Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, immunity for performing their presidential duties.
Thats right, you've got nothing. Run along.
Oh, it may go even further than that.There is no "presidential duty" to take personal gifts and payments for official pardons, yet this rulling makes it impossible to criminally prosecute such corrupt acts.
Take your distortions and put them you know where.
Correct, the indictments, not innocence.91 indictments?
There is no "presidential duty" to take personal gifts and payments for official pardons, yet this rulling makes it impossible to criminally prosecute such corrupt acts.
Take your distortions and put them you know where.
I think he may find that particular orifice is already full of lies...........and shit.Cool euphenisms, but there is no "presidential duty" to take personal gifts and payments for official pardons, yet this rulling makes it impossible to criminally prosecute such corrupt acts.
Take your distortions and put them you know where.
Again, you are just showing how empty your head is with these argument-free posts.No, it doesn't, you dense fucktard.
while president, I was answering the question.Correct, the indictments, not innocence.
nope, wow, you still don't understand the ruling. simply amazing.Oh, it may go even further than that.
Courts might now even be allowed to enter ANYTHING from a president's official record as evidence in ANY criminal or civil trial.
I've just explained to you EXACTLY what to read in your own citation and what it's practical criminal prosecution implications are.
In response you are teling me..to read. That's it, thats the entirety of your response.
Fucked in the head much?
And your cult leader is a demented criminal. Yer point?Trump is a criminal. And that's why he doesn't want to be held accountable for his actions.
They can play the denial game all they want.
criminal
[ krim-uh-nl ]
Phonetic (Standard)IPA
adjective
I've just explained to you EXACTLY what to read in your own citation and what it's practical criminal prosecution implications are.
In response you are teling me..to read. That's it, thats the entirety of your response.
Fucked in the head much?
Again, you are just showing how empty your head is with these argument-free posts.
while other official acts require the government to meet high criteria before it can criminally charge a president for them.
The ruling was a massive blow to Jack Smith’s case, which could look like a shell of its former self once the lower courts have sifted through it to align it with the Supreme Court’s guidance.
The high court’s majority divided presidential acts into three categories: official acts that are absolutely immune from prosecution, official acts that are presumptively immune from prosecution until the government can prove the prosecution would not threaten the authority of the executive branch,
and unofficial acts, which can always be prosecuted.
The ruling is readily available on the internet. Having trouble finding it?it describes what exactly? you can't post it.
I love it when we read togather:
Do you understand what OTHER means in what you quoted?
It means Category 2 - Presidential official acts that ARE NOT core presidential powers.
Power to pardon falls into Category 1 - Presidential official acts that ARE core presidential powers.
And what does this ruling say about Category 1 acts? Reapeat after me: absolutely immune from prosecution
He's met the maximum of his capabilities just posting horseshit.Again, you are just showing how empty your head is with these argument-free posts.
Oh I know you'll keep asserting same buillshit no matter how throughly it's refuted. Such is nutter life.Still no
It had to be quantified due to unprecedented corruption from magaturds.it just had to be quantified due to unprecedented lawfare
It had to be quantified due to unprecedented corruption from magaturds.
