4 or 5 years ago I created threads blasting Obama for not bombing ISIS as they stole American assets

[Remodeling Maidiac]

In Iraq and led a convoy across a deserted desert in Iraq on their way to Syria. As a result of NOT keeping troops in Iraq ISIS and Iran have grown in strength & power in the middle east. As a result the Syrian war has spiraled out of control, over a half a million civilians are dead & Europe is being destabilized by millions of refugees. Add to that it has further destabilized relations between Russia & the US.

This is Obama's foreign policy legacy in a nutshell.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

 

[Camp]

In Iraq and led a convoy across a deserted desert in Iraq on their way to Syria. As a result of NOT keeping troops in Iraq ISIS and Iran have grown in strength & power in the middle east. As a result the Syrian war has spiraled out of control, over a half a million civilians are dead & Europe is being destabilized by millions of refugees. Add to that it has further destabilized relations between Russia & the US.

This is Obama's foreign policy legacy in a nutshell.

OK, what data are you using to claim that ISIS has grown in strength? That assessment drastically disagrees with the assessments made by every entity in the field and tasked with making that kind of evaluation.

What evidence and data do you use to support the claim that leaving ten or fifteen thousand US Troops behind in Iraq would have been able to impact the invasion and attacks by ISIL? Do you have genuine data or are you just throwing out an unsupported partisan claim?