Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please cite a post where I stated I believed any of the things you accuse me of.
Please site posts where I believe the things that you acuse me of believing.
Note that most of the statements that I make in posts I back up with articles, often from peer reviewed literature.
Appeal to authority, damned right. When trying to understand climate, a PHd climatologist is a far better source than a drugged out radio jock.
Escape from a strawman with a strawman. So often your peers end up getting caught in a lie as well. Pardon me for having difficulty with the peer review argument.
What kind of dipshittery is this?!?OK, Liabilty, post a peer reviewed article that state the ice caps, and 90+% of the glaciers are not melting.
You silly assholes are a hoot, constantly posting peope who haven't the least training in science stating the impossible, and you accept it as gospel.
Peer review is a dead letter.
Get a new tune.
OK, Liabilty, post a peer reviewed article that state the ice caps, and 90+% of the glaciers are not melting.
You silly assholes are a hoot, constantly posting peope who haven't the least training in science stating the impossible, and you accept it as gospel.
Peer review is a dead letter.
Get a new tune.
Peer review is a dead letter.
Get a new tune.
You are a dead letter, Dooodeee...... You know nothing and do not intend to learn anything.
Peer review is alive and well. If it is McCarthyized here in the States, it will survive in
Europe and Asia, and that is where the next advancements will come from.
In the meantime, the US will be driven into third world status by people like yourself.
What kind of dipshittery is this?!?OK, Liabilty, post a peer reviewed article that state the ice caps, and 90+% of the glaciers are not melting.
You silly assholes are a hoot, constantly posting peope who haven't the least training in science stating the impossible, and you accept it as gospel.
Prove a negative.
Why not set up a great banquet feast, open the door and sit down and wait for your lobster to crawl in, cook itself and put itself before you with drawn butter. If it doesn't do so in 15 minutes, you may conclude lobsters don't exist!
Quit being such a tard.
They shoot skeptics, don't they?OK, Liabilty, post a peer reviewed article that state the ice caps, and 90+% of the glaciers are not melting.
You silly assholes are a hoot, constantly posting peope who haven't the least training in science stating the impossible, and you accept it as gospel.
Wait. Are you suggesting, Moldy Socks, that if a scientist dares to note in an article that the ice caps are actually thickening -- but his article is denied the "peer review" treatment from the scientific establishment consisting of AGW Faithers and those too timid to speak out contrary to the herd mentality -- then the scientist posting the article is therefore wrong?
You silly assholes are indeed a hoot.
OK, Liabilty, post a peer reviewed article that state the ice caps, and 90+% of the glaciers are not melting.
You silly assholes are a hoot, constantly posting peope who haven't the least training in science stating the impossible, and you accept it as gospel.
Wait. Are you suggesting, Moldy Socks, that if a scientist dares to note in an article that the ice caps are actually thickening -- but his article is denied the "peer review" treatment from the scientific establishment consisting of AGW Faithers and those too timid to speak out contrary to the herd mentality -- then the scientist posting the article is therefore wrong?
You silly assholes are indeed a hoot.
They shoot skeptics, don't they?OK, Liabilty, post a peer reviewed article that state the ice caps, and 90+% of the glaciers are not melting.
You silly assholes are a hoot, constantly posting peope who haven't the least training in science stating the impossible, and you accept it as gospel.
Wait. Are you suggesting, Moldy Socks, that if a scientist dares to note in an article that the ice caps are actually thickening -- but his article is denied the "peer review" treatment from the scientific establishment consisting of AGW Faithers and those too timid to speak out contrary to the herd mentality -- then the scientist posting the article is therefore wrong?
You silly assholes are indeed a hoot.
Ole Twerpemada here would be turning the thumbscrews screaming "RECANT!" if he could.
And yet you won't touch the Admission of the IPCC that they got their glacier data from a sophomore student dissertation, and an article in "Nature" from an eco-activist who used anecdotal evidence based on interviewing Sherpas in Nepal on why Ice Climb trips have gone down in the 1990's.What kind of dipshittery is this?!?OK, Liabilty, post a peer reviewed article that state the ice caps, and 90+% of the glaciers are not melting.
You silly assholes are a hoot, constantly posting peope who haven't the least training in science stating the impossible, and you accept it as gospel.
Prove a negative.
Why not set up a great banquet feast, open the door and sit down and wait for your lobster to crawl in, cook itself and put itself before you with drawn butter. If it doesn't do so in 15 minutes, you may conclude lobsters don't exist!
Quit being such a tard.
You stupid asshole, Monkton does not have a degree in any science. In fact, most of the critics of AGW are scientific morons that are merely obeying their masters in denigrating real science.
And people like yourself follow in the baying pack.
You are harming your children and grandchildren, and you do not give a fuck.
Links to scientifc sources? This is a debate about a scientific subject.
Moldy Socks:
Why are ice caps thickening?
Or, do you deny the data collected by US Army buoys?
For those keeping some kind of score at home: Monitoring the Arctic Sea Ice
This site gets us into the weird world of ice thickening.
Huh, yet another source crocks won't look at honestly or will ignore context.Moldy Socks:
Why are ice caps thickening?
Or, do you deny the data collected by US Army buoys?
For those keeping some kind of score at home: Monitoring the Arctic Sea Ice
This site gets us into the weird world of ice thickening.
And you get that out of this????????????????
change
Huh, yet another source crocks won't look at honestly or will ignore context.Moldy Socks:
Why are ice caps thickening?
Or, do you deny the data collected by US Army buoys?
For those keeping some kind of score at home: Monitoring the Arctic Sea Ice
This site gets us into the weird world of ice thickening.
And you get that out of this????????????????
change
Do we forget that the 1970's was the coldest decade of the 20th century? Of course the ice sheet will be bigger than even in an average decade!
Climates fluctuate. Always have, always will. Man's still not doing it.
And out come the bullshit hockey sticks.Huh, yet another source crocks won't look at honestly or will ignore context.
Do we forget that the 1970's was the coldest decade of the 20th century? Of course the ice sheet will be bigger than even in an average decade!
Climates fluctuate. Always have, always will. Man's still not doing it.
Fitz, do you ever bother to do even the slightest research before yapping?
The '70s were hardly the coldest decade of the 20th century.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/images/temp-anom-larg.jpg
