125,000 jobs

Yup, that was October's job creation report. It will be dismissed here by the usual leftist knob slobbers. But it indicates a slowing, calcifying economy that isn't getting better by the Fed throwing 85B/mo at the stock market.
Worst economic recovery on record. Maybe Obama can apologize for that while he's at it.

Agreed.

Not that the $85 billion a month was ever intended to help the employment situation.

All that's designed to do is stabilize the banksters. None of that money is going into the economy.


The MASTERS know perfectly well the economy we had is never coming back.

You don't?

I'm surprised, Rab, you always struck me as a reality based thinker
 
Not bad considering that we don't make anything here anymore and many other jobs have been eliminated through automation.

Wrong.

We make Big Macs and Fries.

Those are the type of jobs Conservatives want Americans to have.

And long as they're not paid too much.

Yup.

Can't cut into the mountains of gold that are grabbed by the Conservative lords and masters, the "Kabillionaires".

Because if you do? They will flee the country.

Then what would happen??

:confused:
 
Wrong.

We make Big Macs and Fries.

Those are the type of jobs Conservatives want Americans to have.

And long as they're not paid too much.

Yup.

Can't cut into the mountains of gold that are grabbed by the Conservative lords and masters, the "Kabillionaires".

Because if you do? They will flee the country.

Then what would happen??

:confused:



We'll all perish without their guidance and beneficence.
 
Yup, that was October's job creation report. It will be dismissed here by the usual leftist knob slobbers. But it indicates a slowing, calcifying economy that isn't getting better by the Fed throwing 85B/mo at the stock market.
Worst economic recovery on record. Maybe Obama can apologize for that while he's at it.

Agreed.

Not that the $85 billion a month was ever intended to help the employment situation.

All that's designed to do is stabilize the banksters. None of that money is going into the economy.


The MASTERS know perfectly well the economy we had is never coming back.

You don't?

I'm surprised, Rab, you always struck me as a reality based thinker

dewd.... <sigh>

I heard the same shit when Carter was president. Over and over and over.

Even the moron himself believed it. Remember his famous 'Malaise' speech?

Pundits, the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM, Hollywood and even a lot of business men believed we were in a permanent state of decline.

Except us. Except Republicans. We didn't believe it.

So we elected Ronald Wilson Reagan as the greatest president of the 20th Century. And we proved dimocrap scum totally wrong.

On everything. Not just the economy, but on Foreign Affairs and especially on the disease known as communism.

Without firing a shot, President of The United States of America, Ronald Reagan CRUSHED the most powerful and most evil empire in world history while at THE SAME TIME setting records for economic and job growth.

And you know how he did it? Simple, he disempowered dimocrap scum.

Just that simple. He slapped them down at every turn. If they started some shit, he went directly to the American People and that scared the shit out of dimocrap scum.

If you want this Country to start to progress, to cut away at the National Debt, to get back to full employment..... The answer is simple.

Disempower dimocrap scum.

Otherwise, get used to watching us all go deeper into a Death Spiral
 
Yup, that was October's job creation report. It will be dismissed here by the usual leftist knob slobbers. But it indicates a slowing, calcifying economy that isn't getting better by the Fed throwing 85B/mo at the stock market.
Worst economic recovery on record. Maybe Obama can apologize for that while he's at it.

Agreed.

Not that the $85 billion a month was ever intended to help the employment situation.

All that's designed to do is stabilize the banksters. None of that money is going into the economy.


The MASTERS know perfectly well the economy we had is never coming back.

You don't?

I'm surprised, Rab, you always struck me as a reality based thinker

dewd.... <sigh>

I heard the same shit when Carter was president. Over and over and over.

Even the moron himself believed it. Remember his famous 'Malaise' speech?

Pundits, the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM, Hollywood and even a lot of business men believed we were in a permanent state of decline.

Except us. Except Republicans. We didn't believe it.

So we elected Ronald Wilson Reagan as the greatest president of the 20th Century. And we proved dimocrap scum totally wrong.

On everything. Not just the economy, but on Foreign Affairs and especially on the disease known as communism.

Without firing a shot, President of The United States of America, Ronald Reagan CRUSHED the most powerful and most evil empire in world history while at THE SAME TIME setting records for economic and job growth.

And you know how he did it? Simple, he disempowered dimocrap scum.

Just that simple. He slapped them down at every turn. If they started some shit, he went directly to the American People and that scared the shit out of dimocrap scum.

If you want this Country to start to progress, to cut away at the National Debt, to get back to full employment..... The answer is simple.

Disempower dimocrap scum.

Otherwise, get used to watching us all go deeper into a Death Spiral


St Reagan was already out of office when the Soviet Union ended. And he did nothing more than any other president before him to bring that about.
 
The GOP has opposed every program that would have resulted in more jobs, no matter what the need. The present mantra is that the President must not be allowed to succeed at anything no matter how vital to the nation. We saw this in the shutdown, and in the near default. The only thing that prevented a disastrous shutdown was the fact that Wall Street assessed the situation and told the GOP, 'You create a default, and the resultant economic crisis, and we shut down the money spigot".

When the GOP actually pushes legislation addressing the infrastructure needs, science R and D, and more funding of scientist and technician education, we will see an increase in investment and jobs.

You really are naive. The GOP has sent a series of jobs bills from the House to the Senate and every one of them is still sitting on Harry Reid's desk collecting dust because he won't allow them to come to the floor for debate let alone a vote.

You want the GOP to rubber stamp another "Obama stimulus" with the same types of government spending as the first two stimulus plans that saw us spend billions and create so few jobs that the Obama Administration had to come up with a new economic statistic "Jobs created or saved" to hide how bad it was.

This Administration can't create jobs because this Administration is filled with ideologues who don't like the private sector. It's why Barry has presided over the worst recovery from a recession since the Great Depression. Quite frankly, he's clueless when it comes to economics.
 
When the GOP actually pushes legislation addressing the infrastructure needs, science R and D, and more funding of scientist and technician education, we will see an increase in investment and jobs.

Matthew? Is that you Matthew?

A conservative and a blue collar liberal can agree on many things. One of them is that fact that certain things are neccessary for this nation to remain a world leader.
 
Yup, that was October's job creation report. It will be dismissed here by the usual leftist knob slobbers. But it indicates a slowing, calcifying economy that isn't getting better by the Fed throwing 85B/mo at the stock market.
Worst economic recovery on record. Maybe Obama can apologize for that while he's at it.

Agreed.

Not that the $85 billion a month was ever intended to help the employment situation.

All that's designed to do is stabilize the banksters. None of that money is going into the economy.


The MASTERS know perfectly well the economy we had is never coming back.

You don't?

I'm surprised, Rab, you always struck me as a reality based thinker

dewd.... <sigh>

I heard the same shit when Carter was president. Over and over and over.

Even the moron himself believed it. Remember his famous 'Malaise' speech?

Pundits, the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM, Hollywood and even a lot of business men believed we were in a permanent state of decline.

Except us. Except Republicans. We didn't believe it.

So we elected Ronald Wilson Reagan as the greatest president of the 20th Century. And we proved dimocrap scum totally wrong.

On everything. Not just the economy, but on Foreign Affairs and especially on the disease known as communism.

Without firing a shot, President of The United States of America, Ronald Reagan CRUSHED the most powerful and most evil empire in world history while at THE SAME TIME setting records for economic and job growth.

And you know how he did it? Simple, he disempowered dimocrap scum.

Just that simple. He slapped them down at every turn. If they started some shit, he went directly to the American People and that scared the shit out of dimocrap scum.

If you want this Country to start to progress, to cut away at the National Debt, to get back to full employment..... The answer is simple.

Disempower dimocrap scum.

Otherwise, get used to watching us all go deeper into a Death Spiral

Another really dumb ass repeating lies, and not even aware of it.

U.S. GDP Growth Under Different Presidencies ? Currency Thoughts

The Democrat administrations achieved the three fastest rates of growth and four of the top five on that ranking. Real GDP advanced at an annualized rate of 5.2% during the Kennedy years, 5.1% during the Johnson years, and 3.6% when the Clinton administration was in power. GDP rose 3.5% per annum in the Reagan years despite a severe recession in 1981-2. Growth averaged a respectable 3.2% per annum when the Carter administration governed — and yes, some people no doubt were better off in 1980 than 1976 — and the Nixon years experienced growth of 3.0% per annum. In none of these presidential periods was growth substantially less than the 3.4% average pace for the whole second half of the 20th century.

Both Bush presidential periods and the Ford years experienced growth of barely more than 2.0%. The growth rate in the first Bush presidency was 2.1%, identical to the performance of the Ford Administration. The current Bush administration has achieved marginally faster growth of 2.3% per annum. However, that pace has also been substantially less than the long-term trend. From several respects, the current administration’s performance is puzzling, worrisome, and instructive. It is puzzling because a 7.5-year period will be less sharply influenced by a recession than an administration with a shorter lifespan like Ford’s and because fiscal policy and monetary policy were loose. Also, productivity was strong during this period. It is worrisome because this is the most recent presidential observation and might reflect a stochastic downshift in what the United States can expect in long-term average growth. It is also worrisome because the banking crisis and the drag from the implementation of solutions to the current problem suggest that worse times may lie ahead. Finally, it is instructive in discrediting the theory that war is good for growth. Sometimes that has been unquestionably true. World War II helped America escape the depression, and growth was very buoyant when the Vietnam War was fought in the 1960&#8242;s. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and tightening of homeland security have not given a discernible lift to growth.
 
Agreed.

Not that the $85 billion a month was ever intended to help the employment situation.

All that's designed to do is stabilize the banksters. None of that money is going into the economy.


The MASTERS know perfectly well the economy we had is never coming back.

You don't?

I'm surprised, Rab, you always struck me as a reality based thinker

dewd.... <sigh>

I heard the same shit when Carter was president. Over and over and over.

Even the moron himself believed it. Remember his famous 'Malaise' speech?

Pundits, the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM, Hollywood and even a lot of business men believed we were in a permanent state of decline.

Except us. Except Republicans. We didn't believe it.

So we elected Ronald Wilson Reagan as the greatest president of the 20th Century. And we proved dimocrap scum totally wrong.

On everything. Not just the economy, but on Foreign Affairs and especially on the disease known as communism.

Without firing a shot, President of The United States of America, Ronald Reagan CRUSHED the most powerful and most evil empire in world history while at THE SAME TIME setting records for economic and job growth.

And you know how he did it? Simple, he disempowered dimocrap scum.

Just that simple. He slapped them down at every turn. If they started some shit, he went directly to the American People and that scared the shit out of dimocrap scum.

If you want this Country to start to progress, to cut away at the National Debt, to get back to full employment..... The answer is simple.

Disempower dimocrap scum.

Otherwise, get used to watching us all go deeper into a Death Spiral

Another really dumb ass repeating lies, and not even aware of it.
U.S. GDP Growth Under Different Presidencies ? Currency Thoughts

The Democrat administrations achieved the three fastest rates of growth and four of the top five on that ranking. Real GDP advanced at an annualized rate of 5.2% during the Kennedy years, 5.1% during the Johnson years, and 3.6% when the Clinton administration was in power. GDP rose 3.5% per annum in the Reagan years despite a severe recession in 1981-2. Growth averaged a respectable 3.2% per annum when the Carter administration governed &#8212; and yes, some people no doubt were better off in 1980 than 1976 &#8212; and the Nixon years experienced growth of 3.0% per annum. In none of these presidential periods was growth substantially less than the 3.4% average pace for the whole second half of the 20th century.

Both Bush presidential periods and the Ford years experienced growth of barely more than 2.0%. The growth rate in the first Bush presidency was 2.1%, identical to the performance of the Ford Administration. The current Bush administration has achieved marginally faster growth of 2.3% per annum. However, that pace has also been substantially less than the long-term trend. From several respects, the current administration&#8217;s performance is puzzling, worrisome, and instructive. It is puzzling because a 7.5-year period will be less sharply influenced by a recession than an administration with a shorter lifespan like Ford&#8217;s and because fiscal policy and monetary policy were loose. Also, productivity was strong during this period. It is worrisome because this is the most recent presidential observation and might reflect a stochastic downshift in what the United States can expect in long-term average growth. It is also worrisome because the banking crisis and the drag from the implementation of solutions to the current problem suggest that worse times may lie ahead. Finally, it is instructive in discrediting the theory that war is good for growth. Sometimes that has been unquestionably true. World War II helped America escape the depression, and growth was very buoyant when the Vietnam War was fought in the 1960&#8242;s. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and tightening of homeland security have not given a discernible lift to growth.



Ever notice, the dumber they are, the more they bluster?
 
Agreed.

Not that the $85 billion a month was ever intended to help the employment situation.

All that's designed to do is stabilize the banksters. None of that money is going into the economy.


The MASTERS know perfectly well the economy we had is never coming back.

You don't?

I'm surprised, Rab, you always struck me as a reality based thinker

dewd.... <sigh>

I heard the same shit when Carter was president. Over and over and over.

Even the moron himself believed it. Remember his famous 'Malaise' speech?

Pundits, the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM, Hollywood and even a lot of business men believed we were in a permanent state of decline.

Except us. Except Republicans. We didn't believe it.

So we elected Ronald Wilson Reagan as the greatest president of the 20th Century. And we proved dimocrap scum totally wrong.

On everything. Not just the economy, but on Foreign Affairs and especially on the disease known as communism.

Without firing a shot, President of The United States of America, Ronald Reagan CRUSHED the most powerful and most evil empire in world history while at THE SAME TIME setting records for economic and job growth.

And you know how he did it? Simple, he disempowered dimocrap scum.

Just that simple. He slapped them down at every turn. If they started some shit, he went directly to the American People and that scared the shit out of dimocrap scum.

If you want this Country to start to progress, to cut away at the National Debt, to get back to full employment..... The answer is simple.

Disempower dimocrap scum.

Otherwise, get used to watching us all go deeper into a Death Spiral


St Reagan was already out of office when the Soviet Union ended. And he did nothing more than any other president before him to bring that about.

Ronald Reagan may have been out of office when the Soviet Union finally collapsed, but his policies, his firm stand, his honesty, his alliance with British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II and, YES, his firm belief in God was his legacy to George Herbert Walker Bush to accomplish what term limits have prevented Reagan to do.

Can anyone say even with the minimum amount of common sense and decency that a second Carter term and a Mondale presidency would have accomplished the same?
 
Yup, that was October's job creation report. It will be dismissed here by the usual leftist knob slobbers. But it indicates a slowing, calcifying economy that isn't getting better by the Fed throwing 85B/mo at the stock market.
Worst economic recovery on record. Maybe Obama can apologize for that while he's at it.

Another "Ain't Obama Awful" thread by Rabbi. Anyone surprised? A couple of points need to be understood whenever Rabbi posts:

1. He's a liar, so keep that up front whenever he posts anything;

2. He is totally partisan all of the time, the issue matters not - if the RW Propaganda Machine is against it so is he, if the RW Propaganda Machine is for it, he's for it;

3. He is ideology first, and doesn't give a damn if a policy or idea is good for the nation if it conflicts with the extreme dogma which guides his beliefs.

4. He is a callous conservative and said ideology can be summed up in this way: "I got mine, fuck everyone else".

5. He's not very bright, never has he posted anything which resembles a unique way at looking at the world. Like Rand Paul, ideas are to be parroted from others whose words support the dogma of uber conservatism.
 
Last edited:
The GOP has opposed every program that would have resulted in more jobs, no matter what the need. The present mantra is that the President must not be allowed to succeed at anything no matter how vital to the nation. We saw this in the shutdown, and in the near default. The only thing that prevented a disastrous shutdown was the fact that Wall Street assessed the situation and told the GOP, 'You create a default, and the resultant economic crisis, and we shut down the money spigot".

When the GOP actually pushes legislation addressing the infrastructure needs, science R and D, and more funding of scientist and technician education, we will see an increase in investment and jobs.

All hyperbole and not true. R's sent over numerous jobs bills and reid tabled every one.....not that they would have created a massive lot but the bills were sent over.
 
The GOP has opposed every program that would have resulted in more jobs, no matter what the need. The present mantra is that the President must not be allowed to succeed at anything no matter how vital to the nation. We saw this in the shutdown, and in the near default. The only thing that prevented a disastrous shutdown was the fact that Wall Street assessed the situation and told the GOP, 'You create a default, and the resultant economic crisis, and we shut down the money spigot".

When the GOP actually pushes legislation addressing the infrastructure needs, science R and D, and more funding of scientist and technician education, we will see an increase in investment and jobs.

All hyperbole and not true. R's sent over numerous jobs bills and reid tabled every one.....not that they would have created a massive lot but the bills were sent over.

Surprise, one more echo from LBT. Another RWer who parrots the half-truths of the RW propaganda machine.

Every bill which went to the Senate from the H. of Rep. had a rider attached, a poison pill which made passage impossible. A tactic by Boehner which worked, at least for the non thinking crowd like LBT and the echo chamber of which s/he is a member.
 
The GOP has opposed every program that would have resulted in more jobs, no matter what the need. The present mantra is that the President must not be allowed to succeed at anything no matter how vital to the nation. We saw this in the shutdown, and in the near default. The only thing that prevented a disastrous shutdown was the fact that Wall Street assessed the situation and told the GOP, 'You create a default, and the resultant economic crisis, and we shut down the money spigot".

When the GOP actually pushes legislation addressing the infrastructure needs, science R and D, and more funding of scientist and technician education, we will see an increase in investment and jobs.

All hyperbole and not true. R's sent over numerous jobs bills and reid tabled every one.....not that they would have created a massive lot but the bills were sent over.

Surprise, one more echo from LBT. Another RWer who parrots the half-truths of the RW propaganda machine.

Every bill which went to the Senate from the H. of Rep. had a rider attached, a poison pill which made passage impossible. A tactic by Boehner which worked, at least for the non thinking crowd like LBT and the echo chamber of which s/he is a member.

That's such a crock! Passage was impossible because Harry Reid wouldn't even bring those bills to the Senate floor for debate. Why? Because he didn't want them to come to a vote because he didn't want vulnerable Democrats to be on record voting against bills that would have created jobs going into an election year! If you dispute that then kindly explain why the Democratically controlled Senate didn't simply pass a bill without the "poison pill" and send it back to the House for reconciliation?
 
Bottom line is anything you progressives didn't like in legislation that the GOP controlled House sent over, you tabled, therefore shutting down the legislative process.

So what's more important to the Democratic Party right now...retaining seats in the Senate...or fixing the country's unemployment problems? It's obvious from the way that Harry Reid has handled things...that retaining Democratic seats in the Senate is FAR more important than the millions of Americans that have been out of work for record lengths of time!
 
Yup, that was October's job creation report. It will be dismissed here by the usual leftist knob slobbers. But it indicates a slowing, calcifying economy that isn't getting better by the Fed throwing 85B/mo at the stock market.
Worst economic recovery on record. Maybe Obama can apologize for that while he's at it.

Another "Ain't Obama Awful" thread by Rabbi. Anyone surprised? A couple of points need to be understood whenever Rabbi posts:

1. He's a liar, so keep that up front whenever he posts anything;

2. He is totally partisan all of the time, the issue matters not - if the RW Propaganda Machine is against it so is he, if the RW Propaganda Machine is for it, he's for it;

3. He is ideology first, and doesn't give a damn if a policy or idea is good for the nation if it conflicts with the extreme dogma which guides his beliefs.

4. He is a callous conservative and said ideology can be summed up in this way: "I got mine, fuck everyone else".

5. He's not very bright, never has he posted anything which resembles a unique way at looking at the world. Like Rand Paul, ideas are to be parroted from others whose words support the dogma of uber conservatism.

Do you have anything of substance to add here, you cocksucker?
 

Forum List

Back
Top