional opinion the capital riots was not a riot but a peaceful and patriotic gathering of trump supports. Who happen to believe he won and the election was stolen. You know most marches start out as peaceful but then quickly turn into riots. IF you all had just held hands and sung then it would have been peaceful.

I can understand the looting because they wanted mementos of this occasion and visit to Washington. If Trump was a real leader he would have been there with you.

Think of the photo opportunities missed

 

[RhodyPatriot]

So in your professional opinion the capital riots was not a riot

No, Killjoy.

My objective and nuanced analysis actually permits me to accept the fact there was a capitol riot, but also - Trump didn't instigate it.

For one thing, the riot began before he was even done with his speech....miles away.

For another? He never said anything that anyone could remotely charge was a promotion of violence. Not one tiny teeny little shred of a sentence.

And if he had, you'd be quoting it over and over again ad nauseum because your FAKE NEWS would be shouting it interminably from the heavens.

I am sorry you continue to fall for the grift.

Maybe a self assessment is in order.

 

[Arresmillao]

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House committee investigating the Capitol riot will make its final public presentation Monday about the unprecedented effort by Donald Trump to overturn the results of the presidential election he lost in 2020. The committee has called it an “attempted coup” that warrants criminal prosecution from the Justice Department.

That is expected to be the committee’s closing argument as it wraps up a year-and-a-half-long inquiry and prepares to release a final report detailing its findings about the insurrection in the nation’s capital on Jan. 6, 2021, as Congress was certifying Joe Biden’s presidential victory. The committee of seven Democrats and two Republicans is set to dissolve at the end of the year.

Monday’s meeting will be the committee’s 11th public session since forming in July 2021. One of the first hearings, on June 9, was viewed by more than 20 million people.

What to watch for in Monday’s meeting at 1 p.m. EST:

Much more at the link below...

What To Watch As Jan. 6 Panel Cites Trump’s ‘Attempted Coup’​

Should be entertaining and informative. What do you think?

Just one of multiple criminal cases he is facing...

 

[Delldude]

Jan. 6 Panel Eyes Recommending 3 Criminal Charges For Trump​

1. Insurrection, an uprising aiming to overthrow the government
2. Obstructing an official proceeding
3. Conspiracy to defraud the United States

They put themselves into a corner. If they didn't come up with anything, they'd be the laughing stalk of DC.
J3 is coming!!!

 

[1srelluc]

It’s far long past time that this country stop treating this person as it has been treating him for the past two years— as some sort of distressing anomaly or curiosity to be tolerated and managed, and instead treat him like any other person who makes calculated, violent threats against our justice system and the people who uphold it. Trump occupies a peculiar place in our history, one that should by any reasonable measure hold him to a higher standard of behavior. That is an implicit bargain that an elected official submits to — willingly or not — when he is placed in an office of public trust. The fact that Trump refuses to accept that precept doesn’t negate it; rather, it makes its enforcement all the more critical.

We have to stop coddling this guy or making excuses for him. We have to stop tolerating the excuses others make for him. He’s a menace, a clear and present danger, deliberately trying to be cute and clever by couching his terminology in a twisted and grotesque simulation of what he thinks will pass as “patriotism.” And wrapping himself in the cloak of what he thinks will pass muster as “free speech.”

But this isn’t patriotic. Read it again in the context of someone who incited an insurrection against a lawful election, and keeping in mind the person who is saying this, his position, and his implicit (and explicit) duty and responsibility:


And please don’t pretend that “dealt with” means anything less than what is obvious. This isn’t a message of complaint or protest against government overreach or malfeasance, in the context of who is delivering it. It is a threat, from a former president and a now-declared candidate for the same office.

This is sedition, and it’s an evocation — and exhortation — to violence and terrorism to achieve that.

Garland and Smith, please. Do. Your. Jobs.

 

[Lakhota]

It’s far long past time that this country stop treating this person as it has been treating him for the past two years— as some sort of distressing anomaly or curiosity to be tolerated and managed, and instead treat him like any other person who makes calculated, violent threats against our justice system and the people who uphold it. Trump occupies a peculiar place in our history, one that should by any reasonable measure hold him to a higher standard of behavior. That is an implicit bargain that an elected official submits to — willingly or not — when he is placed in an office of public trust. The fact that Trump refuses to accept that precept doesn’t negate it; rather, it makes its enforcement all the more critical.

We have to stop coddling this guy or making excuses for him. We have to stop tolerating the excuses others make for him. He’s a menace, a clear and present danger, deliberately trying to be cute and clever by couching his terminology in a twisted and grotesque simulation of what he thinks will pass as “patriotism.” And wrapping himself in the cloak of what he thinks will pass muster as “free speech.”

But this isn’t patriotic. Read it again in the context of someone who incited an insurrection against a lawful election, and keeping in mind the person who is saying this, his position, and his implicit (and explicit) duty and responsibility:


And please don’t pretend that “dealt with” means anything less than what is obvious. This isn’t a message of complaint or protest against government overreach or malfeasance, in the context of who is delivering it. It is a threat, from a former president and a now-declared candidate for the same office.

This is sedition, and it’s an evocation — and exhortation — to violence and terrorism to achieve that.

Garland and Smith, please. Do. Your. Jobs.

Amen!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Jan. 6 Panel Eyes Recommending 3 Criminal Charges For Trump​

1. Insurrection, an uprising aiming to overthrow the government
2. Obstructing an official proceeding
3. Conspiracy to defraud the United States

If it in fact turns out that Nancy and democrats coordinated with the FBI and Capitol Police to effect a Reichstag Fire event, we should seek the death penalty for treason for all of them

 

[Lakhota]

If it in fact turns out that Nancy and democrats coordinated with the FBI and Capitol Police to effect a Reichstag Fire event, we should seek the death penalty for treason for all of them

Funny. All those conspiracy theories have been debunked.

 

[Lakhota]

Jan. 6 Panel Eyes Recommending 3 Criminal Charges For Trump​

1. Insurrection, an uprising aiming to overthrow the government
2. Obstructing an official proceeding
3. Conspiracy to defraud the United States

Trump has done it all in plain sight.

 

[scruffy]

Jan. 6 Panel Eyes Recommending 3 Criminal Charges For Trump​

1. Insurrection, an uprising aiming to overthrow the government
2. Obstructing an official proceeding
3. Conspiracy to defraud the United States

That's it? That's all?

That's all they got from two years of dog and pony, WITH professional Hollywood production?

Democraps are totally fucking INCOMPETENT. They couldn't find an elephant sticking out of a haystack, couldn't manage their way out of a paper bag

 

[scruffy]

I said ONE of the darkest days. However, it was darker than 9/11 - and had the potential to be much, much darker.

The only place darker than your brain is your heart.

 

[Lakhota]

That's it? That's all?

That's all they got from two years of dog and pony, WITH professional Hollywood production?

Democraps are totally fucking INCOMPETENT. They couldn't find an elephant sticking out of a haystack, couldn't manage their way out of a paper bag

Sounds like a lot to me! If convicted - Trump would never see the light of day.

 

[scruffy]

Funny. All those conspiracy theories have been debunked.

By paid democommie astroturfing?

Only in your self mutilating fantasies

 

[scruffy]

Sounds like a lot to me! If convicted - Trump would never see the light of day.

Yawn. Wake me up when there's a charge.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Funny. All those conspiracy theories have been debunked.