125,000 jobs

[Wry Catcher]

All hyperbole and not true. R's sent over numerous jobs bills and reid tabled every one.....not that they would have created a massive lot but the bills were sent over.

Surprise, one more echo from LBT. Another RWer who parrots the half-truths of the RW propaganda machine.

Every bill which went to the Senate from the H. of Rep. had a rider attached, a poison pill which made passage impossible. A tactic by Boehner which worked, at least for the non thinking crowd like LBT and the echo chamber of which s/he is a member.

That's such a crock! Passage was impossible because Harry Reid wouldn't even bring those bills to the Senate floor for debate. Why? Because he didn't want them to come to a vote because he didn't want vulnerable Democrats to be on record voting against bills that would have created jobs going into an election year! If you dispute that then kindly explain why the Democratically controlled Senate didn't simply pass a bill without the "poison pill" and send it back to the House for reconciliation?

Ask Harry. While you're at it ask Boehner why he won't bring the senate bill protecting the jobs of gay and lesbians to the floor of the H. of Rep.?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Yup, that was October's job creation report. It will be dismissed here by the usual leftist knob slobbers. But it indicates a slowing, calcifying economy that isn't getting better by the Fed throwing 85B/mo at the stock market.
Worst economic recovery on record. Maybe Obama can apologize for that while he's at it.

Another "Ain't Obama Awful" thread by Rabbi. Anyone surprised? A couple of points need to be understood whenever Rabbi posts:

1. He's a liar, so keep that up front whenever he posts anything;

2. He is totally partisan all of the time, the issue matters not - if the RW Propaganda Machine is against it so is he, if the RW Propaganda Machine is for it, he's for it;

3. He is ideology first, and doesn't give a damn if a policy or idea is good for the nation if it conflicts with the extreme dogma which guides his beliefs.

4. He is a callous conservative and said ideology can be summed up in this way: "I got mine, fuck everyone else".

5. He's not very bright, never has he posted anything which resembles a unique way at looking at the world. Like Rand Paul, ideas are to be parroted from others whose words support the dogma of uber conservatism.

Do you have anything of substance to add here, you cocksucker?

Only this, you hate gays and lesbians, hence,

6. You're a bigot too.

 

[Sallow]

dewd.... <sigh>

I heard the same shit when Carter was president. Over and over and over.

Even the moron himself believed it. Remember his famous 'Malaise' speech?

Pundits, the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM, Hollywood and even a lot of business men believed we were in a permanent state of decline.

Except us. Except Republicans. We didn't believe it.

So we elected Ronald Wilson Reagan as the greatest president of the 20th Century. And we proved dimocrap scum totally wrong.

On everything. Not just the economy, but on Foreign Affairs and especially on the disease known as communism.

Without firing a shot, President of The United States of America, Ronald Reagan CRUSHED the most powerful and most evil empire in world history while at THE SAME TIME setting records for economic and job growth.

And you know how he did it? Simple, he disempowered dimocrap scum.

Just that simple. He slapped them down at every turn. If they started some shit, he went directly to the American People and that scared the shit out of dimocrap scum.

If you want this Country to start to progress, to cut away at the National Debt, to get back to full employment..... The answer is simple.

Disempower dimocrap scum.

Otherwise, get used to watching us all go deeper into a Death Spiral

St Reagan was already out of office when the Soviet Union ended. And he did nothing more than any other president before him to bring that about.

Ronald Reagan may have been out of office when the Soviet Union finally collapsed, but his policies, his firm stand, his honesty, his alliance with British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II and, YES, his firm belief in God was his legacy to George Herbert Walker Bush to accomplish what term limits have prevented Reagan to do.

Can anyone say even with the minimum amount of common sense and decency that a second Carter term and a Mondale presidency would have accomplished the same?

Reagan was a traitor, a liar, a rapist and one of the worst Modern American Presidents.

 

[Geaux4it]

Surprise, one more echo from LBT. Another RWer who parrots the half-truths of the RW propaganda machine.

Every bill which went to the Senate from the H. of Rep. had a rider attached, a poison pill which made passage impossible. A tactic by Boehner which worked, at least for the non thinking crowd like LBT and the echo chamber of which s/he is a member.

That's such a crock! Passage was impossible because Harry Reid wouldn't even bring those bills to the Senate floor for debate. Why? Because he didn't want them to come to a vote because he didn't want vulnerable Democrats to be on record voting against bills that would have created jobs going into an election year! If you dispute that then kindly explain why the Democratically controlled Senate didn't simply pass a bill without the "poison pill" and send it back to the House for reconciliation?

Ask Harry. While you're at it ask Boehner why he won't bring the senate bill protecting the jobs of gay and lesbians to the floor of the H. of Rep.?

Supervisors already have their hands tied and are essentially powerless to maintain his/her workforce with performers. EEO and other well intended programs are abused to the extent, the supervisor is afraid to provide constructive feedback in fear of reprisal from a 'covered' demographic

Another drag on productivity

-Geaux

 

[Wry Catcher]

Bottom line is anything you progressives didn't like in legislation that the GOP controlled House sent over, you tabled, therefore shutting down the legislative process.

So what's more important to the Democratic Party right now...retaining seats in the Senate...or fixing the country's unemployment problems? It's obvious from the way that Harry Reid has handled things...that retaining Democratic seats in the Senate is FAR more important than the millions of Americans that have been out of work for record lengths of time!

Grow up. The legislative process is broken, fingers can be pointed all day long but that won't solve the problem. We (all of us) need to elect adults to represent us in the Congress, and that won't happen since members of Congress are bought by special interests. Since CU v. FEC the process has become more partisan and less democratic.

 

[Geaux4it]

St Reagan was already out of office when the Soviet Union ended. And he did nothing more than any other president before him to bring that about.

Ronald Reagan may have been out of office when the Soviet Union finally collapsed, but his policies, his firm stand, his honesty, his alliance with British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II and, YES, his firm belief in God was his legacy to George Herbert Walker Bush to accomplish what term limits have prevented Reagan to do.

Can anyone say even with the minimum amount of common sense and decency that a second Carter term and a Mondale presidency would have accomplished the same?

Reagan was a traitor, a liar, a rapist and one of the worst Modern American Presidents.

Wow- How does it feel being in the minority for once?

-Geaux

 

[Wry Catcher]

That's such a crock! Passage was impossible because Harry Reid wouldn't even bring those bills to the Senate floor for debate. Why? Because he didn't want them to come to a vote because he didn't want vulnerable Democrats to be on record voting against bills that would have created jobs going into an election year! If you dispute that then kindly explain why the Democratically controlled Senate didn't simply pass a bill without the "poison pill" and send it back to the House for reconciliation?

Ask Harry. While you're at it ask Boehner why he won't bring the senate bill protecting the jobs of gay and lesbians to the floor of the H. of Rep.?

Supervisors already have their hands tied and are essentially powerless to maintain his/her workforce with performers. EEO and other well intended programs are abused to the extent, the supervisor is afraid to provide constructive feedback in fear of reprisal from a 'covered' demographic

Another drag on productivity

-Geaux

BULLSHIT

I directed four managers who supervised 16 supervisors and each of them supervised three shifts of line workers who supervised offenders in a jail. Suggesting our hands were tied is a lie, and my staff was diverse in terms of every demographic, as were the inmates.

 

[The Rabbi]

Ask Harry. While you're at it ask Boehner why he won't bring the senate bill protecting the jobs of gay and lesbians to the floor of the H. of Rep.?

Supervisors already have their hands tied and are essentially powerless to maintain his/her workforce with performers. EEO and other well intended programs are abused to the extent, the supervisor is afraid to provide constructive feedback in fear of reprisal from a 'covered' demographic

Another drag on productivity

-Geaux

BULLSHIT

I directed four managers who supervised 16 supervisors and each of them supervised three shifts of line workers who supervised offenders in a jail. Suggesting our hands were tied is a lie, and my staff was diverse in terms of every demographic, as were the inmates.

I didnt know gay porn theaters had managers and supervisors.

 

[Oldstyle]

Surprise, one more echo from LBT. Another RWer who parrots the half-truths of the RW propaganda machine.

Every bill which went to the Senate from the H. of Rep. had a rider attached, a poison pill which made passage impossible. A tactic by Boehner which worked, at least for the non thinking crowd like LBT and the echo chamber of which s/he is a member.

That's such a crock! Passage was impossible because Harry Reid wouldn't even bring those bills to the Senate floor for debate. Why? Because he didn't want them to come to a vote because he didn't want vulnerable Democrats to be on record voting against bills that would have created jobs going into an election year! If you dispute that then kindly explain why the Democratically controlled Senate didn't simply pass a bill without the "poison pill" and send it back to the House for reconciliation?

Ask Harry. While you're at it ask Boehner why he won't bring the senate bill protecting the jobs of gay and lesbians to the floor of the H. of Rep.?

Ask Harry? That's your response? Really...
So basically you admit that what I said is correct because you don't HAVE a response. Got it...

 

[Oldstyle]

Bottom line is anything you progressives didn't like in legislation that the GOP controlled House sent over, you tabled, therefore shutting down the legislative process.

So what's more important to the Democratic Party right now...retaining seats in the Senate...or fixing the country's unemployment problems? It's obvious from the way that Harry Reid has handled things...that retaining Democratic seats in the Senate is FAR more important than the millions of Americans that have been out of work for record lengths of time!

Grow up. The legislative process is broken, fingers can be pointed all day long but that won't solve the problem. We (all of us) need to elect adults to represent us in the Congress, and that won't happen since members of Congress are bought by special interests. Since CU v. FEC the process has become more partisan and less democratic.

The legislative process is "broken" because "leaders" like Harry Reid care more about getting their side reelected than they do about helping millions of Americans who are out of work. What the fuck is "adult" about that?

Kindly explain why you aren't calling for Harry Reid to step down as the Majority Leader of the Senate? If you cared one whit about the legislative process then you'd want Reid gone! But you really don't care about that...do you, Wry?

The process has become more partisan because Barry, Harry and Nancy used super majorities to ram bills down the throats of the GOP while they gave smug speeches about "elections having consequences...I won!" only to turn around and decide that elections DIDN'T have consequences when they got "shellacked" in the 2010 midterms.

 

[JakeStarkey]

204K jobs created...bad news for the anti taper crowd.

Another bogus number from a very confused administration..

I guess the government shutdown created jobs.

-Geaux

The total would have been more than 325 thousand without the shutdown.

 

[pinqy]

204K jobs created...bad news for the anti taper crowd.

Another bogus number from a very confused administration..

I guess the government shutdown created jobs.

-Geaux

The total would have been more than 325 thousand without the shutdown.

How do you figure?

 

[Sunshine]

Yup, that was October's job creation report. It will be dismissed here by the usual leftist knob slobbers. But it indicates a slowing, calcifying economy that isn't getting better by the Fed throwing 85B/mo at the stock market.
Worst economic recovery on record. Maybe Obama can apologize for that while he's at it.

He knows nothing about it!

 

[Sunshine]

Not bad considering that we don't make anything here anymore and many other jobs have been eliminated through automation.

Wrong.

We make Big Macs and Fries.

Those are the type of jobs Conservatives want Americans to have.

Libs want to ban the food.

 

[Sunshine]

Not bad considering that we don't make anything here anymore and many other jobs have been eliminated through automation.

Wrong.

We make Big Macs and Fries.

Those are the type of jobs Conservatives want Americans to have.

And long as they're not paid too much.

If they are paid too much, how will all the welfare mommas pay for their baby daddies food?

 

[expat_panama]

I guess the government shutdown created jobs.-Geaux

The total would have been more than 325 thousand without the shutdown.

How do you figure?

That was my question too. I mean, October's 204,000 is more than September's 163,000, and a lot more than the 37,000 monthly average since Jan. 2009.

 

[Oldstyle]

204K jobs created...bad news for the anti taper crowd.

Another bogus number from a very confused administration..

I guess the government shutdown created jobs.

-Geaux

The total would have been more than 325 thousand without the shutdown.

Uh...oh! Jakey's been visiting ThinkProgress again!

Anyone want to estimate what this number will be once it's "revised"? In case you haven't noticed...jobs numbers generally get revised DOWN under this Administration. It's what happens when you've got your people fudging every thing you can to keep the American public from getting a good idea how pathetic the economy IS under this government.

 

[Oldstyle]

204K jobs created...bad news for the anti taper crowd.

Another bogus number from a very confused administration..

I guess the government shutdown created jobs.

-Geaux

The total would have been more than 325 thousand without the shutdown.

Actually the total would have been more than 325 thousand if we hadn't reelected a President who's clueless about creating jobs.